So, can I set up a more powerful version of this and reroute all the traffic down a different street so I can get a quiet night's sleep?
217 posts • joined 6 Nov 2007
Sometimes, you can buy a bottom-end drive from Dell (used to be a 73GB drive, it's probably bigger now) with the caddy and the drive you actually want from another supplier and swap the drive into the Dell caddy for less than buy a sensible-capacity drive from Dell with caddy - which then gives you a cheap, crap HDD to throw away.
If you want me to see your ads
Then host them on the same servers as your content. No third-party advertising, and there's no (easy) way for the adblocker to work.
Of course, that means that you have to sell the ads to the actual content provider, rather than through a third party, and you have to get them through approval. You know, like a real advertiser running an ad in a newspaper.
He was also factually wrong about the laws.
It wasn't the laws; it was the social pressure. The Jim Crow laws didn't relate to private businesses, or they just added criminal enforcement to private businesses. So, there was a law saying that it was a crime for a colored person to try to use a whites-only counter at a business. There wasn't a law requiring businesses to have whites-only counters.
Most of the Jim Crow laws were about public facilities, like public toilets and water fountains and schools and so on, where the operation of those was governed by law, not by the policy decisions of private businesses.
Of course, if you opened up a business that didn't have a whites-only counter, then white people didn't use your business. Or if they did, they got shunned as "n-word-lovers". That was how Jim Crow got enforced on private businesses, not by legal requirements.
Re: Sorry, Bell Labs...
This is a highly-specialised meaning of disruptive, as meaning "there is already an industry making X; a disruptive technology appears, this makes Y; people making X go out of business." Transistors put valve makers out of business, but other than that, all the other new technologies were either greenfield (ie didn't put anyone out of business, but did something really new) or innovative rather than disruptive.
Take PCs: People using wordprocessors didn't replace people using typewriters; the same people switched from using one to the other. That's classic innovation rather than disruption. Email: disrupted the Post Office and Royal Mail, but didn't result in email-using-lawyers replacing letter-using-lawyers (so innovation, ie process-improvement, not disruption, ie business replacement).
Digital cameras were disruptive to film-makers, but innovative to camera-makers (Canon and Nikon were dominant in SLRs and still are in DSLRs).
Funnily enough, this is already a solved problem
Ever heard of public transport?
A lot more people want to travel during the peaks than in the middle of the day or in the evenings. But people don't like travelling by train if the last train is 7pm (they get worried about being trapped) so train operators need to run services until 11pm or so.
For commuter trains, they tend to run units in multiple in the peaks, and in single outside the peaks, so half the carriages sit idle outside the peaks. Most of those trains go and sit in the depot from 10am to 3/4pm and after 7pm.
It's difficult to shorten long-distance, high-speed services for technical reasons, so they tend to sell off the spare tickets cheap - that's where all those cheap advance tickets come from.
For the cars, they will need enough cars to move all peak-time travellers at once, which is about 90% of the number of commuter cars currently on the roads. The other 10% represents people who are off-sick, on holiday, working from home, etc on a particular day. At the moment, those cars are sitting parked outside that person's house; with automated shared-cars, they just won't have one come and pick them up.
But all the other cars, the ones that aren't used in the peaks in the first place, all of those disappear. Every retired person who still has a car, that goes - they rarely travel in the peak, so when they need a car, there will be plenty available.
Non-peak car travel will be cheaper, because the cars will be available. Peak-time commuting will be quite expensive.
Shifting to a renting model makes the prices more comparable to public transport, which might result in some commuters shifting to public transport. At the moment, if you need a car at all, you pretty much have to own one. Once you own one, using it for a journey is usually cheaper/better than using public transport. If you don't own a car, you're paying the capital costs amortised across each journey, the same as public transport - so they can compete on a journey-by-journey basis, and public transport is usually cheaper per mile.
If you live close enough to a city centre (I do) then you can choose not to own a car, use one of the on-line short-term rentals (car club, zipcar, etc) when you want to make a journey for which public transport isn't good, and use public transport when that is available. I expect that style will be much more widespread when you can live in a suburb and a car will turn up on your doorstep five minutes after you request one - especially as you can get the car to shuttle you to a train station, allowing a single station to cover a wider area.
Re: Whats the matter?
Well, kinda. In QFT terms, fluctuations in the electron-positron field would be stabilised into quantised waves by the energy of the photons. QFT people tend to dislike "virtual particles" as confusing.
If the photons are energetic enough, then any particle/anti-particle pair can be formed; it's just that e-/e+ pairs are the lowest energy by miles, and really high-energy photons are a pain in the arse to deal with, which is why the experiment is so tricky.
