If the Yanks won't buy them...
If the Yanks won't buy them, perhaps the Met will. One on every street corner throughout London. Not against Mexicans, you understand. It's the Brazilian electricians that are the threat.
595 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jan 2008
Spamming the FIT files might help to reduce their usefulness, thus helping the right to express views not approved by the government (and thus lead to the End of Civilization As We Know It, about time too if this is what that civilization has led to).
Come to think of it, they could build a much smaller database if they just listed the few who *do* agree with the government, instead of those who don't.
Was this an accident while drunk, or getting some Dutch Courage, taking a final desparate smoke, and jumping under a train? Those last couple of steps looked aimed, and she appeared to be looking for when the train was coming moments before (although the latter she might be doing anyway).
I googled "domestic extremism", and top of the list came MI5's page, which says "Some extremist groups also have a subversive agenda, seeking to undermine parliamentary democracy or the British economy."
I think us commentards can tell them just who have been undermining parlimentary democracy and the British economy. (See Peter Oborne's "The triumph of the political class" for the horrible details of how parlimentary democracy has been replaced by "manipulative populism".)
How many people are going to follow up on a claimed `CRB clearance' mentioned in an advert, contract bid or whatever, anyway?
Next thing: meaningless `CRB cleared' lapel pins, probably with an EU stars symbol somewhere on them for good measure. Available from any temporary market stall, you don't even have to go to a passport seller.
Citizen MinionZero, why so much optimism for the future?
You think the UK's bad? Well, think what the whole EU could be like if Blair gets to be president for the proposed longer terms, and has more strategies to pick and mix from. Think UK-style spying-on-people AND French-style riot police... (and French/German style `not taking your mobile phone with you is evidence of evil intent'!); but of course you get to vote, so they can say it's better than China; in fact if you vote wrong, you get to vote again until you vote right.
Not bothering with AC because anyone who can cause a problem will be able to track me down anyway. I'm sure I'm already on a list, because a couple of times I've tried telephoning a friend who's involved in peace activism, while I happened to be at Shannon Airport (where there are regular protests again US military use of it) and I couldn't phone her from there; I can phone her number from anywhere else, and I could phone anyone else I thought of trying from there, and I tried it again on other days, and got the same effects; so I'm pretty confident there was deliberate blocking, and I don't expect that any blocking system will fail to record who it's blocked.
It's about time something like this was at least tried. It needn't (and shouldn't) stand in isolation; people (any people, not just the government... in fact, preferably anyone except the government) could set up annotation sites to do the discussion, perhaps with automoderation (karma schemes etc) so you wouldn't have to wade through all comments if you didn't want to.
And as for legislation being indecipherable: this could be the opportunity to push for comprehensible legislation.
The next step would be for people to start standing as direct democracy party candidates, like Demoex and Aktivdemokrati (both in Sweden).
Make available all data that there's no specific (and good) reason not to provide. For a start, that's all non-personal non-security-sensitive data. And don't leave out any details just because you can't think why anyone would want them.
Do it in an open format (XML, CSV, HTML, plain text, etc).
Make everything bookmarkable so we can cross-reference it from citizen-generated data such as a massive sousveillance database :-).
My main (and largely rhetorical) question is why weren't they at this stage ten years ago?
Forms of suspicious behaviour (from David Mery's article "Innocent in London", GIYF if you haven't already got it bookmarked):
* I went into the station without looking at the police officers at the entrance or by the gates, i.e. I was ‘avoiding them’
* two other men entered the station at about the same time as me
* I am wearing a jacket ‘too warm for the season’
* I am carrying a bulky rucksack
* I kept my rucksack with me at all times (I had it on my back)
* I looked at people coming on the platform
* I played with my mobile phone and then took a paper from inside my jacket.
Let me guess, the database will be confidential and so they won't be allowed to give you this amount of information when they use the database as an excuse for arresting you?
