* Posts by Michael C

866 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Mar 2007

So did Windows Phone 7 'bomb in US'?

Michael C

Of these things...

iOS could only not do copy/paste on launch.

It did multitask for all the included apps. (only 3rd party apps, added later, could not run in the background, but they could still multi-task with apple native apps, messaging, and later badges and alerts, which for all but GPS and Pandora was good enough). iOS was multi-threaded from day 1.

It had custom ring-tones. You could make your own in iTunes, or make them with a 3rd party app and very easily drag them in. There were no carrier-provided ringtones, but they were also only $0.99 each, could be completely user customized for the part of the song used, and were easy to make.

As for WP7, yea, after the panning apple got over C/P, and the misunderstandings over multitasking, WP7 released without this, 3 years later, is just plain dumb. lacking security options, home screen customization, numerous quite critical APIs, and having a completely closed store (worse than apple, really, read the terms, ouch) with little or no SDK of value? The devs are gonna hate the policies, its too expensive to dev for, businesses can't use it, and its lacking in so many areas. ...and the hardware is behind too? Its dead before it started.

Michael C

policy?

How about federal REGULATIONS.

HIPAA, SOx, SAS, STIGs, and more. If your communication includes SSNs, Account numbers, PII, PHI, PCI, and more, that communication when going over open networks, must be encrypted. Most companies fall under this but don't even know it.

There are 2 federally approved phone systems currently, assuming DOD Stigs apply directly, or similar restrictions:

- 1 is WP6.5, but ONLY if running a local encryption app ($79 per handset), an expensive and specific 3rd party central server platform to manage devices, connectivity to an Exchange 2003 or 2007 server, and only if the device is owned by the company (not the user), and is approved by an auditor to be used.

- The other is Blackberry, under much of the same conditions, using both BEZ and Exchange 2007 as well as a 3rd party additional server platform.

iPhone is very close to meeting the goals (actually it already has, without reqiring the 3rd party server, one of Apple's goals), and is simply pending confirmation in the next revision of the STIG Mobile Device Security update.

WP7 has a LONG way to go. Sad seeing WP6.5 for a long time was the ONLY approved system (Obama forced BB to be added). Android can not meet the requirements in its current incarnation, nor can WebOS, maybe in Android 4...

Apple iOS is already heavily accepted as a business device. It easily integrates into Exchange without added servers, can be easily remotely managed, can be remotely tracked, can be remotely wiped, includes encryption without 3rd party apps, and is offered on business phone plans. With WP7 off the list, and RIM flailing to keep it together, I think we'll see iOS added to the STIGS in 2011 and it will become the go-to business handset.

MS freebie anti-virus scanner auto-downloads provoke more anger

Michael C

Wow, just, wow...

"possible security implications" of Microsoft simply offering their own solution? C'Mon guys, this has nothing to do with Security (aka, they're hinting MSE suxors), this has to do with "you need to offer our bloated crap next to yours and give the user a choice."

Almost every new PC comes preloaded with their bloatware, so it won;t trigger a download anyway. However, when that bloatware expires after 60-90 days, the user has NO AV being updated, and getting their crap out of the machnie is a PITA to replace it with a "freebie."

Also, the freebies? they mostly suck.

The Auto-update mechanism is not designed to offer choices, its designed to offer patches. The idea they can simply check the "is AV installed and running" flag is good enough. If you have no AV installed, they should push you one. MSE uninstalls EASILY to be replaced by others. Maybe the install screen for MSE could offer some "competitive suggestions" and information to find and install an alternative, but lets get the machine clean first.

Maybe if Sym and McAffee offered their own free version, Ms might even offer to have THAT pushed instead...

Rethinking the iPhone

Michael C
Stop

Don't know what you're all blathering about

I'm on my 3rd iDevice. I got a Gen 1 right about the time the price dropped from $400, then got a 3GS near 2 years later to replace it, and after shattering that got a 4 a few months ago. My wife is still using the 1st Gen (until i get around to replacing the screen on the 3GS to give that to gher, still works flawlessly just broken glass...) Between the two of us, about 800 min/mo average talk time, and combined more than 3GB of data monthly, I have NO ISSUES with AT&T at all.

In several years, I've dropped maybe 10 calls total, legitimately as a fault of AT&T (and who really knows if that was me or the other guy dropping). Not one dropped call on the iPhone 4 since purchase. Yes, there are some dead spots on freeways here where I know I'll drop a call. that is NOT an AT&T issue, that is a local monopoly issue, and effects EVERY carrier. I drop a connection there, but get it back instantly on their towers, then switch back again a few miles later. NO carrier can handle switching in and out of their network, and sprint has no access at all for those 10 miles of freeway. We all deal with this locally, and we all know the spot (there's even billboards warning of the impending call drop area!)

Outside of the few spots, I have FAR superior coverage on AT&T all around the southeast than Verizon. I know of dozens of places Verizon doesn't work at all, more for Sprint, and not a single place AT&T doesn't have at least Edge signal, even out in farm country 50 miles from my home. Most of it is HSDPA+, and gets faster downloads than Sprint 4G. My wife was on Verizon the first 2 years I had an iPhone. She dropped calls weekly, had trouble getting signal at all where she worked, and had to go outside the house to hold a call some days. We're in one of the biggest neighborhoods in the northeast area of our city, and V has 3 towers closer to the house than AT&T does... That's pathetic that I can hold calls inside and she can't. She tried 4 different phones before Verizon stopped offering to exchange them, but would not let her out of her contract as we crossed the 30 day threshold (actually 90 days) trying to confirm it wasn't simply a bad handset.

The monthly bill is within $5 of Verizon for the same plan tier, but i get rollover minutes, hotspots, and there's no data overage charges period (and I have gone over 5GB several times, pushed up to near 20GB on a vacation last fall).

This summer I was in NY, about 25 miles from Manhattan. 1 dropped call in a week, and that was in an office building elevator. AT&T already fixed as much of their service congestion (it was never quality, it was a matter of AIRSPACE) issues as much as the FCC will allow until new spectrum is available. In super dense areas (4 cities, and then only some times of the day), AT&T can have issues, but Verizon does too unsurprisingly.

Data/voice concurrency is the big winner for me. Without that feature, a smart phone is pretty useless to me. Throw in free wifi hotspots, rollover minutes, no caps, no data overages (I'm grandfathered in), its WELL worth $5 more per month. i saved a years worth of the difference on just 1 trip (Verizon would have hit me for some $75 in overages that month, just on data, I've gone over my 900 minute cap 4 times in 12 months and that would have been more than $15 each time on V too). Oh, and verizon as so totally anti-consumer.

Yea, when the iPhone dropped, AT&T got overwhelmed. Their networks crumbled in congested areas. Dropped calls are down 1,000% in Manhattan since then. Where I live, and everywhere within 500 miles I've traveled, AT&T has better coverage than Verizon, and better speed than sprint. What's the fuss? FUD? Oh, any my new job just gave me a Sprint Blackberry. Same device is available on Verizon for less per month, but Verizon is banned by company policy since it's "unreliable in many corporate facilities."

The forgotten, fat generation of Mac Portables

Michael C

it WAS small!

See it's competition...

On sale at the same time: (compaq beat them to market by a year, but the mac was still smaller)

http://inventors.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.microstar.net/museum/cpqslt286.html

just 4 years earlier this is what a portable was:

http://inventors.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/ibm_port/

The NEC Ultralight came out about the same time as the mac, and yea, it was about the size and weight of a common portable 15" today, but it was a monochrome DOS BOX and had no internal drives other than a 2MB "silicon" drive. Add the drive, power supply, etc and it was heavier and bulkier than the Mac. The Macintosh Portable was a full fledged mac, comparable to the SE in every way, with true B&W graphics, floppy AND HDD inside, and could support up to 9MB of RAM (1MB standard). No portable released until 1991 could run more than just DOS, and the Mac was a leader in build size/weight for full power systems at the time. More lug-able than portable, yea, but the term Laptop followed 2 years later fir a grossly slower and less classed system that STILL relied on 5lbs additional stuff to make it work.

Android bugs let attackers install malware without warning

Michael C

Exactly

It's trivial for GOOGLE to fix, in the current build, possibly in previous builds as well. Handset manufacturers then have to update their code, on phones they already no longer support, and then that code has to propagate through the carriers.

Internally, with CVS and other systems, code is easy to modify. However, when a 3rd party alters code your library is not directly supporting (or has moved past with newer releases of your own) integrating (or even FINDING) the necessary code changes in THEIR code to incorporate into your modified version is very difficult. Not impossible, but its complicated, time consuming, and can introduce many many new issues and an array of testing, and worse can impact dozens of handsets.

Apple uses a single OS base with minor module or API differences. A fix in a core function is easily ported across all systems. Google's base code is easily modified, but porting that modification across hundreds of unique models, each using an array of hardware, and little of it even compatible with the latest release version, is a mess. There are still dozens of handsets fully compatible with 2.1 or 2.2 that don't have it. Many will NEVER have a 2.x version. If this fix is populated only through lets say N-2 revisions and Google chooses not to patch all the way back to 1.0.

With the open code base, finding a bug is easy. That also means for hackers as well as coders that fix the bug. Apple can release a patch for all iPhones in days, or less if it was REALLY critical, and all anyone needs to do is plug in and it gets it (including a full backup). OTA code updates whack data that is not protected, restore of android apps post upgrade is a PITA, and that update might take WEEKS to get to your handset even if google has the patch today.

