"By decoupling the auto software from the hardware"
And just how decoupled is the software from the hardware ? Did they remove the infotainment system from the CAN bus ?
Somehow, I don't think so.
19252 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Somehow I doubt that said corrupt elite is going to feel much of a pinch at all.
Putin has been preparing his move since a while already, and I'm convinced that financial sanctions were on his list of things to mitigate. He will, obviously, have warned his ultra-rich friends, and the word will have spread because the rich have ways of finding things out when it comes to money.
So I'm guessing that the Russian rich will just have to take an extended vacation in their datchas on the shores of the Black Sea. Oh, the humanity.
This charge had better have a solution that is as easy to manage as passwords are.
It's not my fault that the Joe User can't be arsed to manage his passwords properly.
I do, and I do not want my fingerprints, eye scans or tongue surface spread all across corporate databases managed by the summer intern.
If one of my passwords gets compromised, I can change it. I can't change my fingerprints.
So, what's the passwordless solution ? I haven't heard of one yet and, if somebody had an actual solution, I'm sure we'd be hearing about it and seeing it implemented already.
Hmm. Namecheap urgently needs to put that statement in effect on China because Uighurs.
What's happening to Ukraine is not good in any way, but reacting now kinda demonstrates a certain level of bias that doesn't really look good when you take a step back and think about it.
But hey, let's go and punish Russia every way we can (while studiously ignoring that every statement can likely be applied to China as well). What's the worst that could happen ?
Not really, no.
It's one thing to have an opinion on stuff you've been told, it's another thing entirely to go off on a revenge campaign about what you think you heard.
He should have confirmed his suspicions first by asking pointed questions. On top of the fact that he visibly offered the drink just to get something he could thrash after the fact. That behaviour is despicable.
In any case, if it had been me, that would have been the last time I ever had a drink with that guy.
Just admit it : it's a sanction against China. Then go on living your lives.
If you're so afraid of equipment from companies beholden to their government, then you only have one choice : make your network equipment a government institution and only use your home-grown equipment.
Because Cisco is just as beholden to Washington DC as Huawei is to Beijing.
Remeber what National Security Letters are for.
It's a mainframe, not a laptop. You support a mainframe for 25 years, not five.
If Fujitsu thinks that it's going to sell a mainframe that only has five years of support left, I think Fujitsu is in for a bad surprise.
They may as well stop making them now - as long as they still offer support until 2035, they just might still sell one or two.
I so agree with you. Especially when it comes to laptops, which are often delivered with a single partition for OS and data. So, when the inevitable Windows crash happens and you have to reinstall Windows, it wipes the disk and your data with it.
Once upon a time I insisted on having two HDDs, one for the OS, one for the data (and swap file). Nowadays, with SSDs and their size, a single disk is enough, but I still insist on a data partition and I install all my programs and put all my files there.
That way, when Borkzilla borks again, at least I can reinstall Windows without losing any actually important stuff.
Icon because Borkzilla still hasn't understood this.
Sorry, what is there to negociate ?
The US does not get EU citizen's data. Simple.
I can agree to an exception when an EU citizen is physically going to the US, but that is it.
And if the White House don't like it, it can stuff it where the sun don't shine.
Oh yeah, absolutely. We really need an identity verifying app on the most insecure, unupdated platform that has ever existed.
Bonus round : having to prove that you are the owner of the phone once you've "proven" your identity.
Different standards will create opposition to those initiatives ?
I'm already there, mate.
Oh good, Zuck is going to fill his Meta-fied Second Life with a bunch of virtual people. Then he will declare the Metaverse a success and spend his time chatting with bots.
And the rest of the world will watch him burn all his money on that particular pie in the sky.
I'm glad you believe that a computer program can teach itself. I can't wait to see how that turns Tay.
Be that as it may, Lite Mode has many advantages and there is no real reason to remove it.
It's like saying "the price of gas has fallen so low, we've stopped making economical cars". No, you don't stop saving data just because in India they have great mobile data plans. I have a budget of 4.5GB/month - normally more than enough. Recently, there was a storm that cut my fiber connection for three days. Working from home, I used up a total of 6.8GB during that time, with a nice 70% increase in my phone bill for that month.
Keep saving the data, you never know when you might need that.
Besides, less clutter on the backend will do good for everyone.
Well that's a big, fat single point of entry if ever I saw one.
Of course, I've been working in IT for more than a quarter of a century. I have no problem managing (checks list) around 200 passwords. I never use the same password twice, nor the same login.
But I know what I'm doing. People who view the Internet as their own personal shopping space, and their computing device as an enabler, those people simply cannot imagine everything that goes on behind and likely wouldn't understand if you explained it to them. It's a shopping cart, what's the problem ? That is their point of view, and I'm not going to blame them.
