Re: Sorry, Jim. You don't get two up-votes by posting duplicates.
Yeah, the El Reg comments features is a bit 19th century, and can't handle logging in and commenting on the same submit - or so it told me. Hence the dup.
192 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Mar 2008
"No one uses IIS these days"
I have the displeasure of maintaining a classic .ASP intranet application for a local business. Written in 2001/2002 "it does what they need" and therefore they resist all efforts to put something better in. And being .ASP, it sits under IIS.
I recently upgraded their kit to Windows Server 2025 and SQL 2022; oh what fun was in store getting that lot to work!!!
It's too early in the morning, but I'm wondering how many /12 blocks there are? e.g. if Huawei have been given a /12 then how many other orgs could be given a /12? Thinking back to when IBM etc had a /8 on IPv4.
I'm guessing 65520? Based on /12 being 1111111111110000
Or does it work differently?
Lame question, but it's 7-ish at the end of a long week so it's easier to ask the experts here than hurt my brain.
Tabs. Always tabs. It's very easy to see indentation differences when it's 1 tab, 2 tabs or 3 tabs. But when you use spaces, the intention to use 4 spaces, 8 spaces or 12 spaces invariably ends up being 3, 5, 9, 11, 13 etc.
Also, if you then want to add another IF condition within a while loop within another while loop, what's quicker - tab tab tab or space space space space space space space space space space space space?
Tabs all the way.
This isn't about storage any more, however code readability shouldn't suffer.
NB I'm assuming four spaces is the chosen number; any less and it's hard to work out what's what.
I used to have a static IP when I used ADSL. About 5 years ago I swapped to 4G (I can get 180Mb versus the 11Mb I get on ADSL). I thought I would badly miss that static. I didn’t.
Yes, it’s annoying to have to keep updating firewall rules on customer sites etc, but I didn’t miss it as much as I thought I would, CGNAT has worked out okay.
I’m due to get FTTP in three years, and will look forward to having a static again. But I’ll be happy to keep using NAT though, there’s nothing in IPv6 that’s a must-have for me, and I certainly don’t need the headaches that v6 would surely bring.
Our car is 8 years old so we're considering changing it. EV doesn't even enter the equation. We live in rural Scotland, with no charging infrastructure nearby, our house roof is unsuitable for panels due to dormers, and we tow both trailer (2200KG) and caravan (1800KG).
There's nothing on the market, EV wise, that can tow the above AND that we can afford.
Meanwhile, we can choose from hundreds of 2nd-hand diesels.
Don't get me wrong, getting away from oil is the right thing to do, but EV just isn't the solution, at least not yet.
I ended up in hospital last October having suffered endocarditis. It's life-threatening, and it resulted in me having an aortic heart valve replacement, 6 hours of surgery, over 200 IV antibiotics, and 30 days in hospital. My work colleagues bought me this as a gift for when I got home as they knew I was having three months off work and it would keep me occupied.
It was a bloody brilliant decision, and it kept me occupied for about three weeks; I could only manage about 30 minutes each day as I was totally knackered.
It now has pride of place on a cabinet behind our dining table.
Concorde was a princess, and whilst I never flew on her (my parents did) I remember seeing her several times, and also working in the buildings beside Heathrow 27R runway when she thundered past, and she was majestic. I now have my very own Concorde.
Still amazes me that MS allows a third-party driver to simply pull the system down and stop it getting back up, with no soft landing to allow remediation (aside from safe boot etc). Surely Windows should still start but with a huge warning that "service X couldn't start".
Windows is too fragile (no shit, Sherlock) such that it can be crippled by a third party component - although MS are pretty capable of doing that themselves.
Updated my two ESXi hosts this morning. They are standalone, so I normally do esxcli software profile update etc. However this resulted in MemoryError.