Also, people "generally" trust what's in the google marketplace, as it is a policed market on SOME level. That means apps there typically get installed without question, but this is very false security. Apple looks VERY deep into the program operation, including directly questioning why some APIs might be included if there's no obvious NEED 9not just a reason, but a NEED), google skims the surface. Apple can pull a app quick and then only jailbreakers could still get it, Google pulls one and its available tomorrow in another marketplace, under a new name, still with the same virus in it.

I think Android is a far more powerful platform, more flexible, i think it even looks better (though it needs some UI love and some better design). However, because Google has no direct patch authority, and because carriers are not FORCED to maintain current code bases on all released devices, and push patches within acceptable time frames, having an Android device is very dangerous. Worse, its literally PUSHED on thousands of consumers who have no business having a device as powerful as it is. There really should be an Android "lite" (or a hidden PRO mode that has to be activated and comes with warnings).

Hackers KNOW planting a virus on Android can take weeks to eradicate, and on some devices will never be removed. Multiple viruses have already gotten through googles defenses, and the frequency is increasing quickly. Apple is not only harder to get past (deep code inspection), and quicker to patch (no middle men to worry about), but they're also half the market segment now too. Also, putting an app in apple's store means VALIDATED background checks and easy trails for cops to follow, not so much in Android marketplaces... putting viruses on iOS is dangerous for the hacker, and a much more limited and difficult target. Its not security through obscurity, it's security through trouble and risk and very real protections, and rapid response. Its not worth hackers trouble with such a rich and easy to exploit target as an alternative.

If ALL device mfrs were required to guarantee continued update support, within 1 week of a google patch release, for all devices sold for +2 years from last date of sale, and forced carriers and device makers to port all "compatible" features of new OS releases (as Apple does, 4.2 runs on everything except gen 1 which is now more than 3 years old, just not all the bells and whistles of it) within 30 days of Google release, then we'd have a platform with better security, and less fragmentation.

Still, even if they got all the manufacturers in line, modularized the entire thing for 3.0 (breaking all existing apps), all they'd do is drive up the cost, and limit the model availability.

My real reason for not diving in though, Sun.... I have a sneaking suspicion we'll be seeing a cease and desist order from a court here, possibly within the year, ordering all code development on Android to stop short of removing every line of Sun's code, and a 1-2 year set back in android development, and a multi-billion dollar fine, and removal of many core features or functions. Android is very much in violation of very strong patents, it's not a minor sleight, and its clear and obvious, entire sections of code copied and pasted.... It could very well be pulled from the market entirely. I can't take that risk.

Apple to buy Sony? Good one!

Michael C
Paris Hilton

Just because you can afford it...

Is no reason to buy something. Sony is within reach of apples liquid Capitol, but songs profits on that do not have sufficient return to be a wise investment. Sure, Sony has a few pTents apple would love to have, and a lot of manufacturing muscle, but buying Samsung would be smarter if the price was the same. (more relevant technology pool).

Really the money is best spend in smaller acquisitions and buying diisionsmofmcompqnies,not the whole thing. This is a laughable idea, buying Sony.

Notorious Koobface worm ported to Mac OS X

Michael C

Wow

OK, admitted, getting a user to click accept is not terribly hard. Getting a Mac user to ckicl accept and ehter a keychains password however, for an app they did explicityly specifiy to download and that does not present a disk image file on their desktop, from a company they never heard of on a site they did not browse to specifically to get this app? VERY high hurdle.

Even my father, who I had to walk through the install and use, click by click, to get FaceTime installed on his Mac, a guy who forwards every scam e-mail that sounds legit no matter how many times you tell him not too even after having put a link on his desktop to snopes.com, who can't figure out to reboot the router when his WiFI icon turns grey, knows in his bones that anything that asks for a keychian password means BIG SHIT is happening, and he better know why....

The only way even the tiniest percentage of Mac users might fall for this would be people led to by a scam to a site, that looks like a legit company at a web address that can be spoken (not funky characters or numbers and dots), and are tricked into thinking they're downloading a real program. Problem? That site would be off the net by takedown order from the FBI in hours. You can only avoid the FBI and ISPs from blocking and shutting down your virus distribution server if you don;t actually have one, but rely on other legit servers being infected, or boits that attack IPs directly for weaknesses. No such attack exists and Mac users don't give out passwords to rogue apps trying to install. (clicking "yes" they do, with alarming ease, but going to the next step that actually allows the virus to install they do not).

And on top, this thing is still actually FLAWED, in that it not only does not install properly, but more relies on services set to auto-run, hiding itself as a running service from the tray (the dancing icon on startup saying Hi, I'm a web Server and I just launched on my own" is a dead giveaway) and hiding itself from other linux process monitoring services, not to mention actually getting out through both the OS X and physical firewalls so someone can route down TO that server? ...and all this without actually getting permission escalation, or running as root (since that's disabled).

This is so low on the threat scale it doesn't register, other than the idea yet another person tried and failed.

There's a reason there has never been a self propagating virus on Macs. The only worm they ever had was from people installing hacked copies of iWork and OS X they torrented illegally (and thus deserved to get infected). The virus another poster mentioned was a PoC and never ITW, and didn;t spread by any means OTHER than LAN anyway (you couldn't catch it to spread it unless you plugged into a network with another infected mac and accepted the remote "driver" install from a device you did not request to use).

Getting a Virus into Linux/UNIX in general is really hard, not because it doesn't have vulnerabilities, but because the security model is simply so damned simple that getting around it is pretty much impossible (did you ASK for kernel memory, the right way, with the right permissions? no, oh, sorry -kill). The user actually has to INSTALL the virus, manually, like any other app, but then it ACTS like any other app, and is easily found and is as limited as any other program running on the OS.

Will OS X remain virus free forever? probably not, but any infection is going to take advantage of a weakness in both the user, and like a 3rd party app (java, flash, some other network service, 3rd party browser/plugin vuln...). Don't download illegal stuff, don't enable root, use a password, don't follow links in e-mail you didn;t ask to get, and you pretty much can;t get an infection on a Linux machine. Macs make it even more obvious to users through the insistance on Keychain and s very simple security model.

iPhones, MacBooks sicken Chinese women

Michael C

Assumptions...

You presume to expect, and in some light you are right. Their pay and treatment is substandard to ours on many levels. HOWEVER, their pay and treatment, as enforced strictly by Apple, one of very few companies who even inspect these facilities, let alone publish openly the results and regularly fine (or fire) their suppliers, is actually significantly ABOVE the average pay, and well above minimum wages, includes mandatory overtime, maximum work hour caps (that we here in the US don;t even have!), vacation pay, and more.

People admitted to the apple areas of FoxConn for example are paid higher on average than other FoxConn workers, and if the treatment of people was so bad there, would it be the kind of place locals stand in line for as long as 3 straight days to even apply for an opening?

Also, n-Hexane is NOT a banned substance in China, nor MOST other European nations. It is a common lab cleaner, and if treated with no more care than you would institutional floor cleaner (wear protective gloves and work in a ventilated area) is perfectly safe to be around. It is NOT banned in the USA either, just restricted and monitored. Per OSHA http://63.234.227.130/SLTC/healthguidelines/n-hexane/recognition.html it's not even an EPA controlled chemical and is IS legal to use in the US of A. Can we really hold them accountable for allowing a supplier to use a chemical WE do not even ban???

Yes, improper ventalation may have been an issue. Use of n-Hexane may not have even been evident during apple site surveys (chemicals of choice for cleaning are frequently changed based on numerous factors), and if Apple had inspected this site, it would have been fined, as they are VERY well known for doing. They have hundreds of small suppliers, some of which may even be sub-contrtacted without apple's notice (which is not permitted, but happens, and there's little apple can do to stop what they do not know about).

Also note, WinTek employees sicked work for more than 15 top manufactruers, including HP, Sony, Samsung and more. Apple was but one company they made parts for, and the only company in the calendar year to survey the site (and fines were issued for other problems, not this one). More than once, Apple has fired a supplier without paying them for parts already manufactured, in some cases costing a supplier millions. Most of them do not fuck around with apple, pay employees more to work on Apple stuff, and work in tighter controlled environments.

Michael C
WTF?

where do you get this crap?

1) Apple supplier accountability is higher than any other competing company by miles, they regulrly fine suppliers not in compliance, and they're one of the few companies to actually do personal on-site inspections for compliance, including surprise inspections. (other companies hire "local" inspectors, many times that have been found to be obn the payroll of the company being inspected...)..,

2) not a single human rights violation has occurred against an employee of an apple supplier. Payroll is well above minimum wage, and as apple employees, they enjoy breaks, overtime, max work schedules, and vacation not offered in most cases to other employees of the same facility. They pay well in excess of minimum wages for the region, and must maintain compliance with all local laws as well as policies apple enforces in excess of them. Worker age minimums are extreemely strictly enforced (by both apple and china).

You may not think the pay is fair by our standards, but in their country, its above board, and people wait in line DAYS to apply for those positions knowing full well the environment.

3) n-Hexane is not even baned in the USA, and you want it banned there??? See OSHA regs regarding this chemicha:

http://63.234.227.130/SLTC/healthguidelines/n-hexane/recognition.html

Have you SEEN FoxConn's facility? I've been in a LOT of US factroeis. Many of my IT clients were textile and food manufacturers. The FoxConn facility is like working inside the largest shopping mall in the world. Actually, it very much resembles a large airport minus the aircraft. over 300,000 people live there, in dorms nicer than the rooms they vacated in the homes of their family. After working only a few years at FoxConn, most of these people can afford to pay, cash, for college level educations. $100 a week might sound low to you and me, but their lifestyle requires far less than that. Look around, half od them are listening to iPods while they work. know any minimum wagers in the USA that live on their own and can still afford a $300 device? Its far from slave labor. People BEG to get jobs there. People LEAVE jobs at neighboring companies to work there. They have a lower suicide rate than general USA populations inside that factory...

