Obligatory Dilbert
Posts by Chris Miller
3550 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Apr 2007
Page:
Bye bye, booth babes. IT security catwalk RSA nixes sexy outfits
Everything is insecure and will be forever says Cisco CTO
Layla enjoys a Sanskrit makeover: Clapton set to become one of several Gods
Dear departed Internet Explorer, how I will miss you ... NOT
Nesting falcons interrupt £200m Vodafone 4G mast upgrades
AUTOPILOT: Musk promises Tesla owners a HANDS-OFF hands-on
Another GDS cockup: Rural Payments Agency cans £154m IT system
Windows 10 build 10041: 99 bugs on the wall, fix a bug, add a feature, 114 bugs on the wall
Let's get patchin' now, everybody's watchin' how, baby fix Safari with me
Leaked Windows 10 build hints at peer-to-peer patching
Timeout, Time Lords: ICANN says there is only one kind of doctor
Blackberry touts UNCERTIFIED 'secure' slab in hunt for public sector biz
Swedish prosecutors finally agree to London interview for Assange™
Clinton defence of personal email server fails to placate critics
The voters hate Google. Heeeeyyyy... how about a 'Google Tax'?
Re: Too Simplistic
Actually, Amazon as a global entity has made hardly any profit since its inception. They have significant surpluses, but these are all invested back into the business (building server farms, warehouses, etc). So even if they were wholly and solely a UK operation, there'd be relatively little liability for Corporation Tax.
Yes our NAS boxen have a 0day, says Seagate: we'll fix it in May
Who said anything about waiting for years (apart from you)? Accessing a reasonably configured system over the Internet is indeed 'unlikely'. In the real world, we have this thing called prioritising - look it up, you might learn something and it may prevent you from becoming 'part of the problem' (when you grow up).
I've no idea what a 'typical' Seagate NAS customer looks like. It may well be that some of them are home brew systems used for storing torrents of old Star Trek episodes, for which enabling remote UPnP might be sensible. But for any commercial operation to expose their NAS directly to the Internet without disabling unnecessary services and the placement of an intervening DMZ (or at least a firewall) would be a bit, well, daft. That doesn't rule out the possibility of misconfiguration, of course.
Job cuts klaxon: SAP axes 2,200 staff, denies 'cost cutting' to blame
Massive gravitational lens flare unveils EINSTEIN CROSS SUPERNOVA
Gravitational lensing was first predicted by Einstein: the presence of enough mass, he reasoned, would bend light passing an object.
Not quite right. Newtonian physics predicts the bending of light in a gravitational field (the calculation is A-level standard, and was first performed in the 18th century - the fact that light may be massless doesn't matter because all objects with a given velocity and initial position, whose mass is small in comparison with the gravitating mass, follow essentially the same path). But General Relativity predicts a deviation twice as large, which is what Eddington famously measured.
UK spaceport, phase two: Now where do we PUT the bleeding thing?
International effort to wrangle t'internet from NSA fizzles out in chaos
UK ruling the realm?
I can see how the US has a disproportionate degree of influence over the running of the internet, what with ICANN, IANA etc, but I'm not so clear about the UK. Or did you just mean that GCHQ have made the second-greatest penetration of Internet services?
[Genuine question, probably caused by my ignorance.]
C'mon! Greece isn't really bust and it can pay its debts
I'm not sure what you understand by 'savage' transaction fees. My (personal, not business) bank charges a flat 2% and gives me market rates (which also contain a very small margin) - and I haven't shopped around for the best deal, because (like most people) holiday spending money isn't a big part of my total expenditure.
To be clear, I'm not claiming that there are no benefits to a currency union, just that they're vastly outweighed by the inevitable 'one size fits all' approach to economic policy - and the experience of the UK suggests the costs are relatively small in the overall scheme of things, though I'm sure there are some businesses for whom they're quite significant.
I don't think the benefits of currency union are as great as you make out. Sure, it's convenient when you go on holiday, but the fact that your UK credit card provider screws you when you withdraw euros at an ATM doesn't mean that the same level of screwing goes on if I'm in receipt of several million euros from a eurozone business deal. As evidence, the UK economy doesn't appear to be hamstrung by the costs of currency conversion (not even a rounding error).
As Tim points out, not joining the eurozone was probably the only good decision Gordon McMental took as Chancellor (certainly better than flogging off half our gold reserves at the very bottom of the market). Of course, he only adopted this position (like nearly all his positions) just to spite Tony, who was desperate to join.
Re: That's a lot of words...
It was partly a cultural thing. I've asked German friends why on earth they believed the numbers that the Greek government (aided by the Vampire Squid) produced in order to demonstrate that they met the criteria for entry into the eurozone. Their answer: "Of course we believed them, they were Official Government Statistics. Whereas what the Greeks thought (in their own minds) was: "These are our Official Government Statistics. And, if you don't like them, we have others."
W*nkers of the world unite to save the planet one jerk-off at a time
Inside GOV.UK: 'Chaos' and 'nightmare' as trendy Cabinet Office wrecked govt websites
@The Beeb
A few years back, the BBC went through a major 'rebranding' exercise on their home page, intended (I imagine) to make it more iPad-friendly. Previously, you could 'design' your own front page by removing items you weren't interested in (in my case: football, pop charts and children's programmes) and moving the ones that you were interested in to the top of the page. All this customisation was thrown into the bit bucket, severely pissing off regular users who had spent a fair bit of time getting 'their' page to look how they wanted, and were now being bombarded with irrelevant dross (a bit like the perpetual adverts now infesting BBC output).
