Re: Boeing’s Starliner problems may be worse than we thought
That relates to the previous un-manned test flight in Jan/Feb 2024 - not the current mission.
36 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Oct 2007
Note that the GoFetch paper does mention (in footnote 22, just after the Conclusions) that "We observe that setting the data independent timing (DIT) bit disables the DMP behavior on M3, which is not the case with M1 and M2.".
It does seem that whilst Apple provided an API to support the secure handling of crypto material, their implementation fell short — with DMP not being disabled when it should have been on M1/M2 devices. Looks like they noticed the omission and corrected for the M3.
Therefore, it seems that if you followed Apple's guidance for crypto code as per your link; code would be secure on an M3 but not on M1/M2.
(I agree with the rest of your comments about this being a low priority issue for many Mac users - especially as this doesn't impact keys in the secure enclave and hence Filevault and (hopefully?) Key Chain.)
> To which I respond "then what did we gain from Ye Olde C Days?"
There is a gain is that, in Rust, this vulnerabilty can't be used to for remote code excution or data leaks — the impact is "limited" to DoS. I fully agree that that this API should be defined in a more robust manner though... DoS is still bad...
Possibly not so bad for WeWork and the like – occasional meetings and other face-to-face interaction will still be required and companies may opt for using spaces such as WeWork on a more ad-hoc basis rather than maintaining large, traditional offices.
There is a StackOverflow question asking the same thing,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/60950/is-there-a-better-windows-console-window
...with the top response being for the ConEmu terminal,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/conemu/
Quite possibly just what you need! I'll be checking it out too!
For the second woman, it's not correct to state that he was requested to stop immediately. From the victim's interview record,
"They fell asleep and she woke by feeling him penetrate her. She immediately asked 'are you wearing anything' and he answered 'you'. She told him 'you better not have HIV' and he replied 'of course not'. She felt it was too late. He was already inside her and she let him continue."
I was worrying that downloading Lion now would effect the available bandwidth on the video call I need to have in an hour - luckily (!?!) I don't think I need to worry given this trickle of data!
PS: Thanks go out to William Gallafent for the hint on finding the estimated download time within the Purchased tab of the App Store.
Seems crazy to me that these systems are destroyed.
Of course proper data sanitation is required if the systems are to leave the government's control and (reasonably) secure data centres; but I would have thought they could be re-purposed for another government project providing that the classification of the their new role was equal or higher to the data held as part of the ID card scheme.
£400k may be the cost to shred the drives; but how much was the purchase cost - money that the government will surely be paying out again for more storage?
JaitcH, just how do you know that iOS4 will be chargeable for iPad? Given that iOS4 wasn't a chargeable update for the iTouch; I'd be willing to bet you're wrong.
Anyway, in your nice 'free' Android world the problem is not with billable updates; but with the likely lack of any update for your device once the manufacturer has moved onto their next model - leaving your hardware behind. Look at the Android phone world for a multitude of examples...
Dr Funk; I think that there are critical differences between the outsourcing that has occurred for decades and the spontaneous availability of computing resources on the 'real' cloud.
The bio company that jimt222 referred to no doubt decided on their solution, put in some credit card details and had access to the systems to power their work within minutes. Critically, when they finished the processing the charging stopped.
With ICL; did the outsourcing of your compute requirements start with the courting by sales types, the to and fro of contracts, minimum spend (though with an element of pay for the level of resources consumed) and importantly minimum contract length - at least a year if not a lot longer? How long did it take between you deciding to outsource and having the systems available? More than an hour, more than six months?
The Cloud is the just the latest buzzword, liberally applied to any compute farm infrastructure; hence so much of the traditional outsourcing market being resold as if were something new.
There is something new here; a new level of flexibility.
Mm. Nice, so you can appear to be a 'trusted' website (forgetting any https controls) as long as the trusted website has exactly 24 characters in it. Aviv even needed to make up the domain 'securelogin.facebook.com' to get this to work right - that domain name does not even exist.
I'm an iPhone user, and now really quaking in my boots with this revelation.. Honest gov..
Apple/PA doesn't need to design its own processors as such; ARM's whole business is about selling processor core designs for its customers who integrate these cores with other more specialist logic to form the final chip.
Apple, with PA's expertise, will take these building blocks and combine them to produce the exact mix of facilities that they feel their products require - allowing the products to be made smaller and more power efficient as a result.
Once they've pulled together a design; they will find someone to actually fabricate it for them.
All very sensible.
Maybe I'm just warped by the Reality Distortion field, but given that Apple is a US company, based in California, any changes are bound to start from there - does it not seem sensible to give them the benefit of the doubt and at least wait 24 hours before bashing them over pricing differences between trading zones???