Found a blog by the legendary William Lam:
https://williamlam.com/2024/03/quick-tip-using-esxcli-to-upgrade-esxi-8-x-throws-memoryerror-or-got-no-data-from-process.html
Solution is to download the offlne bundle and store in repo, then update from there
esxcli software profile update -p ESXi-8.0U2b-23305546-standard -d /vmfs/volumes/NUC3Primary/ISO/VMware-ESXi-8.0U2b-23305546-depot.zip
Posting ths just in case this helps anyone else.
Agreed. Free DElivery was the only thing keeping me there, because Prime Video was rubbish. When the price jumped from £79 to £95 last year, that was the time I bailed and re-evaluated my purchases. After all, there's as much Chinese crap on Amazon as there is on ebay now, so I only buy from Amazon when I'm looking for reputable branded stuff, rather than quirky hard-to-find stuff that I could only ever find on Amazon.
"I'm not one of the El Reg readers affected by this"
I am, and the CAMC has been shambolic at handling this. The first we knew was the website going down (500), then they put up a holding page. It was ~6 days before they issued their first statement. They claimed they were told not to go public with an announcement, presumably in the hope that their 1M+ members (including myself) simply wouldn't notice.
In January. When most people have a new holiday year. And are starting to book holidays. Like we were trying to.
Shame. I run a couple of NUC8i5BEH units in the house, both running ESXi 8 and serving up a mixture of Windows DCs, Windows servers, Linux servers etc. All fun hobby stuff, nothing critical. But they just work, consume only 9 watts each, are silent, and have been bombproof. ANd thye take 64GB RAM, even though the spec says 32GB max. Whilst they are serving me well, at some point I'll need to renew them.
A good thing. Apple has had this insane obsession with making iPhones as thin as possible, and that has always led to rubbish daily battery life. Given the thickness of an iPhone battery, adding 2mm to the thickness of an iPhone would allow double battery life. If this new EU rule provides the push for Apple to completely rethink the battery approach, I am all for it.
Notes was horrid then and it's probably horrid now. We had it enforced on us around 1999 or so, and a staff revolt saw it replaced with Exchange/Outlook sometime around 2004 I think. I'm genuinely amazed t's even still alive, it should be flogged to the software-graveyard company Infor or simply buried and forgotten forever.
I have a couple of NUC8ieBEH units running in the house, both running VMWare and 8 or 9 VMs. They have been rock solid, set it and forget it hardware.
But they are NUC8, and they can handle 64GB RAM, which is what I have. Shame the new units announced here can also only handle 64GB. I get that they are positioned as smal desktop PCs, but they are great for home servers.
Most carriers support it; backbone providers etc. But most ISPs - in the UK at least - who provide the last mile. BT, Virgin and EE are three, and they probably cover 80% of the domestic endpoints. I know you asked about non-domestic but the reality is that most users and probably most SMEs use domestic-class connections.
It doesn't matter how you look at this, it's a pretty damned good bit of work by some very clever people.
Spend 10 years building something that's several metres tall, sit it on top of a "bomb waiting to happen", sling it into space, let it hurtle along at ~10 KM/s (gradually slowing) for around a million miles, and it arrives on time and is exactly where it's supposed to be. No options to retry it or "have another go", and no-one forgot to remove that last cable-tie.
Good design and proper planning really is worth the effort.
I'm also 49, I've worked in IT for 27 years (developer, networking, now a global CTO) and I agree. The IETF needs to fall on its sword and accept that it has failed.
Look at the failings of IPv4, look at the barriers to adoption of IPv6, and find some middle ground. IPv6 throws the baby out wit the bathwater.
Take NAT for example. Yes, people see it as a challenge. But it's great for having simple firewall rules, where the default is to disallow all inbound traffic.
Take addressing. Anyone in IT can easily remember IP addresses as they walk from one end of the office to the other; IPv6 address blocks are longer, with hex, and are just less memorable.
Take the concept of all devices having a public IP address. Maybe I don't want that?
I'm not posting this as an AC, and I'm happy to be shot down. But I don't think I'm wrong. If IPv6 brought enough advantages, the challenges would be overcome, people would find a way. But there are very few advantages at the "IT department level" and the "end user level", so there's simply no appetite for the effort.