Posts by Michael Reed 15 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Nov 2007
[Shudder] American hardcore porn. Fake breasts, fake everything. What would be better is someone created the tech to make endless porn with realtime 3D rendering of the participants. For people who like American commercial porn the fakeness, the smoothness of the skin and the unrealism of the sex would be even better than the "real thing".
I suppose someone enjoys it or they wouldn't make it. However, if they enable the success of a video service, good for them.
So... feminists have stretched all logic to find an explanation that makes the female protagonists the victims. If these really are the result of "bullying" they would constitute a serious sexual assault and the police should be involved. The current laws can deal with a crime of this nature.
Great article. It's nice to see someone talking some sense on this issue for once. An article like this is not only informative. Once someone has laid down the issues in a clear way, it provokes useful and interesting debate. I don't mind the occasional tangent from IT in this way. It certainly seems to be a subject that the readership is interested in.
A bunch of lefties have come up with another tactic to assure themselves and the world that they are mature, experienced and hip and above any purely human reactions.
"I'm great, I am. Everyone else is immature and childish compared to me!"
I don't think that I /want/ to become so desensitized that seeing the naked breast of a female friend or coworker produces absolutely no reaction in me. If women don't like breast fetishism, why don't they give up the plunging necklines and push up bras? Ah right, they like breast fetishism, sometimes.
When I'm masturbating I don't feel that I'm doing anything wrong. Actually, I spend quite a lot of time doing it, and it says a lot about me as a person. Perhaps I'll feature the act in my Facebook profile pic.
IANAL but...
There can exist a legal situation in which a company is not allowed to exclude fertile women from certain types of hazardous workplace, even though they are aware that the work would expose women to chemicals that could possibly cause birth defects. In the book I read, it seemed that case law had established that the parent, if informed of the medical hazard, could not sue the employer but that the child can. Perhaps this is the case and the woman has waited until her child is old enough to sue, and then sued on her child's perhalf as the child is brain damaged?
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
