* Posts by Michael C

866 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Mar 2007

Page:

Apple MacBook Pro 15in June 2009 release

Michael C

"only" a 9400m GPU?

OK, first, other than really high end XPS systems from Dell, they donlt offer systems with a better (or even equal) GPU to the 9400m in 13 or 15" systems for this price or less, and even the systems that do have a 9500m don;t offer near the features, and have crappy 2 hour batteries and lower general specs.

Take the $300 step up to the 9400/9600 combo 15" and then Dell doesn't even OFFER a competitor, nor doeas HP. All their close systems are well over $2K, are all 17", and are all over 10lbs (Dell's closest is an alienware at 11.8lbs and over $2700...).

Even the $999 white Macbook beats the snot out of everything else close to it now that it also has a 9400m. If you;re interested in less performance than that, you better plan on running XP and doing little more than web and e-mail... and if that's all you want, then why are you comparing a $599 POS notebook to a media machine like a Mac?

Compare a MEDIA machine, capable of video editing and supporting 4GB or RAM to any of the equivalent Macs and you'll find typically the Mac is CHEAPER and better equipped. in a few rare models Dell and HP come in about $100-150 cheaper, but adding the 3rd party software to do proper pict and vid editing, and other software you'd need for Vista or 7 you likely don;t already own on your Xp machine, then you're still above Apple's prices...

Owners say iPhone 3GS is a scorcher

Michael C

Mine's fine

Well, lets put this in perspective.

Yesterday i set the 3GS in my dashboard dock, hooked it up to the charging cable and my stereo.

I set the music playing at max volume output, turned on maps, queued my location with the compas on, and drove 3 hours with the screen turned on. When i arrived, considdering the phone was not only under heavy loads, but also in direct sunlight on a black dashboard, and it's the black model 3GS, it was only comfortably warm when i arrived at my destination.

The trip back I did the same thing, but with the screen off. It seemed a bit cooler the second time, but not much.

I had a nearly 2 hour conversation with a friend last night, the phone in my pocket the whole time. No issues. Slightly warm, but it did not keep getting warmer after the first 10 minutes.

A 3 hour heavy load in direct, hot SC, sunlight (it was 102 degrees this weekend), and it was simply "noticably" warm. It did not feel hot, nor did i feel there was an issue. I turned off the screen, got the music running again though headphones, and thought nothing more of it.

Placing it under a pillow, or in an insulated winter coat pocket, that's a recipie for disaster. The device might make it a few hours without causing an issue, but extended use, say all night, and you're lucky it wouldn't explode. The heat has to go somewhere... My wife's camera phone gets hotter than the 3G S did when she leaves it playing music in her purse (it's not nice enough to auto stop when you unplug the headphones, and she often kills the battery that way).

PC repair techs police dangerous picture law

Michael C
WTF?

I've seen 2 arrested...

I worked for a big box retailer for a couple of years, from 2001 until about 2 months after they changed the uniform to that "geekier" thing (at that boint I gout out as fast as I could...)

Part of the training I had to give all my techs was that when they were working on a customer machine:

1) ensure no "explicit" images are displayed on the screen before connecting it to the overhead monitors. (I watched a guy get fired for putting a desktop on display to a crowd of people featuring a nude woman as the wallpaper)

2) when working on a PC, don't make an effort to search, but if you find evidence of child pornography or other federally illegal activity a) stop, b) notify management, and c) management will notify the FBI, and d) do not make the customer aware.

We had one PC come in, this guy was obviously an idiot, it was covered in stickers of naked 12 year old girls and one reading "if it's of age, it's too old!". We accepted it, logged his credit card and phone number, and called the police the second he was out the door. The FBI showed up, took it away (we never powered it on btw), and then called us back later. They asked us to tell him to come in to discuss the repair costs and pre-pay, and we set an appointment. The FBI was waiting when he came in and arrested him on the spot. Over 1800 images were found on his system and he got a sentance of over 25 years.

Another guy had his little girl (who he brought in with him to drop it off) pictured nude on his desktop. She was 13. We told him it would only take 15-20 minutes to add the RAM he wanted and to wander around the store for a while. He was arrested less than 10 minutes later. Some of the pictures they found on his machine had him in sexual positions with his daughter...

If you're going to have blantantly illegal crap on your computer, DON'T BRING IT TO A RETAIL STORE FOR REPAIR!!!

Per a member of the FBI we spoke to after the first arest, they told us that not only was it our duty to call the police, and they thanked us for doing so, but they reminded us that if we saw child porn on a machine that we ourselved could be subject to arrest if we DIDN'T alert the police. Our company execs confirmed that was the case. Not reporting an incedent of kiddie porn is itself a federal offense.

Now, i can agree, it;s possible that in places like your internet cache, tmp folders, and other places viruses stick images, you could very likely have illegal images on your machine you honestly know nothing about. When it;s your desktop image, and it;s you and your daughter, you have no case.... When you have a photo management app, and meticulously organized images, also sorted into clearly identifyable folders in the file system in common locations a user could not possibly overlook (like a folder ON THE DESKTOP called "13yrold golden showers"), you're guilty. As a tech, I've seen some pretty nasty stuff on people's computers (dump.gif), and much of it was actually in plain sight!

I've seen machines with web browser home pages set to illegal porn sites, e-amil archives with hundreds of porn photos shared with others, desktops with nasty images, chat apps that auto-launch and connect and then immediately get hit with invites to sexual chat, newgroup servers defaulted to alt.fettish feeds. People please... Provided it's legal stuff, the least you can do is make it so i don't have to see that crap on your PC when you bring it in for service... If you;re that depraived, don;t bring it in!

Apple races developer to censor smut

Michael C
Grenade

grey areas...

The app was not approoved containing 17+ content, rated that way or not. It was advertised to everyone who previously downloaded it as containing only underwear clad models. 17+ or not, the downloaded had a given expectation of what to expect, and by the company changing the content post-approval, without updating the app version or requiring a re-download to access the new racier content, they did in fact violate Apple's policy as it;s possib le (though unlikely) that existing app owners might have been offended. (I actually have an uncle who loves women in lingere, but speaks against playboy and nudity, he might have been offended).

If they posted an updated version, enabled a way to seperate nude from noon-nude content through the app, set nude as defaulted to off, and tied it in to the rating system more directly, allowing those still interested in the non-nude features to continue use without accessing nude content, then this might have gone down differently...

Apple has ALLWAYS been fishy about externally linked content... The devs knew they were skating on questionable ice. They should have partnered more directly with Apple on this.

Apple sued for 30¢ $5m

Michael C
Stop

it;s NOT money lost...

When you get a $20 gift card from Walmart, you can use all $20 ONLY if you spend AT LEAST $20. If you spend $19.45, and never use the card again, you loose the $0.55 remaining. However, you could buy something else for $1.00, spend an additional $0.45 of your own coin, and get the remaining $0.55 off the card...

iTunes cards are not 20 songs, they're $20. 20 songs would have been $19.80. So there's 0.20. In theory, it sounds like they're forcing you to buy another track for $0.80 of your own coin to get the 0.20 back. However, even when there were .99 songs, there were 1.99 videos, 9.99 albums, various priced games, iPhone apps, and more.

The marketing blurb was not contracting the gift card to provide $0.99 cent songs, it was a statement of what the pricing was at that time. That price CHANGED after the printed date. possibly a big deal, and some might say "false advertising" however, use of the card requires acceptace of the iTunes user agreement, which includes verbage of prices are subject to change. The card, once activated at the store, but NOT activated in iTunes CAN be returned to Apple for a full refund.

They're not stealing Money. Once added to your iTunes account that money is permanant, and does not expire (unlike Visa gift cards....)

This is a completely frivilous case. It's the equivalent of claiming the record industry lost billions from money people were never going to spend in the first place... If you have $.20 left, it;s your choice to spend 79 or not. The value of the dollar is still the same. There weas NO correlation from the value of the card to a number of songs.

Now, if the card said "20 songs, 10 videos, or a combination of the 2 not to exceed $20" then that would be a different story if the price rose to $1.29... but that is NOT what it said, and this is complete BS.

Safari 4: Apple's crash-happy shipper

Michael C
Thumb Up

no issues

I have it on a OS X10.5, Win Vista EE 32, and an XP pro box. No issued with 4.0 on any of them. I use it almost exclusively (except at work where only IE 6 is approved, ouch).

AT&T punts not-free iPhone nav app

Michael C

TomTom

OK, look at it this way. A basic TomTom is $200. Map Packs are $49 anually (just for US and Canada) from what I understand.

This $200 includes hardware, so an app for the iPhone I'd expect would be maybe $79, tops, one time fee, and $49 a year to continue to update maps. they're offering the (optional) car dock as an added revenue stream, which will likely be $69 - 99 (based on the existing landscape of car docks).

If AT&T thinks I'll pay $240 over a 2 year contract for a knock-off GPS system, that doesn't offer a dock with native additional features (like more sensitive GPS, embeded mic, etc), vs the TomTom system which even including the doc would be at most $130 over the same 2 years if you optionally by the new maps... they're deluded. For $10 a month, the free google maps with the little blue GPS dot is more than good enough for my needs... especially on the 3G S where the map will auto orient to the direction you're heading...

All I'm paying TomTom for is voice-over and the ability to take calls and play music while still getting turn notifications. Does AT&T's app even offer the backgrounding features TomTom offers???

Heck, I've actually found that when using the google maps in hybrid, it;s easier to determine how close to a turn I am by looking at the roof profiles around the intersection than it is to simply read the map and street names... I don;t mind at all having to tap a little button to show the next intersection.

I had decided i wasn't going to get TomTom's dock (i already have a nice one that also integrates the FM tuner) and I wasn't going to buy the software unless it was $39.99 or less...

'Overweight' people live longer than those of 'ideal' weight

Michael C

OK, now correlate that with other factors...

My guess, the "overweight" crowd not only included a sifficient number of athletes and former athletes, and a range of people like me who are simply taller than most, but it also included a range of people with lower stress indexes, better overall diets (people who diet heavy tend to be deficient in many key nutrients due to eating the same foods consistantly for long periods).

