Absolutely. My position here is that it's not an overarching cause he donated to, like Greenpeace or whatever, but that he specifically chucked a grand at a specific non-secular (effectively, at its core), very focused cause that aims to deny basic rights to a significant portion of even the company he was working for at the time. His position is that, even though mozilla has this amazing, welcoming culture, that he doesn't agree with it. I'm questioning that assumption because the cause was so specific. I think it's safe to make a conclusion from that assumption.
Knowing that donations above a certain level become public you surely must wonder why he would do it.
Please believe me that I'm not a Militant Gay. I'm questioning, not judging. And I'm ultra-proud to be working for a company that embodies the same beliefs that Mozilla do.