Re: Three decades later
And that would be a bad thing why ?
19394 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
We are long past 1984. The Panopticon is here, and Google, FaceBook, TikTok, Instagram and others have put it in place. Global surveillance is a thing, but the irony is that it is not any Government that is guilty of it, it's just the carrot that the sheeple are blindly throwing themselves at for their own convenience.
Some time in the future millenia, exoarcheologists will determine that we are the first intelligent civilization to have convenienced ourselves to death.
Okay, the situation is clear : NSO knows its goose is cooked so it's shutting itself down in order to transition to a new structure, bringing all its intellectual resources with it in order to re-emerge and continue business as usual.
By the time US lawmakers get around to being pissed off again, the new group will have made more hay on the souls of those it damned.
Agreed, but the fact is that Borkzilla still doesn't know what a true kernel is.
Windows started out as a GUI layer over DOS, and Borkzilla still hasn't made the transition to a true kernel. Everything is tied to the UI.
Besides, if you think that Borkzilla is going to make the Windows Experience (TM) something you can stick another UI onto like in Linux, well I have a bridge to sell you.
I'm guessing that that may be because of a difference in perception. A social media site is basically viewed as pseudo-local. French users of Facebook behave as if Facebook is French. Of course, all Facebook users are well aware that it is a global company, but in their little corner, it's local.
A travel site obviously reaches across the world, otherwise booking flights would be difficult. So, a travel site is percieved as "non-national", and is not expected to be local.
Maybe.
Now that explanation obviously doesn't work so well for food sites, so I won't try to explain that.
With all the new fabs that are being planned or being built, there's going to be a glut of processors of all kinds all over the place.
Prices will drop, and then they'll complain that their immensely expensive fabs aren't making enough money.
Really, how many fabs was there in 2019 ? I don't kow, but it seems to me that there's going to be double that amount by 2025.
Um, if I'm not mistaken, local machines have grown in power to an impressive extent.
The cheapest laptop today can run Office. Okay, not at blinding speeds, but have you tried Word 95 on a Pentium ?
Besides, a server is nothing but someone else's machine.
Some people are really desperately trying to reinvent the mainframe.
That is nothing more than rewriting history.
The absence of information can be just as significant as its presence. If something exists in one source and is absent from another, that means that there is a process that failed and could not write a log entry. For debugging purposes, that is literally more important than the pseudo re-creation of log data.
Not that I would defend Oracle in any way, but it is kind of hard to imagine that the Oracle engineers and technicians don't know how to install and configure their own product. I do think they have internal training on that question.
So the issue likely lies more with the civil administration who, despite having an ERP for a while already, have apparently not understood what they were getting themselves into. It's almost like they don't understand their SAP installation and, instead of trying to get to grips with it, they decided to go with another top-of-the-line behemoth only to hit their collective skulls against the same wall.
I might be reaching, but if the product you're thinking of acquiring needs more people to install it then you have people in your own IT department, maybe you should think twice before signing that contract.
Well that explains it all. They've spent all the money, so there's none left for the boring stuff like keeping government IT creaking along.
Not a problem, when it finally falls over completely, there will be a great big, wonderful £10 billion contract that will immediately be handed to Crapita.
Indeed.
If it was a Cisco problem, the only valid patch I would install would have to come from Cisco.
Anything else and you're just asking for trouble.
If pressed, before applying the patch I would have searched for any problems with the patch (aka wait a day or two). In this case, the problem would have been largely reported and I would have gone, printout proof in hand, to explain why I wouldn't install said patch.
But hey, armchair general is easy, isn't it ?
And who gives a flying fuck ?
The USPTO has long outlived any credibility concerning what it approves and what it doesn't. It is a rubber-stamp for magacorps and has completely abandoned any semblance of pretending that it cared about controlling whether or not a patent was serious or not.
A patent used to be granted on the basis that the submitter could prove and demonstrate how the procedure could be accomplished - in other words, revealing the secret of how the thing worked.
Today, the USPTO rubber-stamps anything it is presented with (rounded corners, anyone ?), and leaves the the judicial system to deal with the fallout.
Useless twats should not have any legal importance whatsoever.
Methinks your "investigation" demonstrates why you got hacked in the first place : you don't have a clue.
That probably explains why the exfiltrated data was not encrypted - you don't have the expertise to manage that.
In other words, another payroll provider with a bit more savvy in the backend might be a good choice.
