No one is worth a trillion dollars,
If (gigantic if) someone can raise the value of my shares by a factor of 5, I'd happily let them have 20% of the profit. That's all this is saying (apart from all the other caveats).
3589 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Apr 2007
You're right but it's not as simple as that. Lots of things on warships don't have to meet civilian safety standards, and access to cooling water is less of a critical issue for a submarine. Before they could be deployed across the countryside, either SMRs or nuclear safety regulations would need significant redesign.
Most people who can realistically operate with an EV - own drive for charging, wealthy (to afford the purchase) and not a "road warrior" - have already got one, to cash in on the tax and other incentives offered by government subsidies (money transfers from the poor to the rich, whodathunkit!). To the amazement of nobody at all, the bottom then drops out of the new EV market.
I'm old enough to remember griddle cars. 50 years ago, my brother and I (travelling round Scotland on a rail rover ticket) took breakfast on the Royal Highlander out of Inverness. Toasted bacon sandwiches and unlimited refills of toast and tea, while Aviemore and the Pass of Drumochter flowed past the windows - hard to beat. ISTR there were griddle cars on a few of the southern electrics from London, too,. BR dining cars weren't all curly sandwiches!
Trivially? If you're a member of the right 'club' (how many different EV charging brands are there?) and pay your dues. But if not, you can be on 70p a kWh (UK), which is broadly the same cost per mile as petrol. Unless you've got an 'off-peak' deal (and are therefore paying more for you 'peak' electricity), even home charging is unlikely to be ¼ the price of petrol.
The problem EV manufacturers face is that EV owners need to: be wealthy (they're still significantly more expensive than ICE equivalents); live in a house with a private drive (so they can charge at home); and not be a road-warrior (or you'll be spending a lot of time recharging remotely at a cost per mile hardly cheaper than petrol). And most people who satisfy these criteria already have an EV.
I live in a wealthy Home Counties village and there are more EVs than you can shake a stick at, with Teslas* on every other drive. But I don't know anyone who doesn't also have an ICE vehicle for when they need to do real driving.
* other EV manufacturers are available, allegedly
There may well be some businesses and organisations that could or should operate in the way you suggest, but for most ordinary folks and non-safety-critical organisations, following all of your suggestions would mean going out of business (I'd except "don't hold personal data you don't need to hold" - but that's a standard part of most data protection legislation in any case).
Once safe, cheap commercial air travel was developed, rail became hopeless for journeys much longer than 500 miles. I've taken 1,500 mile rail journeys in the US (because I'm a rail nerd) - it takes 2 or 3 days and the only passengers are tourists and those who refuse to travel by air (mainly Amish and similar). Even taking European high-speed trains, I've done London-Lyon-Barcelona in a day, but it was a very long day (over 11 hours for an average speed of ~90 mph) - I could have flown to LA in the same time (and probably cheaper, too).
Big US cities (NY, Boston, Chicago, even LA to an extent) have extensive, cheap, well-used commuter rail systems, but inter-city distances are just too great, except for the Bos-Wash corridor.
Note to editors: BART isn't a "light rail" system by most definitions, it's too fast and too heavy. It's a pretty standard commuter rail network with a weird track gauge (for odd reasons known only to the locals).
Causing any damage? Of course, land as soon as practicable is absolutely the correct course of action, but the press vibes are that the aircraft was about to fall from the sky, which is nonsense. To purse my analogy, your wing mirror cover coming off **might** land under your tyre, and then cause a blowout and a crash, but that doesn't of itself mean it's a major incident.
And what would have been your reaction (and that of the media) at the time, if the government had said: "Faced with a pandemic, we're procuring lots of PPE and other medical equipment, but we must go through all the necessary steps to prevent fraud, rigorous testing to ensure quality standards are met, getting three competitive tenders on each bid, validating DEI and anti-slavery policies of suppliers, etc, which will delay things by a few months."? Note that Starmer's Labour were supportive of all these purchases, except for demands for "harder and faster".
Exactly. The best way to improve a cuppa made with teabags is to pour it down the sink.
AIUI the original US thought was that, if you've 'stewed' your tea by leaving it too long (unlikely in the US, where I've never experienced water hotter than lukewarm), you can rescue it by adding a little salt to counteract the bitterness. But if I stew the tea, I just throw it away and make fresh, it's not as though a couple of teaspoons of tea will break the bank.
For the benefit of overseas readers - how to make a cuppa (it's not rocket science) - you will need:
A kettle; a teapot; some loose leaf tea (M&S Extra Strong for me); milk; cups or mugs for drinking from; sugar (no thanks, but optional).
1. Empty kettle and refill with sufficient fresh water to fill the teapot.
2. Bring to boil.
3. Fill the (empty) teapot.
4. Pour back into kettle and reboil.
5. Add a couple of teaspoons of tea to the teapot (mine's a 1l pot, if you're using a larger one scale up accordingly).
6. Pour on the **boiling** water, stir vigorously and leave for 6 minutes (timing can be adjusted for strength).
7. Add milk to the cups/mugs and pour through a strainer. Some will insist that milk must be added after the tea; I won't argue, but they're simply wrong :)
8. Enjoy!
Anyone involved in bidding for government work will know the answer - it involves long, complex RFIs demanding lots of meaningless tick-box qualifications, statements about DEI practices, etc. so that only large players can afford to bid, and smaller (often cheaper and more competent) organisations are effectively blocked. In the end, it's too often a choice between Fujitsu or Capita. And this applies far more widely than just IT projects.
In southern US (and southern Europe), PV can be useful, because there are more sunny days and peak output coincides with peak demand (for aircon). At temperate latitudes (northern US and northern Europe), PV panels will struggle over their useful life to repay the energy consumed during their manufacture - which, given they're mostly made in China, using energy derived from burning coal, means they do very little to reduce global CO2 emissions; though they're great for subsidy harvesting, and transferring money from the relatively poor to the relatively wealthy.