Re: Obvious?
"the urgent forced surrender of the DNS domain would be entirely justified."
Because this is a false flag? Think about it.
17 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Feb 2008
"In 2024, China has the highest volume of new homes and abysmal losses in the construction industry."
You don't know what you are talking about. Unlike the Western world, the government actually proceeded in clamping down on housing speculation by *not* bailing out promoters and speculators. Do you know that lots of those speculators were from the west? That's why they are so pissed and their media spread FUD in the hope to exacerbate the situation so that the Chinese government steps in to save everything. But that didn't happen. You can use whatever FUD qualifiers you want but it doesn't change the fact that it's notthing like the 2008/09 collapse in the US.
As for profit, it means nothing if that profit isn't reinvested properly (*cough* share buyback *cough*). Also, high profits often means the consumer got fleeced and lack of competition.
It “works” because we’ve been so accustomed to it that we no longer see its shortcomings. We work around them, we endure them, we get used to them. It “works” but it could be better. For instance, the Start Menu is a ridiculously inefficient construct for listing apps, Due to its inefficient use of screen real estate, you often have to drill down and scroll through menus and lists to find an item. That is silly.
Believing that it’s darwinian is also silly. The elephant in the room that destroys this belief is user inertia (resistance to change, reluctance to leave familiarity and habit). It’s no coincidence that so many Linux desktops look like Windows. They need to, to have the best chance to attract (mostly Windows) users.
Physical keyboard on phones worked too, why change to touchscreen?
"The great collapse is coming. People have no clue how vital IT is to the modern world and are literally cutting their own throats."
The Great Collapse. The incessant drive to reduce cost and cut corners. The constant struggle of technical workers against tech-illiterate managers/bean counters. Not to mention the sheer lack of skilled workers (how many of them are working on "useless" software like Snapchat, TikTok, etc?). It's gonna eventually hit a wall but not until vital aspects of life are "computerized", e.g. monies become totally virtual, connected vehicles, planes, homes, etc.
I bet the ones who had the bright idea are connected, across a few degrees of separation, to the to-be-hired firm. "I scratch your back, you scratch mine."
Accenture, IBM, CGI -- just to name a few -- they are of the same species of predator preying on tech-illiterate clients. IBM with the Phoenix pay system for the Canadian government. CGI with HealthCare.gov. Very lucrative business.
>Then you are doing it wrong (or you have the wrong people as developers).
The same could be said if you can’t write code by yourself and then meet witth your team members to review and discuss about it.
But “doing it wrong” or “having the wrong people” are fake arguments because you are basically asking for an ideal situation, e.g. that a team have the same kind of people as developers.
So damn true. Or: perpetually being not responsable for the code you write.
It’s sign of the times, now they have kids in elementary school all sit together around a large table to learn as a group. Independent learning and thinking (solo flight of thought), is going to be a skill of the past soon.
JavaScript is more object-oriented than Java. Java is "class oriented" -- the inheritance hierarchy is a relationship between classes. In Javascript, relationships are all about links between objects. You create objects out of thin air and can link them other objects through a prototype chain. In Java, you create objects using a class as a blueprint. Javascript's "class" is simply syntax sugar to make look more familiar to the horde of programmers who were taught classical inheritance.
"could or would China survive without Cisco?"
Wow. Big display of ignorance there.
Why do you think the US is going after Huawei? Because it's going to, if not already, replace Cisco. Huawei is "the largest telecommunications equipment maker in the world" (wikipedia). Cisco has become overrated. It's no longer 1990. Lots of companies can do what Cisco does, and often, they do it better than Cisco.
RE: "Social networks = Bars" by Anonymous Coward. Good one, pal.
About Facebook, it has become a popularity contest where people seem to compete in adding the most "friends" and the most junk on their profile as possible. Sooner or later, the whole site will be such a big mess that users who wanted to do *useful* social communication and networking become so annoyed that they'll go somewhere else.