Liz Truss wasn't testing, nor engaged in an iterative development process.
Posts by Adair
1192 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jan 2008
SpaceX resets ‘Days Since Starship Exploded’ counter to zero
Microsoft declares 2025 'the year of the Windows 11 PC refresh'
US airspace closures, lack of answers deepen East Coast drone mystery
Scumbag gets 30 years in the clink for running CSAM dark-web chatrooms, abusing kids
Re: Punishment is a means, not a goal
I won't argue with you on that particular point (30 years re child sexual abuse), but having worked in a prison I have no doubt that in a significant proportion of cases 'prison', as we run them, often does far more harm than good, both for the 'criminal' and for society at large when that person is released—and all at vast expense. Very poor value for money, and too often a lousy 'solution' to many of our social problems.
Re: Punishment is a means, not a goal
Problem is it's not that great at doing any of those things - except temporarily/permanently removing the perp from troubling 'law abiding society' with their crimes. That outcome is potentially very useful, but as to 'teaching them not to behave badly' and 'discouraging others from behaving badly', the evidence for success is mixed, to say the least.
'Prison' (as we tend to run them), in far too many instances is an expensive, counter-productive non-solution - a sop to the 'hang 'em and flog 'em' brigade.
systemd begrudgingly drops a safety net while a challenger appears, GNU Shepherd 1.0
Australia lays fiendish tax trap for Meta – with an expensive escape hatch
No, I can't help – you called the wrong helpdesk, in the wrong place, for the wrong platform
Re: Warren's big mistake
Some years ago, in a moment of sheer unmitigated madness, I allowed the company's Exchange server access to my personal mobile. NEVER EVER allow yourself to be persuaded to do this. Exchange immediately assumes ownership of your phone—at least all the parts that Exchange deems relevant to it's purposes. I irretrievably lost a number of personal contacts through that moment of foolishness, and it took several weeks of work to recover the rest of the 'damage', having first booted Exchange off the device.
Outlook is poor for those still on Windows Mail, Calendar, People apps by end of year
Re: As noted
Can't say I've noticed any obvious search slowdown, but maybe depends on what 'getting big' means. My main Inbox currently registers over 700 messages, but maybe if that was 7,000 or 70,000 things would get a bit grim. I don't know, they get archived after a two month threshold, so things never get that grotesque.
Both KDE and GNOME to offer official distros
Re: Best to fix what you have first
Sounds like something to do with your particular setup (or even something you are doing) rather than anything fundamentally awry with Mint, which is one of the distros that generally really does 'just work'.
Having just updated my desktop hardware after eleven years, plus running several other boxes for backups, servers, laptops, etc. I can't say Mint has ever failed to install and run properly. That would appear to be the general experience of others.
Google must face £7B UK class action over search engine dominance
I haven't used Google...
for search, or a search engine that sucks off Google, or for anything else really, for at least five years. At least on the desktop—we'll quietly ignore my Pixel phone, although there are mitigating apps at work there.
Guess what? Life goes on without issue.
It only takes a few clicks. And the will.
EU buyers still shunning pure electric vehicles, prefer hybrids
My words: 'Not too likely in either case, but a clear distinction as well.'
Your words: 'The difference between 0.004% and 0.08% is pretty small'
There is a difference between 'overall probability' and 'relative probability'. In this case the 'overall probability' in either case is low; but the relative probability between the two cases is significant, and that is what counts in this argument.
There are some who either ignorantly do not understand this, and others who wilfully do not understand this because they have an agenda to pursue—FUD to spread.
Take a million EVs and a million ICE, on the basis of the Swedish figures in one year there will be 800 ICE fires and 40 EV fires. I don't know about you, but I think most people would decide that was a significant difference—a x20 difference—in favour of EVs, even if the overall probability of a fire in either type is pretty low.
It's not hard to do your own research (you should try it), but let's try a popular source, but academic and technical studies are readily available, Top Gear:
'The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) reported 23 fires in 611,000 EVs during 2022, or 0.004 per cent in a year, which makes it 20 times less likely to happen than ICE car fires, which burned 3,400 times in 4.4 million cars, or 0.08 per cent.'
Not too likely in either case, but a clear distinction as well.
The misinformation isn't 'what kind of fire', it is 'the frequency/probability of vehicle fires' - there is a difference. The statistics to date make it very clear that the chances of a vehicle burning out, or even having a minor conflagration that doesn't write off the vehicle, are considerably higher for an ICE than for an EV. Of course the vast majority of us will see out our entire driving life-times without ever experiencing our car going up in flames (regardless of type) - so the issue is largely moot (so long as we don't get sucked in by the the EV doomsayers' bullshit).
All well and good, but I'm not talking about honest and valid reasons, I'm talking about the bullshit and FUD, the edge-cases that are presented as being the 'general experience', e.g. EVs are more likely to catch fire (when the opposite is true), early battery pack demise (when all the evidence to date indicates battery packs will generally outlast the average lifespan of the car), they all die in cold weather (excepting those being driven in Nordic countries). All that kind of dishonesty and ignorance that merely muddies the waters and benefits those who value their bank balance more than the welfare of living creatures. Not that EVs don't have their issues in that regard.
