Oracle is "trimming"
So, on the one hand, Oracle ups its licenses due to "economic concerns", and on the other it sheds $1 billion of empoyees.
Looks like management bonus is going to be insane this quarter.
Can we have a "big, fat dollar" icon ?
19424 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Indeed.
I downloaded the paper. This is an example of the job posting they created for Retail Sales Associate (page 35 of 59) :
"Our women’s clothing store in *City* is looking for a sales associate to help us out weekday afternoons.
We are pretty busy store and you must *Physical Requirement* . We are looking for someone with open
to working in retail, who *Communication Skill Requirement* . We need you to *Technology
Requirement*. So if this sounds like you, send us your resume and your earliest possible starting date
and we will be in touch"
Apart from the glaring spelling and writing mistakes, I stared at that for a few seconds until I understood that they used *Physical Requirement* (etc) as a variable, to be filled in at posting time, I guess.
So I went and looked for their list of physical requirements. On page 46, I found a table that seemed promising, but their "control" text was like : "You must be good at working without supervision".
What's ageist in that ?
Think of the children, eh ? How can you disagree with that, you monster ?
Yeah, well think of the journalists in a dictatorship. Think of my access to my bank account.
Sexual abuse, in any form and at any age, is abhorrent and I absolutely disapprove.
But if that means that some dictatorships will be able to find and kill journalists that are just doing their jobs, well I'm sorry, but the police need to up their game before I'll accept murder in exchange for child safety.
Not to mention that I seem to recall having read that actual cases of CSAM represent 0.2% of all reported cases.
The needs of the many is strong, point-to-point encryption. The needs of the few is better police work.
While the lion was hunting, the jackals kept their heads down. Now that the lion is gone, the jackals can feast.
So, if these new attempts (that seem interesting, viewed from my chair at least) succeed, does that mean that Intel will buy these companies out ?
Or will Intel just eat its humble pie in the corner and skulk ?
Well that's nice to hear. When is that going to trickle down to creating a business ?
I've heard that, if you want to create a business and you don't want to waste two years for the paperwork, some "encouragement" is welcome.
Is that really true, and if so, when is that going to change ?
I have trouble believing this anti-corruption stance when China openly pirates Western software without even a thought.
Nonetheless, it is a good thing to point them out.
However, the clincher is in the last paragraph :
"organizations using security AI and automation technologies had average data breach costs that were $3.05 million less than those that weren't"
No points for guessing who sells "security AI".
This whole report is just a sales pitch for IBM who is trying to scare customers into signing up for its products.
Zero trust only saves you a million. We can save you 3 million.
Sign here.
No. The FTC is sending you a chilling message.
Don't confuse yourself with the entire market. VR companies are entirely allowed to spring up and thrive. It's just that you are not going to be allowed to swallow all of them up.
"VR dedicated fitness apps and [..] VR fitness apps"
What is this waffling ? So, there are fitness apps, and there are dedicated fitness apps ?
I'm supposed to understand that there are fitness apps that also serve as calculators, or what ?
Look, I'm all for tying El Zuck's hands behind his back, but as far as I know, a fitness app is dedicated to fitness. This supposed distinction just serves the wordcount.
"exposing secrets in seconds" ?
At the beginning of the month you published an article which stated that "it should be possible to factor a 2,048-bit integer in an RSA cryptosystem in about eight hours, given a 20 million-qubit quantum computer"
Ok, so it will expose secrets in seconds, I agree.
28 800 of them.
Nice to hear.
What would be even nicer would be to read a technical forensic report that demonstrates Wordfly's beliefs are justified.
But I doubt they have the expertise to do that, or the money to hire an expert to do it, or the will to go through the expense.
WordFly is a mass-mailing system. Probably maintained by one guy, remotely.
He's not going to waste his time on this and he doesn't have the necessary experience to handle it. Plus he probably has no clue as to what needs to be done to avoid a repeat of this issue.
He'll just continue business as usual, and keep pocketing whatever he can bill.
Is this just opportunistic, or is the US judicial system finally losing its mind ?
If every murder is billed in the billions, who is going to pay ?
It seems clear to me that the only reason for this astronomical amount is because there is a big company to pin the blame on. Even if the company didn't do complete due diligence, a sentence in the billions seems a bit much to me.
And since when is an employee with an access card supposed to be deprived of access if they're not working ?
I'd like to see how much administrative hassle it would create if every single company had to suspend employee access for employees taking half a day off.
The HR department would certainly have to be doubled.
I have literally just come back from having lunch with one of my closest friends. He explained how he was happy to branch out into cybersecurity. He created a new company for that (he already has several that are functioning fine, so he has form in that), company which has secured partnerships with major anti-virus companies present in Europe. He told me how happy he was that this new creation already had about a quarter million euros in orders and upcoming sales.
The whole time I couldn't help thinking : my God what have you gotten yourself into ?
Sure, the money appears to be rolling in now, but what's going to happen to you six months down the line when Putin's dogs savage your clients' data through whatever means ?
I fear for him. Cybersecurity is a world of treason and backstabbing, and you never know where it'll come from.
“I think what is perhaps even more important, dare I say, than the device itself, is the software ecosystem that grows up in support of it”
No, really ? Ya think ?
Gosh. Somebody call Monkey Boy. The 80s has finally found someone who listened.
Agreed.
The cost of the least expensive element has doubled. So ?
You're going to be spending a lot more on all those people and machines who have to actually make it happen.
Sure, margins are going to be slightly tighter. The marketing guy might not get his full bonus. The client might find that there is a bit more to pay.
But it costs a hell of alot to more to dig a ten kilometer trench that it does to lay fiber at double the price of 3 bucks per kilometer.
Let's dial the hysteria down a bit, shall we ?
Yes, of course. Perfectly logical.
Because it is Oracle that is paying for the electricity that makes their clients' servers run, right ?
What ? No ? The clients have their servers hosted locally, or with a Cloud contract ?
So, basically, Oracle is just using an economic excuse to increase its revenues without any expenditure whatsoever ?
My, I would like to able to print money like that.
Well here's the choice :
1) You do not restrict copying technology. Tens of Youtube channels pop up to tell you how to perfectly copy a €50 bill. Thousands of miscreant idiots decide to give it a try, and tens of thousands of businesses are left out of pocket, plus tribunals are chock full of of the penny-pinching, freewheeling morons.
2) You control copying technology. Counterfeiters are forced to put a lot of work and not a small amount of technology into making plausible fakes, and then they are caught anyway after a while. One court case, problem solved.
I don't know about you, but I prefer option 2.