I'd also like to see some correlation to how many of the "ideal" people consumed large amounts of artificial sugars and other synthetic "healthier" ingredients than those in the "overweight" range eating regualr everyday foods.

W3C launches appeal to scupper Apple patent

Michael C

Reat the F-ing patent...

It is NOT a patent on Auto-update, it is a patent on updating a RUNNING program WITHOUT user interruption. That's something NO updater currently does, but part of the W3C spec in question proposed. Apple, a member of the comittee, cited that issue, and WITHIN THIER RIGHTS (see source below), and following W3C terms everyone on the comittee agreed to, Apple is refusing to allow that technology to become a part of the spec unlicensed.

This is also OLD news... From April 8th 2009...

From the patent 5,764,992:

Abstract:

A software program running on a computer automatically replaces itself with a newer version in a completely automated fashion, WITHOUT INTERRUPTION OF ITS PRIMARY FUNCTION (emphasis mine), and in a manner that is completely transparent to the user of the computer. This is achieved by means of a logic module that is incorporated into programs. The logic module performs the functions of locating and identifying other versions of its associated program, determining whether the other versions are older or newer than the currently running version, and replacing older versions of itself with a newer version. As part of this operation, the logic module can copy the newer version to its current location, move the older version to a secondary location, and remove older versions of itself that have been replaced by a newer version. The new version that is to replace an older version can reside on an individual computer, or can be present on a server to which a number of computers are connected via a network. With this arrangement, software upgrades can be effected in an efficient and automatic manner, without resort to any external resources.

The autor of this article is spreading miinformation. This is BAD Journalism.

Several who ARE informed have been saying things like "Under the W3C's membership policies, those within the standards group -- including Apple -- are required to offer their patents royalty-free, which the company has so far refused to do, according to the report" however, upon inspecting that statement, that is ONLY for technologies developed DURING the process, and PRIOR AND EXISTING PATENTS are NOT subject to being offered for free (unless volumteered). Apple (and any other company) is permitted to file such complaint up to 150 days of the publication of the first working draft of the standard. They did so in this case PRIOR to it's publication, when the first draft was still in draft form, not yet fully presented.

Apple is the only company contesting a patent on this particular standard, but this issue has been raised AMNY times in the past on other standard, by Microsoft, HP, Sun, and others.

For more details, the author should actually read the patent, and then also read this: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management The W3C patent exception process...

Hydrogen-powered two-seater car unveiled

Michael C
Stop

Bunk

First, the fuel cell alone costs more than 48,000. This can only exist with that MASSIVE government subsidy of $20M to build the 10 cars....

Next, great, it included H2... But how about those membrane replacements for the fuel cell?

I'm assuming it's using liquid H2 as well, either pressure compressed or frozen to rediculous temps. It's going to take a lot of electricy to maintain that density of H2, or 6-10 hours at a pump to fill it up. (a common issue with ALL H2 powered vehicles).

50MPH is barely usable as a commuter car, on city streets only, no freeways. It can only go where mopeds go... Why have a 240 mile range? ...and how are you going to get to the pumping station without getting on freeways in most places? The car will never be able to go more than 50 miles from it;s home in most cases....

Oh yea, and it;s a rolling BOMB!

MacBooks afflicted with SATA 'degrade'

Michael C

@ Anonymous Coward

""This is normal for a laptop" - Yes, but those price tags aren't..."

Dell M1530, closest comperable configuration in 15",4GB,320GB: $1489

- 8400M vs Apple 9400M graphics (winner Apple, big time.)

- no Vista Ultimate option (Ultimate is only real comparrison for OS X)

- cheap plastic case (apple is molded aluminum)

- 56watt battery w/ approx 3 hour life (Apple has 7 hours)

- sucky software, no video editing package, no music package, no Exchange integration (eqivalent adds $360 to price for Dell, winner Apple)

- heavier

- no single source support (dell for hardware, microsoft fee based for OS support)

- Same screen (but Apple also offers non-glossy option)

- no backlit kbd

Apple machine is $1599, a bit pricier, but requires no additional software, and from most vendors you get Parallels 3.0, a printer, and a carry bag free. Just buy Antivirus and 1 or 2 productivity apps and the Dell costs more.

Next step up: 15" MackbookPro with additional 9600M secondary video processor: $1999.

Oh, Dell offers no 15" with a more powerful graphics adapter... have to go to 17"...

M17x:

- cheap plastic case

- VERY short battery life

- 5 full pounds heavier

- no web camera

- no bluetooth

- no included software

Properly configured, it's a whoping $70 cheaper than Apple's 17" offering, and FAR more expensive than the 15".

Do NOT tell us Apple's machines are overpriced without backing that up with specific examples. Apple's hardware is spot on price wise with the competition, and this higher up you go, apple becomes the cheaper of the 2 offerings. Add just the MINIMUM reasonable software to a PC and the Mac is cheaper in every case when you compare like-like hardware.

No, apple does not offer a cheap $500 laptop. Why? $500 laptops SUCK and typically don't even run Windows by itself well, let alone any real demanding app likel managing 15,000 images or songs in a database, ort editing video.

Starting Mac at $999 blows away Dells comperable offer...

Windows 7 boss predicts 'modest' initial shipments

Michael C

Service packs are free!

Win 7 being just a revamp of vista (same kernel, new wiz-bangs), is just a "plus pack" or enhanced service pack, and it should be free to anyone who was sadled with buying Vista, any version.

Vista was so poorly done itself, it's prices should drop across the board su that Ultimate comes into the $129-149 range. Anyone who bought premium of Vista should get 7 ultimate for like $29 (equivalent to Snow Leapord upgrade, even though it's a poor comparrison). Upgrades from XP should not be over $99.

I run Vista EE 64 at home on one machine. I've gotten used to it's quirks and generally I appreciate it (especially it's backup functions) more than XP. However, short of DX10 support, it really has made no difference to me other than look and feel xs the XP box sitting next to it.

Will I upgrade to 7? Well, it will come in my action pack quarterly update for free, so I'l probably at least deploy it in a VM for a while and play with it, and if I can inline upgrade without issues I'll move it up to Ultimate, but its not on my to-do list... My wife's XP laptop, which btw is 64bit dual core, dedicated graphics, and 4GB of RAM, failed the compatability check even for Vista, so I'm betting 7 won't run on it...

Upgrading my 2 macs to 10.6 will happen the day it's out. If you think doubling performance for $29 isn't worth it for a "percentage of mac users" you need to go take some more statistics classes... Exchange support without needing to buy Office? Done. Quicktime X? Done. 6GB less disk space and faster boot times? Done. Overhauled iChat with both higher def AND lower bandwidth at the same time? Done. An AI for text selection in preview and PDFs? FINALLY! Expose in dock? NICE! Smarter data detection and correlation in e-mail, chat, and other sources? nice. Faster backup, quicker wake/sleep, faster file transfer, intelligent thread handling, fully multi-core-aware OS, plug-in memory isolation, all new 64 bit native code for over 1000 subprograms and apps, using the GPU for more than graphics being native to the entire OS, these may not mean much to users, but they'll NOTICE the difference. Win 7 is improving some aesthetics and makes things simpler to users while making them more complicated in the back end and changes everythgin the user knows. Snow Leapord provides significant real improvement, stability, anf functionality, not just a GUI overhaul...

Oh, XP support ends April 8th 2014... Mainstream support ended in April this year (may have been extended) but that just means you need to pay for support calls, which 9 out of 10 you ended up paying for anyway. Patches will still be free for 4 more years and it will be continually supported by microsoft, just no new "featuers" will be added, only fixes and updates.

Apple takes Snow Leopard for walk

Michael C

for your $29 you get...

in addition to the nearly 1000 applications that have been code modified for back end improvements, enhancements, stability, speed, and more:

- Quicktime X (Quicktime plus previously sold ALONE for $29)

- Fully integrated Exchange support (Outlook cannot be bought for the Mac by itself, but the PC version is $129, Office with Exchange support costs hundreds) I might add, the support looks better than what Outlook offers... and it doesn't require outlook to be running to access the contacts and calendar.

- new iChat with higher def and lower bandwidth and new features (OK, updates to most chat apps are typically free, but most are also add supported and this isn't...)

- full native 64 bit including intelligent thread management, and full OS support of multi-core CPUs (even Win 7 won't be there, many underlying apps are still single threaded)

- open access to the GPU for mathmetic functions to accelerate processing. No, not just limited to apps coded for nVidia cards, open access even for everyday apps to that horepower though APIs native to the OS. (easier for programmers to take advantage of, and also allows more than 1 app to use those resources concurrently)

Yea, all the other 995 bullet points are just performance enhancements or minor gimmicks, but they end up with a result of 50% faster and 50% less install space and greater stability.

What are we getting in Win 7 Ultimate for $129 upgrade (IF it's that cheap, current is 219)? bareley some of what was originally promised for Vista coming 3 years too late, and it's still not native 64bit across the board, most apps don't run well under 64 bit, the entire OS is not nearly multithreaded, and virtually anything you add to the base OS costs more and does less than what comes for free on a mac (of with iLife for $79).

Apple adds 'S' to iPhone 3G

Michael C

counterpoint

1) MMS came to the iPhone late, yes. Why? IT HAS FULL E-MAIL!!!! WTF do you WANT to pay $0.25 to send each message through a snazzy interface when you can send them through email for FUCKING FREE!?!?!

2) Video support: It's a power thing. Yes the original phone could record video, we proved that with hacks. It drains the battery damn quick... and the camera was shoddy at best. Why? Not because apple chose that, but because that was the only non-proprietary camera they could get their hands on at the time that fit in the case. Nokia, Samsung, and others had excusive deals with too many vendors and Apple could not get a decent lense pack during development. Now they can, and 3.2MP btw gets 480P resolution (ie is IS High Def morons. You want a true 720P or higher camcorder be ready to shell out hundreds for a real camera cuz a cheap cell camera at ANY resolution can't cut it. I've seen output from a 5MP phone camera. My 2.1MP point and shoot takes MUCH better pictures... There's only so much noise you can cancel with pizels that tightly packed behind a 1/4" lens.

