Re: Harder Rules Needed
Ah, but that's not in the original rules...
No-one in my house would get away with leaving the top of the stack in that state though!
69 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Mar 2008
All of which is fine, but Wileyfox haven't released the necessary binaries for anything except the Storm and Swift, so there are no Lineage OS images for all of the other phones. Perhaps if you spend your life building and tweaking ROM images for phones this isn't a problem, but for those of us who have more important things to do with our lives this means Lineage OS isn't currently an option for most.
The MEP you elected voted to allow Tusk and Juncker into their positions. You voted for an MEP to represent you in decisions in Brussels, as you vote for an MP to do likewise in Westminster. You don't like your representative's decision? Elect a different MEP next time. This is how the system works at home as in the EU.
Four years of BJ government without the EU to keep him slightly sane is a frightening concept....
How much consideration of the evidence/justification is the Home Sec putting into deciding each request if he's getting four of these requests with a stack of supporting documentation every day of the year, given that he presumably has an awful lot of other stuff to do with his time...? Seems like a poor idea, even without starting to consider the lack of direct judicial oversight.
"The UK market has lagged behind other countries, using DVB-T/MPEG-2 for FreeView when the rest of Europe was implementing DVB-T/MPEG-4. Within two years, Germany will be switching over to DVB-T2 using HEVC, which makes much more efficient use of spectrum for 4K transmissions"
Completely nonsense. It's because we were right at the leading edge that DVB-T and MPEG-2 were implemented. To the best of my knowledge the only countries that launched with H.264 were those who were many years behind us. And we were one of the first adopters of DVB-T2. HEVC was barely even a concept at the point we implemented HD on DVB-T2 6 years ago, which is why we chose H.264.
While I'd agree that DAB hasn't taken off in the way that many would like it to have I'd still argue it's pretty popular. 20+ million sets is a significant number in a country of 60ish million people, and yes, I'm aware how that compares to the number of analogue sets.
Adding a DAB+ mux is a lovely idea to encourage take-up, but what broadcaster in their right mind would accept a (perhaps) 50% discount on their transmission bill for the reduced number of bits required, in return for reaching less than 15% of the audience they'd get on a DAB service?
Comparisons to Freeview aren't really like-for-like, since Freeview is a controlled service with mandated hardware standards so they have a stick (as well as the carrot of the the HD mux) to convince hardware manufacturers to introduce DVB-T2 support. DAB has no stick. Freeview also has a thriving market for cheap, functional STBs, so your telly's built-in receiver no longer supporting the latest standard just means you stick a new external box on. Not an option with a great many DAB receivers, which don't have any external inputs and will therefore become bin-fodder if you somehow manage to convince broadcasters to take up your DAB+ mux. A goodly number of these aren't 20 quid cheapies, but 100+ quid shiny things they were convinced to buy.
Exactly what happened to me, current-spec Marantz now with sub-standard streams and the Beeb saying they're even going to stop those at some point in the relatively near future. Thanks chaps.
And now Nigel wants a whole different set of receivers to be made obsolete. Not that I have any great love for the abomination that is DAB, but that's a lot of kit to be thrown in the bin and a very large number of grumpy people out of pocket after being forced to replace functioning boxes.
Frankly I'd settle for not being herded in cattle trucks before forcing them to introduce wifi. A journey on a Southern service along the south coast usually means being cooped up in an airless box with no toilets for an hour and a half. The trains in the arse-end of China are considerably more civilised...
True, it does require root, but only at the point of inserting the shim - root can be removed immediately afterwards. Similar functionality could easily be baked in, but seeing the mess Google made with AppOps I'd prefer it if they just lifted Xposed/Xprivacy and used that. Anyway, my point being that these researchers have been wasting their time suggesting something that already exists.
Indeed, but that's only because there's no consumer outlet for 4k except digital cinema right now so there's little point. Once there's a way to get that content to the home on onto people's shiny new 4k panels both the content and the post capability in 4k already exists. Hence the original comment about there being no 4k content not being entirely accurate.
Actually you'll find that most cinema productions that are digitally recorded with any kind of a budget are being shot in 4k these days, and as for the holdouts still using film, decent quality 35mm stock has small enough grain to justify scanning at 4k or higher (16mm less so). Pretty much all of the post-production suites in Soho are equipped for 4k and higher resolutions and film can be rescanned at higher resolutions than it was for the original releases to good effect, if a decent quality master is used. There's a move towards 4k for TV production too - the cost of 4k kit is plumetting.
And I think you'll find it was 3D that was the recent way of selling new TVs to idiots.
But if solar is the answer, then surely the way to do that is centralised, large-scale, high-efficiency with distribution, allowing individual peaks and troughs in demand to be absorbed. If it charges within a day and you don't use it for 3 days then you've wasted 67% of the generation potential because you don't have the batteries to store the energy. (Perhaps you should go for a drive, just to justify it). If you're only using it for small distances then it seems unlikely it'll pay back vs. getting someone else to generate the energy efficiently for you.
I really can't see how this wins vs. a plug-in?
(oh and for the school run, the answer is walking)
Look again. The cage the lamp's in can pivot, so when it gets up to speed the lamp is (almost) horizontal and the primary forces run from the top of the lamp to the bottom. There is still a lateral component of 1g, but this force is 3 times greater so it's more like having the lamp at 30 degrees or thereabouts. Cool anyway :)
Except when you end up having to read code that someone's peppered with tabs on someone else's machine where they haven't bothered to set up a proper editor or they really like 8 characters per tab and anything over a few levels of hierarchy means that the code's disappeared off the edge of the screen, nothing lines up and it's impossible to follow. Fixed spacing using spaces works universally, unless you're a freak who uses variable-pitch fonts....
Feckin' ada, is anyone really confused by metric vs. imperial? Really? Can't help but think we've got bigger problems to be considering than what unit I buy milk in (which is, anyway, always litres thanks to the laws passed more years ago than I care to remember, just not an integer number of litres). FFS just deal with it, leave it alone and go off and sort out the national debt or something...
You must be going into a different Best Buy in Southampton. All looked mightily overpriced to me, even compared to Currys/PC World down the road. And as for pushy staff, sorry, I got bored of being hassled and left. Presumably that's how you get your commission?
"I'm just aware of what "industry best practice" might be (as exemplified by $20 DSL modems with error counters as an architectural requirement)"
Erm, that'll be the wrong industry's best practice.
I suspect you'll find that the main reason for the quantity of low-level info presented by DSL modems relates to the amount of difficulty a very significant % of users have getting reliable high-speed connections. If you go out and ask your friends, assuming you have some, how many have link, latency, throughput or data loss problems with their broadband vs. their HDMI link from STB to TV, I think you'll understand why it would be a pointless exercise (and increase the cost to the end-user) to implement lots of low-level debug on every HDMI-equipped box.
If your kit's power supply isn't well enough designed to reject significant noise from the mains input then the chances are it's not going to have had much effort put into amp design either (or anything else for that matter) so buying a 1250 quid mains lead isn't going to make your day any better.
Similarly, if your 99p HDMI lead is causing dropouts (and any errors on audio or video will be hugely obvious), splash out on a 1.99 one with a little bit of copper between the connectors. That'll do. No, error correction is not a panacea. But if the 2b/10b, 4b/10b and 8b/10b coding on HDMI's not up to the job then you've either got a *really* badly made lead or some serious noise around. And lose the paranoia. No-one extracts error correction stats because the recovery is entirely automated and done at such a low level (i.e. not software) it would be annoying (not to mention pointless) to do. All anyone cares about is worky/no worky, not how hard the error correction's working.