Law Firm Logic
It's a Plausible Deniability Password. If everyone can use it to log in, you can't connect any specific action to a specific person. It unlocks the Blame the Intern defense in court.
388 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2007
Fortunately all the data in Canvas at The OSU is assignments, email addresses, and messages between students and instructors. All financial information is on different systems, including SSNs. We use student ID numbers on Canvas.
The timing wasn't too bad for us. Graduating senior grades were already in. Even if it had not come back online Friday, we could have some wiggle room. As it is I will just have more grading than anticipated Monday, but I had most of Friday free.
I taught American History for a small University for a few years. My classes would all start with the Declaration of Independence and the line "All men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights" and see how close we got at any given point in American history. Usually not very.
The problem here is that if we acknowledge the courage of the people who ended Slavery and paused Jim Crow for a few years, we also have to acknowledge the existence of chattel slavery and Jim Crow. The same is true for a large number of unpleasant facts of American history. The MAGA brand of patriotism erases the contributions of many of the best of us by failing to allow anyone to recognize the existence of the problems they worked at great personal sacrifice to overcome.
Dad had a set of tools sprayed neon yellow on one side. The guys at the steel mill each had a pegboard for their tools and each used a different bright color to spay the board with all their tools in place. Not only did they stand out against the grimy equipment in the mill, but they could also tell if somebody walked off with another person's tool and/or if there was a tool missing as it left a void on the board. And it was not good to be caught using a tool that was not your color.
Many American businesses simply refuse to give the government their data. Others take a few months to fill out the reports, which are voluntary. If you want 100% accuracy you are going to have to make reporting mandatory and include the type of regulations this government are firmly against.
If you don't like how they make estimates, read the full report not just the headline. Take the raw data and make your own model. They provide everything you need to do so. They may not have the best model, but it is built by consensus and that is why it is generally accepted. The errors are at least consistent and transparent.
You would certainly be harassed by law enforcement, but as it stands in current court opinions speech becomes threatening when it is made to a specific person or group who are capable of acting on that threat and the speaker has reason to believe that they will take directions from the speaker. You have a sign in public that is not specific. That is protected speech. A crime boss says in the presence of undetlings "I wish the DA would go away." Not protected.
When we first got optical mice instead of roller balls, I had a user complain that their mouse was moving randomly across the screen. Turned out their mouse pad had a lenticular pattern, and the laser was bouncing off the ridges as they moved across the pad. Flipped it rubber side up and all was good.
Even in terms of Europeans, Oregon and California were not empty. If the Hudson Bay Company had not sold supplies and bought grain from the first wagon train settlers, they would never have made it. The Willamette and Tualatin valleys had a mix of farmers (many retired Hudson Bay Company men married to native women), missionaries, and trappers when they showed up. A few traders had outposts along the route already and expanded as overland settlers became a steady business.
I teach a University class on writing for STEM. I tell my students that Wikipedia can be an introduction to a topic just like any encyclopedia, but they can't cite it. They have to follow the links to the source articles. It can also give them good search terms for using in journal databases.
I have shown them.in class how to brainstorm with CoPilot. It can limk to peer reviewed sources (mostly open access). I also intentionally show my students that it can be wrong ("How many 'r's are there in 'strawberry?') so they understand the importance of fact checking.
In classes in my department, students may use AI up to the point of creating an outline. Once they start creating content it has to be their own words.
What I have not read anywhere was of any type of threat against Meta if they did not comply. Informing, advocating, and pressuring are very different things. Was Meta threatened in many way, directly or indirectly? Or were the Federal agencies doing their duty to advocate for voluntary action that could and did save lives, as is their mission? Does Zuck want to turn Meta into X, where misinformation is not just tolerated by encouraged??