Modern?
"Norwegian web sites are campaigning to have users dump Microsoft's Internet Explorer 6 for a modern browser."
I must have misread this. IE 7 and "modern" in the same article. Obviously put there for comedic effect.
326 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jul 2006
Loved the Missed Universe type metaphor. I suppose their hobbies are mainly traveling and meeting people and they’re all aiming for World Pieces. Perhaps, like the real thing, they all look good, but disappoint with their chosen talent.
I wonder where the horse race came in. Shouldn’t it have been a cat fight?
The Simpsons has barely turned out a good episode this century. Maybe Scientology is all that keeps it going, because it sure isn’t quality.
Cartwright is, of course, entitled to use her own voice, and if it happens to sound like Bart Simpson, well, that’s the way it goes. I believe, however, that Fox is legally entitled to govern the use of the name.
Did Warner Brothers have anything to say when Mel Blanc used his voices to promote Amex cards?
Clearly there must be a link between any activity which promotes or glorifies violence and violent or aggressive behaviour.
The link between brain dead adults and moronic behaviour, both in themselves and in their unfortunate offspring must be stronger.
What about all of those notices on cigarette packets that warn of a horrible death, or a life of misery? All they do is desensitize the user into ignoring any warning as a waste of space.
My understanding is that you have to fail an IQ test to work for Immigration in this country. They have a track record for moronic decisions which include deporting residents in error, rejecting legitimate entrants but accepting criminals, and generally making a dog’s breakfast of the country.
Seems to me that M$ is just trying to prove what it has always maintained: you get what you pay for. Fee web browser (Internet Exploiter), free web mail (NotSoHotMail), anybody who voluntarily relies on them is being punished for their ignorance.
Oddly, though, the competition don't seem to get the hint. They do insist on supplying a service or product that actually does a good job.
Obviously, M$ has a legal right to enforce its license. Hijacking and holding your system to ransom is nor normally considered a nice way to do it, and is probably illegal in most countries.
On the other hand, how many users over the world have been forced to pay multiple times for Windows? Buy a PC or laptop, you probably bought another copy of Windows. Replace your hardware, you probably bought Windows again. M$ has no right to complain about lost revenue.
Aren’t the real pirates the ones who ambush you, and demand your money?
I saw this sort of anti-competitive behavior some years ago during the Sydney 2000 Olympics. Because Visa was a major sponsor, you could not buy tickets with your Mastercard.
What sort of moron imagines that while you are on the phone, purchasing your tickets, you're going to rush down to your bank and pick up a Visa card?
Paris, because, well, it's Paris logic at work here.
As far as I am aware, any contract that includes nonsensical or impossible requirements, such as
... by clicking reading this sentence you agree to give me all of your money, name your first-born after the Marx Brothers, end world hunger, resurrect Elvis and show Paris Hilton to be a sensible, intelligent and useful member of our society ...
automatically invalidates itself. Surely this must apply?
The US 555 number was never official, though parts of it are left unused. AKA Klondike numbers, which the Simpsons episodes routinely use.
The Internet has example.net and example.com, both of which are reserved for this sort of thing. A few more interesting ones would be nice.
Australia, BTW, has reserved 7010 and 5550 in all states for fake phone numbers.
A while ago MS Access started to pop up a message about blocking harmful expressions. All that showed is that they have a flimsy approach to security and integrity.
All scriptable environments should have a sandbox mode, which removes all access to the outside world. That doesn't mean that you can't also have a non-sandbox mode which requires user interaction or digital certification. That's it, problem solved.
Are these the same spammers who invented image spam? When spam filters started using OCR, they started to distort the image to bypass this.
So, if I understand correctly, captcha is a technique used to disguise spam, and make it harder for humans to register. it is machine readable by spambots but not spam filters.
If I understand correctly.
Microsoft is a member of the W3C. These are the people who actually make the relevant standards.
Now, either their rep sleeps through meetings, has a serious learning difficulty, or is some sort of double agent. Otherwise, why is it so difficult for a company the size of Microsoft to code things that everybody else seems to get right? Unless, of course, their coders are struggling with the tools they've been saddled with ...
I had to check the calendar to make sure this wasn't some sort of April fools' stunt.
Why would anybody want a company which seems to have cornered the market in security flaws let them anywhere their desktop?
And how would that be affected my Microsoft's own security software which should be stopping this kind of thing?
Mark
Wne Apple was developing OSX, they also decided to charge for beta test copies. The trouble was that it didn't stop there. Those of us who then paid full price for version 10.1 found that we were still beta testing an unfinished product, and being asked to pay full price again for 10.2.