Well regardless
I definately would!
277 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jan 2008
I can see the benefit of improving personal privacy, but I'm not sure saddling the taxpayers with "Large daily fines" is really going to do anything for our already completely fucked economy at the moment to be honest.
No doubt it will do wonders for the EC as a whole though, since they'll be getting a large daily income courtesy of the British Taxpayer.
Should things where lives are "at risk" be dependent on email? Maybe I'm just old before my time, but I like to think if my life was at risk for the taxes I pay I'd get something a little more substantial.
Also, it's not just the NHS that suffer from this sort of palava - it's happened to our email system a few times here as well (I suspect at least one of the times was caused by a competitor...) - and it's a pain to get removed from the blocklists. Having said that, I'd be sure MS must have a global whitelist somewhere that they can add .nhs.uk to?
Not wanting to cause agggro, but perhaps in this case the example slightly misses the mark...
A better example would be:
Car X is poorly designed and constructed and fragile, but strangely popular. Many VIP's who use them get assassinated.
Car Y is well designed and tough but very few people use it. An even smaller percentage of those get assassinated.
You'd take Car Y of course. And then when everyone has Car Y, said assassins would just develop ways to destroy Car Y.
OK my analogy isn't perfect, but more accurate to the situation don't you think? Your example implies that Windows crashes and then hacks all the banks and steals everyones money (which it may well do tbh)
that thinks every time somebody sues someone else for something like this, the amounts involved seem patently ridiculous? I mean $11,000,000 for some stolen emails. Really? I'd have a little more sympathy if she was asking somethign more sensible in damages...
I thought damages were supposed to represent the damage done, not more than many people would earn in 40 years...
Firsty, yes he should indeed get jail. Even if he stole ONE laptop, it's still theft. Secondly, they probably have the same numpty security as many other government places where if you have a contractor pass you can come and go as you please and nothings ever questioned.
But regardless, he stole several things from a customer, that's theft, theft = jail. Not sure what the argument here is. As for the MP's not going to to jail, well you have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt to have committed a crime first don't you ;) And MP's are a cunning bunch!
I don't think the MBT capability would be so much of an issue for the Booties - unless things have changed a lot recently they don't have any organic armour support, they're principly light infantry and operate as such, with just light troop carriers (such as the aforementioned Viking) - they're similar in role to the Parachute Regiment, only they principally deploy from the sea rather than the air.
Note to any ex-booties reading, I didn't say you were the same as the Paras, just filled a similar role so please don't beat me :p
And I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here... But why does a car NEED a synthetic aperture RADAR? I've managed to successfully drive around for the last 9 years without driving into anything else, merely identifying and classifying threats with my eyes...
I just don't see it as being a good idea, people are distracted enough when they're driving - surely getting them to rely on RADAR to warn them of what's knocking about around them is a bad thing.
Also, RADAR, not radar - RAdio Direction And Ranging - it's an acronym not a word :p
With most of the groups on the banned list, the reason they're not permitted many public offices (Police for one example) is because the views of their self declared political beliefs are incompatible with the role of said office.
It would be like putting a member of the Pirate Party in charge of copyright enforcement in Sweden for example - they may well be able to do the job perfectly well, but their political beliefs would be likely to compromise their dedication.
I personally have no issue whatsoever with BNP members - we live in a democracy, they're entitled to believe what they want. I work with at least one. HOWEVER I would take issue if they were a police officer as it would call into question their impartiality whenever an issue of race/religion came up.
That remembers these "Metal Muscles" sound awfully much like the system used in the powered armour so popular in the Sci-Fi genre...
Couple that with the exoskeletons being developed, and the brainwave reading control systems, and I think I've sussed what DARPA are REALLY after....
SU-37 is a Flanker?? Flanker-F if memory serves, it was a prototype or something like that. And I very much doubt the F-35 is particularly survivable, indeed if it can fly as claimed above, it would be more survivable than the A-10 which was more or less designed with soaking up bullets in mind.
As for the range - I'm assuming you mean weapons range? In an air to air engagement the F-22 would cream it, and in an Air-to-Ground engagement they wouldn't be using F-22's anyway :p
Is it just me that thinks this seems like a really REALLY bad idea? Don't get me wrong - the gene pool needs some chlorine, but a robot apocalypse is way down on my list of preferred apocalyptic scenarios. Indeed it ranks only slightly above the 60 tonne hummer sized bullet proof spider based apocalypse...
It's true, the moon landings are fake, and I have the proof in some files passed down to me from my grandfather, that were stolen from a facility in Nevada. I'll just scan them in and then can we please move past this?
Well that's wierd, there's some kind of black helicopter hovering outside my
It was down yesterday a bit of the morning for me. Internet banking being down I can cope with though - much more of a problem was a few weeks ago when EVERYTHING packed up, including card authorisations, just as I was in a petrol station.
<rant>
Card - Declined, Cash Point - Exceeded daily limit - wtf, telephone system - unavailable, internet system - unavailable.
And before someone points it out, yes I had money, and no I hadn't withdrawn anything that day
Then 4 hours later, all back up and running. I phoned them and they said it was the first they'd heard of it...
This was despite people I know all around the country who bank with them and had the exact problem at the exact same time.
</rant>
Did anyone see the picture from the link on the next story down about the house struck by lightning? Wow...
I'm assuming if you're somewhere near trees in a lightning storm, the same drills as for hand grenades would work, drop to the ground facing the trees. Of course you're not wearing a helmet so perhaps facing away would be better. Only then you're going to get tree shrapnel up your arse instead... Catch22 really!
Exactly the point, Maginot Line anyone?
Having said that - the point is if we arm for the war we're fighting now, then due to development times and time into service, most of the kit we're buying for our current conflicts won't make it into service till these conflicts are over, and who knows what the next one might be.
The colonials might object to their repatriation for a start, so we might have to deploy the Eurofighter against the F22 after all :p
I was about to rage about the RADAR powered guns and infrared decoy flares and phalanx till I read the article and realised that they weren't your words.
The Type45 is fitted for but not with, and likely will remain so after it is commisioned. The (formerly Vickers I believe) 4.5" gun is meant for shore bombardment rather than anti air and is perfectly advanced enough for what it does.
If I remember correctly, the Diamond onwards will be fitted with Phalanx when they enter service, but the Daring and Dauntless will remain without.