Could do better...
Come on El Reg, the headline should of been
"Virgin fails to get it up"
Have you lost access to the double entendre generation server?
1087 posts • joined 28 Nov 2007
The bigger problem with DAB is while FM will degrade smoothly, to the point where although you are not getting HiFi sound quality (not a great issue with sport broadcasting anyway), DAB will just cut out leaving you with the dreaded cannot find station signal.
In some ways DAB is a step forward, but in others it harks back to the days where you have to hunt a position for the aerial to pick up the best reception, normally located in the least easily accessible area in your house
Maybe the biggest risk to Intel is China. With the US being increasingly belligerent on using weaponizing IP , there is a incentive for China to invest in its own processor architecture. If China put its weight into RISC-V then Intel and ARM may find things moving away from themselves very quickly
and a bit farther away we have the modern and total waste of taxpayers money " Strépy-Thieu boat lift "
Not sure what the basis of that comment is - on the continent rivers are still important transport routes and by providing a link between the Meuse and the Scheldt allowed an increase in traffic. What would be better, building more motorways?
I have visited the Canal du Centre at La Louviere in Belgium which dragged my wife to, much to her chagrin( don't feel too sorry for her, she knew who she was marrying :) ). It is not perhaps the most attractive part of Belgium and to get there you end up driving through a industrial estate, but is impressive none the less. You cannot help and be impressed by the engineering efficiency. I believe it still does work
Would also like to add the Strépy-Thieu boat lift which although far newer is also impressive.
agreed, sad to see him go. Even sadder (to see him go that is), he was apparently an anthropogenic climate change skeptic...
No he wasn't, although unfortunately his name was bandied around by those who want to legitimize their beliefs. What he believed was global warming would not necessarily result in worldwide disaster. Probably understandable within the context of a man who felt that any problem could be solved with enough application of resources and human intelligence, but not necessarily a great one for those left behind.
I did have one project like that .
We were planning to move from Data General Nova's to spiffing new Motorola Racks, however we could not work out how to transfer the code.
someone came up with the brilliant idea of exporting it via paper tape reader, then reading it in, on a paper tape reader connected to the target machine. Easy enough, except the host machine paper tape was fan-fold while the target was a reel. So we had someone output the paper tape, i had then every day drive 10 miles to the facility to feed in by hand the paper tape into the reader, hoping it would not tear in the process.
I did this for 4 days, then 5 days later the project got cancelled, so it was all in vain
You tell kids that nowadays, and they won't believe you
Just as well we don't use Safari for industrial control devices.
Normally these are local access, do not have remote access and are only updated on long term maintenance contracts (5 year usually)
Often certificates are given 20 years lifetimes because a safety critical system should not go down because a certificate has not been updated in the last year.
Biggest worry would be if Chrome etc follow suit
"A cyber threat actor used a spear-phishing link to obtain initial access to the organization’s information technology network before pivoting to its operational technology network"
More likely the IT system was randomly targetted, without the attacker actually knowing what the PC's did. The OT system was just collateral damage for the ransomware attack.
But it sounds sexier if you try and make out it was some sort of cyber-terrorist thing
My question is why the IT systems did not have up to date AV and malware detection on them
Prognostics, production reports, alert logging, remote diagnostics ... there many reasons.
It has become increasing common to seeing IT and OT connected which increases the risk of these sort of things. Proper firewall protections can reduce the risk, but it is bot unknown to see such perotections bypassed by ignorant IT
Making sure that default passwords are not reused or forced to be changed is important, however it raises another issue.
The common test against any security change is the "Major shitstorm at 1 O'clock in the morning a long way away..."
Basically if a safety critical system goes titsup in an inaccessible location at a time when 1st line support is unavailable, what do you do?
If a system was installed 20 years ago (not uncommon), where do you find your passwords. Are the stored on-site, if not does the company who installed your kit still exist, can they be contacted, have they maintained there records, do they know where they are?
Its scenarios like these that worry people and has to be measured against the unknown risk of a system being remotely hacked.
A few points here.