Maybe, just maybe, all this data sharing and consumer pressure just might end up in creating a world where everyone, not just IT professionals, have the means to really manage where their data is going and who can use it.
Maybe.
It would seem that a proper encryption scheme should also have a default implementation function/procedure.
Encryption is difficult. Even if you (like me) have no idea how difficult it actually is, there's largely enough history to demonstrate that fact.
So don't leave it up to the vendors. If you create an encryption scheme, give a default, secure, functional scheme that vendors can rely on.
That way, if they go their own route and screw up, it's entirely their own fault, whereas here you kinda built the scaffold for them to hang themselves.
But he said "a proper facial recognition system".
His point is valid in that specific, restricted area.
As in, a facial recognition system that does not just a picture, but LIDAR technology or somesuch to create a 3D map of the face on top of visual cues.
That should prove more difficult to cheat, whatever makeup you have.
Of course, if you go putting Silly Putty on your face and makeup on top of that, then all bets are off.
I guess facial regocnition is just doomed from the start.
Wow, that's a lot of work for not much return.
As a freelance, if I had almost $2 billion in revenue, I could shut my company down even after income tax (which would be at least $380 million) and there would be plenty enough left for my family for generations (well, until the 3rd one at least).
Agreed.
It's very nice of Cisco to warn and serve the required updates, but I agree that companies are going to be a bit wary of just rushing into this, and it takes time to validate a test server update.
Besides, it would really be unfortunate for a bank to be offline for two weeks while they recover from a borked update, wouldn't it ?
Unless you're TalkTalk, of course, in which case nobody cares.
Um, idle question : what HDD still has little enough space to be completely formatted in FAT32 ?
I don't think there are any. So, if using an HDD, you're partitioning it into the ridiculously small FAT32-sized partition, then partitioning the rest in NTFS (or whatever floats your boat).
I think you're asking the wrong question. The actual question is : why use Microsoft products when you do not want any possibility of data exiting the EU ?
Borkzilla is a US company. It is understandable that its products are tied with its US servers.
If it is so important to keep data inside your own borders, use LibreOffice and make yourself a local cloud-based fileshare with encryption.
It's not as sexy, for sure, and you're probably going to need to replace Outlook with something else, but it responds to the demands.
Obviously, manglement is not going to have its pretty charts and PowerPoint presentations any more. Boo hoo.
This is interesting. Given the atrocious history of ERP projects I have been reading recently, I am really curious : what makes them think that grouping universities is going to make it work better ?
Or maybe it will, since there will be less manglement of the project and it will be managed by a group that wants the whole thing to actually work instead of being managed by one guy who just wants a star on his CV, or a group of psychotics who view this as an empire building exercise (by excluding all other empires, of course).
So, I'm curious.
Even though we have created a product that specifically allows for stalking without any serious safeguards.
Shame on you for taking advantage of it.
Come on Apple, you goofed. Own up to it, retire the product and think of a better version.
With all these multi-terabyte per second connections coming in from all over the world, what is the impact on the backend in Europe ?
100 TB here, 100TB there, pretty soon you've got petabytes of capacity at your doorstep.
Does the EU have a global backend measured in petabytes ?
I mean, legally, of course. I live in France. Let's say I use a VPN to connect to Switzerland, then another one to connect to India, then I do my business.
The EU has no right to check my Switzerland VPN, nor does India. India can well find out that there is a Swiss IP behind my India VPN connection, but the trail stops there unless India makes an official enquiry.
I mean, we're not in GoldenEye territory here where the Indian government is going to have the image of the world map and a red line going from India to Switzerland to France, are we ? They still have to do something in Switzerland to find out that there is another connection from France, right ? And that something is illegal if India doesn't show a warrant, right ?
I have never heard of an assumption that there is a single, global blockchain.
Every instance of funny money has its own blockchain, I think that's pretty obvious.
However, even if I do not know how blockchain works, I do know that a blockchain is a public ledger, emphasis on the word "public".
So, as far as I'm concerned, all the police need to do is hire competent IT experts in blockchain and they'll be able to trace the money and shut down illegal operations. Or at least point the finger at them.
Now, as far as attacking anything abroad, I do believe that that puts the US in the same boat as the malware criminals themselves. Of course, it is expedient, but it is also not justified when you call yourself a democracy.
On the other hand, the US is no longer a democracy so, win all around ?
Not without a lawsuit, that is.
Tying the installation of an OS to having a proprietary online account is veering straight into monopolistic behavior . . . again.
As usual Borkzilla is confusing itself with a black hole. The difference is, there's nothing a judge can do against a black hole.