Oh, and if you're boycotting Apple on this, Boycot Sony, Samsung, HTC, nokia, HP, Yamaha, Westinghouse, GE, and just about every other company. in fact, boycot them first. At least Apple DOES site surveys, and goes the extra step to PUBLISH those results.

You take a long look at a staff of 450,000 people, SHIT YES you'll find some cases of abuse. There however, its very rare, and what abuse WE report is honestly on par with their cultural expectations and philosophy (rough, maybe, but that's their culture). Take any company in the USA of just 20,000 people and you will find more annual reported cases of physical or sexual abuse than at FoxConn. 20 times the employees, and in a dictatoreship, and most of them live better fuller lives in a safer workplace than some of us.

Facebook pages very much public, even when set as private

Michael C

simple solutions

a) delete your facebook profile and never go there again

b) delete the actual content, ensuring nothing on your face book page is available at all.

Look, your real friends know where you work and live. They know your personal information. Other people trying to reach you can do so through facebook whether or not you publish any of this data can simply REQUEST it, and you can give it only to those who should have it. Keep facebook for associations, and news feeds, and games, if you want, but don't put anything there you do not expect everyone in the world to be able to see regardless of your settings.

My facebook page is a blank slate. Only the absolute mandatory settings are filled in (and some of that with false information where possible). There are no pictures of me there, or my family (just an avatar image). I post no personal details there. It exists so I can have accounts in games my wife plays, so i can post links I want friends to see, and so I can see and respond to things friends want me to see, and so my reunion class can find in a few years.

Too many people not only have no clue of the security limitations here, but they go and post stuff like "WoHOO, cruise finally leaving the dock!" and "Looking forward to a weekend in the mountains." and many others share accounts, and sometimes even passwords, in open news feeds or "private" boards (which are still accessible by friends).

If you would not post the same notice on the front door of your home, do not paste it on face book. 3 of my neighbors have been robbed in the last year alone for such stupidity.

Nielsen cops to iPad stat cock-up

Michael C

Free apps are far from profit free

Most free apps exist either to entice the buyer into a pro version or sequel released for a price, contain revenue generating ads, or simply gain the developer attention and rating making future releases easier to market.

Just because a user has never downloaded a single paid app has no bearing on how "profitable" that user is or is not. Many of the most popular aps are now free because the ad revenue from heavy continued of a larger user base use is simply more profitable than 70% of $1-2.

Michael C

points 4 u

that is also a good point, especially where there are more than 1 iDevice per household.

My wife has never downloaded an app on her own, but she has near a hundred on her device.

iOS bug unlocks iPhones sans password

Michael C

thank the FCC

By FCC rule (and the same organization in many other nations), ALL phones must be capable of dialing an emergency number even from a locked state. Since 911 is not universal (not even across the entire USA let alone internationally), the ability to enter an alternate emergency number in emergency call mode, including that some 911 dispatches you might get connected to based on the home location of the phone may not be able to forward you to a LOCAL 911 branch when traveling, (or even just because your tower is across a county line) but can give you a direct number to dial instead. I've had this happen a few times.

The only bug is from this screen you can get to contacts. That is an easy bug to fix (its been fixed already in a prev version). Unfortunate it came up again, but it took more than a month to find, and is only a security risk if someone you don't trust is in possession of a phone you don't know you have lost yet. This bug should be fixed inside 24 hours.

iPhoto 11 ate my library, say users

Michael C

because it's slow

btw, the files are still there on disk... They do not live inside a data base. The library file is just that, a library, and from the command line it doesn't look any different than a regular folder. Recovering lost photos or objects in the library is as simple as opening a backup copy of the library and dragging folders inside of it back into iPhoto (which re-imports them). Inside the library it maintains it;s own database, as iTunes does, but the photos are just files in folders stored inside a special "container." It;s just a normal folder, but it has a "lock" on it to make it behave differently to the OS and keep people from mucking around inside of it (and causing bad links in the database as a result).

If the Library file itself was dramatically reduced in size, and photos are missing, there are a number of possibilities, but as long as you had a time machine or other backup, the data should be easily recoverable.

Here's a nice article covering common issues with this upgrade, how to avoid them, and how to recover from them.

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20020631-263.html

Michael C
WTF?

stop this now

You do not understand the construct of the library fie. Stop spreading BS.

You do not understand that is is NOT a database, just a "special" kind of folder, and all the photos are in there even if iPhoto can;t see them in the converted database. Look at it from the command line (or right click and set show contents) and you'll see its a folder. Its the equivalent of a CAB or WAR file. It looks like a file to you, but like a folder to the OS.

The iPhoto upgrade does NOT delete any photos from inside the library file, just the control files and database itself. If stuff went missing, it could possibly be disk corruption, but in the cases so far of "missing photos" they are in fact still in there, just an issue with the database pointers being updated properly during migration, and they easily re-imported.

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20020631-263.html

You SHOULD ALLWAYS have a good backup before doing an upgrade, especially after receiving such as a warning on install....

Michael C

rules

1: never upgrade ANY software on any platform without ensuring a full backup first.

2: Check the forums for issues before buying updates to software you rely on.

3: if you can wait to upgrade, WAIT! Generally following: 1 week for major patches, 1 month for new major versions, 2 months for a major service pack or OS update (Os X retail releases updates may or may not fall under OS update), and 3-6 months for a major new OS version. Double this for Microsoft.

4: when updating an OS, always check all your apps and device drivers for compatibility first.

OS X is no exception. At best, common scenarios and some limited lists of extremes are tested, but since Apple has no "open beta" periods, and devs working on unreleased products have tight limits on speaking about it, Apple product releases should be approached with equal caution. There WILL be bugs, pretty much guaranteed.

Most likely, we're dealing with an issue here where your iPhoto library is already at least partly corrupt, or contains unexpected data iPhoto 11 was not tested to handle, and is botching a database migration process. Likely, all your photos are still there, but you loose albums, some photo customizations, faces, and more. To me, that would be devastating!

To be certain, we use a NAS compatible with time Machine and store both the Mac and Windows backups there, and use an archive slot to migrate backups of key directories off-site as well. I have about 600GB of stuff I do NOT want to loose, and that is the cost that comes with it. We also separately back up to a HDD (manually) certain folders about once every 2-3 months, as a fallback. If you only have 1 machine in the house, a simple backup is fine, so long as at least 1 backup set is not in your house at all times (trade drives with a family member, or get a safety deposit box). Leaving a backup drive plugged in all the time is a good way to get a virus on that drive, but also don't forget to plug it in regularly. especially imediately before an upgrades or patches.

Google: Street View cars grabbed emails, urls, passwords

Michael C

A bit too far on the analogy.

The correct parallel here is not that a woman scantily clad asked to be raped, it's that she asked to be ogled at. Google did not "violate" or "rape" your network, they didn't go in there find your credit information and abuse it, they collected your MAC, SSID, information on machines it could see in the LAN, and might hav captured other data in the scan. Why? It didn;t do an active "search" of your network, scanning as one might a corporate network, it simply "listened to traffic" and that traffic might have been anything. It should not have captured passwords, since passwords "in flight" through your LAN should have been on secure sites or systems (aka, encrypted). If you;re logging into non-secure sites online, that password was NEVER secure, and anyone on the net could have captured it. Google tagged LAN traffic data so it might learn about the other MACs on your network, if it was open and unsecured. They took the opportunity to look down the top of a woman who bend over in a loose fitting dress, they didn't rape her.

Ask an insurance company. Do you get to file a claim for a stolen car if you left the keys in it running with the door open? Can they limit your claim if you left your down unlocked and home alarm off after posting on FaceBook you were going on a 2 week vacation? You broadcast unencrypted passwords onto the general internet through an unsecured access point. They HAPPENED to catch that data. They did not intend to or specifically design a system to collect that specific data. They are scanning the data for specific items only (mostly arp requests).

Michael C

Not true

In the USA there is a general popular consensus that privacy is protected by law. In reality, only certain aspects of your life fall under such protections, only in certain places, and only as it would pertain to keeping the government from monitoring those people who seek to lobby against it (to avoid prosecution, persecution, or harassment of said people by the government). You have no "right to privacy." There is no such thing. That is a myth perpetuated by the paranoid and those who in general distrust the government.

The only rights to "privacy" our government has bestowed are from supreme court rulings on generalized text from the constitution. Inside the curtailment zone of your home your possessions, papers and effects are private. Your conversations are private (but NOT who you converse WITH). Anytime you are not within the bounds of your home, the government can watch you, track you, record you, and more, without even due process, let alone a warrant.

Our fore fathers only wished the government to essentially be blind to your religion, personal and political views, and "private ways." However, outside of that, your life was an open book to the government.

I won't claim my stance one way or the other here, and won;t comment on Google's "collection" efforts or accidents until we know more specifically what, how, and most importantly why. I'm only posting this to clarify the status of your privacy.

Hands on with the new Apple MacBook Air

Michael C
WTF?

not fail

If you can get buy with an atom, no GPU, the extra dimensions, the shitty ass 600v line screen, et al, all well and good.

THIS machine is for the real business people who can NOT. It runs real business apps without stuttering, can run a VM on top of that as well, boots in seconds not minutes, weighs less, is smaller, has a great 900v line screen, wifi N, bluetooth, SDXC slot supporting up to 1TB cards when they're released and up to class 16 devices, can drive a 30" cinema display, plays MMOs and even more graphically intense games, can EDIT not just play 1080P video, and multitasks like an atom can only dream of.

