I wonder if you can PXE-boot off an ISO image served over http or smb or tftp or nfs yet...
It must be horrible to be a Windows admin!
5267 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2007
Yep, the Linux version of Skype is rather good. Let's hope they leave it that way.
The only tricky bit is pulseaudio. Its a little ephemeral - you have to configure it while skype is running audio or you don't see the skype parameters. At least, that was my experience at one point.
The problem with APUs is that they are bound to the CPU. If the market for x86 CPU's has tanked, it makes it more difficult to sell anything.
AMD has a marketing problem too. Its difficult to tell where the chips sit in terms of power. Intel's i3/i5/i7 is easier to follow (if fouled up by all the i7 variants).
If I were AMD I'd look to use discrete graphics cards to take over the desktop. Add ARM chips (which are cheap), a NIC and some SATA ports and include a NAS on the card. Do the same for APUs - add ARM silicon to run always-on functions. I'd far rather have a NAS than try to squeeze a little extra speed out of the disks. How about a hardware button on a laptop which suspends x86 and switches to an ARM chip? That might be a favourite for watching videos on the train or just generally for providing a high-power x86 system which can run email and small stuff on ARM for long battery life.
Do you have elastic computer requirements?
For most companies, I think the answer is, "not really." Increasing requirements? Perhaps, but not much that varies a lot up and down. Plus, hardware is cheap.
From what I can see there are several things which reduce costs for cloud: cheap licensing (open source), load-balancing (for sharing hardware) and automation /single architecture.
Perhaps going "cloud" is the only way to realise these benefits but it essentially requires application re-writes. If you are re-writing for the web, you may find you can achieve load-balancing distribution with some apache boxes, some VRRP and BIND. Perhaps you (shock horror!) don't need global reach for your apps, because all your users in an office down the road. The trick may just be to impose the same discipline on internal IT as a cloud provider would.
>There is a perfect fix for this already, it's called a Linux distro.
Few people care about the OS. Apple have it right when they market capabilities, not specs. Do you have a Linux distro which allows you to use the best (only usable?) diagramme tool - Visio?
If I had some of Google's billions and wanted to thwart MS' desktop control, a drop-in, cross-platform replacement for Visio would be high on my list.
Windows does have some excellent apps which don't have a high-quality equivalent in the *nix world. The good news is that MS appears to be running out of useful features to add, which means catching-up should get easier. With the success of Apple in BYOD and Linux in the datacentre, there's also a greater market for cross-platform tools.
>now we've heard that several bugs, some major, can be found at United with only a few hours expended. Perhaps that is one of the 'facts' they should have embargoed?
Nope. The point is to encourage people to find and report the bugs. If people think its easy, they're more likely to have a go. The trick is to make the bounty worth more than selling the flaw. Lucky for United, even high-value mileage probably doesn't cost them much. Win-win.
Perhaps AMD will see this as an opportunity. If fab improvements are running into diminishing returns due to physics, AMD may look to play catch up.
AMD need a USP. They've already got some ARM expertise - I'd suggest integrating ARM onto x86 hardware. A little hardware switch to suspend to RAM the x86 side and allow you to play with android coupled with a big screen and humongous battery, or perhaps a video overlay to run ARM over the top of the x86 display. Add a couple of bluetooth controllers (paddles [remember them?], joysticks, Wii) and you have a trivial games machine.
From https://what-if.xkcd.com/30/
Uranus: Uranus is a strange, uniform bluish orb. There are high winds and it’s bitterly cold. It’s the friendliest of the gas giants to our Cessna, and you could probably fly for a little while. But given that it seems to be an almost completely featureless planet, why would you want to?
Of course, being science, this is probably wildly inaccurate. We just need someone in a Cessna to go and take some pictures for us.
People still don't get it. The EU Charter spells out that it is aiming for "ever closer union." It aims to become the single government for Europe. In that context, "harmonisation" is the goal in itself, it doesn't matter what the content of the law is.