I'm glad I emigrated from the UK. My next move will probably be non-EU, I hear (from a Chinese colleague) that day-to-day freedoms are much better in China as long as you don't want to vote, whereas here (Ireland) if you vote the wrong way (Lisbon) they just ask you to vote again, and both in Ireland and the UK the only parties with much chance of getting in aren't going to do anything significantly from each other.
Time for a massive souveillance database perhaps? Then we can correlate frequency of speeches with Hansard with the phase of the moon, and find out which MPs are actually werewolves ;-)
And of course there could never be a case of certain government departments planting false information on a laptop and leaving it on a train, then making sure the press publicize it to make sure the targetted recipients hunt around to buy it from whoever found it. Such things would never happen in a civilized society.
See articles such as http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/ireland/article6123034.ece (or use a search engine to look for "irish e-voting storage nephew shed" for a bit more variety).
Quote from another page:
Josephine Duffy has denied any impropriety and said her nephew's steel frame shed in Scotstown, Co Monaghan, was the only suitable facility, even though he did not submit a tender.
'[Being my nephew] didn't make a difference. I do not do deals with relations. It was between his solicitor and mine, " she said
Mine's the one with a Friend of Bertie rifling the pockets. Still, it beats living under NuLab.
Remember the pro-hunting protestors being banned from protesting near the Labour party headquarters?
Being prepared to protect specifically the current government party seems to me to be the first small step to a one-party system. There are a lot of other steps before they'll get there, but I reckon that was a step in that direction. Then they can start defining themselves as "The Social Party (tm)" and implying that other parties are anti-social, and you know what happens to people who Behave Anti-Socially!
A long way off, but I reckon they're facing that direction.
PS for those wondering where to move: the Republic of Ireland is OK if there are still any jobs by the time you get here; the politicians aren't control freaks even if they are "the best that money can buy"!
So what are the real problems GSV can cause?
And (quite separately from reality, I suspect, particularly with Davies' Phorm connection), what is Davies really on about? Since he's "not sure what exactly the legal basis of a challenge to the system" would be, does he have an actual issue? Or is what he's really on about that "consent is required for a photograph that is used commercially", and he really wants to be able to demand payment from Google for any appearances he makes on GSV?
I wouldn't normally want to accuse someone of developing a resemblance to a Belgian newspaper, but perhaps for a Phorm supporter it's only fair.
I reckon what he's really saying is "Look how pure I am!"
I've seen an equivalent effect in religious settings which have a strong in-group effect -- people claiming more and more extreme "beliefs" (typically in the form of taking literally parts of the Bible that others reckon are about moral truths rather than literal accounts -- a "membership categorization device") because it's all-important to be on the right side of the enclosing fence.
So the real message is "I'm a good NuLab person, look at me". When the focus is back on terrorism, the same people will be supporting bizarre anti-terrorism schemes. Or did that already happen?
I've already got my coat -- I emigrated five years ago, the best move I ever made.
The `"important functions of the car" will stop if you recieve a phone call'?
That's one way of stopping people talking on the phone while driving.
On the other hand, if the phone refused to take or make calls while the car control application was running, it might make some real sense.
If they do something like that, they'll probably make it impossible to use with screen readers (for the blind) -- although I expect most blind travellers are avoiding Ryanair already after a well-publicized incident of some being turned away. However, it could give someone a chance to bring a discrimination case.
Even a big light on a tower that cycles on/off at known periods could theoretically be spoofed, using another big light that cycles on/off at the same periods (perhaps mounted on a cherry-picker for quick set-up and getaway). In fact, in an earlier form, it was an old wreckers' technique. And it's probably easier to design than a GPS jammer!
I suspect that sometimes these are like "the man that never was" (a corpse made to look like a drowned naval courier, with planted false invasion plans, in WWII) -- a way of leaking misinformation to certain parties. They'd have to be well-packed with other information, to stop it being too obvious.