Re: Nice article, thanks
Yes indeed. I have saved it for personal reference in case I need it.
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
There is nothing recent in Trump's mixed messaging.
He doesn't know how to make a clear message. For that, the Stable Genius would have to have an actual idea of what he was going to do.
The orange baboon is not intelligent enough for that.
And here I was thinking that major industrial sites are heavy investments that you don't go changing on a whim.
So, the EV market is saturated now. And you couldn't tell that four years ago ? Surely there were indicators, no ?
Now it's datacenter equipment. Granted, that market doesn't look like it'll be saturated any time soon, but I would like to point out that there is growing hostility for those energy-gobblers.
But, when the time comes, you obviously won't have problem stripping that down to build Gorilla glass or something.
Carry on !
the malware “integrates deeply into the authentication stack, survives system updates, and leaves almost no forensic traces. Combined with layered obfuscation and environment tampering, this makes it exceptionally hard to detect using traditional tools.”
Once again miscreants prove that they are not always stupid. The knowledge one must have to simply envision this kind of hack must be phenominal.
Or it was built by a state-sponsored group of very intelligent people.
In any case, I almost admire the work.
Now, Linus, your baby is under threat. What are you going to do about it ?
Let's not.
Those pseudo-AI agents never understand what it is you're trying to explain, because they can't. They respond to a fixed set of rules and if you don't fit, you end up literally cut off (the "agent" hangs up on you).
Back in 2019, I had my fiber connection installed (finally). I'd had it for one month when a passing tractor ripped it off the post - it wasn't broken, it still worked, but it was on the ground (living in the countryside has its drawbacks). The problem was, the connection still worked. I phoned the nearest police station to ask what I had to do, and the officer politely told me that it was a dangerous situation and that, if anyone got hurt, I was liable to end up responsible.
So I called my provider's support line. The automated agent drilled my down through choices 2, 1, 2, 4, and then decided to test my connection and hung up. I knew that wasn't going to work, so I waited for the test to finish and I called again. Same rigmarole. I was starting to get angry by that point when the phone rang and an actual human being from the support line asked me what the problem was. I still had to explain twice that no, my connection was fine, but the physical wire was on the street. When he finally got the message, he promised that I would have a ticket and he would see what he could do.
Three weeks later, nothing had been done. Then a passing motorcycle ripped the line in two. This time, no more connection. Call support again and, lo and behold, there is a real problem (for them, that is). Two days later, a new line was installed and, after explaining to the technician, he installed it a meter higher on the pole.
And that happened with actual humans answering the phone. I shudder to think how a pseudo-AI would handle the issue.
Incredible.
That's kind of like walking down the street with a giant "I'm a criminal" sign hanging over your head when you pass in front of the police station.
That said, they'd have to get off their donuts long enough to notice . . .
Unless you're black, of course, in which case they've have you on radar from 300 meters away.
Sure you do.
You used Open Source as a boost to your reputation. Now you've realized that you're not making money out of it.
You're not Red Hat.
So you stop your support. Fine. The problem is, you published the code. What you published ramins available and, if it's any good, someone will build something out of it and you will be left with your tears to dry.
Serves you right.
Open Source is a commitment, not an excuse, and certainly not a tool to get to an IPO faster.
Sorry, but Tom Clancy already wrote about that ages ago.
Say what you want about Clancy, but I'm pretty sure that no US embassy in Moscow would ever consider using Internet - going through a Russia-controlled provider - for anything like secure communication.
They'd use a US-controlled satellite if they wanted anything near confidentiality.
"a pre-planned six-month digital transformation project being accelerated and delivered in just three weeks "
Okay, so either your initial planning was shit, or the results you got are shit, but you cannot tell me that a 6-month project was properly done in 3 weeks.
If that is indeed the case, you need to review your planning procedures, because they are shit.
Diverse ? Neutral ?
As far as Government is concerned, if it can't be taxed, it's not well-governed.
That's why governments all over are trying to get of cash. Cash is the ultimate anonymous transaction and it cannot be taxed.
Ergo, it has to go.
I'm sure the grandchildren of those politicians are going to be forever grateful . . .
"the challenge of maintaining civil peer review norms in the social media era "
What the heck does "social" media have to do with peer review ?
Peer review is conducted on scientific sites, not social media.
At least, that's the way it should be and, if it isn't, then Science is going down the drain just like the rest of us - no need for Trump.
So, the little Nazi bitch thinks she made a point.
She did indeed, but not the one she thought she was making.
TSA is useless, overbearing and exceeds its authority with clockwork regularity. I have yet to see a report where the TSA caught any dangerous person. So what's the point ?
Apart from enabling some power-hungry psychopaths to have a job where they can legally indulge in their power fantasies.
"The benefits to millions of Americans for me will be enormous. We I will save time, we'll save make money, and most importantly, we'll save lives sell more merch."
TFTFY
Trump never does anything for anyone but himself. He has a great opportunity here to look good, but just wait to see how the usual suspects are going to be the ones benefitting the most.
NASA, ESA and the Russkies have more experience, is all.
Don't forget that NASA has a well-documented history of launch failures.
ESA is not without stains on its launch history either.
As for the Russians, it's difficult to tell because the Soviets only ever publicised their successes. However, given the rather recent string of failures since 2010, one must ask oneself if they are as good as you think they are.
Funny how, with any company that is valued in the billions, everything suddelny becomes "strategic".
There is no "give it a shot" investment. There's no "We're going to try this" investment.
No. It's all done with military precision - even though the military has the saying "no plan survives first contact with the enemy".
But it makes the suits (who've never seen a battlefield outside of films) feel more important, as if they've carefully considered all the variables and come to the best conclusion.
Yeah, sure.
My, have the mighty fallen.
Time for obituary, I guess :
Here lies Intel, what's left of it's reputation bleeding out as fast as the ink fills its books.
Let us not forget that Intel basically created and the PC market and the upgrade treadmill we all so joyously participated in for more than a decade and a half, with Microsoft reaping much of the rewards.
Alas, poor Intel, your very success attracted the competition that ended up eating your lunch.
I, for one, will remember you fondly, always.
Well duh. You're not the school teacher, now are you ?
Unfortunately for Redmond, you are journalists, and journalists have a tendancy to talk about things.
Publicly. And openly.
And that kind of mistake at this point in time is really not a good thing for Borkzilla.
But, realistically, what will it change ? Nothing. Redmond's history of failures could fill an encyclopedia, yet Microsoft is still a $3.8 trillion company, instead of being the run-from-a-garage failure it should be.
So, business as usual, then, eh ?
Well yeah. A billion+ person market is obviously mouth-watering from a revenue perspective.
What I find interesting is that he was born in Taiwan. You know, that country that China is gearing up to invade.
Does that make him some sort of a traitor to his birthplace ?
Of course, if China does invade and conquer Taiwan, then he will obviously be hailed as a visionary.
Pfff.
With over $3000 of hardware.
I'm pretty sure that the average PC user does not have a $3K+ hardware setup, and the number of individuals with an A100 graphics card in their rig can probably be counted on the fingers of one hand.
So this is a nice research paper, to be sure, and I salute the fact that it is proven that watermarking is basically obsolete.
Now come back to me when you have the figures on a GeForce RTX 50, which I figure is a bit more available to the common public.