Re: But...
I was a responding to the poster that suggest he was up for life.
3831 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Apr 2007
A few things to get straight mate. In the US the prosecutor has no say so in what prison you go to. Secondly super max is only for violent offenders or people who commit repeat criminal offense behind bars. Thirdly isolation is for punishment when you screw up in prison the prosecutor can not ask for it. Lastly I don;t know why people in here seem to be caught up with this idea that every one will get these supper long prison sentence . First off the crime is accused of caps at 20 years. It's very rare for a first time offender to get the max for a non violent crime.,
Because Intel gave out rebates to those that used Intel only. At one point Intel was giving Dell close to a billion dollars a year i rebates. When AMD offered to give HP 1 million free CPUs HP turned it down because the amount of money they would lose from intel was to great. Things have started to change in the last 5 years though.
In order for MS to be like Disney this it they would had to do.
1.) wait till the copy for ext to expire.
2.)convince courts around the world that they now own all the rights to ext directives and ignore prior art.
3.) extend copy right to 100 years.
This what Disney did with fair tails. They plucked them from public domain.
If it was pre-finalised divorce, isn't it all assumed to be shared property?
Depends. In most sates there is a term called legally separated. At that point stuff that it's in your possession tends to be yours and any new thing you buy is not community property . Legally separate comes before divorce hearing.
Yes he does. There was an article were he was bitching about having to pay US income tax after selling a house in the UK
"Boris Johnson is American already, having been born in New York. So that doesn't count."
I was hoping no one would of noticed that :), But I think he did give up his citizenship after having to pay a hefty US income tax bill.
You know information over load is common tactic lawyers use here in the US You sue a company for a defective item. Lets say a defective fuel system. SO you request that they give you the designs of the fuel system and any related notes. The company gives you every thing possible related to the fuel system including past designs designs that were ruled out notes from a foreign subsidiary in a foreign language all in the hopes to flood you with so much paper work you will never find what you are looking for in time.
They need to be worried about information overload and the abilty to discern from a harmless nutter from some that can actually do harm. Worse yet some that can fly under the radar and appear to be normal.