@ DRM or copyright - pick one
Thanks for the great choice: since copyright for digital media is only respected by the willing, I suppose DRM is left.
Or maybe there other alternatives.
579 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Apr 2006
This looks more like a flexible keyboard than an embedded netbook. I can't imagine wanting to use an upright itouch-sized screen as a display except in emergencies.
The touch screen could prove useful for music programmes, which often enough need a special keyboard to reach the function keys- one reason less for musicians to be impoverished.
If the Asus quality weren't up to it, Logitech will bring out their version soon enough.
A can think of a couple of cheap* ways HMG could sucessfully implement this:
- licence the German system
- use the back door(s) in Windows 7
I suspect the timing is ill-defined because such stuff is still illegal in a few countries. Europe is waiting till the last major one (US?) has set up a legal patch.
*Both could be had for the price of an internet browser and a back-scratch IOU.
What gets me in so many of the cases is that the way to correct errors is such a labyrinth.
Please add a user requirement to the national database "all data pertaining to users may be corrected online by them".
This may bring new difficulties - why are my police convictions set to 9999? - but maybe a decentralised approach offers more hope than than a centralised one.
You have a fine memory, no need to keep the papers. And you are right, 'one user one CPU' is more exact, says http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Pournelle.
That said, you are describing fast switching rather than multiuser multitasking, and a system - a nebulous idea in itself - today would surely bundle in the printing and viruses(cookies, codecs) as well as processing and I/O. Data and hardware sharing are the important drivers for platforms, as opposed to each his own spreadsheet or system.
'Dogma' and 'laws' make things sound over-certain, too - my pointing was away from the direction of small machines doing one thing, that doesn't fit well with larger businesses - I had modern database servers in mind as I wrote.
The opposite concept would be "one application, one system", which is pretty much a non-starter for larger companies, though it used to be PC dogma (Pournelle's law).
I was once involved with a cross-platform product numbering application, jump-started after a merger. For speed, the original data was set up on a database, the decision which ERP and which groupware to use came later. As different parts sought an interface, we observed that they were connecting to existing copies: the replicate of the database, the ERP copy and the groupware copy, which made them de facto platforms. Smaller customers sometimes made their own copy in a corner of their application.
It is rare to watch platforms grow from seed. but pruning to fit is pretty common.
No remeniscence icon, I'll make do with a smiley - it was a fun project.
I'm not an immunologist, but have chased up the question where the allergies come from, especially as they seem so much more prevalent in USA than Europe. Americans also eat more peanuts than Europeans, and peanuts are the largest source of fatal allergic reaction. Peanut allergies are becoming more prevalent.
Some chemicals are thought to prime allergic reactions: proof is hard to come by, the chemical classes are unclear. Such chemicals wouldn't have to be sprayed on the peanuts, just absorbed somewhere earlier. As mentioned, cleanliness is also considered a source of allergy, an immune overreaction, because the body's defences are short of practice, e.g. children growing up on a farm have less allergies than city children. The chemicals in the cleaners themselves are not under suspicion.
One likely source of peanut allergies is a toxin from a mould is found in small amounts in peanuts after storage. The same mould grows on many other stored crops, though, so something in the peanut must be particularly effective at triggering the immune reaction.
As pointed out by some of the thoughtful press, one way to protect from random identity capture would be to take everyone's DNA. This decision would be political, and has pros as well as cons.
The administrative responsibility to keep the data correct, current and complete lies with the owners (the police?). Since they don't allow changes, corrections, complaints or even viewing rights, they do an abominable job at present..That is not a good basis for arguing to globalise.
Is the pause to see if they are able to implement suitable policies to manage correction processes?
I agree that 99.9% is a good figure.
The level of complaints corrected is of the same order as those which were refused. That could mean that crooks want relief, but could equally mean that the rules to prove innocence are tricky - conclusion open.
The last case is the % of uncontested wrong data, which is not mentioned. It could be estimated by following up on a sample of data. If this had a larger error rate than all contested data, that would not be such good news in the context of broader new usage.
Keep testing for usage (applies to all databases).
As the earlier linked article says, the Coop FS IT department was passed on to Steria in 2007, a fairly common occurence.
Wasn't there a requirement at that time for ex-employees be maintained at equivalent salary for a few years? If not, Co-Op FS didn't do a great job at handover time.
