a little late but ...
we use spiceworks, its worth a look and it seems to suit our > 200 org.
14 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Dec 2007
I've stopped watching most telly because the adverts ruin immersion, they are loud, long, and too frequent. I cannot sit down and enjoy the experience any more.
Imagine if you went to a theater and every 10-15 minutes everything stopped so someone can tell you, in a very exited voice, about some inane product. BAH! I'm finding other things to do instead.
Those were my thought too. Also I wonder whether its a get rich quick scheme, whereby content is spread over more pages than it need to be. I cannot imagine that refunds won't have a cap, can you? I guess I will stop traveling the inter-webs if there's a toll everywhere I go. Not made of money me and starting to feel very discriminated against on the grounds of financial barriers to accessing information.
really appropriate technology? DAB radio stutters and coughs, can't listen to my prefered station because the signal is weak. My aged tranny lives in the bathroom and keeps on going.
Have to admit that I'm a bit deaf , so what will I want with fabulous quality? FM works for me.
I sometimes wonder why we chase all these new alternatives without considering whether what we have does the job.
I've seen a few Vista laptops and desktops since its release, most of which were slow performers to the point that they were almost unusable. Generally they had been sold with 512Mb ram, some sort of dual core processor and inbuilt graphics. Minimum spec, not nice, not clever, not suited to Vista.
Anyway, I recently saw a Vista PC with a E6750 processor, 2GB ram and a NVidia 8600GT 512Mb. Using the onboard graphics, the performance was ok but not good with games, adding the the 8600GT improved performance significantly to make it very usable. The performance index jumped from 3.6 to 5.6 on the Vista performance-o-meter.
Vista needs loads of memory, at decent processor and motherboard, a decent Graphics card and fast disk access, all of these together.
XP needs lower specced hardware to give a comparable performance at a lower cost, theres the rub! As I see it, there are a lot of functioning computers out there that will not run well with Vista even with some changes to the hardware, XP can work well on these machines in most cases or just by adding more memory. I'm speaking about Windows but Linux is another option.
I guess that a year (Two?) down the line, fewer people will complain much about Vista performance as they will be running it on better hardware which will by then be cheaper.