Re: Apple's threats
It does however demonstrate the toys-out-of-the-pram mentality of the Board.
Such a childish attitude from one of the richest companies in the world is pathetic.
19005 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
I'm pretty sure that I've already seen button-operated elevators that are quite efficient in managing the wait time before the user gets to go in.
A touchscreen, by itself, is not going to enhance anything. It's the software behind that does all the work, and the software doesn't care if the button is physical or not.
More like zero chance.
The UN is all nice and cuddly, but it has no teeth.
Every government is sovereign, and if that government wants to use surveillance tools on its own population, then By God it will, moratorium be damned.
The real issue is that, if there is a country somewhere that refuses to use said tools, it might become a haven for hardened criminals and, <gasp>, actual terrorists.
What then ?
That is one job I would be very wary of taking in China. Over here, if a car gets hacked, it's "Oh well, we'll try better next time".
Over there, it's "Here's the invoice for the bullet".
Aside from that, and aside from sending data back to China, I rather like those rules. Ensuring vehicle data security is something I've been waiting for my European car makers to declare themselves on, but all they seem to want to do is ensure that every car's entertainment system is firmly embedded in the CAN bus.
Booo.
Generic types.
I will likely be downvoted to hell on this, but IMO generic types are the bane of proper programming.
If you don't know what you're working with, how can you possibly write the proper code to deal with it ?
Obviously, I am for strong variable typing (in case you didn't guess). I like to know that I'm dealing with a String, or an Integer, or a Long. Variant makes my skin crawl, although there are some cases where I know I won't be able to avoid it.
Generic types is just handing over all the issues to the compiler and hoping for the best. That is not good when you're responsible for your code.
There, that was my 2 cents. Blast away.
The word "propaganda" is unfortunate.
Propaganda means fake news, falsehoods erected into fact, and brainwashing of the public so everyone believes it.
China does not need better propaganda, no one does.
China, and every other country, needs journalists that can tell the actual truth without fear of reprisal.
If your news is filled with truth, you don't need propaganda.
It will be interesting to see how well they perform.
Personally, I think we're all getting Zoom fatigue, but then there's a lot of people who would probably like to and can't, for whatever reason, so they'll likely jump at the chance to still attend virtually.
Hopefully it won't be just PR and marketing guff.
I don't think so, at least, not entirely.
He does not appear to be a neo-Nazi sympathizer, not does he appear to be a despicable idiot rambling incoherently when asked a question.
He answers questions, sometimes directly, but generally without hesitation.
He also knows how to stand up properly.
Oh and, incidentally, he takes decisions that actually benefit the US citizens that don't have a billion in their bank account.
I had that kind of surprise with Chuck Yeager's Air Combat.
It's an old DOS game from, IIRC, a bit before Microsoft Flight Simulator, and it was a lot of fun to play because you could configure what you going up against to a rather impressive degree (for the time, especially).
I first played it on my trusty 8086, and it ran fine.
Years later, I was fiddling around on my brand-new 486DX66 and suddenly, I wondered how CYAC would react. Now, I have tried quite a few DOS games since the 286 was done and buried, and most of them end practically as soon as you start the game because they are generally tied to the CPU frequency.
Not CYAC. I don't know how they programmed that thing, but it ran just fine on my 486. I'm sure it would also run fine on a Pentium. Don't know about today's multi-core CPUs though.
Maybe I'll have to try that . . .
"There's always that risk that customers come to you and say, I can't possibly buy your product, because you've got maybe one version out of date of OpenSSL. "
Are you trying to make me believe that you have customers that actually check out the technical aspects of your product before buying it ?
Because that would be a first, in my experience. Generally, the customer buys the product, then finds out what doesn't work and IT has to spend time (and possibly money) to solve the issue. Then the manager responsible can strutt his stuff in front of the Board and boast about how he made incredible gains for the company.
For a holiday, I completely agree with you, I'd go anywhere but on a boat.
But for a nice evening out with the missus, good meal, pleasant view ? I could do with that every now and then.
Except for the bill, obviously. I'd have a bit of trouble tipping . . .
COVID is not going away. We're going to have to deal with living our lives despite it.
After all, the flu claims hundreds of thousands of lives every year, and we don't quarantine for that.
That's a good point. If the package name management system is changed to ensure that only the owner of the name can relinquish it, then if said owner is no longer alive, there will be no one to relinquish it.
Stalemate.
So there will either have to be a process to take ownership by the package management authority, or the package owner should be prompted to nominate a "secondary" owner (and not himself with another email address) in case of non-response under 90 days or something like that.
In any case, it is not an easy situation to resolve.
This is a clear sign that companies bring in outside competence to set up the displays and ensure the content, and then let it rot because nobody on-site has a clue how it works.
When working in a retail store that has an electronics department, that is particularly credibility-destroying.
Deep face ? What the hell is that expression for ?
I get deep fake. Statistical analysis applied to creating an image (or video) and inserting another one. Okay, that's fine.
But there is no deep face. There is facial recognition, period.
Stop gargling yourselves with meaningless verbiage just to make you seem capable.
It doesn't have interactive content.
It's a text website, with a few videos.
They can't handle a server ? They need to "outsource" their IT on that ?
Dammit, give the contract to me. I'll set up two servers on two seperate lines with failover and the job's done.
And I'll only take £1M/year.
I lived a moment like that - and I was the one holding the power lead.
It was at the beginning of my career in Luxembourg, all those years ago (my daughter wasn't even born yet). Our company had just recieved shipment of a gaggle of tower PCs (they were for the training room that was being set up) and I was tasked with creating an application that required server access.
I needed a server.
I went to the head of IT and asked him if I could take one of the new arrivals to use as a server and he agreed. I went down and took one out of its box and brought it our corner office. I set up the requisite peripherals and went to plug in the PC.
POW !
Flash of light and short tongue of flame shot out of the PSU. The PC was dead.
What I didn't know is that the shipment came from the US. It was configured for 110V, and I hadn't thought to check that the tiny red switch on the PSU was in the proper configuration.
I went to explain myself to the head of IT, who was a bit miffed but told me to get another server. I completed my task, wiped the server from the machine and brought it back to storage.
By that time, all the boxes had "110V !" written on them in big red letters.
Ever since, I systematically check any new PSU or desktop box to ensure that it is in the right setting.