Of course it will fail. European countries stick together like iron and clay, but that doesn't mean it won't do a whole stack of damage in its attempt to rebuild the Roman or Holy Roman Empires.
And what happens in Greece? An EU directive you say? Well, I'm sorry, but austerity measures mean we have no money to spend on fancy but pointless IT projects.
>So it's goodbye BYOD and welcome to the world of having a separate phone (and presumably separate tablet) for work.
And this is why MS will fail here. People will pay for a status-symbol phone but companies will not. People can work around network outages, but companies don't want to do that. Why would a company pay for a laptop to run your apps... and then pay for a phone (probably costing as much as the laptop) to run more limited versions of the same apps?
>Each process comes with its own baggage, if you have more of them running at once there is more baggage.
But you forget Chrome's intent. It is a trojan horse to get apps onto Windows, not a pure "for fun" browser. In that scenario, far better to have one process per tab so that different apps don't interfere with each other when they (inevitably) go wrong.
>Blimey - you must have quick reaction times !
+1 for that. UI speed is not a problem for me. Privacy and inclination towards evil is, so FF is the norm with chromium (usually in privacy mode) reserved mostly for "sites that expect IE" and, occasionally, if I can't be bothered to mess with noscript.
I have to say though, not all feature-creep is bad. There is an increasing tendency from OS providers to try to own the entire stack, provide all features and squash third parties. This helps their privacy-intruding search ambitions. Technically, should video-conferencing be built into the browser? Probably not. However, there is something to be said for doing so to promote cross-platform interaction and prevent lock-in by facetime or skype.
Could it be that the value of both those currencies has dropped? MS may claim that's a justification, but for those on the receiving end, its irrelevant.
I'm surprised that MS has gone with this quite so early on though. "How does this compare with paying one fixed price in the past" will still be fresh in people's minds.
Sun Tzu say, "the best tactical solution may not align with the best strategy." (Ok, he probably didn't, but piling on the MS Office bandwagon because Visio is the best may not have been a good long term plan.)
>Perhaps more IT people should learn to speak 'management' more fluently
The issue is temperament. People drawn to IT usually like to be precise and correct. They are the kinds of people you want dealing with machines and data which require precision and accuracy. "Management" likes expectations met. This is how consultancies survive, you put a layer of Management between the techies and the customers' Management, who pad the budgets and the time-scales. Yes, it far more expensive and takes longer, but it gives the customer's Management a warm fuzzy feeling when projects come in "on-time" even if "on-time" is far later than a non-padded project would take.
Android makers suffer from the same problem as PC makers. At the end of the day, if you run Windows, its still just a Windows PC. There is very little that hardware can add to the brand experience. It gets worse when you fail to innovate, or innovate slightly but jack the prices sky-high.
If I were Samsung, I'd spin off a separate company for the high-end. There is little kudos in the "Samsung" brand as it covers too large a range of items. They've plastered "Samsung" across all the devices. They need a different brand and brands take time and money to build. Typically of an established player, they have a product/solution/brand and are going to use it wherever possible. Rather like MS trying to put a desktop on a mobile device or indeed a mobile interface on the desktop. If you ask someone what kind of new phone they bought and they say "Samsung" you have to ask, "Which one?" in order to understand what they have. iPhone purchasers don't have to deal with that confusion. That is brand clarity.
Samsung also need to keep their techie users/press happy. Get that battery life fixed. Stop the segmentation through silly storage limits. 128G only is reasonable for a flagship device at the moment. Needing to pick which music/podcasts to sync is far too irritating. USB/SD storage is also not unreasonable. Make replaceable batteries part of the casing if required. It isn't a great deal of aluminium to add to a battery. Contribute to the techie Android ecosystem. RSync and SSHFS as standard please. Help fund that OwnCloud stuff so that it works really well. Help fund a digikam/f-spot port work to Windows, etc. Samsung has shown it isn't good at writing software, but that doesn't mean it can't help. It might be cheaper than marketing.