THIS is a business machine, or an ultra-compact media machine. People pay $1400 for one because there is not other machine in this class that can do a fraction of those things, let alone all of them. It is a machine that does not REQUIRE you to also have another "real" PC in addition to it (and 2x of each software license, 2X the patching time, 2X the hassle, and issue syncing data between them).

These will fly off shelves, the vast majority being reporters, field photographers, corporate America, and students. BTW: you can;t bring an Atom CPU on most campuses in this country at all. If it won't run Windows 7 Pro (as is necessary to join a managed domain), you can not access campus systems, and thus can not do homework, access presentation material, schedule a class, and more. Check the incoming student CPU requirements of almost any major university. the 2 here in town have on their site "Can I use a NetBook?" and the answer from campus IT is "NO, you CAN NOT, campus systems require a Window 7 Pro or OS X 10.5+ and access to campus WiFi is not possible without it." And the CHEAPEST system either campus recommend for "general education" incoming freshmen is an $1100 Dell system. (with the expectation it will still meet campus requirements 2 years hence, though no guarantee of making it 4 years). Some departments require much more expensive systems, several REQUIRE a Macintosh, and Mac is highly recommended for it;s "versatility" in being able to run multiple operating systems and meet varying student needs. They "strongly" caution not to buy ANY system not on their list as they stock parts and are certified to repair ONLY those systems. The local bestbuys get a few dozen returns every fall because parents go cheap and the on-campus IT folks laugh and send them away.

Michael C

um...

because you still have a PHONE? It does tether ya know... Tethering with any smart phone (which you would already have if your the class of person to buy an ultra-compact like this!), is the more logical choice.

but consider the business use case. This is an inter-office machine first, and a coffee-stop/airport/hotel ultra-light work on the go machine, not a i want to take a working lunch in the park machine. The always on (standby) mode is one of its strongest selling points. You're using this on the corporate or campus network already in most cases. People who spend $400-600 premiums cs a machine that weighs less than 2 lbs more do so for specific reasons.

Oh, and not one mac, not ONE, has integrated 3G/4G. Its not an option. Must be done via USB.

Also, are you seriously suggestion apple actually embed a carrier specific component in a machine!?!?! wtf would I want to be tied to one provider (and complicate the line by having carrier model options for alternatives). Plus, they'll give me a free 3G/4G adapter if I sign a plan, the one in the machine is not free (of COMITS you to a plan). And a USB 4G adapter only drains my battery when i need it, and fits on a keychain. this really is a non-issue....

Michael C
FAIL

Repettitive much?

Geeze. IT IS NOT A NETBOOK. Netbooks DO NOT HAVE REAL GPUS! Netbooks don't even have Core2Duos... This is an Ultra-compact machine, that is a (near) full performance business laptop with some ability to game and work with high rez video too. This also has a better-than 720p (by a lot, 900v lines actually) screen.

If you want an over glorified 4lb typewriter with a low res screen under $400, go fucking by one. If you want a machine that is ultra portable (fits INSIDE a folio with the pad of paper!) that doesn't also require you to have a second computer somewhere else, then this is not only one of the few options, it's actually one of the cheapest and at the top of performance in it's class.

Instant on it not a bad deal either.

Note: the author tested return from "sleep" but he did NOT note suspend resume time. The MBA supports multiple modes of operation, including off, sleep, and STANDBY. In standby resume is less than 1 second (because it was never asleep, but in fact CONTINUALLY ON in a very low power state, still using wifi, for as long as 30 days!) That's a HUGE selling point to a business person who now could walk around with a notebook under their arm and still get notification alerts not just from e-mail, but inter-office chat applications or other applications as well.

Femtocells outnumber proper mobe towers in US

Michael C

Um, yea, bfd

A single tower can host potentially thousands of concurrent calls. A Femtocell balks at more than 4. Also, at least with AT&T, those femtocells are locked down to only approved devices, and are not open to the public in general, but even on Verizon and Sprint, the range of the femtocell rarely penetrates the walls of the dwellign. (V advertises only 40 feet, ouch!)

And that backhaul? In a large number of cases, that back haul is owned by them anyway. My AT&T cell is on an AT&T line... However, free? 1: the backhaul from towers are their own internal network lines. They don't pay carrier fees on them, only the cost of the physical cable and some power,and some routing muscle. the Femtocells? They may or may not be on their own networks, and incurr 3rd party carrier fees to cross communicate to other provider IP networks, eating external, not internal, bandwidth. Also, the back end equipment to handle those units (which are essentially VoIP extensions in their network), is a completely separate infrastructure, and extremely costly to both design, implement, and keep in sync with the real towers.

Also, why have a femtocell if you had good coverage? What this meas is that 300,000 $50 femtocells are covering what is probably 500,000 underserved or not served at all homes. $15m to add 500,000 users? DEAL! (oh, yea, those users, most of them, paid $100-300 for that femtocell, so lets call it a profit party!) 3 or 4 towers can cost that to deploy, if not more. Are we really surprised this is popular with Providers for underserved areas? In served areas, the per-user cost of a femtocell likely exceeds the per-user cost of a node on a tower, all factors included, and that's why they're making efforts to restrict their use by GPS signal and mapping tools.

Seagate-Steve trash for Apple-Steve flash pash

Michael C

flahs vs ssd vs spinning

SSDs are simply too pricey yet vs the performance benefits. Flash is approaching HDD speeds however and is a good option. However, mass storage isn;t going to compete with disk for a long time. On a Tablet or ultra portable, 64-128GB is sufficient. on a main machine, hell no it is not!

That said, hybrid IS the future. Segate is dead wrong, as is the writer of this article. By Hybrid, what I'm really talking about it tiered storage. The EKY to tiered storage is not the hardware price, it;s the OS and the user experience.

If what i suspect is the case with OS X 10.7, one of the fundamental features we have not heard about is that the OS "anonymizes" the storage it finds. Put a Flash pack on the motherboard, and a storage drive on SATA, and the OS will present a single disk to the user. The OS will manage what parts of the dataset (at the block level) are more frequently accessed, and put them in Flash. This is a SIGNIFICANT performance improvement if it is done intelligently, and comes at only a small cost increase vs a single traditional drive. In fact, having mroe than 1 spinning disk provides similar benefits, as the OS can alternate blocks between the drives, then sort them out later when idle.

We've been using 2, 3, and 4 tier storgae models like this in the SAN world for a decade or more. The technology can finally tricle into client-side OS. If the OS handles it, a small SSD (or flash) can handle the OS and some core apps, and any file writes a user is active in, and the OS migrates unused blocks over to HDD as a background process when the drive buffers are low.

Seagate is right, spinning disks won't go away, not for anyone's core machine. For mass media storage its the best option. in fact, it;s going to be replacing tape in the enterprise here soon too. Disk sales should increase dramatically in the channel, however, in point systems, tablets, business machnies, and places where mass storage is not required, flash boot provides significant advantage at a small cost.

As for media consumption, I think we're going to see the cloud start meeting performance needs in a couple years, 2014 at the latest, where people will simply stop buying large scale disk at home entirely. The holdup is not the technology, it's the bandwidth, and the pricing models for content (and protability and sharing of the content) keeping it from wide adoption.

Seagate is deluded if they think we'll keep buying HDDs heavily as consumers past 2014. By then simply flash (let alone SSD) will exceed HDD performance, and possibly some of it may exceed HDD capacity, at comparable prices. Seagate better get on board shifting their business plan, or they'll be in the same shitstorm record companies are.

Dell takes aim at Apple with upmarket pledge

Michael C
FAIL

what?

Although PC shipments have been up, that is a condition of the general market increasing. However, Dell's SHARE of that market has declined 9 quarters in a row. They are failing. Profits are down as well. People HAVE realized there are better offers than Dell. Even Acer has better recognition as a quality brand over Dell, and they were FOUNDED on "cheap."

Apple signals disk free notebooks way to go

Michael C

BR is pain

it's called HDCP. Do some research. reading from and writing to BD media, including all the HDCP required chipsets in between, and ensuring encryption standards, is VERY much a pain. The very vast majority of notebooks and desktops with BR drives do NOT support HDCP. You have to have a discrete GPU first of all, thats a minimum requirement, plus certified drivers soup to nuts, specific chipsets, and limited output options. That means most notebooks "appear" to play BD media fine, but as soon as you find a disk with the appropriate flag set (original copies of Spiderman 2 and a few dozen other "accidental"releases) it WILL NOT PLAY. (or you get SD only, and no stereo surround). The industry is set to flip the bit for ALL disks starting in 2012 (unless they delay again), and that means any machine that does not supprot HDCP will be incapable of playing an new media after that point. Apple will NOT put their users in that situation.

Then, there's the still evolving spec. BR is NOT a complete spec. It;s still in development. Any change to it could render back hardware incompatible with future features.

Then, it's fracking expensive. Not the drive, the license to make software. We're not talking small amounts of money. to a hardware company like Dell, they donl;t write read/write software, or develop Br players. Apple (does (even Microsoft stayed out of that game!). The fees are PER RELEASE, not per title, so a Mac version of an app incurs a royalty in addition to the Windows version of the same app, and that meansd little support from OEM drive makers to write apple native players.

this is much the same reason Linux support also wanes for BR media. There are some "qustionably" legal aps out there, for which the correct royalties or licensing was never paid), but there is no official supprot for Br media in Linux. the cost is simply too high.

Apple solved the issue of moving media. iPod/iPad. Sync it, bring it with you. You can play with either with a cable, or via the AirPlay compatible device (ATV) they have. But why sync it at all, when you can just leave your Mac or PC online at home and stream over the net anything in your entire collection through your phone? Physical media is pretty much dead with this generation. It really isn;t needed anymore unless you hold onto the "physically in my hand" aspects (which are irrelevent and just preference). I can agree with book people that physical books are better (they serve aesthetic purposes, fill walls, etc), but video footage is so east to come by, and so easy to share (and cheaper) without media.