I can't say I'm too worried about that, for some reason. First of all, I live beyond the suburbs in a quaint little village à la campagne. If someone is rifling through my trash, they already know where I live. And if they absolutely want to know my water bill from last month, I'm nonplussed that they burden their neurons with that information.
I doubt that they'll hijack my water company account to have the privilege of paying the bills instead of me.
On the Web, though, that is another matter entirely. I have an non-negligeable amount of activity in the virtual information highway, and I have no idea how someone could piece together enough information to pinpoint my indentity from my various posts and web habits. That said, I never use the same password twice, so I guess any hijacking will be limited in scope.
I hope so anyway.
Qué sera, sera
What a waste of time just to push a Google product.
"Projects are effectively private clouds with isolated infrastructure primitives, and their own enclave"
So they're behind a firewall, duh.
"Only personnel with specified qualities such as specific citizenship are allowed access;"
There's an Access Control List, duh.
"Data locality is enforced by software."
The code writes to that location, duh.
Look guys, if you want to do marketing, go ahead, but don't try and make it look like you're writing a technical documentary. There is absolutely no company database in The Cloud (TM) that should not have these elements. We haven't been waiting on you to tell us that.
I still don't understand that argument.
To connect to the Internet, I pay my provider a monthly due. That is supposed to cover my bandwidth usage.
El Reg has a connection, and it pays its provider as well (probably more than I do). That covers its bandwidth usage.
Where is the unfair part of all of this ?
If it's because there's a carrier between me and El Reg, well it's up to my provider and El Reg's provider to manage the situation. El Reg is not supposed to pay every provider along the way.
This is nonsense.
Okay, one question : why the blazes was it so important to email them documents before evacuating the people you knew were going to be murdered ?
Wouldn't it have been better to just load them on the planes, get them to security and then let administration catch up with the situation ?
Or is that too much to ask from a "civilized" country ?
Technically I agree with you, but one must admit that the Internet is a very peculiar environment as far as software is concerned.
Before the Internet, the only way to attack a machine was to physically sit in front of it. In those days, a programmer was only concerned with making sure the product functioned as intended. Security was baked in because of the limitations of physical access.
Networks showed up, and suddenly computers had to be secured from unwarranted access, but that happened at the OS level, not at the program level.
Today, practically all computers are connected to the greatest network that has ever been implemented. The drawback is that now, programmers must not only ensure their product works, but also that it is protected from attacks that can happen any time, in any way. The minds that can concieve the attacks are intelligent, and more numerous than the minds that concieve the defenses. There is a basic inequality there.
Yes, buggy software is a nuisance that really should not exist, but that concerns functionality. Security is an ongoing concern because the miscreants have time to try things no programmer could protect against before the fact.
But that's the whole point of the article : Bitcoin is not a tool. No one has done anything useful with it.
Lasers started out as something useless as well, today worldwide communication depends on them.
Bitcoin will never become that useful.
Kill it.
With fire.
My group of friends and I had a blast with Battlefield 2. It's simple : I played that game so much that the DVD broke and I had to buy another one.
Of course, we played on my local server, hacked by a now-defunct team of dedicated Internet gaming experts which allowed me to run a 128-slot server populated by the largest maps and tons of bots for whatever slots were not taken up by players. We also had custom airplanes, and I particularly liked the Warthog.
We had tons of fun, and our own ranking board.
The only issue was that, of course, EA Games did not like that people had servers that they did not pay EA Games for, so every update broke the ranking and, sometimes, even broke the server. When that happened we had to find workarounds, like putting specific addresses in the hosts file to ensure that the server stayed local. It was an increasingly frustrating headache, but that did not make us stop.
What made me stop was BF 2142. It was not uninteresting, but you couldn't play solo and you couldn't have a personal server. EA Games had obviously learned the lessons of BF2 and was determined not to let players have fun on their own.
The issue I had with 2142 was that every single patch basically required that I reinstall 2142 from scratch. I did not have a fiber connection at the time, I was on a 10Mbps ADSL line. It took basically all day to update. It was a terrible update system and I hated every moment of it. The final straw came when the online install package asked me for my DVD key. DVD key ?!? What the blazes does an online store ask me for a DVD key ?
So I fired off a rather angry mail to support telling them what I thought of this insane situation. The response : my profile got banned.
You banned me because your shit-for-brains system didn't work and I had the gall to complain ? Fine, EA Games, we're done. You stole my money and you don't know how to make fun games anymore anyway.
EA Games is now banned from my life. I don't regret it.