Oh, brilliant
Another massive ERP failure in the making.
Gotta go stock up on popcorn.
19252 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Unfortunately, being stupid is not a disqualifying criteria for using a computer.
And if you think that just changing the file extension from xlsx to csv changes the file format, then you're too stupid to use a computer.
More unfortunately, there are many, many people who haven't got a clue what a file extension means, but they're still employed and using a computer.
That's the employer's fault : he doesn't know what a file extension means either.
It is clearly a bold stance.
Unfortunately, it's not because you are going to be able to stack chips on top of one another that, all of a sudden, you're going to become a graphics king.
Now, don't get me wrong, there are very capable people working at Intel, that I will not dispute. But there are also very capable people working at Nvidia, and Nvidia has twenty years of experience in high-end graphics. Intel ? Not so much.
So I'm glad that you've set the bar to high expectations. Unfortunately, I have never counted on Intel to power my gaming sessions, and I have no reason to think that that is going to change any time soon.
I am willing to be pleasantly surprised, though.
That really is a nice idea and I subscribe to it wholeheartedly, but look around. If we did that to China, in the short term we'd have next to nothing left to buy.
And I don't see much in term of European or American industry gearing up to replace Chinese sweatshops, especially in the luxury market.
It just won't happen.
It should, but it won't.
Excuse me, but I seem to recall that, if we ever needed discrete graphics in the first place, it is because integrated graphics were shit in performance.
It used to be the case that if you were using integrated graphics, it was because you were working on a server and the only thing on screen was the console - text version. Integrated graphics were good enough for that, but not much more.
These days I acknowledge that integrated graphics can actually show a Windows GUI properly, without much in matter of lag, but if you think that you're going to persuade me that your integrated graphics can boast of GeForce RTX 30-level performance well, I'm sorry, I'm not drunk enough to buy that.
So the point of acquiring Arm was ?
As much as I like my Nvidia graphics card, I have to admit that Nvidia is monopolistic. It is following the likes of Apple, Google and Borkzilla in stifling competition as much as it can.
Nvidia has used almost every dirty trick in the book, from massaging benchmark figures to disparaging AMD products outright.
If Nvidia had taken Arm into its purview, I think it would have had catastrophic consequences in the long run, so I'm quite happy that it did not happen.
What ?
You are pushing people to access their bank account on the historically most insecure platform that exists ? On a platform that can be hacked just by sending a specifically-(mal)formed SMS message ? That doesn't even need to be read ?
Are out of your fucking minds ?
Laws perform no function, they're just signs written (or printed) on paper.
It is the application of the law that performs a function, and that is done by a human being.
As the USofA is demonstrating right now, human beings can be very selective in which laws they decide to apply and even how they decide to apply them (looking at you, Republicans).
What international law, pray tell ?
Which international law does Facebook think means it has the right to purchase any company it wants ?
If I'm not mistaken, Nvidia has just been prevented from realizing a $66 billion merger with Arm. Does The Zuck really imagine his $400 million merger is more important ?
Of course not. It's just that, as a complete human failure, he cannot compute when he hears "no".
The problem is how it is made.
If you're burning coal to transform H2O into hydrogen/oxygen, then you're not getting the benefits of hydrogen because you've burned coal.
The only way hydrogen can be justified is with nuclear/solar/wind energy.
We have to shut down the coal-based power stations. All of them. Of course, we can't do that in one go right away, we first have to get ITER to work and, concurrently, get Thorium stations installed everywhere.
Between the two, things just might work out.
Ah, so they have the USA approach to law. Good for them.
In any case, I note that "The exodus from Hong Kong to Singapore is well underway ", which is perfectly normal.
Yes, Hong Kong will become just another Chinese city. Yes, the Great Internet Firewall will be thoroughly applied. Yes, anyone with any sense of freedom and a smidgen of intelligence should get the hell out of there while they can.
There might still be money to make in Hong Kong, but it will be under Beijing's full control. Your choice.
It is still a very valid response.
It's right up there with "don't say anything in public you might regret".
Gossip used to be the drive to disseminate information. It was the old "can you keep a secret" and the next day you hear about it at the company lunch room.
Now we have Social Media, and gossiping is in overdrive.
The solution remains the same : only say something in public if you are willing to stand up and own up to it.
What Orwell could definitely not have imagined is that the surveillance society be implemented by companies and accepted without thinking by the global population.
Sure, NSA is tapping comms, but Facebook has access to almost everything and people are giving it freely.
It's one thing to wonder about using Signal or not, it's an entirely different kettle of fish when you post you entire life between Twitter, Instagram, FB and Tik Tok.
You're the engineer charged with implementing this National Internet Gateway, and you are quite capable (and you disagree strongly with the current regime). So capable, in fact, that you are considering building in a loophole, a backdoor of some sort, that only you know about and no one will be able to find.
You're sure you know how to do it, and you're convinced that no one will find out about it.
Do you go ahead and implement that, even at the eventual risk of getting caught (the consequences of which do not bear thinking about), or do you just do the job demanded of you and then plan on leaving the country ?
Beer for the round table discussion.