Also, when BR players were $300-400 (and more) and PC drives were significantly cheaper, it was acceptable to considder the PC an option. BD players in PCs come at more of a premium than a set to box, and set top boxes also stream.

Michael C

missed the point

It's not about an SDD in a HDD slot, its about a small amount of SDD to boot from, that is very fast, and also enabling extremely long "standby" times (very different from sleep or hibernate, which a HDD can not compete with).

SDXC may very well replace HDDs as well in ultra compact machines, but the idea here from Apple is Flash (not SSD) for boot and apps, and "mass storage" for everything else. You'll have a small flash partition on the main board AND a hard disk which may even appear as a seamless partition in 10.7).

SSDs and HDDs have about the same power requirements (some more or less). Flah onboard however has significant advantages over SSD, in that it can be powered off and yet the PC can continue to run in a low power state.

Michael C

Simple solutions

In the home, the MBA connects to any PC or Mac hosting DVD drive through a simple driver. You can even boot from that remote DVD over WiFi.

On the road, when you really need a drive, you'll have an external kicking around in your travel bags.

Stream it. No need to own it. You only need a drive if you already plopped down the cash for physical media in the past.

Don't buy a 12 year old a machine designed for traveling class business users, buy then a more durable, more flexible machine that costs less and has more performance and can adapt to their changing needs, and has the storage to handle a 12-16 year olds needs.

Oh, and if you;re thinking about a machine for a 12 year old, it REALLY should have a discrete GPU. preferably closer to the top of the class. If your kid both doesn't play games, and you don't expect them to for the next 4+ years, you are a very rare case.

The MBA costs half again what a regular Mac costs because of it;s form factor, not it's capabilities. Small costs more.

Michael C

wrong.

Spec for spec, yea, it's way overpriced, if you call the specs the CPU and storage and screen. BUT, the spec of this machine it NOT it;s performance class, it;s the fact it weighs under 3lbs, AND has a long lasting battery, and is thin enough to fit in a folio let alone a bag.

The "instant on" function is also VERY nice for business people, and un-offered on anything other than phones and the iPad. "off" or "sleep" is technically ON, for up to 30 days, CONNECTED to the web and getting mail and other messages all the time.

People pay HIGE rpemiums to get a device in a certain size/weight class, especially one that is also durable, and more so if it has 5+ hour active use battery life (this has 7, and yes, that's a real number..., my wife's MBP gets 6 hours playing an MMO in a VM over WiFI and near 7 hours just surfing.).

Add to this that this mac actually has a GPU, one capable of limited 3D gaming (think WoW), and can drive a 30" cinema display, and there is no machine on the market in its class. At $1399 it will FLY off shelves to businesses.

the CPU is a bit weak, but the flash storage makes up for some of the lag. The CPU can actually handle running a VM fairly well, or lots of multi-tasking. Its not going to do video editing of 1080p content in real time, but that's not its design point. A C2Duo is really not a bad CPU. My main gaming and VM rig at home is only a C2Duo 2.3GHz.

Find me a 3lb ultra-compact machine with over 800 vertical line screen (this has 900), a GPU, and a 5 hour battery at a lower price. throw in WiFi N and Bluetooth, which most business customers need and are rarely both offered on the same machine even in full weight laptops?

Michael C

Use case designed

Considering it;s not upgradable, I'm very surprised there was even a 64GB version. Except for people with very specific use cases, 64GB is tiny. People who pretty much use it exclusively for business. Then again, that's the target market, so BAM.

also, again, class 10+ SCXC is on offer there, and there are rumored 1TB capacities coming within 2 years (which will cost more than the MBA on release, but the 128 and 256GB ones might be under $100-200 by then)

Maybe this isn;t so bad. For $200, I'd go 128GB minimum, but for $200 I'd buy a 15" Pro instead and carry the extra 2 lbs...

Apple's FaceTime for Mac debuts with security holes

Michael C

half agreement

It's a doozey, and this should be better addressed, but it is also a beta, and only an issue if someone can actually log onto your session. If you're in a public place, leave your machine without logging out, and don't have a password set for login from a screen saver (or boot), that's YOUR problem. Yes, you should not be able to change a password without a confirmation, but you should not be able to get TO this without knowing the keychain password first...

Its a lower levekl security risk than people are playing on. yes, it should be corrected anyway, it;s just bad form, but it is not an invalid practice in itself, or a bug.

Michael C

nah

If you leave your machine win a public place without locking the screen and requiring a password, you have already failed WAY more than Apple here.

yea, bad form, they should request the current key chain master password before allowing any other password changes, however, that's a "best practice" issue, not an actual security risk since it;s not possible to happen without a bigger security issue to start with. They have to get logged onto your machine to access this feature. If they can already do that, you have already lost. This is a small issue.

There has never been a single successful machine hack that allowed remote control of a Mac ITW ever. PWN2OWN has only been done using custom made web sites, and to get this control required he be at the machine when it happened, it can not be done by a bot or virus, and you have to fall for the phishing scam first...

Michael C

sort of

...but only if they have already cracked your stronger security (got logged in as you on your machine).

Yes apple should change this. Changes to ANY passwords of local applications, especially those already tied into KeyChain, should prompt for the keychain password. However, this is a best practice, not really a security violation. They'll fix it because people went nuts, but the people don;t understand they've already lost if a hacker or thief is already at this screen...

11.6in sub-notebooks

Michael C
FAIL

Today???

You release this TODAY?

Either you have foreknowledge the rest of the world does not re: the updated MacBook Air, that is will be over 12", or you;re blind to the rumors, or the existence of a sub 12" MBA would render comparisons in this argument invalid for one reason or another.

Release of this article now, today, suggest ulterior motives.

Apple posts $20bn+ quarter

Michael C
Stop

Microsoft's respomse...

...Honestly is "YAY!" to the news Mac sales are up.

Contrary to popular belief, Macs ARE PCs, and Microsoft is a PC software and OS vendor. OEM licensing is nothing to Microsoft. Their business is PRO OS versions and MS Office. The $25-40 they get for each OEM copy is not that important. Why?

Because of the greatly assumed need (real or not, but hey, I'm in this camp), 80% of Macs have Windows on them. Many of those have office. Guess what, that's retail, not OEM, copies.

Microsoft makes more money on average for each Mac sold than each PC sold, especially at retail. Yea, business people buy office. They'll continue buying it if they switch to Mac too. Why? Collaboration, Share point integration, DRM, and all the things home users could care less about Open Office not including that business NEEDS. Home users? So few actually buy office its ridiculous. Each person that buys a Mac instead of a PC is GOOD NEWS for the bean counters at Microsoft right now. They known damned well Windows is not going away this decade, ad Mac users have no real issue understanding and accepting that fact.

A quick inventory of people I know, that i did a few weeks back for a similar argument, many of whom are IT people: of thiose with PCs in the house, 80% of those are OEM retail machines (mostly laptops though some like me hang onto the custom-built rigs too). Half of us have office, and I'm the only one on 2010, 25% are on 2007 and the rest 2003 or older, and almost every copy is the Student/Teacher edition (4 out of 26 respondents had a full version not provided by their office). Average income for Microsoft per PC: less than $140, but that;s actually wrong and should be lower as several of those office apps were carried across several chassis and should not count on the current one.

For those who responded they had a mac: Out of the 26 PC households, 8 had at least one Mac and 3 others had only mac. Of the 11 total, 9 had Windows Pro on those macs, and 8 had either Office Pro 2008 for Mac or Office 2007 for Windows (2 had BOTH), only 2 had the student version. Average income for Microsoft on each Mac: $350.

Which camp do you think Microsoft is cheering for?

Michael C

and its not a one time effect

Of PC users that convert and buy a mac, 90% buy another one. Its not just a halo effect, it has a gravity well of it's own, and its accelerating in growth.

#1 quoted reason to buy another: support was exceptional

#1 reason to leave a PC and go to mac: too much maintenance/to many software issues/hassle.

Folks, it;s not the hardware. That's just a perk.

Keep your PC clean - or we'll shut you down

Michael C

This is not difficult

1: a "simple" level of ISP monitoring. Basically, maintain a list of known and VALIDATED (as reported by the government and other security agencies) IPs and domains known to be harboring botnets, hackers, and other scams. This list should not be a "the site you;re attempting to access may be infected." This should be a "that site exists soley for scams or to infect your machine or to control bots on your computer." This should not be a list maintained independently by ISPs, but a natioal, or internationally distributed list.

If a PC on your network accesses one of those known sites on a port/protocol known associated with a virus, you get a 404 error (or equivalent) and the traffic is blocked. If you clicked a link associated with a scam, you'll get a notice on screen, another in the primary e-mail account the ISP has on file (and all other backup accounts on file), and instructions to go to your ISPs home page, log in, and read a security report (which includes NO LINKS to get there and makes clear you will never be linked to such, ever, to avoid potential abuse of this notification system.

If you clicked a link and got a notice because you tried to go to a scam site, your bad. Hopefully this will raise awareness. If you're REALLY certain the link is legitimate, you can go to your ISP home page, log in, report the URL, and request it be unblocked. Within 60 minutes, someone should do that for you, or confirm you are the victim of a scam and mistaken. If some application on your PC is trying to connect to a bot server however, we need a different response in addition to the e-mail alerts:

2: When you do something dumb, the ISP tries to protect you and gives you a warning, which if you're really dumb you can ignore and bypass by request of tech support, unless the government itself has issued a block of all traffic to that address via the courts and due process (take-down of the site, it;s not on the net anymore to reach, which should be the natural next step after a warning about not going there goes out). However, if you have a bot, often those things are moving targets. Taking down one site might not prevent alternate sites from communicating your your infection, or when international based servers are involved and take-downs take time. The ISP needs to act on behalf of others, not you.

