How smart ?
Do they go black at the first sign of danger?
201 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Oct 2007
But the issue is that OOXML is only half the problem.
Yes OOXML is bloated, underspecified in many places, over-engineered to extreme complexity (numbering and styles I'm looking at you) and inrinisically linked to the platform it runs on - how do you work out the default fonts - well that depends on the OS, the language packs and the current locale - most of the time, except when it doesn't.
So yes there is supposedly a standardised interchange format - but this is not enough for interoperability.
Proper standards also have conformance suites and expected outputs - but there is nothing of that to see here.
But the other very real issue is the rendering - there is no interoperable specification of how to render a Word document - the rules for all of this are embedded in Microsoft's code. Many have tried to emulate what Word does with varying degrees of success. Even the most sophisticated OOXML processing solutions do not produce output 100% compatible with Word.
The number one complaint of anything other than Word is that the pages don't render properly - paragraph content is not exactly the same, page breaks are not in the same places. Again this comes down to specifying a not just an interchange format but a processing specification. Both Microsoft and ECMA knowingly sloped their Teflon shoulders on this.
IMHO the only way forward is to get off OOXML, and PDF for that matter, to formats that are semantically richer and much more independent of layouts produced for dead trees.
Books were a great invention - but now modern day electronic scrolls really need to make a comeback.
The only thing comparable (I use the term loosely) at the time was probably the Perq - available under other names IIRC - that ran a complete SmallTalk environment.
My recollection at the time was that these were about £20 000 a pop - and no snotty undergrad like me was ever going to get their hands on one.
At the same time I remember a Sirius PC and a Sun workstation appearing - also in the £3000 to £5000 price bracket.
So yes the Lisa was expensive compared to these but promised something else more akin to the Perq - though it took the Mac to actually deliver something usable for the masses.
Even though that something was not the same as the Lisa.
No contest - you need an audience with Monsieur Pujol - Le Pétomane
Some of the highlights of his stage act involved sound effects of cannon fire and thunderstorms, as well as playing "'O Sole Mio" and "La Marseillaise" on an ocarina through a rubber tube in his anus.
Even if you do come in on an ETA and get let in you would still only get 90 days after which you'd have to go out and come back again - and then you only get 90 days in a 180 day period.
However, the UK isn't great at keeping tabs, only half the details (entries I think) get recorded.
If you request the details they will send them - well the half that they have - we did this when significant other was applying for UK nationality in order to avoid all this bollocks.
At one point - and I no longer know if this is the case - Pearson was running the theory tests - this was (at least) V2 of the theory test system. Which makes some sense as that's the kind of business they're in - I think they also do the wonderful nationality test - 'life in the UK' - I never learned so much about my home country !
V1 was a home grown thing, 1995 or 1996 to comply with EU regulations, run out of Crapita in Coventry on a couple of Sun boxes.
There was specialised hardware that would scan the test papers and work out where the pencil marks were (it had to be conductive graphite) on the test papers ... the failure rate was astronomical
Failure to read the test papers, not actually pass the test !
Yes I have done this.
I have taken the PDF of the contract terms and conditions, edited it to strike out all of the unreasonable clauses, added my signature it and emailed it back.
Nobody from HR departments ever thinks that anybody would change anything, nor do they take the time to send back the copy signed by them - which they are supposed to do in order for it to be an agreed contract - so it then becomes something they implicitly agreed to and their problem not mine.
Obviously doing things blatantly on 'company time' and 'company equipment' ranges from questionable to stupid, but claims to ownership of "anything you might develop at any time" (which I have seen) are just abusive
“ Dynamic languages such as Python defer such decisions until runtime.”
And there be dragons …. Memory safe doesn’t help if the code falls in a heap.
But of course it’s horses for courses, I much prefer a really strongly typed contract based approach for my nuclear reactor or anything I fly in, rather than some runtime error that may or may not occur.
Despite all the downvotes there are cases when you're absolutely right.
I participate on several international standards working groups. We have participants on four continents and in 7 or 8 time zones, We meet regularly, usually on a weekly basis via conference calls.
And usually we get together physically once, or if very lucky, twice a year for a day, possibly two.
What we get done in those physical meetings far surpasses anything that we do via conferencing.
