"The latter three companies are Chinese though assemble many of their devices in India"
For how much longer, I wonder ?
18232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Well then that settles it, it had to be done. Now it is.
I'm not a person who has a hundred tabs open at the same time. My home PC does have 32GB of RAM, but I tend to reserve that power for my games. I do, however, have a growing list of YouTube channels that open at once - that is going towards 40.
So I can't say that nobody would have any use for this functionality.
However, on my work PC I only have the tabs I need to do my job, and that is typically less than 10.
Apparently, some people need more than 50 tabs in their normal work day. I don't understand how you could manage that, but it is not my place to say anything against it.
If this functionality is useful, then I look forward to seeing it in Firefox.
It seems that Business World isn't too good for business.
I checked out their website. I can't say that I find the guy laughing in the banner to be an indication of professionalism. It feels more like they're partying all the time.
In any case, there is no shortage of tales of botched ERP implementations, and no shortage of ERPs to choose from. I gather that an ERP is a strategic-level decision, with great, long-term implications for the company. So how is it that all these implementations are failing ?
And how can a university need such a level of complexity to manage room schedules and order whiteboard pens ? Moreover, how does a university have the funds to change an ERP a year and a half after having upgraded their existing ERP ? I was under the impression that universities are generally strapped for cash. This one is throwing money into a bonfire.
Gosh. I clicked the link thinking I was going to read about how some idiot near London airport managed to screw up royally, but no, the rot is extending its clutches to South America.
It seems that drones are indeed going to be the scourge of the skies. I see a heavily-regulated future for them.
Good.
Hopefully that means that he chose people who aren't easily given in to favoring companies over their job obligations because they aren't expecting a cushy boardroom seat when they're done forgetting what their actual job is.
Eh, Pai ?
Wow, a politician with a smidgen of a grasp on reality.
Is it snowing in Hell yet ?
You guys need this guy to be Prime Minister real quick, before he gets caught up in the greasy pole antics.
I am apparently the only person here who knows a competent electrician.
We moved in our new house in November 2017. After one winter, we had discovered that the heating needed a bit of an upgrade. Fine, so we go looking for other solutions. My wife takes a fancy to some stone panels and I, obviously, agree with her choice. We enter into discussions and end up signing the contract.
In the summer, the guy shows up to evaluate the premises. He takes one look at the electrical panel and says to me "I can't install your radiators with this - you are completely off norm and it wouldn't be safe".
The previous owner had copiously boasted about how he had done all the electricity himself. Apparently what he had done was create a fire hazard. It's a small miracle that he still had a house to sell.
Obviously, I agreed to have the guy redo the electrical panel to modern standards, after which the new radiators were installed.
This guy has done a few other things for me (replacing cieling lamps with LED lights), and I have absolute confidence in him.
I guess I'm lucky.
Um, no. Dropbox does not scour your disk to find stuff to upload.
It uploads what you put in its folder, nothing else.
That is a very lame excuse, on top of whatever excuse the guy with three names had to install Dropbox in the first place.
And three names ? How many mafias are you a part of ?
but your security company.
Signing up with a security company is an act of trust. You trust the company and all of its employees to respect your privacy and protect your belongings.
This is a case of a rogue techie. One asshole does not change my opinion of the security industry in general - they are there to help, for a fee.
I have an alarm system installed, some of the motion detectors have cameras. I have been told that the surveillance personnel cannot access the cameras, they only get the pictures that are sent by the detector when the alarm system is active. I trust that they are telling me the truth.
Aside from that, the detectors are not installed in any given room. They are covering hallways, the garage, the living room, the dining room, etc. Places where thieves have to cross, or will go to because that's where the loot is (TV, audio, etc).
Why would you put a motion detector in the bedroom ? The thief has to go through the hallway to get there and that's all you need to know.
Technically you're right, of course - but at the same time, you're kinda wrong.