It would be possible to have 100% coverage, and still not solve any crimes. The reduced efficacy by increasing coverage suggests that there are other agendas.
As nearly one quarter of the records are from persons aged 10 - 17, capturing young person's DNA records is likely to be one of these.
I would have imagined it is used much less for minors, as voluntary consent - the basis for DNA testing - probably also should require parental approval. Can anyone who knows explain?
"...last nail in the coffin of the postwar European welfare state" - excuse me If I and other Europeans don't find this a good idea.
Isn't a welfare state potentially less energy intensive than, say, a west coast SUV highway economy?
...China's leaders constitute a central authority. Where does this help with energy? Because they can push unpopular measures through?
This is not my understanding of Nazi priorities.
Why not try to copy the Zimbabwe model, and reduce energy by 90%?
I think it is helpful to put liberty and control as extreme positions of one scale.
The same polititian who asks for 10% more control has difficulty saying to his voters that he wants 10% less liberty, and for who. The more honest ones do this, and point out they only want it for criminals, terrorists, immigrants, homeless, patients, children and other non-voters.
There are other laws around that may be more relevant:
- As soon as a category, like laptops, becomes decent, an lower spec is introduced to create room for improvement.
- The form factor reduces until there is no room for the chip set/drive/cooler (keyboard and screen don't count).
- The small cheap £200 computer is here today, but the makers are still asking £350 for them.
The expansion of large mammals occuring at the PETM does not mean that CO2 caused mammals to grow - or deathstars, for that matter. The two things just happened at the same time. Another reason could be that after the demise of the dinos, there was plenty of room and food, hence less pressure on fuel-inefficient organism designs.
Given a sample size of 300, I think El Reg could do a better job of whiping up a survey of readers (call them IT experts, if you will). Going out of your way to prove your figures are unbiased, please don't just survey the people who commented on this article till now.
The questionnaire could use a final comments field to explain why some questions are irrelevant, or require explanation, e.g. Our IT spend could be going down because:
- there is nothing worth buying
- the company is in chapter 11
- we've outsourced everything, so all IT spend is on someone else's books
Vista teams noticed that offices want complete control, full encryption, virus updates, cross-platform integration,... but couldn't really deliver.
Window 7 guys shouldn't forget that consumers want instant start-ups, few changes, no fiddly messages, integration with all devices, and Vista didn't really deliver that either.
I hope the split between the two worlds gets real. Otherwise it could be neatbooks for fun and the clouds for business.
1)All the good bits from my 100 CDs fit as mp3 downloads on a shuffle (728 Kb).
2)Currently (2008 - 2010) I'm downloading my vinyl at about 10 per week to mp3. And cursing the big 4 distributors, who don't have an upgrade policy (Actually its a downgrade but the mp3s are okay over headphones). I'll be blowed if I'll pay full CD price for the conversion, but perhaps 10% for nuisance value and 5% for better quality, and I'd willingly take them on micro SDs, even better on a few multi-Mb SDs.
3) A question: I assume home-recorded SDs also fit? Its not clear from the article. Most PC have an SD slot, and you can get a micro SD converter.
4) I'm not going back to rechargable batteries either, that's just as fiddly as ripping mp3s.
So all in all, maybe Sandisk can tweak their product to fit my profile
..not that you whip up people to working at top speed all the time, but it does provide an incentive to project managers to keep the runway clear.
@ gulfie:
on bonuses, our internal developers do get overtime as time off, and when the going gets tough (when the boss approves) they can choose between cash and time.
on project costing - agreed that risks taken on the project shouldn't be passed on unfiltered to the developer - unless he is a one-man-band, taking on both. Often such hybrid guys are worth hiring, they are good at optimising effort and results.
<...where there may be a difference of approach or of principle, one must try to minimise the consequent differences in terms of the outcome...>
In other words, you can belong to any group, communist to nazi, as long as you do what consensus (i.e. my affiliation) demands. Is mumpits too strong a word?
What if one approach is inadequate and the other misguided?
The current financial climate will be an interesting test for the Euro. Nations are united in calling for trust and confidence, but, as comments above show, it isn't clear who to trust. The fix-it programmes so far are national. Today's hole in the fabric: German accounts in bust Islandic banks are not covered by the German safe-saver guarantees.
Could be that Germany finds it is dragging a lot of beggars on its coat-tails, with little control of the financial direction.
