Re: They're not thinking this through...
Or (false) economy toilet paper.
False because each iteration of the while not clean loop uses 6 sheets instead of 2.
456 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Oct 2007
VMs are available from $5 per month.
Get two in different locations and mirror them. Nothing fancy, rsync and DB replication will do the trick for most web application servers. It's really straight forward and a simple DNS change saves your cured pork belly.
We go one step further and place the mirrored servers not only in a different location, but with a different service provider.
The golden rule : there is no such thing as 100% data centre availability.
On the basis that being compromised is inevitable at some point for every organisation, the measure of effectiveness is whether there was a procedure in place for dealing with and mitigating the consequences, and how good that plan turns out to be. It seems that Deloitte have such a plan and time will tell how good it is.
All of that said, having an email admin account without 2fa seems to be a bit of a schoolboy error by any measure. We had a really good fire drill in place but neglected to fix the leaky gas pipes in the basement.
What I want to know is whether lenders are still consulting Equifax credit checks when extending credit to private individuals. The scale of technical incompetence at the company is clearly so huge that, breach or no breach, their credit scores cannot possibly be trusted. I suspect their credit scoring algorithm is something like :
int value = rnd.Next(10, 100);
or is that a bit too sophisticated?
Exactly, with expensive apps consultants.
And what about completely bespoke third party integrations from legacy systems to banks, third party logistics companies etc... There will be no templates for these so they'll all need to be built from scratch, and because they are likely to be mission critical that will be a lengthy and expensive development and testing cycle.
I've got this issue with my clients too, but I know for a fact that all of those who have safe harbour / data protection issues still send a lot of sensitive data around the world (think spreadsheets etc...) in unencrypted emails, and make use of sharing services such as Dropbox and GDrive for work related material. I know they shouldn't and you can tell them they shouldn't, but they still will. On premises hardware solves none of that.
"bugger out" - like it. I think I'll add that to my vocab.
Reminds me of an Eastern European friend of mine, trying to impress upon me that he knew more than I gave him credit for. "You think I know fuck nothing, but I tell you I know fuck *all*". Legend.
When was cloud ever about cost savings?
Outsourcing of any sort is about turning capex into opex i.e. spreading the cost over time.
With cloud in particular it's also about scalability. If you are planning on growing fast you can start small at very low cost, with the costs only scaling as your business scales. When you're building on-prem infrastructure you have to predict the future to a much larger extent. If you think you're going to grow from a 1000 to 1000000 customers in 8 months, you need to build much of the infrastructure for that up front. And what if your predictions are wrong?
Doing cloud properly is never going to be about saving money.
I got one with the same subject line but the link to the javascript is different. I'm not at a university, just a small business so this looks like it's broadcast rather than targeted.
Mind you, I would have thought that "Copy of K9b Form assessed by : James Eley-Gaunt" would pretty much flag this as suspicious in most intelligent people's minds. Eggheads my arse.
Quite. And the poor sod who is going to have to pick up the pieces is probably the one who wanted to keep things in house all along. Bit like Farage securing the out vote and then buggering right off to let everyone else sort out the impending catastrophe.
Don't get me wrong, I don't thing cloud is actually the real risk here. Revolutionary rather than evolutionary change at scale is as we all know an excellent recipe for potential disaster. If I was on the board of Specsavers I wouldn't let anyone draw up the plan if they weren't going to be around when it's executed. Madness!
@Voland. I'm with you. Pilots are the single biggest cause of aviation disasters, accounting for half of all plane crashes. The fleshpots are the weakest link. They get hung over, tired, are easily confused and get disorientated in very bad weather (think Air France where the pilots flew the plane into the Atlantic without even knowing they were doing it).
The Scully events of this world are vanishingly rare. To set that event up as the minimum standard for autopilot abilities would be like setting it as the minimum standard for all human pilots, which would clearly be ridiculous. It was a heroic and brave event, but a very rare one.
Ah but do you have the right skill set? Communicating risk to the board is an essential part of the job.
If the phrases "gotta have the right hashtags" and "security depends on removing the scourge of end-to-end encryption" do not sound right to you, and if "pen testing" for you does not involve vigorously scribbling with your BIC biro then you're never going to earn £87K I'm afraid.
Anyone who claims they can deliver five nines availability, even for discrete components let alone a complex web of hardware and software, is talking out of their arse. Five nines means you can have a maximum 0.864 second outage in any given 24 hour period. Of course you can start saying that the up time calculation should be done over a week, month or year but where do you stop - a decade? Up time stats only have real meaning over short periods.
