Re: Old style acounting, and old style plans
Who has a mobile phone plan where they actually end up paying for individual calls?
I do. For my usage pattern, it works out a lot cheaper that way...
Vic.
5860 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Dec 2007
A signal that tells an artillery battery to open fire in 5 minutes is fine to send out on a code system which can be broken in 6 minutes time.
At the risk of being pedantic, that's not actually true...
If an attacker can see your historic messages, he can build a picture of you. This will likely give him a good guess at certain phrases that you will usually use in communications. Bletchley Park dubbed these "tells", and they are an important method of breaking future communications. It's essentially how they broke Enigma...
Vic.
then start wanting better conditions, time off work, more pay.
That's basically the motivation that drove Call-Me_Kenneth to start the rebellion.
Vic.
what in the name of ${DEITY} is *wrong* with giving your child a unique name?
It means they have no choice whether or not to stand out from the crowd; they will do so by your volition, not their own.
As a child, I resented my parents' decision to give me a relatively unusual name. As an adult, I have become accustomed to it - to the extent that I rarely use my surname.But the transition between those phases involved quite a bit of aggravation; I believe my life would have been much simpler if I had had a more commonplace name - although it might have been less lucrative...
Vic.
Unless its a British carrier, which will have to make do with a solitary Type 45 destroyer. If you're lucky.
No, that's completely unfair.
Most military docks are full of weaponry, and all of that is available to defend all the vessels within them - including carriers.
Vic.
I have done something similar to prove that RM sold their account lists - or had them stolen - because they were the only ones ever issued with rm@mydomain.com).
You've done no such thing.
A username part as simple as "rm" could easily have bene found by dictionary attack or domain enumeration. Had your address been "thisaddresswasonlygiventormandtheresnowayitshouldcomefromanyoneelse@mydomain.com", you might have had a point...
Vic.
Russ Swift would agree there.
I once emailed Russ Swift to see if he did lessons. I asked if he'd "teach me to drive like a nutter".
He replied that the only Vic he knew already drove like a nutter...
The guy in question had the same surname as me, but sadly, wasn't me.
Vic.
Copyright is ONLY about money. The OP got it wrong when it said that no one can make a Batmobile - anyone can. They just can't PROFIT from it by selling it commercially.
No, that's completely wrong. If it were so, it would be legal to make copies of anything you like as long as you don't sell it. Try copying stuff and telling people about it and you'll find out just how wrong you are...
Copyright is about protecting the original creator's right to make money from his creation.
No, copyright is the right to copy. It's that simple.
Vic.
I've never understood why people buy them over here.
Some of them look rather pretty...
I've always promised myself that one day, I will own a TransAm. I *know* it's a pile of shite, but I still want one.
It will not be my only vehicle. I am fully aware that it will be the single least reliable vehicle I've ever owned. And I used to have a Lotus...
Vic.
That's what Blancco sells: Erasure tools for phones & disk drives
I used to be associated with a charity that refurbished & re-sold PCs. We originally set up a dban station for wiping drives. Management then decided that we would have to use Blancco instead,
I don't know if they've changed their model, but back then, the software had an initial cost, *plus* a cost for each use. And this charity was particularly cash-strapped.
I have nothing to do with them any more.
Vic.
HR: Oh, him? He left last week.
Your point notwithstanding, I'd also like to point out that his former employer was *also* dumb as shit.
When an employee leaves - under *any* circumstances - you disable the account. Keep the data, but make damn sure the account can't be used to log in to anything.
Vic.
There was a major flap at an air show recently due to reports of a drone reported flying around the runway
I went to a few airshows this summer. There were many announcements over the PA that drone flying was not permitted.
And yet there were still plenty of stalls selling drones...
Vic.
I am no MS fan, but MS has datacenters in the EU, the only issue is that they would need to store the data in the EU DataCenters
No.
They are already in court fighting exactly that case; if they win, then what you have said above is (almost) true.
But at present, they are legally oblliged to hand over any data they "control" - i.e. any data in any data centre in the world over which they have any power.
Vic.
MS have recently gained approval for cloud storage for sensitive data. They have concluded a deal with the MoD. Think about that for a moment.
And if they lose their case against the DoJ, they can *still* be forced to hand over all that data to pretty much any US official that wants a gander. Think about that for a moment.
Vic.
If you don't want your letters to go through the Soviet Postal System, don't send any letters to recipients within the Soviet Postal System.
That presupposes that you know your letters are going through the Soviet Postal System.
Suppose, for example. you were simply emailing a UK organisation form inside the UK. Let's imagine an imaginary digital tabloid. Let's call it theregister.co.uk.
Safe to assume that email is staying in the EU? No, it isn't. Because if you actually check the MX records, you'll see that the many MX records for our fictitious organisation all point to the US...
Vic.
No, she said that "You may need to learn to shout at people." was "*fucking* uncool". That's not interesting dirt, it's a perfectly reasonable statement.
No, I don't think so. It would appear to be an escalation of the situation.
If you don't like people being told they need to shout[1], starting to swear at them is inappropriate.
Vic.
[1] Even if you do take that bit entirely out of context. In the original context, it was merely a jokey way of telling Greg KH that he needed to be more willing to reject code he didn't like, rather than fixing it himself every time...
Indeed. If you read the post that this article is about she comes across as perfectly sensible
Well, I'm not going to try to claim some sort of encyclopaedic knowledge here, but from my cursory examination of the spat, she actually appears to be the perpetrator of those behaviours she finds abhorrent...
Vic.
Sarah Sharp, on the other hand, is pretty much an unknown quantity
Not any more.
Prior to this, you'd probably only know of her if you'd had USB3 dealings in Linux. But now she's made this big bold statement, people have been looking into her. And it's not gone well...
Vic.
The fact is that the Linux kernel project is his
Not intrinsically so; he is merely the lead maintainer.
Many a time, he has told people to make a fork if they don't like how he does things. He has neither right nor power to prevent such a thing occurring. The fact that no stable kernel fork has overcome his is testament to the fact that most developers seem reasonably happy with how he runs things.
Vic.
First, it was not "her responsibility", she is a volunteer. No one obliged her or paid her to do that work.
From a feature on her,
Where do you get your paycheck?I work in Intel's Open Source Technology Center,
Vic.
Going off on a slight tangent...
all the pilot had to do at the end was... let.go.of.the.controls.
There's a wonderful story about the so-called Cornfield Bomber. The pilot managed to get the aircraft into a flat spin, which he deemed unrecoverable (probably correctly).
He ejected.
The thrust from the ejection, coupled with the change in CofG, caused the aircraft to come out of the spin. It then landed in a field, where it was left to run out of fuel. It was returned to service.
Vic.
So, if Ahmed bin Nutjob (ahmed@nutjob.isil.sy) buys a pair of fluffy slippers from amazon, then all the communications of amazon are now a legitimate target of global surveillance by the nutjobs in the NSA?
Well of course. But they'll not be indiscriminate about this - they'll delve no deeper than, say, six degrees of separation. More than that would be just silly.
Vic.
How many people bashing Peeple have actually looked into it
Most of us.
It doesn't take long to realise just how bad an idea it is, for the same reason it doesn't take long to realise it's a bad idea to stand in the middle of an unlit mnotorway wearing black at night.
It just is that obviously idiotic...
Vic.