Re: It seems to be good for generating porn
You're asking for a friend I presume?
207 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Feb 2008
>>>
That this innovation isn’t happening isn’t because corporates are using Agile, it’s because the sort of innovation that’s big enough to be noticed is not the sort of innovation that a lot of tech corporates want.
<<<
I'm sure we've all noticed this at one point or another - lots of talk about innovation, but it's pretty scary and maybe not appropriate anyway for much of what is being done in any case. The most important thing is that stuff works.
Not that I've anything against innovation - great fun when you get a chance - but the word itself is becoming/has become part of the corporate BS vocabulary.
Here in Sweden there has been some discussion around why the bloke did a runner in the first place, i.e. to skip out on what looked to be a pretty water-tight rape conviction.
Lots of fawning and sighing about him getting his 'freedom' back though from various sections of the news media, including (or perhaps, particularly) from sections that are very critical of a well known orange haired rapist.
To me both blokes seem to be pretty sleazy, but that's just my opinion.
And in Sweden. Also here the payment system connects though a cell phone number and is a simple way of dealing with both smaller and larger payments directly from your bank account. Scan the QR and approve the payment in the smartphone app. Used by small and by large merchants as well as for private money transfers.
The app is linked to the main local MFA solution (probably others as well), which can be set up to use fingerprint authentication, a PIN or both.
Scammers get around the system by persuading people to sign off transactions that they're not fully aware of, but that's not very different from giving someone a signed blank cheque.
Dunno about Americanisation - 'meter' is the Germanic spelling while 'metre' is likely the Latin (aka froggy) spelling. While one of my distant ancestors was born in France (Alsace to be exact, though back then it was called Elsaß and was patriotically Teutonic), I regard myself as more Anglo-Saxon than French.
So I use 'meter' to refer to the unit of measurement - YMMV.
I reckon we can forget the Suez canal as a reliable transport route from now on - the Ukrainians have shown the world what can be done with seagoing drones that can carry a payload of hundreds of kg, so anybody capable of building and launching such things could pretty much shut down the Red Sea for shipping. The Iranians for example.
Hydropower dam collapse has killed more people than nuclear accidents so anything you say about the risks of nuclear power might also be said of hydro.
The Banqiao Dam failure of 1975 is probably responsible for most such deaths and like Chernobyl, it was poorly maintained Soviet Union technology. But anything that isn't maintained properly works until it doesn't so good the blokes got caught.
I don't remember the name of the bloke, but it was in a context about what construed harassment and I do remember his advice that was quoted in one of the Aussie morning papers.
The advice was "Don't be a dickhead".
It's not really something that can be defined by the likes an RFC, but like an old definition of pornography you know it when you see it.
Making Twitter a dickhead-free zone is probably difficult while Musk is in charge, but it is an attractive thought.
On the other hand if the EU ever managed to get around to getting something done, there'd be a lot of screaming and frothing of the mouth about abuse of power etc. Which might even be justified.
The current setup might not look like much, but it creates unnecessary work and expense for the companies in question and flags up a risk that their insurance companies probably regard as a justification for increasing the cost of the premiums paid etc.
So the process is the punishment, as it were, and I think I prefer this to the more direct method as that could easily get out of hand if the bureaucrats get a taste for it.
But in a year or two when it's time to renegotiate your Cloud provider contracts, would you rather be locked in or be able to migrate your infrastructure to a rival provider at a reasonable cost?
Given the amount of money one provider is throwing at a project I'm currently working with to 'enable' migration, marketing and sales have very deep pockets; that money has to come from somewhere and I'm guessing that locked in customers are at least part of the answer.
A lot can be achieved without having to use provider specific solutions - Kubernetes anyone? - and you're probably going to end up with a simpler solution as well.
I'm beginning to wonder if we've reached peak China and their leaders getting increasingly bolshy (for want of a better word) as they find themselves staring into the abyss.
Demographically China already has some serious issues - even a few years ago there were reports of labour shortages - and Covid has made much of the old developed world realise that they can no longer rely on China as a manufacturing site so have started to diversify. The current leader of the China seems dead set on rolling back the changes that Deng Xiaoping made and that enabled the country to become what it is today.
I think it is a real pity - a decade and a half or so ago I worked with quite a few Chinese colleagues as the company I was working for at the time had an office in Beijing and I found them to be open, honest and hardworking so I had high hopes for China.
Whatever happens, it will take a while to happen as China is so big, but I hope for the sake of people there that things do sort themselves out.
US based Cloud services with local data centers are already off-limits for some organisations I've worked with here in Sweden. The usual story is that their technical people start a discussion with us about hosting on Microsoft/Amazon/Google, but it stops once their legal people get involved. It would be interesting to know if anybody else within the EU (or any where else for that matter) has seen this pattern.
It does mean that there are opportunities for local cloud hosting services, though I guess pricing is an issue. One local hosting service I know of uses OpenStack, so they do exist and a customer doing medical research I worked with a couple of years ago hosted part of their operations with that local service for legal reasons.