With all its datacenters and the time it has had, Google has indexed practically all the Web (except the few who tell it not to, of which there are zero honest businesses). Whatever you think of Google's practices (and I don't look kindly on the ad business in general), that amount of knowledge has become priceless, so, in a sense, Google is the Internet.
That is also demonstrated in the fact that, when you ask Joe User what browser he's using, there is a significant chance that he will answer "Google".
Thank you for having linked to an enlightening article about wireless charging. I knew it was inefficient already (I often link to this video when encountering someone blathering excitedly about it), but I did not know (or remember) that putting the phone just slightly wrong on the pad could double the energy cost.
Given how careless most people seem to be when it comes to how they put their phone down, I'm guessing that they're all costing double the charge.
Wireless charging has to be the worst, most inefficient way anyone could have invented to charge a phone. I really hope you will link to that article every time you write about it.
is trounced by the ability to be organized and methodical and check to ensure that you don't leave the house with the gas still on.
Inviting hackers into your house with stupid-security IoshiTe stuff is not a solution because if you can check and turn off, a hacker acan check and turn on.
All of these automated thingamajigs are turning our brains into much and giving us the focus and attention span of a goldfish. Use your brain, do not trust automated whatevers.
Yeah, in those days there weren't any of the functions we have available now, such as the ability to swap buttons or redefine them in any way.
It was right click to select, left click for menu, and that was it.
Today, I am using a Logitech G602. It has no less than 8 buttons in addition to the basic 2, all programmable. I use all of them.
If Logitech had existed back then, and brought that mouse to market, I think people would have had strokes trying to wrap their heads around the amount of functionality !
But to get here, we had to start there.
It happened to me about twenty years ago.
One of my wife's friends was complaining over the phone about how difficult using a mouse was. The next time we went over for dinner, I had her show me what the problem was. It was simple : she had positioned the mouse the wrong way, buttons under the palm of the hand.
I smiled and gently turned the mouse around.
We had quite a fun dinner after that, and she took a gentle ribbing quite graciously.
I wonder why it doesn't buy a server, plug the Internet into it and host itself.
If nobody wants to host you, you can still do it on your own - for a bit of work and money, of course.
But, given the apparent content, I guess I'm not surprised that they go whining to be hosted back again. Whining is always easier than working.
Aka : It only affected a small number of customers.
Yeah. it affected at least 23000 children.
How on God's Green Earth did you order stuff from children without bothering to order from a properly vetted supplier ?
Oh, right, stupid me. It would have cost more.
Well, enjoy your savings now.
They shouldn't.
The Republican Party should be dismantled for treason and all of its political members thrown in jail for for life.
Of course, that won't happen.
But don't think that the OHSG won't have problems presenting himself in 2024. Don't forget that there is a tsunami of lawsuits coming his way, and some of them have the potential to bar him from ever holding office again.
I'm stocking up on the popcorn as we speak . . .
One, Apple did indeed do a dirty by disallowing that app but allowing a very similar app from a group of hospital employees.
Hospital employees are generally not programmers. I would have more trust in an app made by actual programmers. In this case, of course, said programmers would have had to have some oversight in privacy protection measures and maybe medical counsel as well. I did not see that that was specified.
Two, a claim filed by an apparently non-existing "company" who does not identify a single person in the company, doe snot come forward with the list of its employees, partners or collaborators who worked on the app, and can apparently only be reached by calling the CEO of another company is not exactly a brilliant confidence generator.
So, as much as I'd like to harp on Apple for once again changing the rules after the fact to suit itself, the shady side of the complainant makes me side with Apple.
If you're honest, you're not supposed to hide stuff when filing a complaint in court.
Bullshit.
The Founding Fathers expected the loser to become Vice President and serve his country as a gentleman.
Learn the history of your own fucking country before spouting such ignorance.
No dice.
Every time I upgraded my graphics card - and with XP that was yearly, I had to re-authenticate with a call to Redmond HQ.
I would have thought that a graphics card was not that important in the grand scheme of things - I'm not changing the motherboard, but obviously Borkzilla did not agree.
