Slight correction...
> As usual, no package versions are bumped
Not quite - we included a new version of shim in both Bullseye and Bookworm, ast the very least.
It's rare that we have to introduce new upstream releases, but it does happen.
72 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Nov 2007
I think you're a bit confused here...
Anyway, due to great efforts by some Debian folks we managed to get a fixed release out in record time. 12.3 was the shortest-lived point release ever.
Massive thanks to the people who went above and beyond at short notice, for the sake of our users.
There's a difficult line here.
We absolutely do *not* want to break things and/or take major changes in stable releases, but in some cases it's just way too hard to backport fixes. If you've ever hacked on a browser, you'll understand just how complex they are. At some point, we have to make a judgement call on the best way to roll out fixes. That's what you're seeing here.
- You HAVE to take all of the stable/LTS releases in order to have a
secure and stable system. If you attempt to cherry-pick random
patches you will NOT fix all of the known, and unknown, problems,
but rather you will end up with a potentially more insecure system,
and one that contains known bugs. Reliance on an "enterprise"
distribution to provide this for your systems is up to you, discuss
it with them as to how they achieve this result as this is what you
are paying for. If you aren't paying for it, just use Debian, they
know what they are doing and track the stable kernels and have a
larger installed base than any other Linux distro. For embedded,
use Yocto, they track the stable releases, or keep your own
buildroot-based system up to date with the new releases.
https://social.kernel.org/notice/AZDeSjvZ39K0vf1jKC
Debian was the first distro to support this, to the best of my knowledge. I wrote a trivial kernel patch and some grub changes to make it work better!
We still support this feature today, although most of the machines that ever needed it will have been killed off by now.
>Audio firmware? I don't believe there is a text to speech reader (Knoppix Adriane is pretty good for those >interested)
The Debian installer has included text-to-speech for a number of years already. Newer machines are starting to need audio firmware to be able to use that at all, and we care about supporting blind / partially sighted users.
Yes, seriously - programmers are that bad. All of us. I've been a professional software engineer for 25 years, doing lots of C (and other languages) along the way. I've genuinely described myself as "thinking in C" at various points.
However, I've lost count of the number of times that I've seen *good* programmers make mistakes, myself included. C makes it *very* easy to make certain kinds of mistake, and as an industry we *keep on* making those mistakes. Rather than just push the "find better programmers" argument, can't we try and improve the tools too?
Absolutely this. Think very carefully about your choice of license.
Don't just follow the herd if you're going to care about how and when others can use and distribute your software. Equally, do *not* come up with your own special-snowflake license unless you have *very* good reasons...
There are options to run a 64-bit OS on top of those even so - I made Debian installation work on Bay Trail machines for exactly this setup. Grab a multi-arch netinst image and you're good. It just needs a 32-bit version of Grub, then everything above that is 64-bit.
PDF used to be a nice, simple format that you could trust. But that wasn't enough for Adobe to continue to sell new versions, so they started adding extra crap like Javascript. Guys, we DO NOT NEED scripting in documents we're sharing.
Now your options are to continue on the Adobe treadmill (spending more time downloading and installing updates than actually using the software), or to switch to something more secure instead.
"If you've paid for software and it doesn't work, then you shout down the phone till someone fixes it."
Or until you shout yourself hoarse, maybe. The vast majority of *all* software sucks. Whether open source or proprietary. There are big wins with the open stuff, though, including:
1. typically you've not just paid a fortune and locked yourself in to it;
2. even if *you* can't fix the code yourself, it's possible to find somebody else who *can* if the original vendor can't / won't / goes bust
But as you're yet another person who seems to claim / believe that open source == free in cost and therefore worthless, I doubt you'll even understand the argument here.