Re: Reverse
Now that's an interesting way of conducting a job interview.
Obviously, those with not enough experience will automatically weed themselves out, those with experience will be able to ask some pointed questions.
I like that approach !
18911 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Google certainly has the means to make things work. If Borkzilla does gain widespread market acceptance with Teams, the incentive for Google to undercut it by removing all the Teams angst and making something that is actually user-friendly as well as efficient will be enormous.
Plus there's all that additional slurp to be had, which Google is very, very good at obtaining.
No, I don't think the conference wars are over yet. Not by a long shot.
The problem is that not enough people react on this. They just accept the cost, shrug and get on with their lives.
Look how long it's taken to start hearing about the Right to Repair (and people were getting riled up about that).
This kind of news needs to repeated every day, every where, until people wake up and realize that ink is the new mafia domain, and we're all being held at gunpoint until we hand over the dosh.
Absolutely.
If you use your inkjet once a week, it's pretty much guaranteed in my experience that your print heads will dry up before the cartridge empties out.
I put up with this nuisance for more than a decade until I got fed up with the endless head cycling and wasted ink and paper and just bought a laser printer instead.
One of the best purchases I have ever made. I bought it in September 2010 and it's still working fine.
Laser printers are really affordable now, and you don't to need to print in colour as much as you think you do. Buy one that does scanner at the same time and you'll be able to use it for a decade or more.
No. The Statistical Analysis Machine is going to use and break a million industrial robots in order to find the best way to do one job without breaking either the machine or the piece it is supposed to work on.
IBM finally made a computer that could soundly beat a master chess player - but only because said computer played 60 million games against itself before being confronted to a human, which doesn't have a chance in hell of playing more than a few thousand in his lifetime.
Industrial robots are built for one task. A riveting robot is not going to paint, a painting robot is not going to cut metal.
Intrinsic might be an interesting experiment in applied computing science, but I doubt companies will want their expensive equipment "finding out" how to do the one thing they were bought for.
Shouldn't there be a law against that ?
They not firing the US guys (and gals) because they're no good. They're perfectly good at their job, they're just more expensive than foreign workers. Who just might be not so good at their job, but they're cheaper.
I'm looking forward to the reports on how Rackspace hosting is plagued with problems because their new workforce doesn't know their job or how to read the procedures.
I've never had to make so many side searches as I did to be able to understand this article.
Silver ticket ? Ok, now I know what that is.
VSS ? Should be called VSC. It's disabled on my machine.
Mimikatz ? Never heard of it. Thankfully, its home page is quite simple to understand.
I think I've already hit my quota of learning for the day, and it's not even beer o'clock.
If Google and Apple had reigned in their lust for money and set the tax at 5%, we wouldn't be having any of these discussions.
But no, they had to go all rapacious and greedy and set their tax at 30%, which is 29.994% more than the cost of running their Store.
I'm not against making money, but there comes a point where you have to admit that the rate is largely exaggerated.
30% is definitely in the exaggerated category. Then there is the added insult of not allowing in-app purchases from outside the Store - but even that would be less of an issue if the tax was 5%.
Well that comes as news to me and I'm very sorry to hear that you've had such a string of bad luck.
I would like to think that my bank would be a bit more attentive. Once I set up a transfer of over €3000 to plumber for the work he did, and the next day I got a call from the bank inquiring if the transfer was legitimate. Of course, I told them that it was and they definitely needed to make the transfer because my plumber needed to get paid for his work.
But they called.
Oh really ?
Show me one bank account that has been hacked.
I'm not talking about credit cards, I'm talking about the account itself.
Go on, show me one case where a bank account was hacked and money transferred without the authorization of its actual owner.
Good on them.
All this data sharing shenanigans is just driving me nuts. Finally some people are taking a stand and thank God it's the doctors.
They took the Hippocratic Oath, not the Hypocratic Oath, and they're doing their job.
It may very well be that there can be a legitimate use and benefit from a centralized national health database, but the UK Government is not exactly in the best of positions when it comes to providing any sort of guarantee on how that data will be protected and managed.
Especially not if any US private company is involved.
The obligatory conclusion from that statement is that there has been "legal" use of the Pegasus spyware.
Logic is extremely simple. If India didn't use the software, the Minister would have been boasting about it.
He's not, so they're using it.
Yes. Of course. The usual bullshit.
You're committed to, of course. You take very seriously, obviously.
And you took five fucking months to reveal the problem.
That is a brilliant demonstration of your actual commitment.
Five months, during which your responsability to protect data left your customers exposed.
Burning at the stake is too good for you.
True words.
But it is also true that you can be influenced by people you have respect for, and those people do not necessarily have enlightened views.
I am, obviously, referring primarily to your parents and elders, because that's where all this nonsense starts.
The one thing to hope for is that it ends with you.
That comes as a surprise to me.
Okay, I'm just a programmer and I have zero qualifications when it comes to physics, but I would have thought that if the size of the wave is smaller, you'd need a larger antenna to properly capture it. The rules of physics have spoken, and I bow before them.
But what is this love affair with 802.11 ? Instead of suffixing with an endless array of letters, couldn't they finally pass on to 802.12 ?
Let it go, guys. There are more numbers available.
I agree with you. The sentiment is most assuredly well-placed, but plain HTML would have been a much more valid demonstration.
What is killing the Web's usefulness is JavaScript. The over-reliance on this demonstrably dangerous technology is not just a nuisance, it is responsible for 99% of all malware infestations and, at the best of times, just transforms a web site into something you can't even bookmark properly.
Long live NoScript !
Short is not equal to young. We don't let five year olds drive because they're not mature enough to handle driving, not because they can't reach the pedals. Short adults are very capable of driving.
Additionally, short people have eyes that generally work. He could very well have controlled that the pin was placed in the right socket.
He didn't.
P.S. : why is Danny 2's post no longer open to votes ? What is the reason of this special treatment ?
That's rich coming from a country with National Security letters and more than 10 official requests per day to Microsoft - that we know of.
A collision of three robots. Two I can understand, but three ?
And how exactly did they catch fire ? Were they carrying flammable cargo, or did their batteries overload and if so, how is it that they have batteries that can do that ? Shouldn't there be some temperature monitoring ?
So many questions . . .
I work in Luxembourg.
Check it out on the world map. It's a very small country. You can cross it in an hour on the highway.
It's even smaller in the workplace. I learned that very early on in my career.
If you want to chew someone out, you had better be damn sure you're right, because your reputation can be trash quicker than you can blink.
Does it matter, seeing as Bourdain did express those sentiments albeit in an email and not into a microphone?
Yes it matters.
We most definitely should not get into the habit of bending the ghosts of dead people whichever we choose simply because we can.
The only case where I would accept recreating a specific person's voice is when the actual recording of said person has bad audio quality. That, for me, would be acceptable, especially in the case of a documentary or such, but I would still prefer that there be a banner or some notification that the portion had been recreated.
If we are already faking people's voices to make them say things they never actually pronounced in public when we are the very beginning of this technology, just how far are we going to go with it ?
Knowing the basic (absence of) principle of the Human race, we'll go too far.
So let's reign it in now.
I think we've already seen some real damage.
Go ask the hospitals that have been hacked if the damage wasn't real.
As for an online ID ? Pie-in-the-sky. Won't ever happen until the Internet is managed by a single entity, and that's not happening for the forseeable future if only because China ain't going to let anyone else manage its local part of the Internet.