So, in an Azure AD environment, you have the cloud AD and the on-prem AD, which both have logs, but there are some instances where you login in the Cloud and it is not recorded in the same log than in the on-prem log, and the Unified thingy does not carry the info either, so it's not all that Unified.
Great. Feels like that makes security controls real easy to handle.
Still doesn't let SolarWinds123 off the hook, though.
I think Google is going to find out that they very much need extensions, for example, via a drop in the market share of Chrome in favor of browsers that do accept extensions.
Security for Google is like terrorists for the NSA - just a convenient excuse to increase their own power.
It is beginning to seem obvious that if you are an important company with Internet access these days, you need to have an IDS.
It took three months for AnyVan to discover that they'd been hacked into. To me, that clearly indicates that they had no IDS and weren't monitoring their network activity properly.
I guess they should be thinking about that now.
Oh, and no "we take the security of your data very seriously" ? You're not playing by the rules, AnyVan !
"There are technical reasons relating to the bespoke and complex nature of the solution which would lead to substantial duplication of costs and unacceptable technical risks which would not allow for the service to be transferred to another supplier "
As the saying goes : when you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will soon follow. So it has happened here.
That said, I'm in a bit of a bind here ; as much as I'd like to make a scathing remark on how BT is screwing its customer, this is a telecomms project. I do not know that there are any Open Source telecomms infrastructures available, so I guess that BT or anyone else would have landed the NLPS in pretty much the same boat.
Is there any other provider available in Northern Ireland ?
I really appreaciated your article and I think you did a great job of outlining the situation Intel is in and the person Gelsinger is (and I envy you for having met him more than once).
I hope Intel is going to pull through for the same reason I'm glad AMD is having a moment in the sun : we need competition. We need people who can think of new ways to improve performance, reduce power consumption and generally make computing an even better experience.
So I'm looking forward to what Gelsinger is going to cook up.
I would have to say that I would have told the guy to do his job and keep me out of it.
I would also have found it quite suspicious to come to me and specify that "it didn't have to wait until 3, you can do it early".
Nope, no way. You're not going to weasel way yourself into an excuse for blaming me.
Of course, I say that with the benefit of 25 years in the industry. I've seen enough office backstabbing happen around me, and sometimes to me, to not have a sixth sense about it.
Oooh, burn. So, what extensions does Chrome have that manages ad blocking ?
Let me see : uBlock Origin is not available, searching for "ad blocker" returns No Result Found, no, you only have Easy Ad Blocker which, curiously, finds that it has to override my searh settings to "eaburl.com".
I don't think so.
"The hardware it makes does go into the backbone of a critical resource, and if someone could disrupt, intercept, or disable that resource, there would be big problems. "
I'm sorry, are you talking about Cisco ?
Or maybe Netgear ? No, not Netgear - they disrupt themselves already, no need to meddle.
The fact of the matter is that there is no argument against Huawei that could not be made against any other provider as far as security is concerned.
And don't get me started on the "secret backdoor" or "modified mainboards" bullshit that is clearly a lie, plain and simple.
If there had been any shred of proof, do you really think Washington wouldn't have it plastered all over the Web and on billboards along the highway ?
It's a lie, fabricated to support a desperate effort to curb Huawei and give a chance to US companies in the 5G arena - chance they do not really deserve if the market is supposed to determine things.
But the US has form in fabricating lies to further its own goals (WMDs in Irak, anyone ?).
Folks will always complain, that's a fact.
But complaining would be a lot more difficult if the fee was 15%. I personally feel that 10% should be largely enough for a Store that resells the same string of bytes indefinitely without having had to do any work to create said bytes.
Comparing to a brick-and-mortar store is not realistic. Those stores generally need to stock items before they can sell them. They need employees who are alert for shoplifters in addition to serving customers. The cost of running any store is higher than the cost of having a server that sells the same app again and again and again on demand, 24/7 and without any shoplifters.