Re: "a large US-based aircraft company"
Oh yes. It meant that a problem reported on leg N would never be reported on leg N+1 and would therefore likely be disregarded by pilots and maintenance staff as a fluke, unless they studied the log in depth.
1891 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jan 2008
"an increasingly protectionist US" is not really so new; the USA has long had the mistaken belief that it's the only country that matters and that "fairness" means "beneficial to the USA". Trump is an outlier, and will be gone in a few years, but the underlying belief system hasn't changed.
However, a pause in the mad rush of technology for a few years, until China catches up (or captures and operates the Taiwan fabs) really wouldn't do any harm to society. A sudden shortfall of chips for crypto mining and AI would be a wonderful thing, in fact.
"“Mark” told us he spent Y2K eve in New Zealand, and was supposed to inform his boss in Australia – where the time was two hours in the past – of any problems."
Hmm. If he'd been trying to check on a flight to Oz early on January 1st, the Auckland Airport web site at http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz would have told him it was "1 Jan 100". I have documentary proof but only on paper.
Similarly, http://www.hp.com/year2000/index.html said "January 1, *** DATE INVALID ***" just above "HP ready to Assist Customers Through Y2K Rollover"
It wasn't really a non-event. I'm looking forward to the Unix date rollover... only 12 years to go.
For various reasons I didn't see this story sooner, so I expect nobody will ever read this comment, but:
1. IPv6 didn't turn 30 in 2025; the IPv6 decision was announced in July 1994 at the IETF in Toronto.
2. Since Google sees more than 49% of its users connecting via IPv6, and that doesn't include China, it's more of a success than a failure. We expected from the very beginning that v4 and v6 would coexist for many years. That's a feature, not a bug.
3. There is no grey market in IPv6 addresses. That in itself should be a pretty convincing argument. There are half as many IPv4 addresses as there are living people. How silly!
IPv6 rules.
It also carries the bizarre implication that he "passed" to somewhere else, whereas in fact his thought processes simply stopped, as did all his other biological processes. That is indeed called "dying" in English. But American is a different language.
Gerstner didn't fail. The Chicago School economists won; the IBM Board became obsessed with "shareholder value" and picked a successor (Sam Palmisano) who was basically a glorified accountant rather than a technologist. Palmisano set IBM on course to the disaster that it has now become, and his successors have been even worse.
In reality, Gerstner did teach the elephant to dance, and even to pivot. But his successors blew it. A great pity.
Ritchie wrote a paper "The Development of the C Language" if you want details.
"His presentation about CENI is an eye-opener"
Not. It contains good advertising copy, but no actual technical information, except a passing reference to network coding and detnet (deterministic networking, an IETF work item). And network coding is not a recent Chinese invention, as a quick glance at Wikipedia will show you.
They built a high speed network. Good, but so did everybody else.
What Churchill actually said was "Meeting jaw to jaw is better than war" and despite being Churchill, he wasn't wrong.
Especially if the jawing keeps the politicians and their acolytes busy and away from the actual physical real world. Fortunately that is the exact effect of the self-named "Internet Governance Forum" to date, and in that sense it has been an indisputable success and has achieved absolutely nothing, despite some incremental climate damage due to pointless travel to pointless meetings.
Sir Humphrey would be proud.
"The European Commission is setting up a Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Internet Standards Deployment"
What a horrible idea. At least it's only a Forum, i.e. another talking shop, so it will mainly contribute hot air to global warming.
"Downside is Internet governance is kinda split"
No, that's an important upside. It's one of the reasons why transborder and international regulation of the Internet has repeatedly failed to happen over the last 30 years or so. Long may this remain the case!
Unfortunately nation states do have the ability to restrict or stop Internet usage in their countries, and we can't ever stop that, whether it's North Korea, Sudan, Russia, Ukraine, or wherever you happen to live.
The real surprise in this story is that ICANN started this effort in the first place. Just another of their political blunders, I guess.
Exactly. IBM isn't stupid, whatever else it may be.
Problem: ThinkPad future profitability looks terrible?
Solution: Sell the ThinkPad brand to China.
Problem: x86 server future profitability looks terrible?
