"the process can be secure and run honestly"
Oh, sure it can be, but that does not guarantee security or honesty.
Not enough, guv'nor. Not enough.
19020 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That's why I do not install any Google products (Chrome, Earth, . .) on my home PC.
Install Google Earth and you'll find yourself with Chrome in short order, because Google has decided that you can't possibly want Google Earth without also wanting Chrome.
Your opinion ? Google doesn't give a flying one.
Remove Chrome ? You'll get it back whether you like it or not.
So, since I have to have GMail for my professional laptop, I use Chrome for accessing GMail (I'm already effed there) and I can install Google Earth as well because it's already too late.
Yep, that's about right. You can't move jobs oversees during 50 years then complain that nobody home knows how to make anything anymore.
Remember those 50 years of cost-cutting and employee trimming and executive bonuses ?
This is what they have cost you.
Enjoy.
(P.S.: can be applied to all "First World" countries)
Yep. Apple is notoriously bad for business networks and integration. Having a Windows network is bad enough, a hybrid Windows-Apple networkd must be exercise in frustration.
Apple shines, however, in creation and the arts in general, which are mostly solo endeavours.
So, you're saying that climate change isn't happening ?
Back in the 1980's, I clearly remember trudging to school in winter through 10-20cm of snow for weeks on end.
This winter, we got barely 1cm of snow and it lasted a day.
I think there's a change, there.
As well it should be for many reasons and for many other countries as well.
Eggs in the same basket and such.
Besides, competition is always good in the long run, so I think more companies making and selling CPUs, RAM, network equipment and computer platforms means more choice for everyone and less chance of global shortages generally speaking.
And, of course, there will be the fun of reading a whole new slew of NSA paranoia about how everything made in China phones home without any proof or pics to back it up.
During all the time nobody noticed, she was living large and paying zero taxes on a billion dollar revenue stream.
Then, when she got caught in the spotlight, presto, her access to taxable revenue disappears, so she won't be paying taxes either.
Poor husband, he's now going to be the sole earner for the household. Does he pay taxes in his position ?
Oh, and can we get a kaching! icon ?
Sorry Pichai, but I don't see how trudging to the office of a company that does not create or manipulate physical objects is improving my quality of life.
Now, I will admit that my only daughter is over 25 and working in Paris, so I don't have a gaggle of bawling, roudy offspring to distract me at my home office.
I also admit that I live in a house, not in an appartment surrounded by tenants who all think that the noise they make is quite acceptable.
Finally, I have a wife I love and who completely understands the words "I'm busy now".
Obviously, if one or more of these criteria is not met, I can understand that taking the daily commute to park oneself in an office might be more productive, but that is not my case.
I prefer the view of my front lawn, the bandwidth of my fiber connection and the absence of endless phone calls.
Agreed.
NSO stating that their software could not be used like that is pure cow manure.
At best, NSO could have said that all of their clients were aware that their software should not be used like that. That might have been acceptable, except that they specifically created software that hijacks mobile phones.
You don't do that when you're honest.
I went to check them out.
The most interesting thing I find is that there isn't a dollar quote anywhere to be seen.
You get a boatload of MSU ranges and corresponding AWLC percentage reductions (could somebody translate that into English ?), but after skimming over the blah blah I couldn't for the life of me tell you how much one would cost.
Of course, I'm sure a call to my nearest friendly IBM salesperson would guarantee a quote and a nice monthly charge in the blink of an eye.
The problem is not with voluntary data submission. If I choose to activate 2FA then I provide my phone number, that's my choice.
The problem is with all the tracking that done without consent. The fact that ad agencies are basically finding out who you are as soon as you connect, and they're following you all the way whether you like it or not.
I use Firefox with NoScript and uBlock Origin, or Brave. I like to think that I'm rather invisible to ad companies, until I actually make a purchase somewhere. I like to think that, but I'm not sure.
I would like to be sure.
That is a high claim.
The only thing that is secure by default is a safe hidden in a salt mine behind a camouflaged brick wall that nobody knows is there and everyone involved in making it happen has been brought to a pit in another country and shot.
And those that did the shooting were brought to a pit in another country and shot.
Then the person having orchestrated all this took a poison pill and died.
THAT is secure by default.
The rest is just guardrails surfing on hope.
Is this going to improve the various Telecom provider's incentive to update their customers' equipment ?
Because you're not using Android on your phone, you're using your provider's version of Android on your phone.
So, if this means that your provider is going to improve on getting Android updates out to its customers, I'm all for it.
Not really.
You're making the mistake of thinking that Democracy is a thing in Russia.
Democracy is a puppet, and Putin is the puppetmaster. Successful political figures running against Putin have a tendancy of disappearing, so voting for them is not really an option.
Putin leaves the cretins that have no chance to justify his rigging of the electoral landscape. You don't need to rig the votes if you've taken care of all serious claims to your power.
And don't forget that Putin has changed the Russian Constitution to basically ensure he can stay in power as long as he wants (aka until he dies).
So, the only real vote against Putin is a bullet to his brain. The rest is just theatre.
Well, in all honesty, a drone is going to have a spot of trouble finding (let alone taking down) a botnet with only its cameras.