Re: Bin there and suffered
That's not how you shape packets!
99 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Mar 2008
Far less misleading than previous articles, but still not quite there. To be fair, with the ridiculous app names and poorly worded comms, MS haven't made it easy.
What is going is the atrocious Remote Desktop Store app, which hasn't been available from the store in a while. Now support is going to end.
The Remote Desktop Client for Windows app (installed via MSI) will remain the preferred app for Windows users connecting to Windows 365 (!) or Azure Virtual Desktop for which Windows App is a long way from being ready.
Who the fuck is responsible for these names? They'll be first against the wall when the revolution comes. Standing next to whoever came up with "New Outlook".
User content isn't the real issue. The problem with TikTok is the amount of tracking and data slurping it does. In particular through the in-app browser, which is *potentially capable* of tracking keystrokes and sending that back to China. Follow a harmless link posted by another user, then unthinkingly use the same browser session to log in to something more important.
Using a second provider seems like a good idea, but I've seen cases where it turned out that somewhere along the way, both providers were using the same trench someone just cut through with a digger. Many providers will offer the option of diverse connections where they ensure that no part of the connection runs in the same physical path or on the same part of the backbone. At a price, obvs.
Searching for "rdp" will still find mstsc.exe. It will not find Remote Desktop, which is a completely different application. Which won't show up unless you have it installed (unlikely, unless you use AVD).
If you search for remote desktop and have Remote Desktop installed, then both will show up. Simples.
As I've said elsewhere, Remote Desktop is not RDP (mstsc.exe). It is another client for Azure Virtual Desktop (and other things depending on which version and what platform). And the article is incorrect, it has not become Windows App.
The Store version of Remote Desktop may be going. It is certainly the worst client for AVD by quite a margin. There is a version available for iOS, which handles RDP connections to Windows boxes. That may be getting replaced by Windows App, which is aiming to become the multi-platform, unifying client.
For the moment the Windows version of Windows App (confused yet?) is pretty useless as a client of AVD. It can't manage the simple task of displaying Remote Apps in alphabetical order. Or indeed, any discernible order.
MS put out a badly worded announcement that gave the impression that Windows App was replacing Remote Desktop (still not RDP), but have confirmed that is not the case. Remote Desktop client for Windows - to give the full name of the msi installed app - and its name will continue to sow confusion for the foreseeable.
Talk Talk's service may have improved, but there are still plenty of reasons to avoid them.
1. Their customer service is atrocious. This may be less of an issue if the service is more reliable and you don't have to deal with them as often, but chances are you'll have to at some point.
2. They gave me a router whose configuration included my account password (and therefor my email password) in plain text.
3. After their big breach, they insisted my credit card details hadn't been compromised. My provider replaced the card with a new number due to the attempted fraudulent activity detected in the immediate aftermath.
Regulators may have forced them to tighten up their security, but no heads rolled. If you believe they've changed their attitude to security, I've a bridge I'd like to sell you. Or a Samsung appliance.
MS haven't renamed anything. The confusingly-named Remote Desktop Client for Windows (Remote Desktop for short) - which is a client app for Azure Virtual desktop - is being phased out in favour of the ludicrously-badly-named Windows App.
Said Windows App is, as I told them six months ago, somewhat broken and definitely not ready for use in production. Still, it is not RDP (mstsc.exe); although that is the underlying protocol it uses.
I used to carry a pair of pliers with a notch melted into the cutting section as a reminder to always double (or triple) check I had isolated the correct circuit. I eventually replaced it with one that was more effective at cutting - and with better insulation - but only after the lesson was well hammered home.
"knowingly causes the transmission of a...command"
It's no stretch at all. Typing a command into a console session is exactly transmission of the command.
The legislation is not specific to malware. It explicitly includes the type of activity he engaged in. The basis of his attempted appeal was that the consent given by his employers to access their systems in the normal course of his duties extended to his acts of sabotage.
Common sense tells us that this is nonsense and his own admissions suggest that he understood that he did not have permission to do what he did.
After sorting out an issue (I forget what) for an Underwriter, I got treated to the opening day of the third Test v the Windies at the Oval. Lunch and beers (many) for the day provided by a bunch of brokers, who seemed a bit bemused when I told them I worked in IT.
It's a day I remember fondly, though I subsequently lost my souvenir England cricket hat in Rome airport. But that's another story.
They don't have to charge for those destinations, they choose to. All of them - apart from Monaco - are on Three's list of Feel At Home destinations. A service they offered long before the EU forced the other operators to follow suit.
A word of warning though to anyone travelling on a ferry or near a coast: neither Roam Like Home nor Feel At Home include the Maritime Network, which is quite expensive to use. Your phone may connect to it without warning. As I discovered the hard way.
One thing to note about installing patches individually rather than as part of the Windows Update bundle, is that Microsoft don't test them that way. Obviously, they also don't test them against every possible permutation of hardware and software, which is why you need to test the patches yourself.
The 25,000 Jains had grounds for complaint, but were hardly the voice that "[forced] a change of Bank of England industrial processes." Try considering the over 800,000 Hindus that consider cows sacred or the 2.7million Muslims that would require it to be Halal. Or if you don't care about people's religious sensibilities, how about the estimated 12% of the British population that are vegetarian or vegan?
It seems to be the norm in the US to go for maximum sentences or the most serious charge available to pressurise defendants to take a plea. This looks like a case of applying anti-hacking legislation to a case of criminal damage, presumably on the basis that it carries a higher tariff. It deserves to get knocked down for over-reach.
"If he is found to have acted without authorization, the question then becomes: does that make other sysadmins criminally liable for mistakes they might make unless they get explicit permission beforehand? That would create a hell of a problem."
Really? I thought getting permission in advance was called Change Control. I'd certainly be required to follow that process for any of the changes he made.
Zuck's actually not wrong about this. Sure, we group together for mutual defence; but that's an example of a thing we cannot achieve on our own. It's also not the only reason we come together and secondary in the long run to achieving economic benefit.
The rest is deluded, self-aggrandising bullshit.
That's to purchase a download only version. I'm not sure how you imagine you would be able to achieve that without internet access.
Windows 10 will function perfectly well without an internet connection - albeit with very limited utility, in this day and age. And by 'perfectly well', I mean with a dog's dinner of a Start menu.
In the past, people designed machines that reduced the amount of human labour required in a given process. Increased production created economic growth, bringing mode jobs. A high proportion of those losing jobs in one industry/workplace found new ones in another.
AI potentially doesn't just remove human labour from one process. Eventually, it is likely to remove the need for human labour at all. In the immediate term, we are already on the verge of being able to replace a large proportion of the workforce with machines that can do any job those humans are equipped to do, including any new ones that come with economic growth.
Some of those people will be able to retrain to do something that machines can't yet do, but the numbers will grow year on year that can't. If we don't find some way for those people to share in the new economy, then civil unrest is inevitable. The Terminators of the future may not serve a machine intelligence, but rather a ruling human elite.
Rather that this is intentional. There's a long-standing security flaw that allows Windows to pass authentication details to SMB shares, even over the internet. That should not happen and if the fix for this issue is to make the network your NAS is on a trusted one, then it looks like they are fixing the older flaw.
About time.