Main problem
Will it be a gadget running Windows, or will it be a full fledged Linux computer? How well will one be able to use a console on such a device?
4851 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Mar 2007
I mean if you hand 1 Million to microsoft it will end up in the pockets of a few managers. From where it probably will go into some hedge funds buying some companies in order to destroy them.
With open source solutions the local admins will suddenly be possible to actually do something. Fixing a machine will be more than just re-installing the OS several times until some non-user accessible configuration is right.
Closed source software barely is good bang for the buck if you want employment, unless you want it in India.
I mean seriously, Skype is a blob of encrypted binary code. There surely is not only code inside to monitor in- and outgoing calls, but also to activate the microphone and camera or take screenshots. I mean even if Skype would be a honest company, if I was a programmer there, I don't know if I could resist putting such code inside. The risk of detection is near zero.
Besides, the NSA could probably just order such "features" to be implemented.
The big question is, is this availiable or just some vapor ware like windows, which you can only get if you pay huge sums of money?
Appart from what, what's so different about his approach to, let's say the LISP-Machine machine one? There you don't have any user visible RAM, but insteadt everything is done on disk. RAM is only a cache for disk.
They should read the article "Peripherer Datenverkehr in Datenverarbietungsanlagen" from "K. Ganzhorn" and "W.Walter" of IBM Germany. It explains, among other things, in detail how a "Handschriftleser" recognices letters and digits written by hand. Only with analog electronics. No CPU is involved in the process. I can scan you that article if you want.
Unfortunately they only install the dumbed down versions of Windows which do not have propper network support (especially terminal server). If they'd go with a propper version I could understand going for Windows, but what use is that OS, if you can't log into your laptop or desktop from another machine to use your data on a larger screen?
From a Netbook OS I expect it to run GUI applications like Browsers
I expect a real OS to have networking capability. So I can, for example, log into it remotely without disturbing the person currently working on the machine directly.
So... what will Windows 7 will be? A boot-loader for Browsers, or a real OS?
Microsoft forgot it's most important feature, backward compatibility. The main point about buying an OS from Microsoft always has been that _all_ your old applications since DOS 3.something would continue running as if nothing happened. Now they kill that feature and of course nobody buys Vista.
The problem why you cannot do propper work with Netbooks is because they run some sort of Windows which is not really suitable for every day work. What's the use of a computer when starting gnuplot takes you lots of clicks? What's the use of a computer where even sox is hard to get and you have problems installing even a latex distribution?
Windows is just for games. If you want to do some real work done, get Linux.
Why the distinction between client and server? What I want is a 'workstation'. A computer I can install software one which can not only run that software locally, but also act as an occasional application server so friends can also use them, by logging into my computer. Every cheap Linux distribution does that. Even Windows did that in version 2000. All Windows Vista has is a lobotomised RDP implementation which cannot do anything more than VNC already does for free.
Well first of all congratulations. The lighting of this video is by far not as bad as it's with the others. You know those wheels on the lens and the dials on the side of the camcorder actually have a meaning.
Second, sure it's great to have a wristwatch computer, but what's with that "phone-like" functionality. If I want do use a phone, I either do it at home or in the office, or go to the nearest phone booth.
Well I'm currently thinking about getting a new graphics sub system. Currently the only decent choice for Linux is Intel. They have good on-board chipsets with good drivers. But that also means I will buy the whole board including the CPU from Intel.
Now if AMD provides usable (=open source) drivers I can not only buy a graphics card from them, but also buy the CPU from them. And I can even get multi-socket motherboards for several CPUs.
I mean office software, in general, never has been a pinnacle of productivity, but now Microsoft actually has a motive to make it even slower to use. Now every additional click the user has to preform to do a given task translates to thousands of Euros of additional income. Re-introduce Clippy and you are rich. The more time your users will have to waste using your product, the more money you will get.
I can already see interface design toolkits which automatically calculate the revenue, based on typical user behaviour.
OK, DECT is still the best dedicated wireless phone standard availiable. Unlike GSM there is no way to intercept calls remotely, as from the base-station on you can use decent encryption.
The next step might be to do an ultra-simple IPv6 based voice standard. Essentially you would dial the IP-number of the other station. The whole communication goes over a protocoll which adds redundancy to UDP, so you can reconstruct the information of missing packets. Signalling should also be done in such packets. And everything would be strongly encrypted end to end.
I expect form Firmware that it loads my bootloader into RAM and executes it. It would also be nice if it would provide a little hardware abstraction for it.
Other than that, a little setup and update utility would be nice to have in ROM.
I guess the only possible advantage could be that it can still provide hardware abstraction services to the kernel. That would make kernels way simpler. But unfortunately that feature is completely useless unless the whole EFI stack is open source. Otherwise it's unlikely it will be usable.
I mean it's the peering contracts that cause money, but couldn't they just peer directly with the BBC? Or couldn't they just ask the BBC to put their servers right into the data-centers of the ISPs?
I mean there is no technical shortage of bandwidth. It's just horribly bad management.
I mean what's the point of running benchmarks. You won't really notice any change below 1:2.
What's more important is how durable it is. And Apple has had _lots_ of problems back then. Apple is, unfortunately, absolutely uncreative when it comes to securing the reliability of their devices. Drop it from a meter a few times and see if it still works.
Maybe they meant 400 volt. China uses a 3 phase system like much of the rest of the world. In such a system you can get way more power out of the line.
Anyhow such hybrid cars would be great for stabilicing the power grid. Just enable people to sell their electricity they generate with their cars.
You can also get the Dreambox from Dream Multimedia which can do DVB-T and DVB-S depending on what tuners you have. It has open source software, ethernet and can use harddisks as large as you can get them. You can even get a keyboard to have a (fairly limited) web browser.
I think there's another company selling the same software with different (cheaper) hardware. ABcom or something.
It cannot play files from NFS or SMB network shares. OK you might say it's a DVD-Player it's just made to play DVDs. But then you have the problem of the machine beeing non-stackable. With hardware based media, it is crucial that you can stack the individual devices, as you will need lots of them, one for every format, unless try to buy everything for one standard.
I guess all those companies will be dead-meat once the chineese find out that they can just sweep the market by making high quality cheap devices which, for example, just playing stuff from NFS, SMB or HTTP streams.