> ... the burden of taxation always falls on individuals, never on corporations. Corporations are paper entities run by humans for the benefit of humans.
The first sentence is true, the second requires caveats.
Taxation falls on nearly all the population, but Corporations are paper entities which concentrate wealth in the hands of shareholders and executives. They also tend to be anti-competitive, by which I mean they seek to use the legal system to block competition by other entities, particularly new entrants. Multi-nationals are also able to move profits around by operating outside government jurisdictions and moving money around fast than governments can update the law.
Personally I suspect a large dose of xenophobia might be in order. The current legal system seeks to maintain a level playing field for local and foreign corporates. However, rather than playing fair, this just encourages all corporates to play the field and move profits and cost-centres around to circumvent the intent of the law. If we biased the tax system in favour of those obviously keeping operations and profits (and therefore taxes) within our own country then perhaps corporate tax receipts would be higher.
I have no idea, for example why the UK government is so enamoured with MS (or any other foreign high-IP-value corporate), when it sucks so much value out of the UK economy for so little in return. You don't need to put up tariffs, but they could do more to encourage those who keep all their profits and tax receipts at home.
Embrace, extend...
Put ARM logic inside your x86 silicon and use power management to switch off the x86 bits when you want to run in tablet mode. Switch to x86 when you need x86 apps which can do heavy lifting.
That would help slow demand for ARM to grow larger-power chippery.
> So, what will children be doing after 10 in their bedrooms?
Perhaps the Germans idea of the "children" who need protecting is different from the simplistic American idea that the law is the be-all and end-all of existence.
Perhaps they just don't want porn mixed with "bob the builder" books for six-year-olds. The teenagers aren't going to be fussed or limited, which is probably fine by all.
London to Aus is 22 hours in the air with only a 2 hour break after 14 hours.
But back to the "cloud" bit of the story: it looks rather similar to what we use to call the bureau model. The difference appears to be that because the Vendor runs lots of small systems, you have a complicated job division and results reassembly requirement. It's just a batch job.
I can nver understand why big companies don't spend cash on hardware for jobs they don't care much for. Ditch the redundancy, just get around to fixing it when you can. Hardware is cheap and if it's just for ad hoc jobs which are not time critical, you don't need expensive DC facilities such as separate power suppliers, anti-tank traps etc. if the aircon breaks, you just hit the off button until it's fixed.
re: Beethoven, Bach, Mozart
Didn't they tend to get people to pay them to compose? Getting your money up-front and doing a lot of composing might be handy.
What happens today is different.
Someone noted that you get a little brain reward when you hear something, you know what comes next and then it happens as expected. I noticed this when I heard an 80's track and thought "ooh great!" despite really disliking the actual track.
So what we get now is saturation coverage by promotion companies which means people get a little "brain reward" whenever they hear it, which they confuse with liking the track itself and/or the artist.
Many "artists" seem to think its their art which people like and is successful. That's only minimally correct - the real determinant of success (given a pool of approximately equally good "art") is the cash spent on promotion.
I can see where this is going.
I don't think RH make their money from the desktop though.
I'd hazard a guess that it is mostly support for systems running apache and oracle for companies where such systems handle a lot of revenue.
The year of the Linux Desktop is not here yet. We need to wait for Snow Leopard users' systems to die and be forced to look at the abomination of Yosemite and Windows 10. They will choose the one true KDE Way ;)
We also need a time-machine equivalent to be shipped as standard in a visible way, not be some add-on.
Versailles is fine art.
That large lump of whatever it is, is the vandalism. Yellow paint couldn't polish it.
Even if you think the sculpture is art or satire, you don't scribble the words of Orwell's 1984 over a Constable.
(But it still isn't art, its just rude pictures scribbled into a rather nice desk.)