But of course it is a special event - not RTO - and there is a different level of motivation.
“Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien” the corollary of which is that “good enough” is sufficient.
My son has a robo vacuum cleaner and mopper, called Jerry. Jerry is not the sharpest tool in the box but is eager and enthusiastic.
Since the last software update my son maintains that Jerry has been lobotomised and his mopping skills are not what they were. However, I digress, suffice only to point out the degree of control that he has over Jerry.
We all know that Jerry’s vacuuming and mopping skills are average and that we could do better. We also know that what Jerry does is tedious and that Jerry can do it more often than we would ever want to. So we put up with mediocrity for the sake of convenience.
And so it is with Copilot et al.
Jerryisation : Mediocrity, Homogeneity, Banality - a fitting replacement for Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité
But only if we allow it.
There's a room ... it has 101 on the door ..though of course it doesn't need to physically exist to be effective ..
But you're right, something definitely does happen to newly appointed Home Secretaries that changes them permanently
Along with the illegal possession of a nuclear device.,.
There is loads of good stuff on the statute books like
- slaying the lord chancellor - treason, from 1351
- adultery with the queen - same punishment
Though I don’t see possession of an offensive wife in there yet - but it’s only a matter of time.
"It will turn up in time" turned out to be 4 days once received - so 5 in total.
In fact my new passport turned up a day before the old one was returned.
Whereas the French passport took 3 months ...
You had a good experience in Germany, I'm happy for you, but don't believe the UK services are unilaterally really bad compared to everywhere else, it's just not true.. but, as always, YMMV depending on where and who you are and what you're asking
30% is too much to pay for someone else to manage
- app hosting
- distribution and download
- billing and payment processing
- VAT collection
- multi country access
- additional in-app purchases should you require them
- in-app advertising (not that I am a fan)
Other industry sectors would kill to pay only 30% …. Try working in retail
And before you say it’s all about choice, if the cost were zero you wouldn’t have a problem.
They are already mostly there ... and have been for some time
Under the UK’s Right to Repair regulations, manufacturers are legally required to make spare parts available for up to 7–10 years after a product is discontinued. This regulation ensures that appliances can be repaired and maintained, reducing waste and supporting sustainability.
Large Appliances: Spare parts like motors, pumps, and door seals must be available for at least 10 years.
For most heating equipment it is at least 10 years or longer, although have managed to source new parts for equipment discontinued for nearly 30 years.
Sounds like they are catching up though
"In the year 2017, the United States has fragmented into post-apocalyptic wastelands with a few civilized areas. An ongoing economic crisis has led to the recycling of aging 20th-century mechanical and technological equipment."
Only about 10 years out if the orange wotsit keeps having "ideas" ....
Mine still is.
It’s a hang over from the 70s when everything was electric because the French nuclear program was going to make electricity almost free.
See how that turned out.
Though because of the phasing and the probably insufficient power delivery there are combinations to be avoided
Always have a torch in a well known place with working batteries.
I thought this had been tried before ... and didn't end well (according to some) ... also good for 1st April..... World without Sun
Apologies to Jacques Coustaud though ...
Sounds like a SunRay but more expensive (IIRC the unit price was ~$250 with the monitor) and it would also remember your session from one place to the next.
It was kind of cool shoving your smart card in a machine in Paris and picking up the session you left in London.
Shirley all doable on Azure… but this was 25 years ago
But nothing beats VAXClusters and DECnet….. set host BONNET :-)
It's been burning since 1962 and could apparently continue for another 250 years ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centralia_mine_fire
Most of the globe doesn't speak English so it matters less to them whether they get bad English AI or bad Chinese AI - in addition they are all foreign corporations as far as they're concerned - and many do have a pathological desire to stay clear of the US and any other ex-colonial states.
But in the end it comes down to money and availability - if your US AI is either unavailable or more expensive than a competitor's, then you loose.
The larger 2900 series of machines were heavily influenced and borrowed from the experimental work of the University of Manchester’s MU5.
Built in collaboration with ICL West Gorton which was just around the corner from the university.
Lots of wonderful historical information here from my old prof of processor architecture - https://ethw.org/The_University_of_Manchester_MU5_Computer_System