"declined to make public any [..] figures that would demonstrate their true performance level"
And why would China make figures public ?
Much better to keep everybody guessing.
19000 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Okay, I'll be the first to admit that networking is not always easy, especially when you're a vendor with an uncountable number of variations to handle.
Still, I stand by the idea that having a Quality Control team to test and wean out the at least some of the problems would go a long way to make these out-of-band patches rarer than they are.
"an internet platform cannot facilitate free speech for one demographic of its users while applying extensive political censorship against another demographic of its users"
Well, it seems that Borkzilla (et al) must make a choice : either it is for free speech, or it is for raking in the dough in oppressive dictatorships.
It's going to be interesting to see how this goes.
"A little more than half of the illicit proceeds, $15,111,453.84, has since been transferred from Swiss bank accounts to the US government"
So Uncle Sam gets a windfall, but the companies who paid for the non-existent ad views get what ? The satisfaction that that particular crew isn't scamming them any more ?
"speed up bag tracking, enable preemptive rerouting based on weather conditions"
Isn't that stuff they're already doing now ? With computers ? What exactly is the improvement AA is expecting after having spect weeks, if not months, handing their current system over to the single-point-of-failure platform that is Azure ?
And when Azure is down, will that mean that pre-emptive routing will not work, or will AA keep the existing system as an emergency backup (yeah, as if that would happen) ?
A terabyte of data every minute is a rather tall order to transmit via WiFi, even with 5G. Also, 60TB of data is one heck of stack of hard disks to put in the trunk (or boot), and driving for one hour is not all that uncommon. What is the data retention policy ?
So how is the car linked to the Azure server, and what is being sent/received ?
Also, when the learning phase is over, what kit is going to be left in the cars ?
No kidding.
The one good thing about COVID is that it has amply demonstrated that going to the office is not a requirement to being productive.
Oh sure, for the insecure managers who like counting heads, yes, having all your minions on hand must be very satisfying indeed, but unfortunately, your minions have worked off-site for almost two years and productivity has not gone down.
You're going to have to live with that fact now.
You don't want that.
Think about it for a minute : why are you authorizing remote access to a 3rd party in the first place ? Most likely, it is because they have the special proficiency you are lacking in your own workforce. That means they'll be coming in with near-admin level privilege. You want to be able to track that, and you don't want to give admin access to someone who clearly will never need it.
Create a specific user for that specific access, and log the interactions. That way, if something fishy happens, you either have proof of origin, or proof that you need to look somewhere else.
You might be right, but you should avoid thinking that Linux is impervious to infection. Privilege escalation exists, even in Linux world, and malware is capable of taking over a Linux box.
As usual, proceeding with caution is always a good thing.
Once you start forbidding some form of online expression, you start a game of whack-a-mole with all the derivatives.
Well Xi Ping, I'm happy that you give plenty of work for your endless pool of administrative busybodies to continue making the lives of Chinese citizens worse.
Way to go.
By the way, you will not suppress dissatisfaction by governmental decree. It will grow and, some day, it will come to bite you in the ass. If you were intelligent, you would let the people vent and listen to what they are venting about. It would give you pointers on what you need to improve.
You cannot dictate how people feel, and there's more of them than there is of you.
The author here has devoted a lot of time and work to produce this piece. I applaud the effort. I also appreciate the fact that the author has opened my eyes to the fact that, yes, basically almost everybody is implementing the Windows UI.
From a technical point of view, the Windows UI is a Good ThingTM. I remember reading about how Gates & Co really racked their brains over menu management, the homoginization of function keys and ease of use. Once upon a time, if you had access to Help, it could be via a function key, a combination of CTRL-<something>, or whatever else. Now, you just press F1, job done. That is good - except that now help is online, so if your connection is down, you're up shit creek without a paddle, and that is bad. Oh well.
But, concerning the efforts of volunteer developers, I'm sorry but nobody is forcing them to invest themselves. It's their choice, and I'm sure that they are dead set on improving some aspect or another of the user experience. The real issue is that (probably) none of them, or at least not many of them, have a lot of experience in alternative UIs, they just dive in with their idea and go for it.
It's their choice, there's nothing you can do about that. Yes, after reading this article I agree it's largely a waste of time, but it's their time to waste.
Why do the security regulations not apply to the most critical part of the entire banking infrastructure ?
I don't get it. Central banks should be the most paranoid institutions in existence. If a central banks gets infiltrated, there's no limit to the mayhem that can follow. So why are they exempt ?
My, are you a generous soul.
He's got money, and that's all he's got.
He's got no class, he's got no refinement, he's barely cultured and he's got no reserve. He's a mouthpiece on steroids and he's got all the money for all the steroids he wants.
There is absolutely nothing interesting in him, if not for the fact that he is almost single-handedly bringing Humanity back into space.
That is his only redeeming feature, and I will give him that.
Probably not.
I doubt that most Universities have the competent people on the payroll to effectively manage the complexities of such a specific environment. I have not had much dealings with Universities, but every time I have, it was always ad-hoc solutions implemented because they allowed things to work. Security ? The best case answer was "we're talking about reviewing things in the budget meetings, but for the moment, we don't have the money".
One down, plenty more to go.
I have worked at several large companies and organizations that have disabled or restricted Reply to All in Outlook.
There are very few cases where you actually need to reply to everyone.
Now, to be perfectly objective, Borkzilla is not reponsible for Reply to All. That lies at the feet of the people who invented email.
Freedom of speech hasn't prevented deadly violence from fermented views.
I'd wager that said fermentation has increased since the Internet - and smartphones - have become near-ubiquitous. Before the Internet, the wacko would stay in his corner of the bar, muttering to himself. Now, he's aware that there are other people that share his views, so he might become inclined to act on them.
How many school shootings were there in the 80's ? None.
Information is a double-edged sword, is what I'm saying.
The only reason companies have the same rights as a person is because some stupid judge way back when was bought and ruled in their favor and since, nobody has challenged that.
In France (and, I presume, much of Europe), companies do not have a person's rights. They don't need that to do business. There is no tax issue, companies have their income tax level set by law, period. A company has a manager, the law says that said manager needs to be declared in the company statutes. Everything a company can or needs to do is allowed by commercial law.
A company can run ads, a company does not need Free Speech.
Free Speech is for individuals, not corporations. I doubt any Founding Father would think differently.
Remember the caravan ?
When that orange-haired asshole was running for President, he repeatedly stated that there was a whole caravan of Mexicans (ie non-whites) on their way to the border and only he would build The Wall to stop them.
Well he got elected, a very small section of wall was built (and much donated money went into private pockets), and no caravan passed.
That is Republicans today for you.
A bunch of lying wankers.