But surely, it's impossible
- to imagine a scenario where someone would be utilising Facebook's data sets inappropriately? It must all be appropriate as Facebook profited from selling them, right?
And don't call me Shirley...
336 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
Until I eventually realised that the brand has never been able to live up to the nostalgia associated with it. It's now just a paid for label that increasingly shit companies are using in turn, each wringing another drop of blood out of it. Come back Nolan and your Age of Aquarius! Time Warner ruined it initially by not foreseeing the original VCS would become obsolete, Jack Tramiel gave it a reasonably good shot in the ST era, and really, ever since the ill fated Jaguar it's been rather a torrid affair.
I'd be all up for a buying an amazing new Atari device, but this isn't it. What the 'new' VCS ought to be is a nostalgia machine, similar to the mini SNES and Megadrives recently seen. With simple modern hardware you could easily emulate all the various history of Atari machines and back catalogues of popular games - and maybe even as a major differentiator, include creativity software too. A pocket sized Atari ST with a MIDI sequencer anyone?
"The main problem" is perhaps the wrong way of looking at it. If all these Access databases and Excel spreadsheets became business critical then perhaps he was doing entirely the right thing!
Going the corporate 'full IT' way with these things can be very difficult and challenging, especially without first having proof of concept or working model. Irrespective of whether the model owner and IT bods are in agreement, there's always at least one, or more layers of management level funding decisions to be made in-between.
Hey! I can understand some of the hatred for Access, but Excel always seems to be an easy soft target. For all the criticism it gets it actually does a great job for most people in most circumstances.
As for Access or Excel not being 'proper' solutions, show me an alternative that 'ordinary' people can use without specialist IT training? The difference is ownership. Sure, if I contract out building a custom SQL database to run a particular business model or application, then I expect to need IT professional support to operate it. But show me a consumer level equivalent. Most people have other specialisms and responsibilities beyond being DB admins or system architects. These office level tools just let normal people get on with whatever they need to do. If there was a consumer level 'Office' style implementation of a 'proper' database would this solve more problems, or create more problems?
I think they've somewhat missed 'opportunistic' and gone straight for 'dead on arrival'. Again.
If you're already worried about search privacy you're likely already on DuckDuckGo or StartPage, and if you're only just getting worried about search privacy why on earth would you go there? Personally, I ask Alexa to Bing results on Android, just to piss Google off.
For all the tongue-in-cheek derision, good quality cables do (or at least can) make a difference. Especially anything in the analogue domain - phono leads and speaker cable being the obvious targets.
I'm not suggesting spaffing thousands of pounds on hugely pricey esoteric nonsense, but once you get to a particular level of component quality you don't really want to constrain it by using shitty entry-level patch cables. Where your happy medium lies, as a free-agent consumer, is entirely up to you. Hi-Fi ownership is complex - and much like car ownership - there are many, many opaque rationales for wanting different things.
Yep, progress seems slow. You'd think they'd have had a chance to, I dunno, make all the control panel option pages consistent beyond 2 levels, or fix search so that it can find an application that's already installed. Or maybe even - and I don't know why this bugs me in particular - when you click 'empty the recycle bin', it would be nice if everything in the recycle bin actually disappeared.
I'm pretty sure that - maybe a couple of decades ago - anything described as 'Military Spec' was regarded with god-like levels of capability and reliability. These days 'military spec' seems to be about as trustworthy the bloatware pre-installed on a suspiciously cheap unbranded smartphone.
80's Action Film: "We got these from the military" - Cue some awesome special effects and epic stunts...
2010's Action Film: "We got these from the military" - Cue some Windows XP critical error noises...
More seriously, is there some sort of established basic relationship between software complexity and the scale of deployment required to ensure that it remains actively fit for purpose? Clearly military equipment software needs are now complex, but the deployment will always be, by definition, niche.
And before the immediate impulse to down vote this suggestion... hold on a minute and work with me on this - someone needs to make a Linux GUI that looks and works exactly like Windows 10. There, I said it.
MS appear to be integrating more and more Linux into Windows. Lets start at the other end and meet in the middle? All the underlying system advantages of Linux, without anyone even realising it's not Windows! Even better if existing Windows applications and games etc can run transparently and seamlessly without any extra end-user complexity at all.
One computer to rule them all.
"I was thinking rather than blocking, why not feed it random (believable) crap?"
I've thought about this before. It would only really have an effect on the advertisers if a large proportion of people do it, aside from all the difficult issues of making it 'believable'. Whereas blocking is currently a more effective strategy as an individual.
This is completely correct. I legitimately use a Visio diagram to keep up with the complex wiring that's just behind my TV and Speakers. It has at least 51 separately identifiable cables, and it's not even a multi-channel set-up, just stereo.