1. Working on ships can be really boring. Its not like its a 9-5 job, you are there for 24 hours for extended weeks. This means the temptations to hack the systems to make access easy is far greater. I remember being on a Royal Fleet Auxillary vessel in the 90's and I was amazed by the amount of pirated games that were onboard, because basically there is so little to do on your off-time. If ship owners wish to reduce the temptation to hack, they should provide the facilities to the crew for R&R in a separate secure system. But most won't because it increases cost.
2. Most ship systems are based on COTS systems. This means there is a great temptation for crew to "re-use" bits of kit. Its very hard to lock down say a PC running windows 7 to a determined user with a lot of time on there hands. The biggest threat however is things like USB sticks. They get plugged in so that someone can run their porno picked up on-shore which runs a virus. Virus checkers are very hard to run on such systems because a) without internet access they cannot be easily update b) interfere with the functionality. Fortunately most viruses are designed not to attack control systems but to get bank details etc, although the ransomware ones are a pain
3. Its all very well saying that passwords should be secret, changed etc, but IT policy often does not work well in a Operational technology environment(OT). Imagine a systems where you want to move a ship from a hazard, and your password has expired or you forgot your password and the system locks you out. In fact security standards emphasise that safety trumps security when there is a conflict.
4. Marine systems are very conservative, meaning they are very slow to react. The industry is moving forward, but with systems out there which are 25 years or older, it will take a long time before systems are bought into the 21st century cybersecurity wise
I disagree. Priti Patel (one of the senior figures in the current Brexit-delivering government) actively campaigned for Brexit on the grounds that it would allow the UK to increase immigration from Commonwealth countries (such as India) back to pre-EU levels of 300,000 or so per year.
The idea that Brexiteers weren't fully informed about what they were voting for and what the consequences would be needs to be put to rest. They didn't vote out of ignorance or prejudice. They knew what they voted for and they are going to get it.
Wait a second you really believe this? we are well and truly buggered
"Unlimited immigration of high calibre engineers, scientists and doctors from around the world (specifically India) is what many I know voted for."
I think a lot of your comrades in arms would be surprised to know that they voted for unlimited immigration from places like India, however well qualified they are.
Still a few problems with this. Firstly there is already a program where talented people can come in. It is capped at 2000, but those limits are rarely reached. We have always had the capacity to attract those, but there are better places to work and that is unlikely to change in the near future
Second is it treats people like commodities that can be bought and sold. These are human beings with their own needs and wants. They are also the sought after people so we are competing on a global stage. So here are a few questions that I would want to ask if I was one of them. Can I bring my wife/partner.children. What would be there legal status. Would they be able to work if my pay falls below the immigration threshold? When my children reach majority will they be given the rights as citizens? What are my rights as visa holder compared as a citizen. Am i tied to one employment? Do I have to pay extra for health care, etc. Certainly for many Europeans the answers to those questions will most likely fall far below what they can get in a similar post in the EU
Thirdly, cost to business. Which ever way you couch it, there is bureaucracy involved. If I wanted to hire the brightest band best I still need to convince the home office they fit the criteria. Big companies and universities will be OK, but startups may well find the cost and effort difficult to sustain
Fourth. Who decides who is the brightest and best. Why are some areas not included. Governments have a terrible track record in anticipating present and future needs
Finally. Can someone also be bright and unaware that the UK has become a far right xenophobic cesspit in recent years. It is almost a catch 22 situation - if apply, you are showing you are not bright enough to understand the ramifications
"Yet they could get their trains running again faster than we can now, in the 21st century?"
Steam trains are incredible time consuming to get going. Apart from the effort in cleaning ashes, it takes a long time to bring steam up to pressure. Nor were they particular reliable and when they went wrong, it tended to be a catastrophic failure.
It easy to look at rose tinted glasses at the age of steam, but they are inefficient, labour intensive and most of the drivers who drove them for a living were glad to see the back of them
Well its nice to see Windriver branching out. Unfortunately when they were owned by Intel, they only seemed interested in Intel x86 architecture so they supported things like ARM and other platforms poorly. However it is clear that Intel have given up in the embedded space, so it left Windriver with no where to go
"yet not a single one of you able to summon an argument for why my post is wrong."