3) 18-24 month contracts? Your blaming APPLE for this? Buy a blackberry and see if it's any different. The Storm is $499 without a contract, and you only get $100 towards a replacement after 2 full years with Verizon... It's $199 with a 2 year deal, same price as the iPhone ($100 LESS subsidy to you) and the Storm's calling plans with data are $20-30 more per tier and tethering is STILL extra ($40 extra!). 2 year cost of a blackberry Storm is $820 more than the new iPhone with the same plan, and you only get $100 off your next one if you go the whole 2 years, Apple is offering $200 off your next one at 1 year.... This does not include Blackberrie's poor store and over inflated prices on apps. If you don;t want a contract, but the iPhone at $599 if you really went to. Just give up MMS, SMS, 3G, visual voicemail, aGPS, and pretty much everything else that doesn't work over wifi and you can bring it to the network of your choice... feel free!

4) Voice Dial? How about Voice COMMAND. We've had voice dial in the form of FREE apps from 3rd parties for a long time. That's nothing new and something Apple left to the free market. The phone may not include it, BUT IT'S FREE TO ADD! There are a LOT of apps the iPhone does not come with out of the box, but they ARE available, and most are free. There's little at all free on other phones, and most apps START at $5, many are $30! Big deal it wasn't fully integrated, it could still be done, and now there's a complete solution available that comands not only calling, but virtually every feature of the device.

5) 7.2MB HSPDA is the current deployed standard. Yes, 21MB 4G is coming down the pipe, but we can NOT legally distribute chips capable of using frequencies the FCC has not approved... 4G is nearly 2 years from coming online in major cities, still nearly a year until it's running on pilot systems. Do you REALLY want to add $100 in cost to a device you can't use for 2 years???? 7.2 is only yet availablein select locations... Besides, WTF do you plan to dowload to YOUR PHONE on a connection that's likelly FASTER than your home broadband pipe? 7.2 is pleanty fast enough, even tethering, to pull multiple concurrent full HD streams.

6) And whoever said it *still* doesn't have cut and paste: You're *still* an idiot, that was added with 3.0...

iPhone apps - the 10 smartest and the 10 stupidest

Michael C

Hrm, pocketbrick

...Too expensive? $199 is the core price for any comperable device. Yes there are smartphones cheaper, but they either suck, lack core features, or the "cheap" apps start at over $5 each and are limited to a mere handful of about 2,000 choices, and the good apps all cost $19.99... AT&T's plans are about $15 a month higher than equivalents on average, but the TCO of the device over 2 years, it's not out of line... Verizon and Sprint may have better plan pricing, but they also nickle and dime you $3.99 for ring tones, make it a pain to sync data, charge aditional fees for GPS use and streaming TV, in the ned, their plans are often more expensive, even including the unlimited tiers. I pay $69 a month for my iphone, get 200 texts, unlimited data and I have a bank of unused minutes several months deep. Factoring in even the 50% of the apps I COULD have bought (not counting the one's I can't) on Win mobile and Blackberry combined, I've spent $42 total on iPhone apps, the WinMobile equivalent would have been over $320. My $.99 iPhone ringtones would have cost me nearly a hundred bucks from the competition. I can't imagine what the MMS messaging savings were (at $0.25 per message on the competition, much of the time i had an iPhone unlimited plans including MMS were not an option from the competition). Also, AT&T and Apple are announcing price drops on the 8th... btw: when i bought the iPhone, i looked at ALL the other options. Even at $400 for the phone at the time, 2 year TCO on my plan saved me $300 over the 2 years vs buying the closest cheaper competitor. It;s all the "additional" charges for "optional" features that you REALLY need to investigate before you spread FUD. might be different in your country, but in the US, iPhone is one of the cheapest TCO smartphones ever made.

...Too restrictive? 43,000 apps, nearly half of them free, and you can jailbreak it? Name ANYTHING that comes close. ...and it works with Macs, PCs, and Linux. ...and tell me Verizon doesn't lock down their devices! I had a motorolla that ON THE BOX indicated bluetooth sync, PM3 playing, A2DP, and more, ALL DISABLED by Verizon, and only enabled by MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION, even on their unlimited plans... again, back off the FUD train pal.

...Too fragile? I've dropped mine a hundred times. I've ripped the headphones out more than that. I've got dings in the corners, scratches on the casing, and it's 100% perfect. I even dropped it running in the rain, screen side down, stepped on it, and there's not a scratch in the screen... It's singularly the most durable handheld device I've ever had. I'm 22 months into my contract, and I expect for the first time in my life to have a device live all 2 years of it's term, and I plan to hand it off the the wife when the gen3 phone comes out next month and think she'll get a good year out of it. I don't use a shell on the phone, just a clip-in belt clip. I don't even use screen protectors. Even the battery life is 90+% of original... still plays MP3 8+ hours straight, makes a few calls, and collects e-mail all day, and I can play a game yet for a while before I get the 10% remaining alert around 9PM each night. You objously have never actually HELPD an iPhone in your hands and been satisfied by it;s strenght of build. Yes, you CAN break the screen if you do something utterly stupid, name another full screen touch phone that isn't equally or more fragile... For christs's sake, it lasted 4 seconds in an indistrial blender before it finally broke!!! (will-it-blend? barely....)

...Too Apple? I don't know what that means... More people use an iPhone with a PC than with Mac OS. It's the single presented design everyone is trying to match. If you mean the aesthetic design, lack of crashing, stability and fluidity of the interface, and overall finish of the design, feature and function, well, if you're not keen on that go f* yourself and deal with your cheap, plastic, crap, Windows, Symbian, or other worthless OS phone.... I've had them all over the years (work insists on giving me worthless smartphones that crash incessently and loose any data not stored on external cards. I spend about 2 hours a week maintaining those damned devices, i spend NO time maintaining the iPhone). If you're referring simply to the fact that since Apple makes it, you'll never buy it, then you should have disclaimed yourself a technology biggot somewhere in your post. Not buying something because of who makes it, especially when they're the NUMBER ONE rated company in overall consumer satisfaction is simply moronic.

You're probably one of those idiouts who allways votes republican because you allways have, and completely ignore the fact that the new millenium democrats more resemble the republicans of the 50s than the republicans do now... You don't buy apple simply because everyone seems to love them.

European 'standard' e-car power connector details emerge

Michael C

Not bad, but not good enough

even at 400v 3phase, it's still TOO LONG to charge. We need a 300+ amp 4 phase connection, if not more, at 440v. Li-Ti and Li-Su batteries are capable of charging to 85+% capacity inside 10 minutes, given sufficient power sources. We won't get that kind of power in our houses, but at home you can live with a 2+ hour charge cycle, but on the run, charging in 10 minutes will be much prefered, so we would like a power connector that handles 220v 30amps, 440v 3 phase 60 amp, and high voltage high amp 4 phase, all in 1 connector please....

Google: Let us keep search data or die

Michael C

symantec differences

You see, keeping the ACTUAL search queries and user tracking information is unnecessary once the data hasd been tabulated. We can keep a historical record of the trend analysis without actually having to keep the original inputs... That data is only valuable at the moment. We're not going to crawl that data later for reference once it;s been verified and validated.

Rumor rubberizes iPhone 3.0

Michael C

Water damage now warrantied (to an extent)

http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/05/06/apple-policy-waterdamaged-iphones/

Apple changed it's pland Jean-Luc! You CAN get a refurbished phone as a replacement for a water damaged phone. It's still a $199 cost to you, but it's a LOT better than popping for a whole new device.

E-car supplier demos battery swap-shop

Michael C

Not my car, and not my dime

First, as someone noted, the battery packs will vary in quality. We'll be paying upwards of $15K for our battery pack in a new car, I'm not letting you swap it for a 4 year old pack built using cheap components and lesser grade batteries. F* no!

Next, forget the cost of the robot, the packs are $15K each... You'll need hundreds to get through a day. Most of these packs would also be swapped at freeway stations, long distance filling spots, and they could need hundreds or thousands of them to make it thorugh a day.

third: it's not just storage of the packs, they'll need to be shuffled back and forth between stations, DAILY. They weigh hundreds of ounds. This will require additional motor assits or robots, lots of trucks, and men to do the work on the cheap...

Fourth: charging. Swap the pack, you still need to recharge it. This means not only storage, but cabled storage, and large scale smart charging systems that make sure batteries are not only in stock, but to know which one is ready to go in the next car... If you need the charging stations anyway, just build charging stalls for people to park in and charge...

Fifth: it's mostly irrlelvent! By the time we get 200 of these stations built we'll be shipping cars using Li-Ti batteries that charge to 85% in 5 minutes or less. It takes me 3-6 minutes to fill the gas tank in my Van today (depending on the pump speed), 5 minutes to go 200+ miles is not an issue. Besides, i'll have gas backup to extend that range to more like 400 miles, and I (or someone lese in the car) do need to pee every 3-4 hours anyway... On long trips, those pit stops are never less than 10-15 minutes for us.

Sixth: Inventory. We're hard up enough producing enough battery packs to put in the carrs rolling off the lot. You'll need to multiple that number by 5 to keep up with demand for packs to be stored at stations.

7th: Manufacturers: not only will it be IMPOSSIBLE (let alone cooperativley, but also from a simple design perspective) to put the same battery in every car, let alone the same battery capacity in every car. Even using modular packs with smaller cars having 1 or 2 and larger cards having 4 or 6, you're still talking about structural limitations on where a battery can fit ubder a car (and most are not UNDER cars, but under seats, in trunks, packed in around the front hood, etc). There's NO WAY to make this a universal system...

8th: Cost: Filling a battery costs electricity, a chaep meter, a cable, and a guy to watch. Replacing a battery STILL costs that, PLUS an expensive robot requiring maintenance, large numbers of replacable packs, guys to move them, places to store them, infrastructure to support them, this is simply assonine. Even if it would take 30 minutes to get a full charge, a 400 mile hybrid range is worth 15-20 extra minutes per stop if it costs 1/4th as much... Charging a battery costs about half what gasoline goes today to go the same distance. So, 400 miles should cost about $25 (including the gas to double the range). Swapping a battery (plus the gas to double the range) would cost not less than $80 by rough estimates, assuming a full 1000 charges per battery pack before it's thrown out. Between my home in the south and upstate NY, a trip i take frequently, I'd need to start full and fill up twice on the way. Replacing my battery packs would cost nearly $100 more and save me what, 40 minutes? IT'S NOT WORTH IT!