I remember him; a bit 1980s for my taste - I had my fill of that with the university economics papers I took in the mid-80s - but interesting to read his columns even so.
His website is also interesting, even if it's too much 'stream of consciousness' for my tastes and hard work to read. YMMV.
> The chinese like to play the long game
This doesn't look like the long game to me - the long game is the Chinese stopping wasting resources being aggressive and instead building up their economy so that the Taiwanese decide they'd quite like to be part of China after all. To get there the Chinese will need to be a little less up-tight about freedom as well, so that issue will solve itself along the way.
The Chinese in the current scenario are acting like a short-term thinking Western country rather than a country with a multiple thousand year history.
Bees live with these already; we had beehives on the farm I where grew up and we used to find the grubs in old combs we'd stored in the shed. Occasionally we'd see grubs in the beehives, but only in odd corners where the bees weren't.
Wild bees living in hollow tree trunks would likely be a better environment for wax worms as bits of old comb and dead bees etc would likely build up below the colony.
Strictly speaking, the Finns were colonised first by the Swedes and later by the Russians after the 1809 war. Though the Russian colonisation didn't get heavy handed until a bit later on. Then of course there was the Winter War 1939 - 1940, when the Soviets basically tried to do to Finland what the Russians are trying to do to the Ukraine.
So the Finns have been on the receiving end of colonisation rather than the other way round and have more reason than most to be suspicious of Russian motives.
I hate office landscapes - always a lot of noise and movement - never enough rooms for meetings/calls so people take calls at the next work station.
Good enough reason to start looking for a new employer if my current situation of mostly working from home ever changes.
Workshops and some meetings can be taken in the office, I don't have any issues with that, but I prefer to leave office space for the poor sods who don't have room for a proper home office.
The Register spoke to Richard Dinan, CEO of Pulsar Fusion, who told us "2040 sounds about right" once one considers the infrastructure and sign-offs needed to build a power station.
"That's what's taking the time," he said, "it's not the fusion."
I'm not sure if this is a good thing or not, but it does suggest we're closing in on fusion reaching the business-as-usual state and getting bogged down the same way as other infrastructure changes do.
I agree also - I first came to my current country of residence when I was 23 and had the good fortune to work in an environment where few spoke English. After a year I was fully fluent and after a couple more people started wondering which part of the country I came from.
Learning languages at school felt pointless and a waste of time. A good comparison would be learning a new IT skill by taking a course and getting a certification as opposed to learning by doing.
Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries.
I am a little disturbed to see that even after a few hours there are no references to this quote, given the subject matter and M. Dabbs' country of residence - or perhaps I am just getting old.
There'd likely have been a lot of more posturing here in Sweden from all sides (there was plenty of it as it was), but I never saw anything that made me think he'd have been handed over to the US. Except in the minds of various paranoid individuals, but that's nothing new.
Personally I think that doing a runner like that was an admission of guilt by him, but it did save the Swedish government quite a bit of money and by extension me as a local taxpayer.
Nothing ever designed by a committee of any sort is going to be 100% fit for purpose so it doesn't matter if the committee consists of scientists, bureaucrats, politicians, tribal witch doctors or marketing managers. The important thing is that something needs to be done about the tech giants so that the next generation of them can grow up and take over.
If Microsoft had manged to buy Google and IBM Facebook, the online world would have been a different place today.
Don't know if regulating content is the right way to do it though.
Regardless of which side of the discussion you are on, the pommie negotiators have been a bit useless; they seem to have seen themselves as a combination of James Bond and Hercules Hurricane, but in reality they been more like Derek Trotter and George Mainwaring.
And I don't mean that in a bad way either - both Del Boy and Captain Mainwaring are sympathetic characters, just a bit out of their depth.
Every time I see something like this I think these people lack imagination; instead of using data that creates a monster like this, why not use data that results in something a little more entertaining. Feed it the transcripts from the all Python TV series for example. I guess there must be some reason (copyright?) for this not being done, but there must be something in the public domain that could be used.
What I'd really like to see would be what happens if Roger Irrelevant is used as the example.
One of my old cats liked to chew on network cables as well as the occasional USB charging cable. Her teeth were OK as she happily ate kibbles, so I guess she just liked the taste of them. Never any marks on power cables though so maybe she'd learnt to leave them alone with her previous owner.
Mentioned this to the chap behind the counter when I was stocking up on unchewed cables one day and he said 'yeah, you're not the first customer to say that'.
I remember one of my history teachers pointing out that another major reason for the US dominating the sharp end of NATO was that they didn't want Europe and Germany in particular to be able to rival the US in military capabilities. Interesting therefore that MAGA seems to include encouraging the EU to become a military power.
Hmm, would be interesting to know how they got that past the PCIDSS auditors. A few years ago you could wave a bit of paper at them with a list of possible mitigations on it, but in recent projects I've been involved in the correct answer to the auditors saying 'jump' has been 'how high?'.