Network quarantine, and a notice on screen if you attempt to go to any sites other than those of OS vendors, security app vendors, and sites registered with the government that can assist in virus removal. A list of these should be included in the warning (no links). If you absolutely HAVE to bypass this quarantine, there should be a link on your ISP page (after you log in) to release the quarantine for 24 hours. There should be a fee ($10?) and you can;t do this more than 3 days in a row for any reason. OR, prove to the ISP you are infection free by running an AV scan using today's latest definition pack, screen shot the results, and mail the to the helpdesk. Since this is triggered by application activity on known ports to known sites, the risk of false positive should be very very small.

Anyone on a business class connection should receive only warnings, not quarantine, but might suffer increased fees if the issue is not dealt with "swiftly" after multiple days of warnings (including a contact call).

3: "Certified internet security aware." People in the know (or who bother to GET in the know) should be able to take a simple web based exam, hosted by any of a number of certified testing centers (CompTIA, etc), to become "internet security aware", and provide that certification to their ISP, along with a screen shot of the expiration date of the AV client installed on their computer (one for each MAC address in the home), and a list of non-PC MAC addresses as well (set top boxes, NAS, etc, that might access the net for content or updates). Going through this simple process would avoid the automatic quarantine, and allow those who would prefer no disruption to services to receive only notices and not be quarantined for several days. This test, and materials to pass it, would be under $5, and would be good for 2-3 years, and be able to be passed from ISP to ISP without retaking it.

So, in summary:

1: you do something dumb, and a router alerts you there might be an infection or scam at a web site.

2: you're infected and we know it, they notify you 7 ways from Sunday and quarantine your machines until you prove clean with a scan, or pay $10/day to get online anyway for up to 3 days.

3: you certify and maintain AV on all your PCs and can avoid the quarantine complications (and extra fees if you solve the issue quick) and still get notified 7ways from Sunday if they detect activity, and could still be quarantined if you go more than 3 or 4 days without resolving the issue.

Iomega's flashy SSD clones your PC

Michael C

twice as fast...

...as a device limited by the bus speed of USB 2. That same 7200RPM drive on Firewire 800, or better yet eSATA? likely the same speed! USB 3 is fast, but any device I can name that needs more than USB 2 speeds should be on eSATA anyway, and in that case USB 3 is simply getting in the way and adding unnecessary costs.

USB 3 is nice for large capacity thumb drives, 128GB or so, but that's only typically needed for speed reasons when doing a backup and then you;re limited by capacity for that backup, so why really? USB3 is a nice speed improvement over USB, sure, but it's still crippled by USB hub architecture and multicast and will never be as fast as dedicated drive technology like SATA. I can't think of a single consumer device other than mass storage (which should be on eSATA), that requires USB 3 speeds to operate. As an internal bus spec, maybe, but again USB is a multicast bus, no dedicated channels, so it can be unreliable or unpredictable in heavily used systems.

iPad to lead netbook and Kindle market munch

Michael C

Wrong

Major universities do NOT allow or recomend netbooks to students. Lack of a Pro version OS means the devices can not be a part of the university networks. They also have significant trouble consurrently running both requires student software (typically MS Office), and the security software required by the university. They also have issues with video playback in most cases (only netbooks north of $500 can typically decode H.264 feeds). They're simply underpowered and under-capable. The vast majority of netbook sales are actually to individuals who can not afford a real notebook, or to those who will not give up the power/price/performance ratio or convenience of large screens and numerous connected devices a desktop provides while also requiring a portable device.

I've never seen a Netbook get over 10 hours of runtime, have you? Some come close, but only under "ideal" conditions. The iPad can play video, on wifi, with BT enabled for 10 concurrent hours, and can act as an e-book reader for nearly 16 or play music for more than 3 days. Netbooks can not do that, and anything that lasts "a full day" on a charge is good enough, especially if it can be charged off a USB port in your car...

Netbooks don't do portrait mode, and the very low res on sub 13" netbook screens (most 600v lines or less) is really unideal for web surfing. This is a killer feature of modern tablets. Better screens than netbooks and better use flexibility.

netbooks don't do 3D games and other entertainment.

Netbooks are not instant on. most are abysmally slow to boot.

netbooks don't do AirPlay and stream media to TVs wirelessly.

Tablets in 2003-now have been bulky, thicker and heavier than traditional notebooks let alone netbooks, and had limited functionality, designed mostly for form entry and menial tasks. The OS experience on a tablet has been horrible, with no thought to use cases for touch/multitouch in the OS, just a "quickie" port and a virtual keyboard. They simply do not compare to media centric tablets like the iPad and lite OS versions designed for touch.

What netbooks do well? Powerpoint. (which tablets are encroaching on, and the iPad itself doesn't do bad at unless you require presenter modes or dual screen displays).

The tablet is NOT to replace your notebook, it is to SUPPLEMENT it, without itself being treated as, maintained like, and licensed as another machine. That's what you don't get i can have 80% of my notebook functionality on a device that easily syncs, needs no backups, and uses $1-10 apps instead of $50-399 apps. Besides, app functions on the iPad are dramatically improving, and throw VNC on top and you can in fact do everything your desktop at home can.

A netbook might be $299, sure, a really shitty low end one that can't do H.264 and has no 3G (or has it with a 2 year contract at twice the monthly rate of AT&T for an iPad). Then add Office, AV, backup, windows upgrades, and more? Its no longer cheaper...

netbooks may be more capable, but what they fill in beyond what a tablet offers is still available on the other machine you already own. They're less convenient, less weather resilient, less secure, and fail at media. They also have very slim profit margins, where Apple can lower the price of the iPad another $200 and still have bigger profits (and they admitted on day one the pricing was "flexible" and they'de see what the competition could do). Netbooks will not survive, except as a niche business for specific tasks (much as other tablets are today).

Michael C

kindle is not a device...

its a platform.

Have you not read the articles regarding this? Amazon;s kindle book sales on iDevices and other software platforms actually exceed their sales on kindle devices directly. Amazon;s model is to sell books, their device is just a simple additional revenue stream, but not the focus of it. The kindle e-book reader exists because of the store, not to support it.

iPhone, BlackBerry, Droid: purveyors of pestilence

Michael C

probably even safer

1: older phones had buttons, and crevices germs could get stuck in.

2: touch screen phones are extremely smooth glass, not plastic, and are usually oleophobic coated (finger oils have a hard time sticking and prefer your finger to the glass).

3: most people clean their smart-phones regularly. Even just being taling in and out of a pocket cleans them significantly better than a non-touchscreen phone.

Best bet, an iPhone is probably one of the safest (on the scale with "you still might consider not doing this, especially with a sick person", being on the lowest end) devices you can hand between people.

Michael C

more

...or a keyboard, or a mouse, or a door knob, or the handle of a coffee pot, or car keys, or the arm rest on a chair, or a remote control...

You both cannot and SHOULD NOT protect yourself from such mundane contacts (unless you have an immune deficiency).

Exposure to small amounts of infection is actually GOOD for you. You'll get sick less, and less severe if you permit contact with life to actually happen. On the flip side, do you think contact with al those lysogens and anti-bacterial chemical is actually good for you? Do you not think killing all the viruses won't cause those immune to such treatment to become more prevalent?

I'm not saying give hugs and kisses to people you can see are clearly infectious, I'm simply saying (backed by clinical surveys dating back 50 years), that the small amount of material on a surface, exposed to air until it;s dry (which by itself kills most bugs), then a fraction of that transferring to you, is such a small amount that unless you have a habit of licking your fingers or poking yourself in the eyes regularly after using public doors, your immune system can handle (and is designed to handle) that small potential infection, then rendering you IMMUNE to further exposure.

Also, if you, or your kids, ARE infection, STAY THE FUCK HOME!

Michael C

Paranoia, focussed

"Smartphone" dangerous? Why focus on the smartphone?

In companies, employees often share on-call phones of all kinds, typically even laptops (upon which the keyboard is a veritable cesspool of infections waiting to strike), conference bridges, projectors, even buttons on the soda machine are all more likely to get you an infection than a smart phone. At home, you share a remote control a dozen times more a night than a phone. I clean my iPhone regularly, and its nearly button free exterior means very few places for a virus to hide. When's the last time you polished the TV remote, or the land line phone, or your shared home computer keyboard, or sprayed down with lysol the seat your ass just departed?

Targeting specific things to clean for fear of viruses is the job of nut cases and those with specific medical issues. If your susceptible to colds and viruses, use hand gels and antibacterial wipes and you have little to fear that's not airborne, no matter the surface you touch. For the rest of us, being exposed to dirt, grime, and bugs is actually IMPORTANT, as it strengthens our immune system. Over-ridiculous cleaning regiments can only protect you so far (most of the bugs you can get are airborne, face it), and exposure to all that chemical can't be good for you in exchange.

I'm not superhuman, but I only get a couple sniffles a year and maybe 1 or 2 good colds. I get the flu maybe once every 7-8 years (and more often when i get the shot then when i do not.). This past year both the wife and my daughter got it, and I both had no flu shot (they did) and I didn't get it. I clean my kitchen very well (food borne illnesses are both bad and easy to prevent, but I dislike ants equally), and keep the house in general order, but I don't spray and clean every last surface for fear of infection (I clean mostly to prevent unpleasant smell and the look of disorder, not for the medicinal benefits), I only vacuum once a week and not even regularly, and we're lucky to polish the bathroom at least as often. People that i know who do clean heavily, spray everything, and waste hours a week; they are constantly sick, as are their kids.