This is a crock plan cooked up by the NiCad folks, who's batteries take 3-8 hours to charge. The Li-Po and Li-Ti batteries charge in minutes, 30 tops. you charge to 85%, not 100%... You stop more often (1 extra stop every 1200 miles or so) but you save hours doing so.

No, you'll never see 10 minute charges at home. a 400Amp house circuit might get you a 2 hour charge, but a 4 phase high power line at a filling station can top off a 40KwH battery pack in 5 minutes... and it's safe. You'll need hydrolic assist to move the cable around (it;s about 6" in diameter, and uses interlocking flexi joints (it;s not a cable that bends on it;s own, it only bends at joints), but even a child could move the cab;e to the car with an assist system and plu it in to a resonably universally located port (where a gas insert is today, just in the front half of the car to maintain safe seperation from the existing fuel port, which hybrids will still have).

Intel hit with largest ever EU fine

Michael C

Luke...

Luke,

Sony choosing to release the game only in limited quantities and only on certain platforms is not anticompetitive. They own the rights to it, and CLEARLY, there's thriving competition. Now, if Sony started telling Microsoft that they could only distribute GhostBusters on Xbox360 if Microsoft restricted the sale of non-Sony produced games to specific numbers, that's a different story.

Limiting the sale of things you produce/own if people won't play by your rules is supply/demand. Limiting what the OTHER GUY sells based on terms in your contract with a third party is ILLEGAL.

Windows 7’s XP Mode — Virtually worth the effort

Michael C

Virus FUD

The VM machine is firewalled off the the network. Virueses can not penetrate directly to it through common cracks and vulnerabilities.

Yes it can read/write the Win7 home folders, but they should already have THEIR OWN virus scanning, so that's NO DIFFERENT than simply downloading something to your my docs folder.

Any media inserted can be easily scanned by the host first, then configured to be mounted inside the guest, so again no worry.

You should not ever be browsing the web with the XP instance since it's entire reason for being is ONLY for apps that can't work under windows 7. Yea, you might need IE6 for some ancient intranet sites, but if those sites are already scanned and clear by their own AV systems, again, safe...

This is NOT a full blown VM to use in that manner. If you want an XP machine to use as a virtual machine, note that VPC supports "multiple instances of XP." Build one AND SECURE THAT ONE.

Space shuttle may fly until 2011

Michael C
Alien

2.5bln to keep shuttle going, 65 million to BUY a Soyuz

the only real objection to using the Russia spacecraft is cold war fears (ie, complete BS in today's real world). Russia actually offered to SELL us a complete Soyuz, including 2 cosmonots to teach NASA how to operate it, and all the launch geat, transports, towers and more...

Launching a soyuz costs less than $200 million. Maintaining the space shuttle costs 2.5-3 Billion PER YEAR!

Our replacement for the shuttle will cost a grand total of 3 Billion over 2 YEARS, not one, and can be ready for launch in 2013 with that money. (it would be ready by March 2015 without that 3 billion, that's just what it costs to speed up the process). That craft will cost significantly less than a Soyuz for each launch.

We could BUY a WHOLE NEW Soyuz and launch it OURSELVES, without any russian involvement, and THROW IT AWAY after each launch, save the 3 billion extra for the new rockets and plan on the 2015 date already accepted by NASA and Congress, and we'd save nearly 10 BILLION over 5 years vs trying to keep the space shuttle running even HALF the time until 2013...

This is old school mistrust from the cold war taking billions out of your tax paying pockets. We have NO FEAR of Russia today (they're MANY times more dependent on us thatn we are of their space shuttle.

The ONLY think keeping us from buying and operating out OWN soyuz rockets is a STUPID law banning the purchase of spacecraft from Russia, China, and a few other countries... Instead of passing a law to spend 5.5 billion over the next 2 years, they should have simply repealed the older law and SAVED us that money.

It should be criminal for our congressmen to be so fucking retarted, as it should equally be a crime for allowing uninformed voters to keep them in office. Can I get a term limit over here???

AT&T reveals slipping iPhone sales

Michael C

re: how much

I expect the latest phone to be $199 and $299, just like the current 3G model, and with 8 and 16GB of memory and the better camera and better battery life. Apple has a history of releasing the latest and greatest at the same price point of the current.

I also expect the existing 8GB 3G may become available at $129 marking a new price point. I also expect dramatically lowered plan pricing including an unimited plan (text, data, voice, everything) for somewhere just above $99 with 2 year contracts on the new models.

I also think Apple may have a new H2DP headset up it's sleve, some specific announcement on tethering support (hopefully inculded in the unlimited plan), voice activated features for the phone, and may introduce a larger "micro-tablet" iPhone with greatly improved capabilites somewhere about double the price of the top iPhone model.

Brussels: Old-school lightbulbs to be gone by 2012

Michael C

dimmable lights cost too much...

...But that's my only real issue. In many rooms I much prefer lighting control with dimmable switches. Fortunately, efficinet halogen doesn't cost a ton to place here. Dimable CF can be $20 a bulb or more... This price needs to come way down.

A minor issue would be to form regulations on forcing CF bulb manufacturers to make it clear and easily distinguishable on the packaging the color temp of the bubls in the pack. a 2400 degree bulb is simply crap, and useful only in attics, storage clostes, and other places where seeing colors is a non-issue. 4000K bulbs are good general use in kitchens, clothes clostes, and most other parts of the house. However, for a living room, library, or bathroom, only 5000K and higher bulbs should be used. The cost difference can be extreme in some cases between bulbs of the same type with different temps. The cheap bulbs are almost allways sub-3K, but regularly I'll find 4500K's mixed in at close pricing, but the only way I can usually tell is to go online and look at the specs. Color temp NEEDS to be displayed on the package, and the method of doing so should be standardized.

Most people don;t like CF for the "poor lighting." No, that's just "cheap bulbs" with low color temp. Cheap incandescents have the same issue...

I'm glad some country is finally making a swift move on this. 3% might not sound like much, but even considdering the increased cost of the bulbs, over the lifespan alone most of them come out cheaper, factoring in the electic savings it's a deal only stupid people avoid. For a country to reduce electric use by 3% without multi-billion dollar investments means we can invest that same money in new clean energy instead!

Reg Reader poll on notebook quality: results are in

Michael C

This would matter more if...

...we actually compared like-to-like, or detailed the survey into categories as well as generalizations. I mean, if you're going to compare a brand in general, then we're really not talking about the hardware at all, we're talking about general user perspective, skewed dramatically by the large number of people who are A) cheap, B) are given a likely improperly configured or supported machine by an employer, C) who are not technology minded and understand little of what's in their hands, and D), who have only used a small fraction of the manufacturer's systems personally.

Lets have a survey comissioned to ask this information first of all to a group of 10,000 minimum. Next, itentify what systems people have and have not ACTUALLY used. next identify seperately how system admins feel, pro users, light users, and general consumers... I'm sure this will cause huge variances in opinion alone. Next, let's also segregate this by consumer class (high end and low end seperately), business class, and professional class systems. Apple would only play in the top 3 classes, some would only play in the bottom 2 or 3 classes.

What's the value proposition of a high end Dell notebook compared to a Mac 17" pro notebook? I'm sure most will say the Apple is the better value (mostly because it's cheaper than the dell at that level). Statistics can be used to show either side of an argument simply depending on how you state them. This is an example of bad journalism at its best.

Apple 2G iPod Touch

Michael C
Stop

GPS and aGPS

The iPhone 3G has BOTH GPS types. It acquires aGPS data from cell towers first, since it's quick to do, then in a few seconds updates that with more accurate satellite GPS. If it used only GPS, apps would take several seconds to pull the data, making the device feel sluggish. Also, keeping the GPS system cycling every 30 seconds has dramatic battery saving potential, and once aGPS is fine tuned with GPS data, aGPS is nearly as accurate. It's really the ideal solution for a mobile platform. aGPS alone is not as accurate, but having both systems proviudes the best speed, battery life, and overall accuracy.

aGPS is "asisted" GPS. by itself aGPS is not a complete system. Sattelite data is still collected and still used. Stop spreading FUD about aGPS if you don;t understand the technology.

Senate bill sics DoJ on copyright infringers

Michael C

Actually, this is good, trust me

Why is this a GOOD thing?

1: this castrates the RIAA. With an oficial body of enforecement, the RIAA will have to process all activity through this agency, and they would be subject to harassment suits from individuals if they did not.

2: the taxpayer will be footing the legal bill. No, this is actually GOOD. ...because they will not be able to a) go after people that they "think" are guilty because of the immense, million dollar, countersuits there will be if they're found innocent, b) since there's no budget for enforcement in the bill, it will be both low priority/high reward only prosecution.

3: Do you see the government kicking down doors and seizing property of pot smokers, casual drug users, illegal gun owners, etc? no. They only do after the dealers, big time distributors, and true dangerous persons. Why? a) they can recoup damages, fines, and/or property to pay the excessive legal bills, or b) the community actually agrees the expense is worth the effort because it removes the risk of violent crime, and c) manpoewr is limted. Do you think the agency will blow $30-50K in legal fees and manpower to seize a kids's PC, to do what, fine him a few grand he can't afford to pay? Keep in mind, the bulk of offenders do not own property. If you ask a cop in your neighborhood if they now a particluar person doesn drugs, usually the answer is "yes, we're aware" but the do nothing, because the effor to tdo so, even for a CLEAR CUT, easily provable guilty conviction, is simply not worth disrupting the commuity until the kid actually becomes an issue (drives stoned, gets in fights, robs someone, etc). Shit, I know a dozen cops who smoke pot...

This agency will almost exclusively start by targeting corporations, and anyone who PROFITS from sharing. After 5-10 years of that, with an occasional bust for nothing more than publicity ("we'd like to announce our largest every piracy bust... " etc.) maybe we'll see some actual local activity. With this bill passed, the ONLY thing the RIAA will be able to do is complain to the govenment about their lack of action, and continue their media war, but their ability to investigate and prosecute will be gone.

...and for those where guilt is assured, for those who are big time file traders and stealing hundreds or thousands of files, and if the government does see cause to get the warrent and proceed, if and when the person gets caught, convicted, and punished, well, they did afterall break the law... I can't have sympaty for them.