But, the petro-chemically backed bullshitters have no shame, wallowing in their ignorance and greed. It's the lying, the exaggeration, the deliberate misinformation, the FUD - that is what I'm on about.
Horses for courses. Apart from the issue of off street charging, most recent EVs amply cover the driving needs for a substantial proportion of the driving public; and the 'battery pack lifetime' argument is basically FUD.
Currently, EVs are definitely not suitable for everyone, but a lot of the arguments people put up against them are nothing more than ignorant/malicious social-media trash talk
RHEL 9.5 debuts alongside AlmaLinux, Rocky, and Oracle updates
Public developer spats put bcachefs at risk in Linux
Every tree...
has it's natural life span. Once it's fully grown it's just a matter of time before senescence sets in. Hopefully, before that process becomes too advanced the tree will have reproduced, but even if not there is usually another nearby tree for the creatures that live on and/or feed on it to move onto.
OSes are not really that different. It's just a question of time.
SpaceX claims another Starship success, but fumbles the catch
Steam cuts the cord for legacy Windows and macOS
UK energy watchdog slaps down Capita's £130M smart meter splurge
Re: "without the good residents of Norfolk coming out with the torches & pitchforks."
Let's all huddle around our open fires in our draughty caves.
Pylons are an eyesore—although there are prettier ones that are not much more expensive—but there are also far worse things to deal with in this world.
And, in the end, a row of pylons are easily removed when no longer needed.
Photoshop FOSS alternative GNU Image Manipulation Program 3.0 nearly here
NASA fires up super-quiet supersonic X-59 aircraft
China's first space tourism venture sells first pair of tickets
Because they spent a fuck-ton of money trying to make sure everything was right first time, plus they are basically riding on a a lot of existing and proven inventory. Starship is pretty much a clean sheet design, so in principle there is a lot that could go wrong and a lot to learn.
OTOH, the 'spend once and biggly' approach doesn't always produce the desired result, witness one Starliner. Now they have to decide whether to abandon/sell off the white elephant, or continue to add to the existing money mountain to try and recover the situation.
Neither approach is foolproof, and neither is right/wrong, both have their pros and cons. You pick the one you want and do your best to make it work.
PS - look up 'iterative', and then compare the definition with SpaceX's development approach.
Don't understand your point, are you trying to suggest that Starship should have launched straight to orbit on its first flight?
That's not how SpaceX work; it's an iterative process of trial, error, learn from error, trial,... until you have something that probably pretty much has the bugs well worked out of it and is likely to prove predictably reliable.
But I'm sure you already know that.
An awful lot of FOSS should thank the Academy
Combustion engines grind Linus Torvalds' gears
Linus Torvalds affirms expulsion of Russian maintainers
Re: Economic Sanctions are War Crimes
So that's alright then, nothing to see here. Just a friendly tiff between neighbours. Only it wasn't like that at all was it, on both sides?
If you were alive then you may remember that everyone was trying to live normal lives with the perceived very real possibility of nuclear annihilation hanging over our heads. Good times.
Wow, next stop Moscow!
It's all in the plan, you know. or, perhaps not. Instead merely a tactical venture. Mind you, given what Russia has stolen from Ukraine one couldn't blame Ukraine if they end up deciding to hang on to that little bit of Russia—just as a reminder that what is sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander.
And all of this justifies the slaughter of thousands of civilians and military personnel. What an abysmal view of life and political values. Merely the petulant, cowardly school-yard bully writ large—someone who never grew up, but learned that if you smash someone in the face first you often get what you think you want. Only to discover, usually too late, that it's all for nothing—you are nothing more than just another bloodstained bully who is a long time dead, and the sooner the better.
Putin and his ilk in Russia, the capitalist moneygrubbers in the 'West'—all cut from the same cloth. All selfish murderous idiots, and no amount of weasel words and slimy justifications will change that reality.
Say hello to the epi-bit, a new approach to DNA data storage
Microsoft says its Copilot AI agents set to tackle employee tasks in November
WeChat devs introduced security flaws when they modded TLS, say researchers
Re: Who uses WeChat anyway?
I wonder what they expect, and how many of them actually have a choice of messaging apps?
Given the source of WeChat there is no reason to suppose that is is in any way meaningfully secure from state intrusion, let alone anyone else's efforts to subvert its 'security'.
Please note that I am not in the least implying that other similar apps from other sources are any better, and some may well be worse, but 'deliberate security flaws in WeChat'? Quelle surprise.
Viable fusion power in a decade? Tokamak Energy dares to dream
Re: Within a factor of two anyway
Meanwhile completely ignoring the fact that we have a perfectly functional and very efficient fusion reactor running continuously only a few million miles away, which is not actually owned by anyone and which shares its energy upon the just and unjust all alike.
Make hay while the Sun shines.