Exposure to an infection is not a guarantee of infection. A tiny bit of care can prevent that (don't stick your fingers in your eye after touching something that doesn't belong to you personally, don't shake hands kiss or hug people visibly sick, and visit places that sick people go as absolutely infrequently as possible). However, that small exposure causes a small immune reaction, and potentially develops immunity, so later when you touch someone's phone who really is sick, and they have a cold you've previously been exposed to, you do not get sick! Taking away that exposure means you have no protections. The body was designed to fight these things, but lack of exposure not only means you have more things to be exposed to you're not immune to, but the immune system is like a muscle, and under-worked it gets weaker in general, making tho colds you get harder to get over.

Oh, and unless specifically advised by a doctor not to, breastfeed for as long as humanly possible, 2 seasons minimum. I swear, all the 0-3 month baby formula should be strictly by prescription, and the 6 month stuff used only as supplements. Failing to provide your child those immunities by personal choice should at the very least cause your insurance company to raise your rates if not come with civil penalties. It should be something only done out of medical necessity, and never choice. Don't want to feed? Don't have a child!

Apple to lead fanbois 'Back to the Mac'

Michael C

Thinking retail

Companies and schools do not buy bottom of the line machines, because of contracts and bids, they buy a bit ahead of the curve. Keep in mind, those machines not only need to run Win7, but 4 years from now they STILL need to run it, without any IT hands touching the boxes for upgrades. The labor to add 2 RAM sticks on 1500 machines is not worth it, they pay more and include it now. The SFF and simply machines sold by Dell and HP and Lenovo for schools and businesses are $1100-1400 per workstation (monitor included), plus the business warranty with is more expensive than retail ones. You can upgrade a home PC for free, a school pays $50-110/hour for that privileged, upgrades are verbotten. They buy mid grade business machines, not cheap PCs.

EDU pricing for a 22" iMac is about $1,000 per machine (less in bulk), and that machine is significantly more powerful than required for the job, but in 4 years will probably meet minimum requirements, and that Mac can connect to Exchange servers for free and runs a $99 student copy of office. Apple's business warranty on that machine is $249 same as the retail one. A PC with Windows Pro (required for domain management) costs about $800 with an EMT64 VT enables i5 and 4GB of RAM (a typical machine being put out now under business pricing), plus a monitor ($200), Office Pro to connect to Exchange ($349 before volume discounts, probably $229), and a warranty from Dell under business licensing on that package will likely be $299. Thats several hundred more expensive. In fact, for the difference, they could get Windows on that machine in parallels for legacy app support. I'm not even including back-office IT management tools which are licenced per client (ARD is licenced per site regardless of number of machines and is WAY cheaper), Corporate AV versions, and more.

This is not BS. I'm a contractor who currently works IT for some large companies, and 2 years ago I was with a reseller doing large business and government bids. I've never sold a desktop station for under $1250 configured. I could easily sell macs for less than PCs to almost any school or business.

Michael C

old news

That disparity died with the Intel Mac evolution. A HDD is a HDD. RAM is not proprietary. The only expensive part in a mac is typically the motherboard. Guess what, try buying a motherboard from Dell or anyone else; better get out the lube, you're about to learn a new fetish... The Apple slimline DVD writers used in iMacs and Laptops cost a bit more, but so do laptop drives in general. The repair cost is in line with any other OEM, and many of the parts are obtainable on NewEgg as industry standard. The Intel Motherboard used in the power Mac is a server board and costs $465 from Tiger Direct if you wanted to build your own machine. It's only $389 as an apple replacement part.

Also, warranties from apple are cheap.

Michael C

additional clarity

PC:

- slightly cheaper hardware (within the same PC performance class not by more than $200 typically, and at the top end Macs are in fact cheaper, sometimes even than building one as the 27" iMac is an example)

- lots more time investment

- expensive software than mostly can only be used on 1 licensed machine (Have to buy office Pro now to use Exchange, Apple does this free out-of-the-box for example). Very little can be done on a PC without investing in additional software, especially for photo/video editing which is the big hot thing with families.

- very low or zero resale value after just 3 years.

- lots of stuff works with it, but very little legacy software works with Windows 7, about as much works with a Mac, have to virtualize windows on windows to have full compatibility.

- Desktops are more flexible, but most lower end ones are not as upgradable as commonly believed, and since most have all the ports common people would add in the end, very few ever get more than a HDD or RAM upgrade in their life cycle, especially in business and simple home (non-game) deployments.

Macs:

- slightly more expensive hardware. No bottom end options under $600. Expected for nothing less than multimedia use cases so that's OK (drop to web-only use cases, and Mac OS doesn;t do anything Linux or Windows, or a smartphone can't), its a market they care nothing for and choose not to compete in).

- easy to set up, easy to maintain, easy to recover from software issues. Mostly effortless, and backed by world class support (that will actually support the OS, not just break-fix for parts).

- Most Mac Software is family licensed or not encumbered by DRM at all, and is licensed for any one mac concurrently, not a single install on one machine (there is a difference). Office is not required to access Exchange servers meaning the Student and teacher office edition provides the same functionality to a Mac user as the pro version costing $200 more does to a PC user. US upgrades also cheaper and no "pro" version there at all. Stock software accommodates the needs of the vast majority of users.

- resale for as much as half the original purchase price after 3 years is COMMON. (check eBay...) Replacing a Mac with a new one factoring in resale is almost guaranteed to cost less than buying a new PC, even one of inferior performance.

- Legacy apps through rosetta. Windows not only also runs on it for legacy app support, but Coherence visualization actually makes that easy (treat a Mac and a VM as a single machine, not 2 separate systems, including winning Office on a Mac as if it was installed native without ever seeing Windows 7 underneath, and most games can even play inside a VM).

- memory upgrades are a snap, HDDs in most models (though ample external HDD options make that a non-issue). Less flexible hardware except in the pro series. If you need GPU flexibility, or specialied IO cards, a Mac is not for you. Thankfully less than 1% of people who buy a PC ever change a GPU so its not really a big deal unless you;re the slim market who play PC games or work in sciences (and then a Mac pro if often on par pricewise to top end water cooled rigs anyway).

In the Power days, Macs were priced very high and had very little compatibility. If you didn't need one, you didn't buy one. Current Macs are prices very close to competing hardware and often run Windows with better performance than similarly priced PCs. As they continue to gain popularity, software vendors are coming back to mac as well. Native 64bit, every model with a GPU, 8+GB RAM support in every model, VT on every chip, GPGPU and more. Blizzard and bungie are releasing every game going forward on Mac and PC. Even Microsoft/Turbine have multiple Mac games, and are coding Halo for Mac OS X as we speak.

Macs cost a bit more up front, but over time actually have as much as 66% of the TCO, given a 5 year lifespan. Businesses, not that most internal legacy apps have Java and SOA front ends, are starting to see they're easy to maintain in networks (ADP is an awesome tool suite), have native AD and LDAP support, and can save the cost of MS Office deployment for a large user base. Downtime is less, patching time is less, Security hardening scripts are simpler, meeting DOD standards is easier. Macs on dekstop actually make more sense than Linux, and Mac minis draw very little power, make little noise, and cost LESS than Dell or Lenovo Business marketed SFF PCs. Governments and school districts figured that out a few years ago. Walstreet is learning.

Microsoft loves it too (since 80% of Macs end up with Windows and half of those with Office, and the majority of home PCs come only with OEM and free licenses. its a fact that the average Mac is more profitable to Microsoft than the average Dell sold to a home or college user. They're 100% behind apple, and moving more and more of their product line to Mac native.

Tablets? Pah! Netbooks still selling well, says analyst...

Michael C

netbook is dead

People wanted a 7" tiny very low power and very long battery life machine. Then consumers complained the screen was too small and it could not play HD video, and was useless for entertainment, so it got bigger and more powerful. Now, for $100 more, you can get a real notebook since their price came down.

Also, people realized netbooks did not supply enough power to use solely, you still had to own a "real" computer. Colleges banned them because they don;t run the Pro version of OS (and thus can;t join secure domains). Businesses can't use them well either. Companies tried so hard to restrict them to not eat into their profit center (business and college machines are their only real profit, most other systems are sold for very slim margins), and now many tablets can do everything or more than a netbook was intended for (not what they became). having 2 machines also meant double the software costs, double the maintenance, file syncing nightmares, and more, so double the trouble. For $100-200 more, a single machine weighing not much more than 1 lb more could handle it all. Then the 1.5lb iPad came out, synced itself, needed no other maintenance, worked with most of their stuff, and was what they wanted all along, a portable e-mail and typewriter with some web and media functions, and some idle game playability.

If netbooks stayed try as nothing more than underpowered $200 internet machines, subsidized by mobile contracts it would have been fine. As they evolved, and WiFi sprouted up everywhere, (and MiFi etc for the rest) the need for a subsidized device died, students shunned them as dd businesses, and the only people left buying them were people that could afford nothing mroe. They simply because the lowest end of the notebook line. After dealing with the sub in sub par for a year or so, everyone realized raising another $100 for a real notebook was the way to go as portabiltiy in a 11" machine was not a big enough difference to sacrifice usability.

iPad + real notebook is a FAR more realistic combination than a netbook and a PC, and about the same price, but you can't play 3D games on a netbook, and they make horrible e-readers (portrait mode has power!). When a real viable iPad alternative eventually hits the market, you;ll see numbers explode for tablets, and the atom powered netbook will cease to exist in less than 2 years.

Sales for 2011 should be under 2010 sales. Sales in 2012 will be a anomaly at best. We'll ship 100 million tablets by 2011 easy, the bulk under $350.

FCC bids to curb 'bill shock and mystery fees'

Michael C

New Rules: (proposed by me)

1: un-bundle unlimited data from unlimited calling and text plans. I should be able to choose which I want and which i do not. (AT&T does this to an extent). Including that i should be able to get a smartphone without a data plan (for use on WiFi only) if i so choose.

2: notification of use of any feature that incurs a fee, including the amount of the fee and total incurred of that fee thus far in the calendar month. If I don't have a text plan and get a text, it should be "pending" until i approve to receive it. If I go to send one, I should be told exactly what it will cost to do so, and that't I've racked up $7 in text fees thus far this month.

3: Overage fees many not exceed 150% of the price difference between the current plan tier and next one higher if that higher tier would accommodate the overage without additional overages. For example, if the overage is $0.10 per text, and I have 200 texts for $5, but there's a plan that offers 700 texts to $10, then $5 is then $7.70 is the max overage i can pay in any month I stay under 700 texts. (essentially, they auto-upgrade my plan tier for one month at a 50% premium). If you auto-upgrade this way 3 months in a row, it should notify you in your bill that you will instead be set to the new plan tier automatically the following month and billed the standard rate unless you call to stop it. Same goes in reverse, if you under-utilize your plan 3 months in a row, it should automatically be reduced.

4: There MUST be an unlimited option for each feature, priced at not more than 33% higher than the highest not-unlimited tier, or $20 more, whichever is lower.

5: Data is data is data. SMS can go over IP, and should when able by default. If you phone can't do concurrent voice and data, it should use the SMS frequencies when you;re on a call, but if you're not on a call and have a data plan, SMS should come in via IP and incur no additional charges. SMS plans should really only exist for data-incapable phones like simple camera phones.

6: ETF prorating: ETFs covering additional subsidies must reduce each month by a fixed amount such that in any month the remaining ETF is not more than the number of months remaining in the plan plus 1. if the subsidy was $400 on a 24 month plan, in the last month the ETF should not be more than $33, and should have dropped about $16 per month each month. Contract ETF fees must be separate from subsidy and be clearly defined. Contract ETFs may not exceed 70% of the remaining total due on the contract, with a max fee of $250 on 2 year plans and $150 on one year plans. If a subsidy is offered, and has a fixed number of months reducing subsidy ETF, then starting in any month not under contract, the plan price must be reduced by not less than 80% of the value of the monthly subsidy. Your total ETF is the sum total of your contract ETF and unpaid subsidy reimbursement.

7: subsidy changes: Subsidies may not be included in the base monthly plan rate, they must be in addition to it, and after the subsidy term has expired, the monthly rate must be reduced accordingly. A premium of not more than 25% may be charged on this monthly subsidy (essentially interest on the loan). If your prorated subsidy is $20 per month, after 24 months you can expect your phone plan to reduce by not less than $15. Also, if you are offered an "early trade up" your remaining unpaid subsidy is WAIVED. For example, everyone who got an iPhone 4 12 months after getting an iPhone 3GS would still own half their subsidy, but trading in cancels the one from the old phone and replaces it with a new $400 subsidy and 2 year term. You would not owe both the remaining subsidy and the new one. Whatever the value of the subsidy, you can pay that in full on day 1, or at any point in time during the contract, and have no additional monthly fee. The phone companies offering to upgrade your device is their offer to you and waives any other outstanding obligations if it comes with an additional contract requirement.

Plans with limits:

If you paid for 900 minutes, you GET 900 minutes. unused minutes, texts, MB, etc must carry from month to month. Everybody gets rollover. Overages must reduce back-stored underage before incurring a fee. Carriers may cap max stored under-use at not less than 3 months worth. They must not expire for at least 1 year (or length of the plan, whichever is longer). Reducing your plan tier should remove 3 times the difference in tier minutes from your pool. (ex going from a 1500 minute plan to a 1000 minute plan would erase 1500 rollover minutes if you had that many). You can not be charged retroactive overage fees doing so.

9: Bill changes: Your remaining subsidy ETF and contract ETF must appear on your bill at all times, including the amount it is reduced by. You can pay either or both iof these at ANY TIME, and be released from ongoing costs in addition to the base plan rate, and be released from your contract, though you may choose to continue service. (currently, if you pay an ETF, you have to close your account, I might want to pay it to save the premium charges and reduce my monthly bill now but remain on a plan, this way i can). Overages per plan option must be included in a summry for that option.

10: every device MUST have a month-to-month contract option, each for minutes, SMS, and data. If you get a subsidized device on a month-to-month plan, you are however committed to pay monthly until you have paid off the subsidy, you simply have no contract requirements other than to pay a minimum plan fee for at least a calling plan until the subsidy balance is paid in full.

This will break the entire phone company billing model. they will resist this hard. Plan base prices will be increased. So, put into the law that their total quarterly profit shoudl they adjust their rates higher may not exceed the per-subscriber profit margin of the previous 6 month average by more than 2.5%. If they raise the rate too high, they simply have to credit back the difference in the following month's bill cycle. this gives them a cushion of a few months to adjust their billing terms without risking a financial collapse, but ensures the consumer does not get screwed. People on current plans will not take in all of these new rules immediately (just the billing changes, and high bill protections, and ETF fee changes apply), unless the accept a change to a new plan tier system and monthly rates (without extending their contract) in order to benefit from other new rules (like rollover etc and new overage rates).

Finally, as for billing and tracking usage: If the device can not read out in real time the remaining minutes/mb/sms on the plan, then a text (free) must be sent to each device operated by someone with authority on the account on the plan at 75%, 90%, 100%, 110, and 125 of useage. Also, at the point that the monthly bill would be 25% higher than normal, and at each additional 25% thereafter, the text sent will be followed by by an e-mail. If in 4 hours the plan oener does not respond to the message, access the web portal, or call support, the plan must stop acruing overages. Use can be restricted by 911 must remain available, and phones must still be able to use any free data available or remaining options in separate plans (run out of minutes, you can still call after 9PM and still use data freely until you hit those caps too). Only if the customer approves may overages beyond 25% be permitted.

Tape backup could be binned soon

Michael C

Parallel writes are a major issue

First off, the number of DVDs necessary to meet the write speed of a single HDD or tape is massive, on order of dozens. Most companies need 4-16 tapes of a few dozen disks writing concurrently to handle a nightly backup window as it is. The power, heat, and space requirements of a massive disk array is simply not feasible.

Then you have to deal with getting media in and out of those drives, appropriately labeled (inline DVD printers), and stored in removable cartridges. Keep in mind a stripe of 16 DVDs would have to be ejected pretty much concurrently, and a new disk loaded into each of the 16 drives before the backups could continue, that's a lot of work for a robot, or a lot of robots.

Then there's data validation... Tapes have 3 heads: read, write, read. As a bit is put on tape as it fies by, it is instantly read the the head next to it. DVD does not work that way. Have to write the whole disk then validate it. This is more complicated when data is spread bit stream across 16 platters that have to be in sync, and parity bits have to be taken into account.

No, its been researched to death. it just isn't viable. The media is dirt cheap, but complicated and prone to data loss. The hardware is massive, and expensive in terms of both physical and power costs. Even 50GB BDR media is not viable, and is used most often for single system archives, or in the medical industry for MRI image storage that is never centrally managed on a server but is too bid for a singe CD/DVD.

As for longevity, CD/DVD media was designed for streaming playback of digitally converted analog data sets (music, video). DVD can hold a music file with no "perceptible" errors for 50-100 years, but bit failure on the disk level is evident after just 60-90 days. In binary data, single bit lost on a disk can be a major issue, so parity bits have to be used at the block level, and they have to be able to accommodate multiple bit failure per block. Hard disks, not being subject to environmental factors like light, humidity, dust, and physical contact, and which are much better able to deal with heat fluctuations, have a better chance of surviving long term.

DVDs archived just 10 years ago have proven unreadable. Many in the national archive have been lost to bacteria corrupting the inner metal layers. Its a devent low cost portable media for short term data transfer (mailing a large file set), but it is a very poor DR media.

Michael C

new = less reliable

This has applied to technology since the early 1800s. The faster, more advanced, etc the tech, the less reliable it is.

Old tapes were both shorter and had fewer tracks per tape. They also were thicker, and took more energy (and time) to write each bit. Doing so meant it also had a longer magnetic memory (more grains of metal per bit are more resilient to minor environmental effects). Old tapes might have had 16 or 32 tracks. New tapes can have over 400 in the same space, are on thinner material, and has a tiny fraction of the magnetic material per bit. They're also required to be MUCH more strictly aligned to the heads and even a fraction of a degree shift can be a major issue. I;ve seen LTO drives read a tape fine ,but put it in another physical drive, and it looks blank to that drive, back in the first and it can read it.

Tape has abysmal reliability, especially when moved from site to site and device to device. it needs to be binned.

Unitrends figured this out near a decade ago, and was the first to market with a D2D appliance. their tech is far superior, and they did not hold on to false logical structures like virtual tapes. A backup is a file. Data in that file is managed by a database which can prune and compress it using Deduplication algorithms. Files are stored on arrays (which can also be archived as an array of disks for reliability). Online recovery takes seconds. Even from archive portable database files are quickly searched, and random read heads find data very fast, typically while a tape robot is trill getting the header read off the tape... Disks are also multi-threaded and limited only by the IOPS potential of the pool. Some tapes can packet write for faster backups, but that just means data recovery is slower as a single file may be fragmented across an entire tape set, and tapes can only write as fast as you have tape heads to mount tapes in, and those costs thousands each and jukeboxes have SCSI maximums for number of tapes and slow robot arms.

Tape died 10 years ago, IT departments just have not realized it yet...