Will this agency even care about casul infringement? copying DVDs you own for your own uses, downloading a few songs you used to own, or have on tape but not digital format? no. They really can't be bothered with it. If they did care, do you think there would be so many people on the road with valid licenses without car insurance? Estimates place approxamately 30% of south carolina drivers as un or underinsured and driving illegally. They get a slap on the rist, a fine, and a license suspension when they get caught, pay their dues, and typically, do it again... When the cops have reason to target you for another crime, IP violations will just be another item on the stack against you, and typically not the key crime unless you;re a really agressive (and careless) offender.

Fact is, even if they can connect uploads and downloads to you, it;s simply too easy to defeat the case in court, too easy to introduce doubt. To get a conviction, the evidence is going to have to be especially damning, and in court, odds are half the people on the jury will actually be guilty themselves, and leaning in your favor...

McCain: Keep Shuttle flying, don't trust Russia

Michael C

many prblems with McCain

Ok, first, this Russia-Georgia thing? OK, look at it this way: Mexico, with a band of underfunded radicals, declares it;s taking back Texas from the USA, and raids the state in force headed towards Dallas, empting banks and resources along the way. Their politicians spout thqat that the USA can't possibly do more than chase them out and would never have the guts to enter Mexico in retaliation. Do you think we'd really stand by???

Russia did not start this, Georgia did, and unfortunately for them, they drew the wrong straw, and Russia, long downtrodden, decided it wasn't going to take it anymore and invaded. Sure, they're killing people in the streets, and using non-pinpoint bombing techniques, but WE DIID THE SAME GOING INTO IRAQ... Should the whole wold see us in the same light as Russia? Do we have any right to complain when we ourselved have done (are doing) the same thing?

Next: The ISS is an international cooperation. We only need the shuttles for manned missions, and since we are a big funder of the ISS, and have supported russias cosmonots on it for years, it;s about time they returned the favor. We cans till launch lots of other unmanned missions using other technology. Lets let China, Russia, the UK, and a few other spend all the money getting to the ISS for a while. They're not going to let that project fail, there's too much at stake up there for too many nations.

Next: The ISS is valueable for a lot more than teflon and a few other minor experiments. Its part one of our ability to construct large scale craft in space. Without this we can not build systems that might intercept incoming asteroids, nor could we even start on a path to populating other planets. I'm not so much interested in the science we'll collect from those worlds, but in the resources this may give us access to, and what we'll learn about this planet by going to another. This IS an important process, and we need to continue funding it. Once we get our next manned craft running, lauches will cost in the 10s of millions, not billions, and we'll get a lot more done.

McCain is still living in a world where we hate russia. The rest of us got over that long ago, the cold war ended, and we've made great strides, partnerships, and more with Russia, not to mention on our current track, they'll be a more powerful economy than us in not too long of a time. McCain is treading dangerous water, and if he continues, we're likely to have another cold war on our hands. The world trusts us little enough, if we elect someone they see as paranoid, our place will fall farther, and we risk wars with actual nations, not just radical terrorists.

Oh: spewing gas on a few kerds is not a WMD. A WMD would be a device capable of dispursing said gas across a large distance and over a large area. The gas bombs they used were mostly trucks and short range scuds, and the gas was only of limited effect. A chemical waepon is not necessarily a WMD. Also, this gassing occurred in 1990, when he DID have WMDs, before he burines and destroyed them all and purged his country of anything that would again bring the UN's wrath. We chose to ignore that fact since Jr wanted to finish Daddy's little war.

Apple slapped for dodgy ads

Michael C

definitions and misinderstanding

Java is not the internet, nor is flash. It is an application API, not a website. The site loads, we can access it, but the application embedded in it, which is actualy compiled code, will not run wiothout that addition. You can access every website on the iPhone. Whether the site operator chooses to publish in the industry supported HTML versions, or have flash only support has nothing to do with the phone's ability to get there.

btw, IE can not access the whole internet either by the ASAs determination, nor can any browser on earth for that matter, even with additions of flash and a hundred other plug-ins. In fact, IE can't be used at me.com, but firefox, opera, and safari all can, not just apple's proprietary browser. Nothing BUT IE can go to microsoft.com anymore and access actual content without installing silverlight, which is available to noone else.

You can get the whole internet, but you can not get all the CONTENT that's on it that uses PROPRIETARY protocols.

also, flash IS coming to the iPhone soon enough, and I expe ct java might actually get there first. If the iPhone is more powerful that a PSP, and computers less powerful than that can run flash, the iPhone can too. It's just a matter of integrating it so it's not ALLWAYS running in the background.

iPhone passwords not worth the paper they're written on

Michael C

bypass trick workaround

By simply redirecting the home button double tap to iPod instead of contacts (or turning off double tap ion settings) this trick becomes useless.

Of course, I'm sure this will be fixed quick and easy enough. Also, I don't see there being a big business in stealing iPhones as an identity theft supplement. There's not a lot you can get out of my phone by having access to my e-mail account, and I can quickly and easily enough change the e-mail password rendering that useless, and ask AT&T to unregister the sim. Without being unlocked (and erased) my data won't be accessible at all.

Anatomy of a malware scam

Michael C

Another reason to get a Mac

I run both Lavasot AdAware and Webroot Spysweeper (which actually work GREAT running concurrently, and I even schedule them to scan nightly at the same time). I've also got Trend Micro running for AV security, and all my e-mail passes not only through g-mail's filters, but 2 others as well in a multiple forward process. Using an e-mail alias doesn't hurt, and I have not had a single spam in my personal account in 2 years.

I've always used Alt-F4 to kill windows, just a habit, but it avoids clicking. When I need to kill something, it's also typically easier to kill it from the task bar than the window itself. Also, using Opera, pop-ups are easy to avoid and windows designed to look like IE prompts are easy to spot.

This is an impressivley complex scam, and I'm sure they'll refine the spelling errors and other consistancies to make it more impressive. If I wasn't an IT admin, I might fall for this one myself.

I'm so paranoid using a PC that I NEVER click on a link, but always copy and paste the link into the browser. I've trained most of my family (including parents, cousins, and more, to do the same.)

On a Mac, I'd have none of these concerns. Any malware would likely not work at all. Any pop-ups targeting Windows this way would be VERY obvois indeed, and any malware i might inadvertantly download would not run.

Please ignore the net neutrality sideshow haunting Comcast's BitTorrent bust

Michael C

oversubscribing is not my problem

Oversubscribing is common, and generally accepted. Not only in ISPs, but in airlines, doctors offices, heck even freeway design. The problem is not "should we allow oversubscribing" but when oversubscribing comes back to bite them "who's problem is it?"

I'll give you the answer: Just like with the airlines, it's THEIR problem. If you have a ticket for an overbooked flight, and you get bumped, they HAVE TO PAY YOU. The same should apply to ISPs. If they sell you unlimited access, up to some speed cap, and because of network congestion you get throttled to a lower speed, then they should have to compensate you for it, either in free time online, lowered bills, or outright in refunds.

It was their choice to subscribe you, their choice to set the limits for your access, and their mathematical prediction formula for over subscription. Your choice to use what you have been given is not your problem, and if they actively block or delay packets from your IP, then they're violating their agreement. We're all used to the idea that networks run slower at certain times in the day, and we all know we rarely if ever get the speeds we're sold. However, active processes that interfere with that must be prohibited, especially any that target specific applications, uses, or behaviors.

Here's what i propose: Oversubscription is fine, provided that 1) throttling is global to all accounts on a percentage basis, never on an individual IP, 2) bandwidth is not reduced by more than 30% at any point, 3) bandwidth is not throttled at all for more than 8 hours a day cumulative, and 4) packet loss is less than 1% for residential class connections (0.2% should be normal for business class). This is the difference between "oversubscribed" and "overbooked." If the network is "overbooked" for any neighborhood or group of users for more than 1% of the billing cycle, then all those users should get their monthly bill reduced by 25%, and an additional 25% for each additional 1% of time overbooked, and this bill reduction should be automatic and never user requested. The penalties for overbooking should be higher than expanding capacity, so hopefully few will ever see this kind of discounting, and we'll all have better running networks for it.

As far as download/upload caps? They admit that 5% of the users are problems for the network. Fine, lets set the the caps at a point such that 95% of users on a given subscription level do not pay overage charges. We'll further cap overage charges for any connection at the cost of the next highest connection tier. Beyond that, we'll throttle the connection to 50% of the lowest tier speed (about 1MB down, 128K up, which can't be further throttled for any reason) unless the user agrees to accepting further charges for access. The maximum allowable monthly charge, regardless of speed of connection or price tier, will be locked at $99.99 / month, and you can't be charged more than $20 above your current tier price without verbal or written confirmation. (no surprise bills). We'll require ISPs to increase the caps quarterly as necessary to ensure 90% of users in any 30 day cycle receive no additional billing. We'll allow the caps to be lowered only for new subscribers or for those on month to month billing (contractless customers).

As far as security management, I will allow ISPs to voluntarily block users from connecting to known sources of virus, phishing, and other malicious activity. For example, if we know that http://www.EBY.com is a phishing site mocking ebay, then we'll redirect that address to a warning site indicating the user either made a typo or followed a bad link. Additionally, I'd allow them to automatically quarantine incoming e-mails containing links to those same known bad addresses (provided they're recoverable if false positive), and provided those e-mails actually come through their servers (aka, not blocking 3rd party provided sources like gmail or MSN). The list of bad addresses should be 1) published and 2) provided by a 3rd party (so the ISP can't block sites they "feel" are bad). This should help limit identity theft and bot net activity.