Solution: Sell the x86 server line to the same idiots in China.
When you happen to be pointed by a search engine to a far distant site that doesn't pay for a CDN, you soon know it. So the question isn't why sites pay for CDN service, it's why Cloudflare has such a large share of the CDN market. And the answer to that question is simple: unregulated capitalism. I believe that Dr Marx and Mr Engels pointed this out some years ago.
Andy learned that at CERN, where "Bicycle on line" and "Jumbo jet on line" were the modes of moving mag tapes around (on site and off site, respectively).
Earlier than that, apparently the local customs post was fine with people driving between the Swiss and French CERN sites transporting used punch cards (ones with holes in them), but balked at unused punch cards, which had commercial value.
Worth noting that when I grew up in England many yonks ago (before there was Windows, before there was DOS, long before...) I never saw a St George flag. It just wasn't a thing. Its gradual rise to become a political emblem is definitely unhealthy. Funny thing is that St George actually came from... Georgia, and not the one glued onto Florida.
No need or rush to upgrade
Neither of my Win10 capable PCs are signed up for the free ESU, so I'm doing nothing. Everything is fine. The machines are getting a bit elderly, so I do face the dilemma of either taming the Win11 machine that is sitting idle, or planning a complete switch to Linux Mint.
I do feel sorry for corporate IT managers who have no way to thumb their noses at MS.
"The definition of a wide adoption of IPv6 seems to be when all popular website have AAAA records."
Not really. The Google measurement, for example, is how many users actually use IPv6 to reach Google servers.
Anyway, the new game in town now, given the general progress, is running your enterprise network as an IPv6-mostly network, where IPv6 is used except when it really can't be, because the remote host only has an A record, in which case you use 464LAT. Then the local infrastructure can be 100% IPv6-only and the OPEX goes down.
Sorry mate, your world view is OBE. Yes, IPv6 took a lot longer to reach critical mass than it should have done. (If TimBL had invented the web a few years later, large scale NAT would never have happened, and the Web would have been deployed over IPv6 from day one.) But now v6 is way past critical mass and IPv4 is rapidly being pushed into a legacy role. Fifteen years too late, which is a highly unfortunate reality.
I think that the global IPv6 adoption (as measured by Google) will exceed 50% in the last week of 2025, if not before. The reason is that IPv6 usage peaks at weekends (because more private subscribers use IPv6 than workplace subscribers) and because private usage peaks during the end-of-year holidays.
Also the Google estimate for China is meaningless; actual usage in China is 77% (China Daily, 2025-10-31). So if Google could measure China properly, they would already show more than 50% worldwide adoption.
It's about time for the IPv6 naysayers to shut up.
It will be pretty nice when all those updates stop coming. I haven't seen any evidence that any of them ever actually protected me.
'At the 2015 Ignite conference, Microsoft employee Jerry Nixon stated that Windows 10 would be the "last version of Windows"'
That's clear enough for me....
Too right. And judging by the downvotes, a majority of Register readers have fallen for the anti-Chinese rhetoric and lies. (E.g. Huawei isn't run by the CCP; of course it takes notice of Chinese law and political pressure, just as British companies take notice of UK law and politics, and as so many US companies have taken a Trumpian turn.)
Disengaging with China will prove to be a blunder of historical dimensions.
In the Internet tech realm, Google's "AI summary" doesn't know the difference between an Internet-Draft and an RFC. (The first is a draft in discussion and the majority of drafts never become RFCs. Even if they do, the drafts are still only drafts.) This can lead to radically false AI summaries, not to mention failing to point to the actual RFC that the user might have been looking for.
I have no doubt the same problem arises in every other realm of information too. It really should be against the law.
I asked Google about this (publishing lies) and it said "Lack of harm or intent: If the lies don't cause any harm or injury to individuals or public interest, and there is no intent to deceive or defraud, it's unlikely to be a crime."
There's plenty of scope for harm or injury in the sort of lies that Google tells these days.
And there are millions (I mean that) of historical documents in the old formats on obscure, and less obscure, web sites. Not to mention .ppt. These formats will never, ever go away. Thank heavens for LibreOffice, indeed. I haven't bothered with the MS apps for at least ten years.