I'm just about competent enough with my home network to have set up a Pi-Hole and continue to use my ISP's DNS service (from BT) via the Pi-Hole to allow the fairly simple use of parental controls. I know DNS based parental controls aren't perfect, but lets run with that for now...
So basically, now, in Firefox, I can just go into settings, switch on DoH, and this will completely bypass my Pi-Hole and my ISP's parental control options. What now? I was just getting the hang of being slightly in control, and now that's all gone?
Surely the better solution would be to improve the existing dialogue boxes and file explorer, so that online OneDrive / SharePoint document stores can be accessed directly through file explorer (instead of a locally synced copy a la OneDrive client).
It's all very well when you're using a 'logged in' MS application that has sight of your network, cloud and local storage locations, but this all falls apart when you need to save / open from cloud locations from any other application
People just want to get stuff done. What is the simplest and least controlled way of getting a file to someone else? The email attachment. To quote Princess Leia "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." The tightening of grip often isn't done in balance with enabling productivity.
Historically there was little choice, as requesting a change to network file permissions could take weeks, but now even with cloud repositories such as SharePoint there's still a ton of stuff that just gets attached to emails, even with corporate level communications.
Generally, anything that blocks users to do something productive in a corporate environment is subject to circumvention and security risks. So, you don't have the software you need to do something simple and trivial that would take you minutes at home? Then why not bring in that unauthorised 'portable' installation version and run it from a USB stick?
Well, I guess everyone is entitled to their opnion...
I've never heard a single sensible rational argument for any single instance of any example where the EU is in any way holding the UK back, or at the very least acting for the greater good, be it environment or people. So, you can have your opnion, and that is what it shall likely remain as.
"It's not that fucking hard." This! Exactly what this man said! It's all about the context!
There doesn't need to be a conflict between privacy and advertising, it's just that Google chooses to leverage user information to attract advertisers. I guess from Google's perspective the target audience can be sized far beyond 'context only' advertising (as per pick up truck example above). If Ford want 500,000 people to see it's adverts for a pick up truck, then it's much easier to accomplish if those ads are injected into any website rather that only those related to cars and pickup trucks, so I can see the advantage for Google, it's just a shame it's at odds with the behaviour I'd like to experience as a user.
Context is critical, and no matter how much data Google collects it will NEVER know the context of why I've searched for something. Maybe I searched for that F150 because I want to buy one, maybe I searched because I think they're fucking stupid. Maybe it's because I just saw someone load a dismembered body into the back of one, and I wanted to double check I was reporting the correct model of vehicle to the police...
And for that matter, why shouldn't there be functionality for the user to set ANY window to be always on top? Just right click the menu bar to toggle on or off. You see, useful and productive ideas aren't even that hard! Instead we get auto installed Candy Crush pish. Thanks Microsoft.
I agree that the problem is pricing. The 1060-1080 series has been out for years now, and faced with a massive oversupply of stock at the same time as the release of the new 2080 there were two options: 1. slash the price of the 10 series, or 2. Drastically increase the price of the 20 series in order to make the 10 series appear to be better value. No prize for guessing which option they went with....
2 Years ago, a top flight 1080ti was in the £700 to £800 range. Now a top range 2080ti is £1300 to £1500.
When I read that sentence I came here to say exactly that same thing! Have an upvote! Statistics available (quickly googled) show the number of 'Active' Facebook accounts as 2.27 billion for 2018 Q3. So, assuming this is minus the 1.5 billion of closed accounts, that means 40% of their 'Active' accounts have been shut! More worryingly, what if the accounts were't members of the set of active accounts? What if they were part of an unknown count of total accounts, active or otherwise? There's no upper limit to this - what if there's >100 billion facebook accounts and they only closed 1% of them? I bet the total number of accounts would be a statistic facebook aren't keen on publishing - any number far in excess of the world's population with access to technology would be a fairly damming indictment of the presence of shadowy bot plagues and sinister advertising practices. The whole ad industry is a fraudulent bubble as far as I can tell.
Certainly for the domestic graphics card market, the costs have inflated grossly and disproportionately against the performance increase. A new 2080ti costs £1,200 pounds or more. This is utterly mental! The previous generation 1080ti was an already excessive £650, and the new cards are nowhere near touching double the performance. It's just greedy pricing.
And to add, the already very expensive 1080 series had been the performance leader for SOOOOO long, that most of the market of high-end users were already running one, and few will justify the extortionate re-investment at this point in time for such a small gain.
@joekhul Bro, that's quite some comment history you have. Almost exclusively posting on articles related to Google, massive amounts of downvotes, and liberal use of the terms 'RegTard'. I'm almost tempted to believe you might be attempting to troll...
And just for clarity; exactly which part of Russia is it that you think is still communist? You appear to be >25 years out of touch.