Punishing US companies
The EU regulations clearly do not "punish US companies" as long as those regulations apply to all countries, which they do.
129 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Mar 2008
"Government and military communications would be exempt from the plan."
I wonder why. If the backdoors are so safe, and those with nothing to hide have nothing to fear, then these rules should apply to everyone. It would be interesting to see how politicians' attitudes change, given the prospect of their own communications being scrutinised.
I still have a few old radio programmes on pre-recorded cassette, and one of the things I like is that I can press 'play' and the programme picks up exactly where it left off, even if the tape was previously in a different player. Is there any modern recording medium where every album remembers its place?
I agree that backwards compatibility has its uses. On my Linux Mint box, I just sync-ed my PalmPilot using an ancient copy of pilot-xfer. Hardly a common use-case, but it's nice that such things still work, and thus keep some old hardware usable that would otherwise end up as e-waste.
"It uses deep learning and foundation models trained on large datasets of human driving behaviour [...] This means that vehicles are designed to benefit from vast amounts of real and synthetic driving behaviour data to safely navigate complex environments..."
I bet they haven't trained it on any of the roads around here. In recent times I have had to deal with...
And those are just a few examples - something unique and unexpected seems to happen fairly often, and if the training data doesn't cover it, who knows what the AI would decide to do?
The microwave oven equivalent figures fail to take into account the fact that the magnetron in a microwave oven is only about 65% efficient, for example my 800W microwave has a rated input power of 1270W. So taking one of the examples from the article, 3.4MJ would correspond to 3.4e6/1270 = around 45 minutes, not an hour as stated. The point of the article still stands, of course—that AI uses a shocking amount of electricity to deliver very little value—but we might as well get the engineering right.
One problem with phones and 'smart' devices is that software/firmware updates often stop after a ludicrously short period of time, rendering older devices dangerously insecure. I just tried to update the firmware in my DSL router and discovered that the manufacturer (Zyxel) classes it as 'end-of-life' and will no longer provide updates. It's about 2½ years old.
The entire purpose of a door lock is security, so purchasers are likely to give at least some thought to how secure it is. If, on the other hand, I'm buying a smart lightbulb, or an audio streamer, or some other internet-connected appliance, I'm unlikely to even consider its level of cyber security unless it comes with some kind of official rating or warning label.
I'm not sure that follows. Just because the US Government doesn't practise what it preaches doesn't necessarily mean that what it preaches is wrong. The principle that certain software security vulnerabilities can easily be avoided and should not be tolerated applies regardless of who is saying it. Of course it would be better if the Government led by example, but the idea is still sound.
I look at FB through a browser with an ad blocker and the plugin from fbpurity.com installed, and that makes it usable - I see nothing but posts from friends and from groups that I follow. Which is how it should be. Occasionally I look at it on my phone (without the filters) and yes, it's then 99% BS.
"Together, the arrays will produce approximately 700 watts of electricity at Jupiter, or just enough to operate a small microwave oven."
The magnetrons in microwave ovens are only about 60% efficient, so a 700W microwave would consume around 1100W. This could be a problem for anyone on board the Europa Clipper who fancies a jacket potato.
The in-car conversation problem could easily be solved—with AI! If I was in charge of Uber, right now I'd be secretly recording all of the conversations going on in my vehicles, and using them to train a giant LLM so that it could hold optimal 'taxi driver' chats with passengers. "Do you know who I had in my cab the other day...?"
All modern processors optimised for themselves, with out of order execution, executing multiple instructions in parallel, elaborate branch prediction, all manner of caching, etc. I think the problem is one of diminishing returns - we've got so clever at all of this optimisation that further improvements require increasingly complex hardware and only give marginal benefits.
Where were the tests? Surely a system like Horizon would have had thousands and thousands of tests—unit tests, integration tests, directed tests, random tests, etc.—plus coverage analysis to ensure that everything was being tested, and a regression system to run the tests regularly. So Mr Jenkins wouldn't have to 'accept' that everything was working, he could just look at the most recent test results. Or am I being naïve?
I recently acquired a newish VW, and I'm already fed up with the amount of unnecessary technology in it, complete with very poorly-designed user interfaces, and so-called 'assistance' features that don't work properly and just end up being distracting, which is the last thing you want when you're driving. I don't want to think about how much worse the driving experience would be with an AI assistant trying to 'help'. It's tempting to say that I'll never buy another VW, but I fear that by the time I need another car, all manufacturers will have gone the same way.
Totally agree. We need WW2-scale sacrifices, from everyone. Unfortunately no government would ever consider this because it would be be political suicide. It's possible to get support for sacrifices on this scale if there's a really obvious and immediate threat, e.g. an evil army massing on the borders. But climate change is happening too gradually, and it looks a lot like the danger won't appear severe enough to justify the necessary drastic steps until it's too late to turn things around.
Ditto with my 41-year-old HP-11C. A beautifully-made thing, slightly battered but still working perfectly. And I remember back in the 80s/early 90s, there would be labs full of HP test gear that was totally solid and reliable. And expensive, admittedly (hence HP = "High Price") but you felt you were getting your money's worth. Those were the days!
Government departments clearly don't have the skills or resources to build their own IT systems, but what they do need is a few senior people who understand both the workflows and the technology well enough to ask the right questions, to define appropriate requirements, including for security, and to be able to monitor private sector development and deliverables to ensure those requirements are being met. I suspect that a lot of problems stem from the fact that nobody in the organisation has much of a clue about IT, so it's easy for suppliers to pull the wool over their eyes.