My laptop battery lasts for five days...
or more.
With the laptop switched off, of course.
It has to be switched on, you say?
Oh, bugger.
...like this claim...
1194 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Dec 2007
is that Bletchley Park is associated with <whisper> The War (don't mention the war) </whisper>.
The PC Brigade would rather have anything associated with <whisper> The War </whisper> cleansed from the (PC approved) History Books (along with the blanket bombing of cities like Dresden, and all the other 'nasty' things that happened). Their delicate little sensibilities can't handle the fact that all these 'nasty' little things happened, on both sides, and they forget the price that was paid so that they could enjoy the 'freedoms' we currently do (until the NuLabourian Utopia is fully implimented, another reason Bletchley gets no Gov't support, as it represents the struggle for these freedoms we now take for granted and are allowing to be eroded at an ever increasing rate).
Disgraceful?
Certainly.
Surprising?
Not.
Please, can someone in 'merka reassure me that you DO NOT have the aforementioned agency.
If this agency DOES, however, exist, then That Explains Everything!
"Earth orbit is indeed a lot closer than you might think."
and a lot further away than you realise, Mr Akkerman.
BTW, does anyone else see the resemblance of the 'spacecraft' in the picture to a very large phallus? And is that a zero-g orgy going on in there?
Or is it just me?
for making things 'vanish' without explanation.
Had an Orange email account for years, linked to phone. They USED to have a free text facility on the email portal, but it 'vanished' some time back, leaving a similar gap on the web pages where the links used to be.
All without explanation, despite numerous requests for 'clarification'.
Well, fuck me, who'd have guessed! And as usual, it's the rest of us that'll be picking up the tab for this cock-up.
And as for;
"We don't have to pay for wind power - it just comes to us naturally,"
I'd suggest that Ms.McCaffrey should perhaps consider changing her diet / psychotherapist.
Or does she still believe in faeries too?
Unfortunately, the mag "WebUser" carries an artice on Phorm.
I say unfortunately, as it casts a 'rose tinted' view (IMHO) of what exactly the Phorm tech will (or more importantly COULD) deliver.
The line "examines a surfer's complete browsing history, cataloguing which sites they visit and how often, and detailing how long they spend on a site and which links they click on. From this information, ISP's can build a profile of each unique user, without discovering their identity."
Whilst this is true, the article fails to illuminate the next (logical) step, wherein the ISP, or Government Agency, equipped with this data, and the ISP's subscriber/IP database, wouldn't take too long to associate browsing habits with IDENTITIES.
This, I believe, is the nub of the whole argument.
now all they need to do is remove it from ALL their other 'services'
(from Googlemail)
"11. Content licence from you
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.
11.2 You agree that this licence includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organisations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
11.3 You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this licence shall permit Google to take these actions.
11.4 You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above licence."
Deja Vu, anyone?
is it relies on the honesty and integrity of those compiling or editing it to achieve any degree of accuracy.
However, people with a vested interest in distorting the *facts* have ample opportunity to do so. Without, it would appear, too many checks (if any) being done.
Wikipedia WAS a good idea, in principle.
But now, only a fool would take the information therein as 'accurate' without cross checking against at least two or three other sources.
And it should NEVER be allowed to be cited as a 'reference' in any court of law.
now all they need to do is remove the same clauses from all the EULA of all their other 'services' which DO contain this wording (from Googlemail)
"11. Content licence from you
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.
11.2 You agree that this licence includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organisations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
11.3 You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this licence shall permit Google to take these actions.
11.4 You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above licence."
Deja Vu, anyone!
That wouldn't have *anything* to do with the 'free money' given to the guinea pigs, would it?
No.
Of course not.
How cynically foolish of me to think that anyone's opinion could be swayed by a nice shiny new phone, and some 'credit' to spend.
Does anyone have a breakdown of the spending profiles of the guinea pigs (without any personally identifiable data, of course!) to see just what proportion (if any!) was spent on BOOZE?
In five easy steps
1) Don appropriate PPE.
2) Remove hard drive(s) from PC/laptop being disposed of.
3) Remove casing of said drives.
4) Reduce drive platters to 5mm fragments using 1kg hammer.
5) Install new, clean replacement drive into equipment for disposal by sale, if required.
I'd be much more impressed if they managed to get that sort of resolution into a 'normal' (sub 48") screen, at a 'reasonable' price.
"we were forced to sit some way back from the screen"
Just how far back exactly? 30'? 40'? More?
Great for exhibitions and the like then, but not your average livingroom.
Likes 'em big! (Allegedly)
for one of these POS letters to arrive.
We have NEVER used any torrent, of any kind, and have never downloaded anything counter to "copyright". (No, I'm not a feckin saint, just not interested in being a 'freetard')
I plan to cite demanding money with menaces, for threatening to take court action over a non-existent event unless I cough up.
This is 'legitimised' extortion, and must be stopped.