If....
AI "data" (really compute) centers follow the example of Mad King Elon's RacistAI™ farms, high-demand power falls back on rows of methane-powered generators. Swell (not).
788 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Dec 2007
…. probably didn’t sue any of the originators of the distros because they remembered how they got off scot free when Apple, with considerable justification, tried to sue them for the visual language in the Windows desktop, stolen directly from the Mac OS of the day (System some-number-or-other).
Study after study has shown that human (admin) costs for Windows are way higher per seat than for macOS seats. Whether that’s true for systems used as servers, I don’t know, but based on my own experiences ~ 7 years ago and earlier, it at least held true fir our mix of server and desktop deployments. The Linux per-system cost for admin appeared to be similar to the Mac cost for servers, but my experience was limited, so it’ll have to remain “appeared” until I read a credible study.
....should probably be applied, as jamf is an app for managing groups of Macs, but they're claiming, as the internal user IT group at IBM did a decade or so ago when they started allowing users to decide between Macs or PC/Windows for use on the job, that the life cycle costs (initial purchase plus support) is lower for Macs in enterprise deployments. the basic argument, as I recall from the IBM slide set, was that is took ~ 1/3 the number of IT professionals to care and feed Mac users as a similar number of PC users. And people, as we all know, are a lot more expensive, year by year, than whatever a laptop or desktop costs.
https://www.jamf.com/blog/total-cost-of-ownership-mac-versus-pc-in-the-enterprise/
“We're calling on phone manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung to do more to support us and protect their customers – especially around phone security and reuse.”
And yet the article glaringly fails to mention that the intercepted package was found because an owner of one of the purloined iPhones had Find My enabled on the device, and was able to direct police to its location.
....should DD deploy these in my neighborhood: the young, stupid males with minimally souped-up cars with abnormally loud exhausts who like to vroom-vroom and screech-screech on the public roads will no doubt compete to see who can punt the red blobs the farthest.
I’m retired now, but I spent a measurable part of my three decades at my last employer’s talking back to piss-poor mangers in public. At least prior to the current US administration, that was not a firing offense. Indeed, it appeared to improve morale among both the decent managers and all the rest of us.
I didn’t see anything indicating they were being prosecuted for being geniuses. The prosecution was brought based on evidence that they had broken one or more laws. Whether the people responsible for “critical national infrastructure” should be legally liable for shoddy ITsec is something else entirely.
In the meantime, the two alleged perps were remanded in custody, awaiting further court appearances. May be some time before they walk, or crack, free.
Considering the incredibly obsolete systems that particular tax outfit depends on, it's probably just as well they don't try to recruit managers from outside.... they'd probably be liable for injuries incurred by interviewees tripping on the first step in their terrified rush out the door.
The "I manage people, not content" line stems from the immediate post-WW II dictum, supposedly originating at Harvard Business School, that a good manager could manage anything: the students needed to learn how to manage, not any of the semi-infinite types of business they's all go on to manage in their careers.
Evidently, Steve Jobs Mark I bought into that philosophy when he recruited John Sculley, who'd spent the previous 17 years of his life selling (in Jobs's own words) sugared water and buying advertising prices ~ a factor of ten higher than his competitors'. It was never clear that Sculley understood the personal computer business, nor Apple's niche in it. Differences of opinion with SJ M I led to Jobs's departure and the founding of NeXT.
Apple's board ditched Sculley and hired Michael Spindler, who had excellent credentials (DEC, Intel, President of Apple Europe) but figured that the only way to reign in losses was to fire as many people as possible, and then try to sell the company (to IBM, Sun, or Philips). He lasted less than three years before the Apple board canned him.
Then came Gil Amelio, a guy who knew computer hardware from the ground up (Bell Labs, Fairchild, Rockwell, National Semiconductor) as well as having a Ph.D. in physics. You know, a smart guy. Yet he spent months trying to lowball the price of BeOS, failed, and then contributed his one historical decision: buying NeXT for twice what he'd tried to offer Be. In less than 18 months after starting as Apple CEO, Amelio was out on his ear, thank to Jobs's lobbying the board. The rest, as they say, is history — but remember that beyond soldering, Jobs's hardware experience was extremely limited, and it was his partnership with Wozniak that jump-started the company and the industry. Jobs should be respected for interesting himself in the hardware just enough to allow him to pursue one product vision after another. Those may be visions that most people reading this site mock, but that punters literally lined up in mall hallways and on city streets to turn over their hard-earned <insert currency name here> to buy. Jobs never knew everything about the technologies that went into his "magical" devices, but he was intellectually curious enough to learn what he needed to know about them to make superior (as measured by sales) products. and let's face it, in the business world, it's only the bottom line that matters.
All human beings are creatures of habit. Get one of them used to their every whim being fulfilled by suckups and misguided women willing to be impregnated by the serial big daddy, and it's very hard for that human to recall that there was ever a different way of life. Hopefully, the Starship that takes the Mad King to Mars will be large enough to accommodate a sufficient number of sycophants and uterus-for-hires to satisfy his bipolar wishes.
To what degree does an IPv6 implementation of “an upstream router” handling all address allocation replicate the security function of NAT on a home ‘v4 network? I recall that some years ago, v6 went from “no obfuscation” to “some obfuscation, if desired,” but I don’t know where that stands now.
Or I suppose they could have looked at the connectors on the drive and the receptacles on the rackmount system and figured out what went (and didn’t go) where. But I guess that’s the sort of thing that some fraction (guessing ~ 80% for males in their maximum testosterone years) are only capable of learning the hard way.
Here in the US, there’s been a “ Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act” (HIPAA) on the books since 1996. Prior to that, the author’s urgent care facility was very unlikely to have been able to access MGH’s or any other medical facility’s records — but it was only able to do so in 2025 because the author had to fill out/assent to some printed forms that allowed the urgent care outfit to access his HIPAA-protected records. MGH may or may not have digitized its patient records prior to 1996, when the HIPAA clock started ticking, but eventually it had no choice, just as it had no choice but to insure the security of those data (well, OK, who knew from zero-days when that law was written?). Thus the paperwork I feel certain the author had to deal with before he could receive treatment in 2025, just as I do every time I visit a medical facility here.