So, data theft
Seems to be sop for AI.
152 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Feb 2008
In this age of Democrat supermajority, they can pass any law they like, no matter how insane. And they keep doing it. It almost seems like a contest, where they see if they can do something even more insane than the last.
Noting they're currently putting a tax on everyone in the state to help with the cost of the Malibu and pacific palisades fires. Not that a penny will ever go to actually do anything.
It seems to be that the rust rewrites going on in the Linux world seem to have one thing in common... that the coders are reaching for the "unsafe" option.
So, what to make of that? Is some stuff just not doable in a "safe" style? Or is it more to do with the coder?
Given the size of the Windows codebase,, well... are they going to take a lot of time and effort to recreate a different mess?
In terms of AI "learning." As in, it seems to need to take copies of as much internal data as possible. Which pretty much means that your data has left the building.
That and if some evil bugger manages to hack AI then they get a gigantic data playroom of data, yours and dat from everyone else who uses that AI. And it gets scarier if AI's are actually sharing data.
To me the Chess and Go AI that could beat the elite showed what AI could do... if you had a very small (limited) knowledge base to learn from and used the feedback of human experts to train it. But that's not what the pimped version of AI is. It appears more and more to present as the result of around a million psychopaths googling
I think they have the legal obligation to provide the CE source upon request, at the point of last release. Noting here, that the prices they are asking for their commercial edition is pretty much cost prohibitive for small to medium size businesses. I am just bloody lucky I kept a copy of the CE installers around.