The BBC offered (prior to the change) the opportunity to beta test - the public comments were overwhelmingly negative. They went ahead with the change anyway. Within a few days there were over 2,000 comments, at least 98% of them negative. Initially, the managers responsible responded, but without any indication that they were prepared to do anything. Shortly thereafter the comments were cleared, within a few days there were another 1,000+, nearly all negative. Some of us used Google to locate 'old' versions of the home page lurking around the BBC site - if they were linked on the comments, the pages were soon closed down.
There seem to be only three rules for senior managers at the Beeb: never explain; never apologise; and never, ever admit that you might in any way ever have been wrong about anything. I can see no reason why the GDS would be any different.
MELTDOWN: Samsung, Sony not-so-smart TVs go titsup for TWO days
Re: Why would you even fix this?
I think the problem (on Samsung anyway) is that the Smart TV is a walled garden - it displays a page (which I'm guessing comes from a Samsung web site) of icons that you can select using your remote (including iPlayer and YouTube, but not e.g. 4OD). So if you can't reach 'samsung.com', you're really dead in the water.
Now working again
My Samsung Blu-ray PVR is now back online - it was still broken last night, so something must have changed in the last few hours. Its DNS config points (as it has always done) to the local gateway (192.168.1.1), which some on other forums have claimed is a problem.
FWIW e1722.g.akamaiedge.net (= www.samsung.com) resolves (for me in the UK) to 184.24.107.225
BOFH in mugnificent return to Cash'n'Carrion
MP resigns as security committee chair amid 'cash-for-access' claims
Re: The Superman defence
If you or I were called out of the blue for what was effectively an interview for a highly lucrative job, I think we might take 30 seconds to Google this foreign company and its apparent representative that we'd never heard of. At which point "no results found" might start a few alarm bells ringing. But not for these two bozos! Even if they can't figure out how to turn on their iPads (provided by us), presumably they have access to people who can.
And yet they have both at one time been in charge of our foreign policy. Not exactly Viscount Palmerston material, are they?
Marconi: The West of England's very own Italian wireless pioneer
Microsoft to store deleted Exchange Online mails FOREVER
Shift-delete?
On 'real' Outlook, shift-delete actually deletes an item, as opposed to moving it to the "Deleted Items" folder (just as with files). I've no idea whether the same holds true if you're using web-based Outlook365, since I have a 10-foot bargepole under my desk with which I'm not prepared to touch it, but it reads as though you can set an option to keep deleted items only fro a set period of time - it's just that the default has been changed to 'keep forever'.
Superfish: Lenovo? More like Lolnono – until they get real on privacy
Re: Simple solution
Good points, Trevor. I wasn't really aiming at Lenovo with my comment, I think any manufacturer would do well to think about it as an option.
I really miss the good old days when life for PC guys offered simple no-brainers: you want a laptop? IBM; you want a desktop? Dell; you want a server? Compaq.
Simple solution
Offer a clean OS install without all the bloatware/spyware/crapware for - what? - an extra £20/£30/£50 (as has been pointed out, maybe Microsoft would be willing to subsidise it for Windows). Of course, I'd buy it, and so would Trevor and so would many of the ElReg audience, but I'd bet 99% of sales would be for the cheap version.
Be your own Big Brother: Covert home spy gadgetry
HAWKING ALERT: Leave planet Earth, find a new home. Stupid humans
Royal Mail's Colossus move gets ex-WREN's stamp of approval
El Reg chefs whip up Post-Pub Noshographic
Watch a hot, speeding space alien explode all over Earth's Beaver
Are you ready to ditch the switchboard and move to IP telephony?
First HSBC, now the ENTIRE PUBLIC SECTOR dodges tax
Two things
1. Since this is government departments getting their VAT wrong, isn't this essentially an internal transfer between HMRC and some other dept, there's no 'real' money involved (either plus or minus).
2. The article claims: "Money spent on off-the-shelf software, hardware and interim IT staff is not eligible for recovery." That's news to me - I've been recovering VAT on hardware and software, and charging it on my consultancy services (admittedly not as interim staff) for more than a decade - should I dob myself in? (Perhaps this means that it's only the case for government depts?)
Microsoft: Look at our cloudy privacy award. Isn't it so ... meaningful?
@Paul
If I'm talking bollocks (nice argument), you should easily be able to provide an example of such a service. I shan't be holding my breath,
Better still, set one up for yourself, since you're so clued up. You could piggy back on Amazon or whatever, so it needn't cost very much. Do come back and tell us all how it went.
Re: “If there is unauthorised access ... we’ll let you know about this,”
Damn, I was trying to keep my peerage a secret :)
You are, of course, free not to use cloud services if they transgress the boundaries of your personal privacy (though, increasingly, public services are moving to the cloud, even though that may not be obvious to their users). But, just as with mobile phone operators, hoping to see a commercial service that offers complete protection from lawful interception is wishing for the moon.
Re: “If there is unauthorised access ... we’ll let you know about this,”
Sorry Trevor, but no-one is going to offer a commercial service that makes it impossible for them to get at your data if so requested by lawful authority. If you're that sensitive about it, you can always encrypt it prior to uploading, but a commercial operation will look dubiously upon such practices - how can they know it's not your stash of kiddieporn and they won't find the Feds (or local equivalent) beating their door down?
It's not easy being Green. But WHY insist we knit our own ties?
@Tim99
I think the number usually quoted is 3-4 hours per day*, but, of course, this is 365 days a year, which isn't that far from a 35-hour week with a few weeks holiday. If their needs were similarly modest, I think many people could achieve a similar standard of living with just a part time job. Our problem is that we tend to get sucked into wanting more and more and working harder and harder to get it.
*Leaving plenty of 'free time', what there was/is to do with it is an entire 'nother question.