I agree with both Tim Schormer in principle, and Graham Ts reminder on Ohms law.
The point is that each gadget with electronics requires a highly inefficient transformer. The energy savings plus the melted down transformers would allow you to install broad-band copper underflooring.
I haven't yet worked out how to turn this into the next Microsoft, or what to do with my Rio Tinto shares.
A signal converter needs embedding in every light. (The signal must come from somewhere: a wifi router linked to the house mains? Perhaps a LED bank in the cellar and fiber optic pipes to each room would be cheaper?)
This will move GNP on and upwards. Lights will become so expensive that they can be taxed. A licence to fit lightbulbs will become obligatory for safety reasons.
Seriously, this discussion might be valuable to the floater of this lightly-baked idea, since many legitimate problems can probably be solved in the design phase.
I didn't participate in the survey, because I'm only a data manager (=user with funny ideas) who happens to sit in the same office as an even mix of about 150 from India and internal IT working on a global SAP implementation. But I also don't agree that blogospherics would improve the stresses I currently observe. There IS constant talk, and passing on of information, though often enough analysing what went wrong, or what is really needed.
In our case, the workflow and responsibility is also pretty well solved (accepting a time and documentation penalty) which is currently leading to an interesting work-to-rule from the out-side after adding a complex SAP module.
The bottom line is that our case ducks the old IT adage that one good programmer is worth lakh average ones, so you want the good guys in the right places. At the moment we keep our head above water, among other fixes, with pensioners rehired as consultants.
You could bring much to light as journalists if you sat down and discussed in depth with a few of the willing who answered the questionnaire.
Unnecessary cooling might be a left-over practice from the bad old mainframe days. A colleague who recently retired described one of his first jobs, keeping a department store's computer up and running. " At[...], the air conditioning was under-powered. If a hot day was forecast in summer, we knew where we would be spending our time. The beasts only functioned between 19 – 21°C".
Since heat increases more than linearly with speed, what about underclocking?
Keep it up, for the 20% that believe their own data is safe. We've all lost control of our data many times, from addresses or medical records to creditworthiness, and can only hope that those who collect it aren't sheep, black or any other colour.
The double standard observed in the survey is akin to the well documented one of risk-taking. Joe Public accepts high risks under his own control, such as smoking or driving motor cycles. Where he has no control, he objects to much smaller risks, like a vaccine campaign.
What you describe is that when technology is primitive, the mechanics of cut and paste require more specialist knowledge. As platforms are today easier to use, the total creativity is much greater, though the individual contribution may have dropped.
The ideal project takes existing data, shows it in a useful new form, and costs nothing. Wikis come pretty close to this ideal, for instance.
*For proof, see John Livingston Lowes, "The Road to Xanadu: A Study in the Ways of the
Imagination", Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1927 or a short summary like http://www.xanadu.com.au/mail/xanadu/msg00192.html.
What's wrong with trying to increase energy efficiency, reduce consumption, support the industrialising world and fix the worst problems as they arise?
Reminds me of the BBC discussion of how north sea oil revenues should be spent: education and housing, better pensions, developing new technology, or whatever. In the end, the presenter, aged with make-up, concluded from far-future 2010 that Britain had just muddled through.
I am unaware whether the success of Cambridge start-ups was driven by the funding, or the role of this or previous heads.
I agree with his tenor, that Europe's only advantages are longer-term planning (really?) and a few brains with good ideas.
And I do wonder how close start-up support comes to corruption - the 'all our competitors are doing it' argument would seem to fit.
The point is not whether liquid bombs could be made, but that solid and compressed gas bombs are more efficient. The banning all states of matter is more logical, but less economically viable. So 100% safe is not possible, and some Body squeezed out an extra 0.01% by taking away our shampoo, perfume, drinks, eyewash etc. (>>0.01% convenience)
Things started the 70s, when nations fought hard - and won - to stop hijackers becoming an everyday occurrence. Presumably, they wanted air travel, on national carriers, to be a positive experience.
Well, it hasn't been fun for decades. Imagine car travel being channeled like airlines today, body/bag checks/separations at every crossroad. If security gurus want to be proactive, they should be fighting the increase of sea piracy, ready for intercontinental airlines going belly up. And, in the meantime, non-intrusive spot checks with a small group of intelligent people.