"real-time conversational interfaces"
Great.
We're being trained to talk to machines.
Skynet won't need to kill us, it'll talk us to death.
18221 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
How totally unsurprising.
And, of course, it is asking for a stay of execution while it spends the next ten years fighting this decision.
Because that's what it's going to do. Google will fight this tooth and nail, because it hits its bottom line and we can't have that, now can we ?
Why do you say dodgy ? That seems to me to be a gratuitious ad-hominem attack. Other app stores can very well be just as reliable, or better, than Google's (or Apple's).
And what makes you think that any other app store is going to list an app if its owner doesn't submit it for listing ?
I don't know that app stores scrape other stores like pseudo-AI companies scrape other sites. If you do, please tell us.
Oh I absolutely agree.
Windows only exists in the business market because of the vast amount of sheeple who can't, for the life of them, imagine using anything else.
Unfortunately, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Those who are intelligent enough to use Linux already are.
The morons are infected with Windows and will remain so.
Oh knock it off.
If companies could do that without totally disrupting the back-end services, they would have done it already.
Stop touting Linux as the obvious solution to all IT woes. It isn't.
Not without a hell of lot of expensive preperation and the full support of management up and down the hierarchy.
I'm sorry, but I strongly feel that the days where we could take care of our own privacy are long gone.
Ever since Google, our privacy has been in the hands of strangers in suits sitting in plush, expensive rooms who only think of how they can monetize our private lives.
And Eric Schmidt is the asshole who started it. Damn him. (but, if not him, there would have been another)
Remove a tool included since forever for free and impose a paying replacement.
I'm not saying WordPad was the bee's knees, but having the gall to remove it and officially state that now you have to pay for Word to get the functionality is something that only the marketing department could possibly think is a good idea.
But I'm sure that the strain of supporting that decades-old code you haven't touched in years is reason enough, right ?
Yes, that could be interesting.
There's this other, well-established technology called a screen. It can show images and, with a thing called a computer, you can use a tool called a mouse to move your point of view, and a thing called a keyboard to advance.
It's all very high-tech, I know, but maybe it means that you don't absolutely have to depend on strapping your head to some bulky portable low-definition screen to achieve the same result.
No, you have signaled it's time to not buy.
Not that I was going to anyway.
I went, a few weeks ago, to Verdun (France, for those who don't know). There is an underground citadel there, with a rather nice tourist ride that has AR goggles in the mix. It was well done, I can't say the contrary, but let's just say that after 40 minutes, I wasn't unhappy to take the damn things off.
And it's not like you're going to catch anything at the corner of your eye. If you're not looking right where you're supposed to, you're not seeing what is theoretically there.
I have no idea what tech those goggles were, but they very much reinforced my conviction that I'm absolutely not interested in acquiring anything like that for me in the forseeable future.
Gosh. I have over 25 years of expertise in my field and I'm not making that kind of money. I'm guessing that those ILA members with that kinf revenue are the ones who are deciding the strike.
And why are you griping about a 50% increase for $20 an hour ? It seems to me that that is an appreciable increase.
Oh, you're expecting more.
Unfortunately, Big Business wants to maximize margins and you're at the bottom of the pecking order. Yep, a strike is just about the only thing that is going to help.
So, most major founders of an open-source thingy have fled the house to another, non-Redmond-managed one ?
There's a clue there. I'm sure of it.
I mean, it's not like Redmond has ever declared that Open Source is a cancer, now is it ? Oh wait . . .
I really don't care about the details. In my experience, Intel graphics has only ever been good enough to get a computer running until I can slot in a true graphics card (Nvidia or AMD, given the moment).
If Intel thinks that putting its "graphics engine" on an add-in card is going to impress me, I'll put it right in the bin with the Matrox 3D card that I wasted money on way back when.
Those are not adjectives that I would like to describe my driving experience.
I'll keep my ICE car until the industry delivers to me a car that doesn't have a steering wheel, where I can just give the destination and take a nap, or read a book.
Until then, as long as I am responsible, I'm the one driving, thank you.
“This is a meritless lawsuit. Android device makers are free to take their own steps to keep their users safe and secure”
Hold on, Google. Aren't you the same company that lost in court to Epic's claim that you were garden-walling your app store to ensure insane revenue ?
And now, because you lost, you are saying that phone makers are free ?
I note that you did not say that phone makers can accept any app store. No. You just said they're free to ensure their user's safety.
Somehow, I feel that that is a strawman argument.
"The investor Fidelity was recently reported to have cut the valuation of its stake in X to $4.19 million, down from the $19.66 million it had initially invested"
So, from 20 to 4. A fivefold reduction.
He's already pissed off advertisers (and whined about it), but pissing off investors is going to hurt a lot more in the long run. Not only because X is going to have trouble finding more money, but investors of the caliber of Fidelity are going to think twice, nay thrice, before investing in any other project he might dream up.
By the way, Elon, how's that Hyperloop going ?
And once again, the old song about capitalism regulating itself flies out the window.
I have trouble believing that, in this day and age, there are still utter morons who prefer to wait for a catastrophe to do something about the security of their IT infrastructure.
Today, as soon as you are connected to the Internet, you are a possible target for a legion of very savvy, dedicated miscreants who would like nothing more than to bring your company to its knees in exchange for money. And then more money. And the bigger the company, the bigger the target.
If that's not enough to get your finger out and start securing your network, then you deserve the cost that is coming to you.
Now that we have Starlink, like it or not, I wish China good luck in getting its firewall on there.
It is now possible, maybe, for a Chinese citizen to have a direct link to the world without Beijing's oversight. And there will be more constellations that China will not control.
The door is opening, Xi. You're going to have to deal with that some day.