Further, in their defense, if the ISP is CERTAIN that a machine at your address is infected (because say it's repeatedly trying to connect to a known IRC channel operated by virus writers, or that it keeps sending phishing spam through your personal account, etc), they should notify you, and if possible, block that SPECIFIC activity or SPECIFC system deemed infected, with as little impact to other systems as is possible. If they can't stop the particular infection activity (or don;t care to try) without impacting other activity, they should simply notify you. I do not approve of the ISP disconnecting you simply because you have an infection, though I do approve of them having a contract requirement for you to maintain "reasonable" security measures, including the use of a simple hardware firewall and any of the top 10 commonly accepted security software packages on your PC (at least one of which they should provide for free under your contract). If you're still infected after 30 days, have no security software installed and up to date, and can't provide a receipt from an engineer showing your PC was inspected and free of infection, then they should be permitted to quarantine your connection (though not completely disconnect it). On the other hand, false positives should be quickly discovered and compensated (check in hand within 5 business days, NOT a service discount), including the full cost of diagnostic charges, rental fees of temporary equipment if the diagnostics take longer than 24 hours, and compensation for any time needing to be taken off work, at your full hourly rate, plus any additional charges that might reasonably apply.

XM-Sirius merger OKd in fines plus booster-dump deal

Michael C

on the a la carte deal...

OK, if the new radios are required to recieve channels from both tiers, I want the chanel selection options for 50 and 100 chanel non-premium options to include ANY channel from EITHER provider, not just 50 from one or 50 from the either exclusively.

I'm interested in a whopping 30 chanels from XM, and about 20 from sirrius. I want all of those and nothing else for their $7 a month option.

I'd also like to see them go one more step and require the new radios to get digital HD terrestrial broadcasts as well, to further offset the device restrictions, as well as open sourcing the technology so other providers can broadcast to the same devices.

Japan kicks off electric car format war

Michael C

speed refueling power cable size

There's a lot of FUD going around about the size and weight of the cables necessary to get a 10 minute recharge on Li-Tit batteries on some new electric car prototypes unveiled recently.

Keep this in mind: The guage requirements for power lines over distance are vastly different than a 15' cable hanging from a filling station that will be used for 3-10 minutes at a time. Heavy voltage cables must 1) support their own weight which dramatically increases it;s thickness and rigidity, 2) are designed for low resistance over distance, making the cable thicker than necessary for other uses, and 3) have to deal with heat dissipation internally, 24/7 on their own, for which cables at a filling station could very easily be internally water cooled without much trouble or efficiency loss, and actually give off some reasonable heat.

Lines we expect will be used to fill up? 3 phase 400 amp lines are commonly used on high power electric welders, and can be found in many high school shops, and are buried under every supermarket and other commercial building site. The lines are thick, yes, about 4-5 CM when made flexible enough to maneuver, but they are movable by most people, and by no means "unliftable" just cumbersome.

To make things easy, a simple overhead spring and sway arm could easily heft the weight, with the charge end hanging down with a small amount of slack, leaving the person filling up to simply align the cable to the outlet adapter on the car and plug it in. Easy. Even an imfirm elderly person, or someone with the use of only 1 arm should be able to move such a cable.

At home, this is not an issue since you'll be using at best a 200Amp single phase line (same as your home's trunk line) or more likely a 220 volt 25 amp standard outlet like your electric dryer uses....

Stop making excuses. This CAN work. It DOES work. STOP LISTENING TO THE FUD PRODUCED BY THE COMPETITION AND DO YOUR OWN ANALYSIS OF THE FACTS!

Michael C

...because toshiba is a threat...

Look at the companies involved here... toyota, Matsishita, these guys have heavy investment in Li-Ion technology. toshiba however, who was not invited to the party, has proprietary patents on the Li-Ion killer, Li-Tit batteries. Same weight, size, and basic manufacturing costs as Li-Ion, same capacities, they don't explode, and they can be charged in 3 minutes to 80% and 10 minutes to full charge....

these guys want not to standardize on one format, but to exclude a format they can't get without licensing from their hated competitor.

I'm fine if they want to standardize a connector format, battery size and shape, or some other minor issue, but standardizing on a TYPE of battery or a voltage or design is 1) anticompetitive, 2) holds back technological progress, and 3) causes issues dealing with international power grids

Also, as better capacitors, better motors, and more technologies are developed, this standard will cause great complication, as we'd have to start including transformers and other converters, which greatly lower efficiency of the batteries.

Again, standard connectors good; specific design restraints, vendor lock-in, progress limiting factors, bad!

Michael C

Li-Ion batter life

Simpson: Li-Ion and Li-Tit batteries have a lifecycle in charges or partial charges, but do NOT degrade over time like Ni-Cad and other rechargables of old. Vehicle use Li-Ion batteries on it's 3000th charge will have 95% or better of it's original charge life. This is guaranteed by the manufacturer, and backed up not only by sound science, but by the fact we've been using them for more than a decade and have lots of use evidence to back it up.

If your PC has a Li-Ion battery, and the charge isn't keeping up, you have a BAD CELL, not a degrading battery. Get it replaced. GM is backing up the batteries in the Volt with a lifetime policy, others will as well.

Also, even if the battery is holding a shallow load, due to a few bad cells, or Noi-Cad degradation, the energy it stores will also be less, so your KW/mile should remain fairly constant (though electric motor brush replacement about every 100K miles will be necessary or else motor performance will drop).

Blighty's electro-supercar 2.0 uncloaked today

Michael C
Stop

fighting FUD

Dervhied: 530 miles? Neither my Van, nor my wife's car, nor for that matter any car I have ever owned but one, could go more than about 400 miles on a complete fill up. The point is not "can we make it non-stop" but "can we make it in the same time vs. a conventional car, and do so greener, and for similar or less cost"

With Lithium-Titanate batteries, you can recharge in 5-8 minutes to full. About the same amount of time it takes to hook up to a gas pump and fill my van with 19 gallons of fuel. (plus a piss break for the family). These batteries are the same size and just slightly lighter than lithium ion (less than half the size of current hybrid batteries, and are typically mounted under the floor, not in the trunk, so you still have all your cargo space, and the car is balanced very well with the bulk of the weight near the center and close to the ground instead of all in the rear like most hybrids today.

The range of this sportster, on batteries alone, is reportedly 100-200 miles. However, less expensive systems using hybrid gas/electric can go 400+ miles, assuming you sacrifice the 0-60 in 4 seconds or less and high end features of a supercar. The gas engine gets great economy because it has no connection to the drive train. It simply runs at peak efficiency generating additional electricity. It is merely for convenience to keep you from having to fill up, and to make those long hops down lonely cross country roads where gas stations might only be 200+ miles apart (upper Canada, Midwest USA, etc).

With a car like the GM Volt, on short, daily trips (60 miles or less total) you will be able to use ZERO gas. On longer trips, if you can stop frequently, you also use zero gas. If you let the engine run to keep the car going longer and avoid stops, you'll get about 60-80 MPG while the engine is running (depending on other electronics, headlights, DVD, etc in use while driving).

the GM Volt will be available in 2009 now according to recent news from GM, should be about $30,000 (USD), and will go 360 miles AFTER the batteries die completely, on a "less than a 12 gallon tank" Originally, they planned a 600 mile range "after the batteries were empty" based on a 14+ gallon tank, but they recently decided to shrink the tank to reduce vehicle weight figuring more than 10 gallons on one trip would only be needed infrequently and carrying that weight year round would be a waste of efficiency. If they offer choose to offer a Li-titanate battery option as well as Li-Ion, you'll have the option of the 10 minute or less fill up (at 3 stage power locations), 2-3 hour fill-ups if you have a high amp direct line at home, or 8-10 hours on your garage 110volt outlet.

The carbon cost of electricity will be is than half of that used in a gas engine (even better as we expand with more wind, solar, and other 100% carbon free solutions), and the cost per mile on electric will also rival even highly efficient cars (and will remain relatively consistent in price over time on green energy as fuel costs continue to skyrocket)

Sure, the Volt is a bit small for my family, but I'm absolutely certain a crossover SUV will be available a year or two after the volt (it;s already been seen as a prototype), running on a similar platform, and still costing under $30K. GM makes many chassis that could easily be converted to the Volt's power train system, as do other vendors.

electric cars in every garage? Well, in 30-50 years when that's likely we'll have in place a national super grid. It's already under construction, and is not only feasible, but profitable to install when considering how power companies expect to get cheap energy in the future. There's already a section ONLINE in Long Island, so I don't want to hear about how it's "vaporware." The energy costs to keep the lines super cooled with liquid nitrogen to 200+ degrees below zero is less that the average current loss over high power lines in use today, and we can run these lines hundreds of miles (potentially near a thousand) instead of our current limits of about 150, with no generated heat and conduction losses of a fraction of a percent.

Any major store with high voltage parking lot lighting in place could offer fill-ups on 3 phase lines (walmarts, targets, etc). The power cords are NOT "unliftable" as many would lead you to believe. When they claim they are, they're referring to the long distance lines used on poles, which are designed not only to carry the electricity 24/7 without heat build-up, and with as little current loss over extreme distances as possible, but also to carry their OWN weight from pole to pole, over hundreds of foot spans. 3Phase lines of the kind needed for rapid fill up are used in theater stages, industrial lighting, and common commercial building construction today, and when hung properly from a spring assist, could easily be maneuvered into filling position by the elderly. These are also the kind of lines used in high power electric welding equipment as another example. The cords are not that much larger than you'll find on high power, 3 phase, shop equipment, like large band saws, or metal benders, equipment you'll find in any common high school shop.

Instead of gas from oil, we can use WindFuels, aka petroleum made by combining H2 (made using wind energy) with wasted carbon stock from coal plants, and completely eliminate the use of oil from all society. Check out www.dotyenergy.com for more infor on WindFuels!

Do the research and STOP SPREADING FUD!

Michael C

80% in 3 minutes...

Well, to fill my gas powered car, which has a 19 gallon tank, which I typically find I'm only adding 15-17 gallons to (since I don;t want to risk running out), on average I'm standing at the pomp for 7 minutes, with about 1 minute of that answering "no, I don't want a car wash, yes I do want a receipt,..."

If I can get 80% charge in 3 minutes, that's FASTER. Even if I took an extra couple of minutes to take a piss, and grab a drink and a snack, I'm completely OK with that. I don;t see how this will dramitally increase lines at pumps...

...not to mention, THERE ARE NO PUMPS, just a cord and a way to put in a credit card. EVERY parking space on the lot could dispense energy. A typical gas station near me has 12 pumps (of which 1-2 always seem out of order). On the same lot, I could imagine 20-25 electric filling stations. Since electricity also doesn't have EPA regulations to be concerned with, we can turn every grocery store parking lot into a filling station, heck, I could even have low power outlets at the office in the parkign lot, keyed to employee ID cards. (I work 8 hours, low power fill-up is 8 hours, this seems logical! Holy Shit, it's a miracle solution!)