So, hands up, who for any amount of money is going to guarantee less than 0.864 seconds of downtime over DC, comms, hardware, and 200 interdependent applications. And how do you even define what counts as "up"?
It's basically all finger in the air stuff.
I've set up a satellite dish for fixed domestic satellite Internet. It's a bit of a pig, to say the least, to get the alignment spot on and the signal can easily be disrupted by stupid things like leaves growing on a nearby tree.
My question then is how does a mobile terminal such as an individual sat-phone or an aircraft moving at several hundred miles per hour acquire and maintain a high bandwidth connection to either a geostationary or LEO satellite?
Sometimes it's fingerlickin' good. Other times it's just ass wipin' bad.
The shit bit is things like this, spam, people still sending out messages with 500 recipients in the Cc field and then the people who still Reply All to that same message.
The great bit is it's the last bastion of the Internet as it should have been. SMTP for all its faults is a protocol to which all email services comply. I can get my email service from anyone, or run my own email server, or write and run my own mail server and still communicate with everyone else who is on email, irrespective of where they get their email service from. The tragedy of FB, Whatsapp, Snapchat etc... etc... is that they are walled gardens. There is only one Whatsapp service in the world, and it's proprietary. This goes against all the early promise of the Internet, back to the dark dark days of Compuserve and AOL.
Anyone who says that playground humour has become more prevalent since the 60s should talk to my colleague Buster Gonads who can testicle to the fact that no such trend is observable. In fact any such claims are unfeasibly large porkies. Just today I walked into a restaurant and asked the waitress for an opinion on toilet humour, and she gave me one. What more proof do you need?
You could look at an event such as that of the last few days as the Internet's version of a wildfire. In the short run some damage is done but in the long run the fire's job is to clear out dead wood and enable the regrowth of a stronger, healthier ecosystem. Short term pain for long term gain.
"We are looking to bring it back online as soon as possible"
There's a gaggle of techies sitting around with that slightly vertiginous / nauseous feeling in the pit of their stomachs, sweaty palms, and fingers trembling too much to type accurately at the command prompt ... all of them quietly mumbling "fuck fuck fuck oh fucking fuuuuuck" under their breaths. AKA the patch borked everything and the rollback isn't working.
In this case, not necessarily.
OpenStack is designed to run public, private or hybrid virtualised server environments (aka clouds) so the computers may well be yours and may well be on your network.
A second point is that is that if I wanted to base some or even all of my infrastructure in the public cloud, I would much rather it was running in an open sourced virtualisation environment than a proprietary one, so the demise of OpenStack would be a significant loss to those who are serious about secure and reliable computing, and a significant gain to the proprietary vendors.
Your coat is indeed required. Orthopaedics is muscles and bones. Orthodontics is teeth. Lucky he wasn't one of those Paedophilic surgeons they have in Portsmouth (https://goo.gl/8zunyy)
All of that said, we are all actually Xenophobes now it seems so he's finished his plane just in time to fly it back to Germany where he belongs! He is after all a prime example of yet another low skilled immigrant nicking our jobs and sucking our welfare system dry.
NASA engineers are currently conducting a final check on the list of commands that will maximize scientific returns during the kamikaze dive, before uploading the instructions to Cassini on April 11.
April 11th 2017 : "Cassini to NASA Engineers. Well you can fuck right off if you think I'm doing that. Cassini out"
The obvious comment here is, why on earth is anyone still using any services delivered by 186K.
However email migrations in particular, which used to be a trivial task, are now a nightmare. First, email is used by most users as a storage system, resulting in multi-gigabyte mailboxes. Secondly, people now expect to sync their mail, contacts and calendars across multiple devices (phone, tablet, laptop) using ActiveSync, IMAP, CalDAV etc...
Moving even a single mailbox is a significant job, and the time and effort involved increases proportionately with the number of mailboxes. OK there are some automation tools you can deploy such as imapsync, but none of them are perfect and all need a lot of manual intervention.
In the light of this, maybe people don't move away from poor providers because they don't know where to start, and they can't afford to get someone in who does.
I thought it was quite a good comment myself. Trump is famous for his outrageous tweets. Maybe top politicians (and Stephen Fry) should pay for a "licence to Tweet". Not such a bad idea when you think about it. Possibly anyone with over 100 followers should pay a fee. Or anyone who wants to send more the one tweet a month. Any of these would work for me.