You could get proton/anti-proton if you have 1870 times the energy in your ɣ/ɣ collision compared to the electron-positron pair. But getting 1870 times the energy, now there's the rub.
WANTED: New head of crashingly expensive, error-prone and frankly cursed one-dole-to-rule-them-all system
Re: Fusion & Free Clean Energy For All?
I just hope they remember to build the connection across North London.
Sod going to London, I want to bypass the blasted hell-hole and get to Paris or Brussels faster.
It's not the 30 mins you save from Brum to London, it's the hour you spend not walking from Euston to St Pancras and queueing up in St Pancras.
Brum-Paris in under three hours; Manchester-Paris in just over; Leeds-Paris in less than three-and-a-half.
Want to count the flights that won't happen as a result?
Humint doesn't involve inserting spies, that's where the Bond image gets it wrong. It involves recruiting people who are on the inside.
Get an actual terrorist to give you information, don't send a Western spy-agency employee to pretend to be a terrorist.
Real spy-agency employees aren't spies; they're handlers, they're couriers, they're the conduit between the actual source and the home agency.
Plug standards? How many standards do you want today? Would sir want an IRAM 2073, or perhaps AS 3112, or BS 546, or BS 1363? How about a CEE7/4 or CEE7/5? A nice, juicy Italian CEI 23-16/VII? Then there are the NEMA selections, plain old NEMA 1-15, or the earthed options such as 5-15.
The IEC letters the standards from A to N.
The least standardised standard ever created.
The lighting isn't as consistent or even as the paperwhite.
The device is a little bigger (screen's the same size), but that's because it has hardware page turn buttons.
Which means you can read it with gloves on - which you can't do with the paperwhite.
I use the Kindle in summer and switch to the Nook in winter because then I can read in the dark with gloves on, ie typical conditions on the way to and from work.
Re: it will probably be an expensive @ Jess
I doubt that specific route will be a big deal; there's a freight route by rail from China to western Europe - takes 11-14 days for container freight (compared to 9 for passenger rail or 45 or so by sea). That's probably similar speed-wise to airships and certainly cheaper.
Several additional routes across Asia are being opened up at the moment (including ones that don't go through Russia - Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran-Turkey).
Trans-Pacific is the route that might be interesting for airships.
How unusual is this?
We don't know how rare this is yet. If it turns out to be relatively common, then we need to re-examine planet formation theories, but if it's unusual enough, then there are plenty of explanations for an unusual big distant planet.
Some suitable rare explanations:
* Capture of a "wandering planet" that was expelled from its original stellar system.
* Planet was disturbed from original orbit by a close encounter with another star
* Two stellar cores formed in the original star formation, and one (the future star) accreted much more material than the other, so instead of a binary system, we got a star and a Jovian.
Re: Everyone seems to be conflating two separate ideas here
I don't know if you've noticed, but shared cars already exist - ZipCar and CityCarClub are the main UK providers - feel free to look for yourself in your own country.
You seem to be trying to prove impossible something that is already happening.
Re: efficiency of word
Actually, there was a reason for that.
They used to append changes to the end of a file to save changes faster (in an old version of Word, you should find a "fast save" option). But the problem was that if you then emailed that file to someone, they could wind back the last few changes and find out about things you've now deleted from the file.
Why should I want a TLD to be "competitive"?
How about "accurate"? I'd be quite content with paying slightly more (.co.uk is cheaper than .com) for accurate WHOIS, rolling out DNSSEC, IPv6 glue and making hijacking domains really difficult.
I liked the old Nominet rule that reassigning a domain required you to fill in and post a form. It made it hard to steal .uk domains.
I do see that they're giving first dibs to people who own .co.uk / .org.uk, which makes sense:
"A ‘right of first refusal’ would give registrants of existing .uk domain names at the third level (e.g. .co.uk, .me.uk, .org.uk etc) the opportunity to secure the corresponding registration at the second level. In the event of two competing claims, the oldest current, continuous registration would be given priority. The proposal is to run the right of first refusal for a 6 month period from launch."
It certainly is NTO/UDMH. That's one reason the fireball is so big; UDMH will burn in air at almost any concentration.
The Russians use nasty chemistry like this instead of plain old H2/O2 for launches because storable fuels were much superior for ICBMs than cryogenic ones (modern ICBMs are solid-fuel) and these rockets are all derived from ICBM rockets, rather than being redesigned from scratch.
NTO/UDMH is still used in-space because it comprises non-cryogenic liquids with a very low freezing point and therefore they stay liquid out to Saturn orbit; they're also a hypergolic mixture, which means no need for an ignition system. There really isn't a good alternative that's less chemically nasty; any two liquids that ignite on contact are likely to be pretty unpleasant.
Re: Windows 8.1: 'It's good for enterprises, too,' says Redmond
Yeah, it's annoying.
What they/you missed is that you can transfer the upgrade license from your old PC to a new one (can't transfer a particular licence more often than every 90 days), so, as long as the new PC has an OEM licence on it, you hold X number of UG licences, which matches your number of people and shuffle them from one machine to the next.
And yes, you do need SA as well to get Enterprise, though when the SA expires (after three years) you don't have to downgrade from Ent to Pro; you had Enterprise rights at the time, and the license is perpetual so they can't take them away again.
The reason for it all is so that Microsoft can maintain their position that every new PC has to have an OEM Windows licence on; if corporates were to start buying bare-metal PCs and sticking a full licence bought from VL on, then you'd be able to buy one for yourself and put Linux on it.
The supremes didn't affirm any such patent. They just said that it wasn't at question in the case at hand, so they weren't going to decide on it.
They said "this patent is invalid and these other patents are not affected" - that doesn't mean that those other patents are valid, it means come back and ask us about those other patents and we'll have a look at those if you need us to.
If you've read AJ Thomas' judgment, you'll see why they avoided those other questions; they spent a lot of time learning the science and they don't want to have to learn a load more about cDNA and replication techniques unless they really have to.
Reading slush (unsolicited manuscripts of novels) is generally a terrible experience. There's an article from Teresa Nielsen Hayden (an editor at Tor) that lists the reasons things get rejected:
Herewith, the rough breakdown of manuscript characteristics, from most to least obvious rejections:
1. Author is functionally illiterate.
2. Author has submitted some variety of literature we don’t publish: poetry, religious revelation, political rant, illustrated fanfic, etc.
3. Author has a serious neurochemical disorder, puts all important words into capital letters, and would type out to the margins if MSWord would let him.
4. Author is on bad terms with the Muse of Language. Parts of speech are not what they should be. Confusion-of-motion problems inadvertently generate hideous images. Words are supplanted by their similar-sounding cousins: towed the line, deep-seeded, dire straights, nearly penultimate, incentiary, reeking havoc, hare’s breath escape, plaintiff melody, viscous/vicious, causal/casual, clamoured to her feet, a shutter went through her body, his body went ridged, empirical storm troopers, ex-patriot Englishmen, et cetera.
5. Author can write basic sentences, but not string them together in any way that adds up to paragraphs.
6. Author has a moderate neurochemical disorder and can’t tell when he or she has changed the subject. This greatly facilitates composition, but is hard on comprehension.
7. Author can write passable paragraphs, and has a sufficiently functional plot that readers would notice if you shuffled the chapters into a different order. However, the story and the manner of its telling are alike hackneyed, dull, and pointless.
(At this point, you have eliminated 60-75% of your submissions. Almost all the reading-and-thinking time will be spent on the remaining fraction.)
8. It’s nice that the author is working on his/her problems, but the process would be better served by seeing a shrink than by writing novels.
9. Nobody but the author is ever going to care about this dull, flaccid, underperforming book.
10. The book has an engaging plot. Trouble is, it’s not the author’s, and everybody’s already seen that movie/read that book/collected that comic.
(You have now eliminated 95-99% of the submissions.)
11. Someone could publish this book, but we don’t see why it should be us.
12. Author is talented, but has written the wrong book.
13. It’s a good book, but the house isn’t going to get behind it, so if you buy it, it’ll just get lost in the shuffle.
14. Buy this book.
If there was an filter on self-publishing that kicked out everything from 1-8, then I'd be happy to take chance on hitting a few 9s and 10s to get to the 11s and 13s that the editors are rejecting.
The problem that self-publishing should solve is the 13s (good novel; not commercial in the current market) can get published and find their market; mostly that will be only 5,000 readers, which isn't enough to be profitable for a publisher, but is still plenty for a self-publisher. Sometimes, the editor will be wrong and it will really sell (e.g. Dr Debra above).
The problem is that if you're picking through self-published stuff more or less at random, then you hit lots of 1-7s, or if you have a "wisdom of crowds" filtering system, then those often get gamed by spammers.
Add to that the problem that good novel-length writing needs real editing ("you've forgotten what happened to this character" "I've tried to lay out the events on a calendar/map and they don't work" - "this character had an unexplained personality transplant between book one and their reappearance in book four") as well as proof-reading and copy-editing, which, yes, self-published novelists can buy in, either by the hour or for a percentage, but most don't.