On a side note, as for the emissions sounds, I like the idea of that guy from the Police Academy movies faking engine sounds lol.

The iPhone 2.0 update - don't do it, kids

Michael C

why i did it yesterday

I knew it was going to be a cluster-frack today, so I got the leaked firmware and updates yesterday afternoon, and was happily running 2.0 and playing games on my iPhone with little trouble at all. I wouldn't go near apple's site for 3-4 days at this point...

Cap, trade, subsidise - Obama's energy plan goes off piste

Michael C

It GENIUS!!!

So, we set a maximum cap on emissions, sell the rights in auction, which of course the worst producers (coal plants and heavy industry) will have to pay for. On the back end, we ENCOURAGE more utility use, thereby INCREASING demand (or at least not reducing it). They key is that the subsidies won't start rolling in until quite some time after the caps are set, so demand will increase, but only after capacity can't, at least, NOTWITHOUT INVESTMENT IN GREEN ENEGY :D

Basically, we give people incentive to use power without fear, then limit the power that can be produced "dirty", leaving only clean power to fill the gap. If the electricity prices remain regulated as they are in most places, and because the power industry is now mostly deregulated (meaning I can buy power from anyone, not just the local company), they'll have no choice but to either build more clean power plants to fill the gaps, or buy power from their competitors who generate clean power on their own already. Prices won't be able to be simply raised at will to accomodate the cost, so power companies who invest the most quickly will have more power to sell to others. Since most power companies are regionalized, in order to resell clean power across great distances, they'll be incentivised to add superconducting lines to the grid, further improving our infrastructure and efficiency.

As years go by, caps reduce, thereby eventually requiring all power to be clean. With proper incentives, say additional rebates for those who use electric powered cars, demand will further increase while also reducing the number of fuel burning cars. (additional legislation on engine makers can also help this process). As the grid expands to accomodate competitive power sharing, and as clean power (mostly only able to be generated in specific regions, mostly low in poulation by nature except for nuclear) becomes more common, shifting power from place to place as demad sees fit becomes easier and cheaper. Concentrated power farms will be able to resell power cheaper than regional co-ops, and the power companies that can't afford to go green will be absorbed into larger, cheaper to operate, more efficient major firms. ...and joe public really can't get screwed out of this because and power price increases can be offset by rebates via fines, auctions, and taxes.

This is a pure genius system. Without legistlating power companies to make specific improvements in a timely fashion, and dealing with fighting the beuarocracy of it, we're getting a simple law passed, one that Califirnia companies are mostly familiar with already, and as a side effect, market pressure to become green will be unsurmountable, and the timeline will likely be accelerated far beyond what we can do in congress.

Rare Mac Trojan exploits Apple vuln

Michael C

Infection process

OK, I just e-mailed a compiled script to my father's mac to see what process he had to go through to even get it on his machine.

First of all, his e-mail account blocked the attachment, so we had to tweak his settings to allow the attachment to come through at all, without resorting to compressing it and hiding it inside another file format, which would have added an additional user required step.

Once I managed to get an e-mail in his inbox containing the attachment, he couldn't just run it. The Mac made him save it to a file first, and bitched about the message containing an active program, promting a warning.

Then, running the batch, per the notes online, actually runs an installer, which prompts for a keychain password... Well, most folks in a company that use ARD have administrative rights in place to prevent application installs, and user acounts typically don't have admin permissions in the keychain anyway.

I'm sure there are a select few idiots who may have allowed this exploit to actually get on theitr machine. People in firms with clueless admins who have both a lack of knowledge and a wealth of money (ARD isn't cheap, and the need for a mac server to run it on doesn't make it any easier), are the only targets for this attack. I don't call this a virus or a trojan, I call this due reward for stupidity, aka natural selection. If you're so both innept to be able to stop it, and gullable enough to follow through with it, you DESERVE to be hacked. (I'd prefer you to not be permitted online in the first place!)

Even my father, who I had to walk through printing his address book last week, knows enough to never download a file, even from someone he knows, unless he's expecting to get it for some reason, and then any file that asks for a keychain password is something to question a second time...

When they come out with a virus that can infect a mac that is in a standard state (root not enabled, firewall on, etc) without any user action, then we'll call it insecure. Mac users fall to social hacking just as easy as anyone else, but phishing atacks and other social tricks aside, there's no real way to infect a mac that has yet been discovered. (unlike a PC, where simply connecting to the net is enough).

FTC wants to hit the spyware guys where it hurts

Michael C

Who said we had to define it?

Why not define a comittee, that can independently maintain a definition of spyware, spam, spit,and other forms of computer, electrinics, and telecomunicaions abuses in the legislation so that the law does not need to be rewritten to make minor definition changes? This is done in other segments of law, and in many countries. The law only needs to spell out the creation of said comittee or department, or a even a subcomittee of an existing group (like the CIA, who has umbrella like oversight of much to do with communication prosecution), spell out the punishments, and spell out powers and due process. It does not need to define specifics.

The DMCA could have been structured much the same, and we would not be in such a shitstorm now if it had.

Apple to charge iPod Touch owners for new OS - again

Michael C

not their fault

...it's a sticky little law here in the states that prevents a company from recognizing revenue in one quarter for a sale made in another. I'm not a CPA, but basically, new features added to a device that has been paid for previously can only be done so if either a) the consumer pays for the new feature, or b) there is residual revenue from a subscription or other plan in place (aka monthly fees).

Apple does not have a choice, they MUST, by law, charge for these features. Adding simple software functionality is one thing, but major changes, including opening up additional functionality originally built in but not accessible at launch, must be charged for. Since they have to go through the effort, a dollar value consistent with the procesing charges must be applied. They could probably charge $4.95, like they have in the past for other items (like 802.11n on powerbooks), but this is a big deal, a complete overhaul, a ten spot is conmpletely reasonable.

Biofuel 2.0 gets off ground in Kiwi airliner trial

Michael C

not so good news....

Well, if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

1 - plants don't start bearing seeds until 2nd year, commercial harvesting can't begin until 3rd year

2 - produces, at maximum with proper manual pruning, good soil conditions, and lack of drought (it can SURVIVE drought, but does not GROW in drought), about 500Kg of seend, which will make about 150KG of oil, or in other words, less than 50 gallons per acre per year...

3 - requires approx 2Kg compost per sq/foot, and in desert soil, would require massive amounts of nitrogen fertilisers and other nutirients that we are actually dangerously low on, and may soon (30 years) run out of world wide without finding ways to mass produce.

4 - they grow in deserts, but require MANUAL prunings... can't be done by machine, so where are you going to find enough people to prune 1.5 million hectares of plants in a desert environment? ...and that just covers the airlines, not cars, trucks, and power generation

5 - the plant produces more than 5 toxic residues during oil extraction that would be an environmental hazard we'd have to deal with.

Rogue MP3 Trojan streaks across P2P networks

Michael C

It was only a matter of time

Actually, I expected this attack to come from the studios themselves. Not in the form of a virus, but in the form of tagged or watermarked files that would instantly identify themselves as stolen on a simple scan.

Keep in mind, when you're stealing files through these services, you have NO IDEA what you're getting. I used a service many many years ago to download MP3s of files I had CDs for, but that were too scratched up to rip properly. I dowloaded a few hundred files, and in the end deleted nearly all of them. Many were cracked files that beeped loudly in the middle, many were live cuts of poor quality, some even the wrong songs, others had lead-in and lead-out issues. It was a MESS!

I invested in a CD refinishing system, cleaned all my disks, and ripped them.

I have NO illegal files on my machine. I do rip music from some digital music stations for songs I don't justify paying for, but that's not (currently) illegal. I have over 12,000 songs according to itunes, and every one was legally purchased on physical media and ripped, paid for online, or streamed from a free music source.

To all you kiddies out there that por through torrents to get all the free stuff you can, first of all sooner or later you're going to get nailed by a virus like this or worse, second, you'll ned up starting all over from scratch regularly since likely you have no backup for your hundreds of GBs of data...

Apple sued over 'inflated' iMac claims

Michael C

corrections

First: unless your images were taken with an extremely expensive tripple CCD camera supporting true 24 bit color, than even a 6 bit (technically 18 bit) color monitor can display every color and more your camera can represent.

Second: Apple's prices are not inflated. Go to Dell.com, try to build a comperable system to either an iMac, Mac Pro, Macbook, or Macbook Pro. You can't do it, the Dell systems are ALL more expensive. (if you leave out the webcam you can build a macbook clone that's $30 cheaper than Apple, but since Dell doesn't offer 13" system with dedicated video, you have to get a 14" which is bigger and weighs more than a pound more). You CAN build a cheaper Dell than a mini, but then it's also not 10" square... the Mac Pro ($2700) equiovolent from Dell, $4000...

Third, sicne dithering is done at 70Hz, and the human eye only sees at about 30, dithering 6 bit color can actually produce 100X more colors than the eye and brain are capable of seeing. (about 68 billion colors) Only in rare cases with specifically designed images can the difference be seen.

Fourth: Placing a dell screen side by side with any other, iMac or not, is not a fair comparison. The Dell screen you have likely has a much deeper black as most stand alone monitors do, and also will have a diferent pre-set contract rating. If you want a good screen, add a Cinema display beside your iMac, or get any one of a number from Acer, LG, or Samsung that use the 6ms display panels. They'll all outshine the Dell screen. On a side note, the Apple display is made by the same people that supply most of Dell's own monitor panels... I happen to have 3 Acer 19" monitors on my desk. All the of them show colors slightly different even though they're all the same model and all have the same software configuration. It took me hours of using the OSD controls to even get them close to each other... I have 2 Westinghouse (panels made by samsung) professional series 22" screens, and they are perfectly identical. The Westinghouse screens were designed for editing, the Acer not.

fifth: no real people expect you to do professional editing on an iMac. If you have a $2000 digital SRL or $400 hansol digital camera, a copy of Photoshop, and plan on taking high res 24 bit images, then realistically your looking at a system comperable to a Mac Pro, and you'll want a 24 or 30" display anyway. If you're editing the pics from your 8MP Sony camera, it's only a "simulated" 24 bit image, taken by snapping 3 quick images in succession on the same CCD panel, thereby being a DITHERED image in the first place, and with even lower accuracy than a 6 bit display (18 bit native color)

Six: The screen type used in the 24" mac is no longer available in 20" models. there was one choice; use a TN 20" instead of the ISP used in the 24", or go even further below to a TFT, which although techniocally has better color accuracy, but has visible range limits, requires more power, and is actually 2 screens glued together (and you can usually see the line halfway through and using metering devices tell a color difference between the top and bottom screens on most TFT displays). They're still displaying millions of colors. your eye can't tell it's being dithered.