Well, here's one argument. When UKIP was minority party in the European parliament and had no sitting MPs, he was invited consistently, while no other Euro MPs were invited onto the show.
However this is because QT a long time ago stopped become a forum for serious debate and became a mixture of the Jerry Springer show and the Daily Express, where people were invited not so much for there political discourse but as shock jocks. Even the audience is now invited based on not so much a selection of the country, but on who will give the best 1 minute tag line which is why it largely consists of red face 50 year old white blokes complaining about immigrants cluttering up their golf courses
The most significant award was 8 years ago. At that point it was believed Wikileaks was a organisation dedicated to journalistic values. In the subsequent period we have learnt that Assange is primarily concerned about himself even to the point of selectively releasing information to damage certain democratic parties who he has issues against.
Rather than a crusading protector of free speech, he turned out to be a petty demigod only interested only in his own glory, and screw anyone else (sic)
Be careful who you make your heroes
tying Assange to journalism is an insult to journalists everywhere. There are good, honest journalists around the world who are being vilified, suppressed and even arrested. Assange is not one of them, instead he is a parasite that feeds of the ideals of journalistic integrity
Never much liked Eno's music anyway...
My wife was seriously wedded to her Razr, refusing for may year my entreaties to get a smart phone, and as a piece of design it was hard to beet, from the lazer cut keypad to the display panel on the outside. I still believe that if it had a continouos upgrade program (better screen, camera and processor) it would have a niche today
Not sure about this one. I like the outside notification screen, but the folding screen seems like an overkill where two screens would of been easier and more flexible (sic). And the price....
I used to keep getting regular status reports for a GMC Yukon. It would tell me interesting reports like tyre pressures, diagnostic reports, mileage etc. It even listed its VIN number etc
Only one problem, I have never owned a GMC Yukon and since it was registered in Michigan, and i live in the UK, it is unlikely to be mine. I traced it down to a difference of one letter. I'm Tony and the car is owned by a Tonya.
Being a good citizen I set about trying to fix it. However I found it impossible to contact the diagnostic firm. They had no customer contact email. In the end I did it via twitter messenger. I told them the problem, but they seemed to struggle with the concept. They eventually agreed to fix it.
1 month later I got another diagnostic report. At that point I said what the hell. I just hope Tonya doesn't get a big issue with her car
While I agree with your maths, the idea of replacing petrol pumps withe charging stations is old school thinking
Because there is no need for large petrol storage tanks., electrical charging stations can be distributed anywhere there is a adequate power supply.
I too work for a well known multi-national company.
Firstly the best engineers are not exclusive to any part of the world. I would bet our German engineers against any in embedded and industrial control development. Our 2 best power system engineers were Greek, until they got nicked by Jaguar Landrover. The biggest obstacle is cultural and language, this is where we find that certain cultures work better together. Skill set is one thing, but it is generally easier to work with say a set of German colleagues in project development than say India. That is not to say we don't use both, but years of outsourcing has shown you cannot just swap groups out
But to your points
1) I hear this from some Brexiters that one of the upsides is that know we can pick and choose from a global pool instead of being limited to just Europe. Does anyone out there truly believe that the same people who seem offended that a pole wishes to speak Polish on a UK street is going to be perfectly happy to open immigration to all parts of the world, especially the none-white bits? Its a classic bit of Gas lighting. What we will find is that it will be increasingly difficult to recruit from anywhere outside the UK, and those who come will be treated as second class citizens. Not only that but skilled UK workers will be locked out of the wider European market, making co-operation and joint projects more difficult.
2) I have never had an issue with sending non-white engineers to France or Germany, while we have had racism to some Indian engineers here. Maybe you should of fought back a bit more. In truth it sounds more like a cultural problem at your company rather than a Belgium issue, but hey if they people like you in HR, maybe thats not a surprise
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020