The class action system is broken
Yes, lawyers should definitely get paid for their time.
No, lawyers should not get more money than the people who have been wronged.
Class action or not, lawyers should only get their hourly fee, not a cent more.
18239 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
2022 ?
No, seriously, just ten more days ? How generous, Google.
It's obvious you are not the one putting in the overtime your changes have imposed.
Now that you've caused the stink, you could at least give something like 60 days for developers to analyze, define and implement the required changes.
It's not like the Web will break in that time anyway.
Back in 1984, my father brought me an IBM PC. It had the venerable 8086 CPU and 128KB of RAM. It also had the finest manuals I have ever read in my life to this day (I still have them).
I learned how to program with that computer. I made my very own D&D random magic item generator.
That didn't help my studies much at the time either, but now I am a professional programmer and have been for more than 25 years.
It's not because something has impacted your studies that it was necessarily bad at the time.
But go ahead and blame gaming. I'm sure that all those teenagers glued to their smartphones will suffer no consequences at all.
. . and I accept that said judgement was made with respect to the law, I still find myself frustrated that a multi-million data breach from a company raking in almost £5B results in punishment that represents barely a pitiful 1 hour of annual revenue.
Come on ! If the fines do not become significant, nobody will make the effort to secure properly !
No.
Just no.
I don't care if you think that the process is outdated or not, software should not dictate how the company is run. And no single company should be allowed to dictate to their customers how they run their business.
It's incredible to see that we are now in an age where a software maker decides how you should run your business.
Fuck off. If your software doesn't suit my way of doing things, then you are useless to me. I'm not the one who should change.
So I'm to believe that all those industrial plants using SAP need to review their production lines just so that SAP can integrate the data in the right way ?
Are you out of your fucking mind ?
I use Excel to prepare my invoices, because I've set it up so that it prints out everything I need the way I need it.
Hint : if Microsoft changes Excel so that I have to change my invoices to correspond, I'll stop using Excel.
Son of a billionnaire seems to not notice that the peons don't get much of a chance to talk to the VP of sales and marketing, even if they are hanging around the watercooler together.
Son of a billionnaire also doesn't seem to realize that he could network in shorts and flip-flops around a swimming pool at one of the kind of parties the peons never, ever, get a chance to go to.
Son of a billionnaire, your "trajectory" has far less to do with who you talked to at the office, and far more to do with who your father is.
And that, right there, is the seed of doom for the project.
If you don't know by now what you need from your ERP, then your project is doomed from the start.
You cannot implement any IT project, make "substantive" changes mid-way through, and expect the end result to work.
What you should do is exhaustively list your needs, the results you expect to be able to work, and get an expert to draw up the specifications that answer those needs. When you have a working platform, then you analyze what changes you require and request their implementation.
The best project manager I ever had the privilege of meeting was adamant on one point : when there was a meeting to discuss project progress, it was out of the question to add new points to the requirements list. If there were more requirements, he automatically and authoritatively shunted them to version X+1.
Because he wanted something that worked first. Then you add the bells and whistles.
It helped that he was IT manager and no-one had any authority to complain, but still.
Once upon a time IBM was the reference in business stability and reliability.
Then it fired everyone with a clue because costs, since its own management didn't have a clue.
Now, we get this IBM that can't even manage its own cloud properly, not to mention its own internal mail upgrade.
Frankly, anybody using IBM Cloud deserves everything they get. Yes, Cloud is obviously difficult, but IBM killed every excuse it could possibly have with its endless layoffs of experience.
You reap what you sow.
In Luxembourg, if you are the general manager of a company that goes insolvent, you are forbidden from ever being a general manager in any Luxembourg-based company again.
Generally there's a limited amount of siblings and cousins an incompetent idiot can call on (and who will agree to take the fall), so I rather like that law.
This is not a discovery, this is just the new batch of developers not having older mentors around to slap them behind the head when they try to make their code the center of attention.
Microsoft : you're making an Operating System. Get that dictionary definition and engrave it on all your walls.
So he properly issued an "undebug all" command at the console, and said console decided that no, it was going to do a "debug all".
I don't get how that is possible. There must be some shoddy programming behind that thing.
The US only has one rule : USA first and everyone else is fair game.
Share information more openly ? The US will readily agree - to recieve shared information. Giving it out ? No so much.
Trust China to vouch for Huawei ? Okay, not even I would trust that one, but hey, why should the US do so ? It knows very well what the NSA can do and there's no reason China shouldn't be doing the same.
Contrary to the US Government - which can't seem to get a grip on its super spy agency, China's government will have no trouble keeping its spy agency on a tight leash - which will tighten even more if there is something China's rulers don't like.
One thing I don't get : how is it that a French privacy group made a complaint to a non-european-institution in Luxembourg ?
The CNPD is a purely Luxembourgish institution, it has no teeth at the European level as far as I can tell. It's home page makes no mention of Europe at all (neither does its Missions page), and the European flag is conspicuously absent from it, contrary to every other European Institution web site.
I'm giddy at the idea that somebody is finally levelling a fine that represents a meaningful amount against an Internet goliath, but how does this work ?
Once an update is committed to the upload server of the supplier, there could be a mechanism to ensure that that file is properly identified (MD5 and signature, or something similar). As soon as the file changes, if there is not the proper declaration in the records, shutdown the Internet connection for the server, send an alert mail and wait for the admins to come and check.
I'm pretty sure implenting this kind of procedure wouldn't break the bank, and it seems to me that it could be rather efficient in keeping customers safe.
Yeah, which means I have to give up my phone number to any number of websites run by any kind of sysadmin with a budget I am not aware of and qualifications that I know even less.
Sorry, I'll keep my password management in-house, thank you very much.
I think Jim is not the only one who should discover the wonders of marmite. Looks to me as the head of accounting should also get a taste for allowing personal visits during work hours, and for allowing a perfect stranger to use unsecured media on company property.
Then, of course, there's the boss who actively made the situation worse by granting a security risk access to the Holy Sanctum. And, obviously, the sheer blasphemy of his grubby hands on the PHY's and BOFH's computers.
Oh yes, they're going to need a lot of marmite.