Seven: Every single one of you posting in this column are either using TFT or TN screens, unless you happen to have a shiny new 23" plus screen that is true 8 bit (like a cinema diaplay from Apple) and connected using digital cables directly to a DVI or HDMI port.

eight: Apple does disclose in the white papers the specific details of the 20" and 24" screen. Just because the chose NOT to include this fairly irrelevent piece of information in the summary page on Apple.com for the general iMac itself does NOT mean they did not disclose this difference.

last: This lawsuit was filed by lawyers, not a complaining user or purchaser. therefore, this is nothing more than a troll lawsuit.

Apple ignores Jesus Phone life raft

Michael C

Background vs running in the...

It's one thing to let an app go to the background and come back. Letting it DO things while in the background is a completely different story.

If you're using an app on a phone when a call comes in, it pauses processing, you take a call, then it returns from a cached state to the foreground. This is acceptable. It's like hibernate. Not in the foreground, no CPU access time.

For remote support, if the phone is operational enough to connect to the wifi or cell network, why would it be so hard for a user to launch the forground application? The only thing a remote support agent would need access to on an iPhone would be the settings files, and those are not exactly located in a file system for easy access. The phones are programmed by connecting via iTunes. There are no AT&T specific apps on the phone to support. AT&T doesn't even support the phone, only Apple's own people do, so why do we need a 3rd party app for this again? If the phone is locked up, you need a PC to fix it, and remote support is useless anyway. If it crashes, it reboots. All we need is a log file to be able to send to Apple support from within the phone's interface as an e-mail attachment... There's not much for them to do other than identify who's 3rd party app (or their own) crashed your phone.

As far as chat... um, we have SMS and e-mail and they both run in the background, sort of... The program itself doesn't need to run there, just the transport layer (protocol), for which Apple could easily add a simple chat protocol the the OS that's allways running if configured. the phone itself does the background processing and alerts an application. mail doesn't actually RUN until you launch it. Only the Apple OS tells you you have an e-mail... why can't this be done for chat? it's just another protocol... Chat won't be using resources in the background. What good is presence awareness when you're not looking at the screen anyway, right? All you need is notification someone's trying to chat you. You turn on the phone, see a nuber on the chat icon indicating you have a message, then open the app to get it which is when the message actually downloads...

On the central chat server, the chat program can know wether the app is foreground or sleeping, and if someone sends you a chat, the central server does presence awareness and sends a message, (at your option) to either your e-mail or SMS to let you know someone is trying to chat with you if there's not some inherent transport layer Apple can provide... This will require client side or server side support for anyone wanting to chat with an iPhone, but this is not difficult.

I don't want apps using up background resources on my phone. I don't want the CPU and battery being tasked if I'm not actively using a specific program. I don't want some app hitting the net every 10 seconds forcing edge or 3G to broadcast continually. I don't want a choppy call or jitter in a movie because some app is hitting the CPU to hard. The OS layer, provided exclusively by apple, should have a list of protocols that IT and only IT can run continually. If an app is configured as the default app to talk with one of those protocols, and there's activity, than Apple can update their Icon on the screen and chime you.

With what's going on in the phone industry, free unlimited everything plans and all, I doubt AT&T users will have to wait too long until SMS is 100 % free all the time. presence awareness is a bit more difficult, and would need to be server side (or controlled by the remote client) but again, to restate, I don't want some friend or family member causing my battery to get eaten up because they feel they need to keep me in their chat window all day long and know exactly when I'm in range of a signal or not.

Apple's idea of refusing background apps makes the device more stable, the OS response more predictable, and makes it impossible for there to be a virus, or for one program to damage another one's functionality. It's a stance MANY other phone makers should also have.

I think the ONLY room for wiggle here would be it the phone is on, and logged in (not sleeping) and then maybe Apple could allow certain applications to run in a quasi-background mode, provided a call is not in process or a video is not active (or limit CPU cycles or something to ensure non-interference, though fron what I understand, the iPhone OS is not actually multithreaded yet).

Michael C

@ Mark Broadhurst

Apple's apps don't run in the background. the OS runs in the background and has a few protocols it monitors (for push e-mail, SMS, and a couple of others). It's not the mail app that's telling you that you have mail, it's an Icon presented by the OS. IMAP is an open protocol the iPhone OS supports. You'll notice that even though the mail icon indicates you have 5 messages, when you open mail, it doesn't show them, it actually has to itself connect, determine how many messages you have, then doenload them.... It is not a background application.

Apple could provide protocols for other similar services, and I expect that as soon as iChat is ported to the phone, chat will have this OS level function. unfortunately, their agreements with AT&T currently prevent Apple from using chat on the iPhone since AT&T charges for SMS. It took LONG fights and hard won battles to convince AT&T that a minimum 200 SMS messages would be required in the base plan and that pict messaging would not be supported by Apple. As soon as AT&T joins Sprint and offeres unlimited messaging as part of their plan, and makes an unlimited message plan standard on ALL iPhones, then AT&T is not going to let apple out of that clause.

On some levels, Apple is using this restriction to make the phone more reliable, certainly use less battery life, and prevent viruses, application interference, and more. On other levels, it's their job to make sure AT&T actually sellt their device. Phone comapnies make LARGE portionsa of their profits from SMS, pict, and other pay-pur-use services. Just taking ringtones away from AT&T on this device almost did not go though...

Open network legislation on the upcoming 700MHz band may change many of these limitations. We'll have to wait and see. i expect to see an iChat client as soon as AT&T adjusts plan pricing to make SMS irrelevent.

Michael C

Sleep mode vs background

There's a layer here I just came to realize. When the phone is active (screen on) obviously theres a lof of battery use between the screen light, tough sensor, positional sensor, etc. When it's asleep (screen off, not on a call) even the app that was in the foreground gets paused. I've confirmed this by downloading a large PDF file (via a web page) and let the phone sit motionless and go to sleep (set sleep to 1 minute). The phone powered off with the file about 60% downloaded. When I clicked it on later, slid my finger to activate, it brought me back to the web page, still at 60% loaded, but it cound't finish, I had to reload the page since I had apparently lost connection.

When the phone sleeps, the iPond function however can week going. When playing video, it doesn't sleep automatically, nor does it when on a call. I'm thinking there's not only a "screen off" state, but also a deeper sleep state that the device enters. If this is the case, it could be unloading lots of stuff from memory, maybe even spinning the CPU down.

My phone sleeps on battery for more than 3 days before i get a warning. I'd think wifi woudl draw more poewr than that. On bluetooth it does! (with a headset paired I get less than 2 days battery). I need to run ethereal on my network to see what activity is coming from the iPhone durring different modes, but perhaps to simplify how the OS handles sleep in order to preserve battery, background apps may not really be possible. I'm guessing when on I'll see much more packet activity in my network then when the phone is asleep... If someone else gets to do this before i post a response, please post first (it'sll be a couple of days before I can do this, I'm traveling).

Sprint and Samsung unveil Jesus Phone lookalike

Michael C

Second Coming?

Sure, now you can get an uglier jesus phone that's locked into Sprint's proprietary charge-you-for-everything network. Sure access and messaging are free now (for $100 a month, compared to Suncom's $79) but if you want a ringtone it's $4 each, and you don't even get an MP3 of the song to go with it. Cheap ass games are as much as $15 each, and some have monthly use charges on top of that... Sure, iPhone store will charge too, but there will also be free apps a pleanty. There are free apps for a lot of sprint devices, but there are NONE today for this new OS...

It looks somewhat sturdy from the pic, but I doubt it has the iPhones durability. The OS is clearly not Win mobile or Blackberry, so will it have Exchange IMAP support? It's not exactly coming soon, so y the time it;s out, so too will be a 3G iPhone, not long after I suspect a 700MHz iPhone too.

GPS is included? well, google maps is pretty damned close, but since bluetooth has GPS syncing, it won't be long until a software update enables that and then if the phone is near any GPS device, it will be able to use it, without draining your battery 24/7 pullung GPS when you're not interested. (and without making the device bigger) There's a few GPS bluetooth adapters out that simply plug into a cigarette lighter. That's it. That's all you need. walking around town? I don't need the GPS adapter. I'm not going that fast, i can read street signs, and the "current location" feature usually gets the map within 1 block of my location, if not closer... If I'm near wifi, I've gotten it to spot me inside the right storefront...

- Locked into Sprint vs locked into AT&T, I'll stay with AT&T.

- iPhone OS vs whatever the crap this new thing has? OS X all the way.

- Packed with applications? great, another Sprint device that has 50%v of it's application memory or more used up from day 1, and I likely won't be able to delete apps I don't want... I'll keep my iPhone.

- "is that an iPhone, can i see?" vs. "ah, an iPhone clone, whatever" Annoying either way, but being the center of attention is better than being the center of the joke.

Here's another thing to considder: the iPhone is based on a core OS more than 7 years old, is extremely stable, and has a developer network of over 100,000 people. 6 months from now the OS on the phone will be even better, and there will be hundreds of apps for it. It will be a mature 2.0 device. This new phone was likely smashed to gether by a pressured crew in less than a year, uses borrowed technology and duck taped together features on an all new UI. Can you predict how stable it will be? How secure it will be? That apps of any decent quality will actually be flowing out for a device with the tinyest fraction of the market on an OS noone knows anything about? At best it will be released as a slightly unstable beta device. A year after it's on the market, maybe it might have a chance at competing, but then, what's iPhone 3.0 going to look like?

Page: