Oh yes
We'll all be rushing to test that for them.
I suppose they expect n00bs who don't read t'internet to do the beta this time.
Paris, 'coz even she'll wait a week and see what happens.
970 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2007
"They shouldn't be targeting the individuals anyway. It's the pirating "companies" they need to smack around. These are the groups that make the difference in profits."
That may have been true before the internet but it's rather difficult to prove now. I've heard it claimed many times (usually by folks who are "harmlessly" downloading stuff and have never heard the term "categorical imperative"). But I've never heard a shred of evidence.
A company pirating 10,000 copies of a disc is clearly not worse than a billion internet users pirating 1,000,000 copies of a disc. It's also rather easier to take down. So without numbers how are we to judge?
It seems to me there's probably been a step-change in the magnitude of the problem since the internet. If the problem was largely confined to organized crime that's existed as part of the status quo for decades then why would the RIAA / MPAA etc. be so worried now?
Going for patent-free IP-free open standards is a dogmatic approach, not a practical one.
For the rabid FOSSer above, I presume you never play MP3 audio or MPEG-2 movies. Those are open, IP-restricted standards, and they work just fine.
This is something that needs looking at case-by-case. Document standards might want to be more open and less IP restricted but to say "never" to any standard that has any aspect of IP is just stupid ideological bullshit.
(BTW, is it just me, or was that article nigh-on incomprehensible?)
It goes to show that the old-fashioned notion of "warranty" means nothing when companies are forcing new firmware onto the console at a whim.
They broke it, they need to fix it. It should be illegal to charge money for that "service" even if the console is out of warranty. I'd be inclined to take that to the small claims court or even find someone to start a class action.
It's like a Ford engineer comes to your house and messes with your tuning to the point the car will no longer start, and then you call Ford and they say they have to charge you to fix it because it's out of warranty. It could be argued that this is a deliberate ploy to make money out of naive users.
And that's on top of the absolute annoyance when you finally clear 2 hours to play GTA IV only to spend 20 minutes of that waiting for a bloody update to download. You can't even queue it. It makes Windows Update look user-friendly.
However ... I have reasonable confidence that Sony will eventually agree to fix the bricked consoles for free. They usually tend to do the right thing, once they have exhausted all possible alternatives.
An interesting fact is that current BluRay readers will accept multi-layer BluRays of the future without hardware modification (only firmware upgrade). So the drives are pretty future-proof and in theory support 2700GB or more.
Phil Harrison told me that, and he should know, as he is God.
The warheads used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were measured in kilotons. They devastated whole cities. The warheads we have today are measured in megatons. There is no missile shielding in the world that will not melt if standing 10 feet away from a megaton warhead going off. Of course they'll "popcorn" in that scenario. Who cares? One warhead going off at location A, ten going off at location A ... everyone's going to die anyway.
"SPain in 2007 produced 10% of its electricity through windpower."
That's 10% of its electricity. Spain has a low reliance on fossil fuels at only 56.8% (http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Europe/Spain-ENERGY-AND-POWER.html) so 10% of electricity is about 4.3% of total energy.
"It's taken them about 10 years to do this."
So another 25 years to get to 15% of total energy then ...
That's hardly within the 2020 timescale and they've got a 10-year head start.
What happens when some terrorists get hold of some of that LETHAL marijuana that Gordon Brown smokes? It'll be easy enough to get it through security, not being metal and all. Then you just have to threaten the plane with lethal marijuana blowbacks and it'll be 9/11 all over again.
I live in the country and I keep seeing unidentified plants.
I've researched this (unlike you other guys) and apparently this happens all the time. Since 1990 there are at least 10,000 recorded incidents of people seeing plants which they were unable to identify. Not a piece of grass on the car's wing mirror reflecting in the sunlight - actual plants, growing in the ground.
Now maybe *some* of these can be explained as just plants the people had "never heard of" but even if that explains 99% of the sightings, there's still the awkward 1% which can't - statistically - be explained this way.
It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that at least *some* species of Unidentified Plants must have an extraterrestrial origin. But people's minds are too closed to appreciate this obvious fact.
It's also a FACT that the government tries to bury these unknown plants. Ever seen a farmer drive a tractor through a field with funny-looking spikes on the back? Do you know those guys are paid by the government to do that?
"But then again, as with most education related league tables, the tendency is to look at the placing on the table rather than the actual performance metrics."
Well of course it is, that's why they make the table.
Of course, as you obviously realize, you can't create a "well-ordered" relationship from more than one independent metric anyway.
Therefore, the idea of "league tables" themselves is silly and vying for #1 and #2 is about as sensible as two people with IQs of 180 and 181 arguing about who is smarter.
The article is, in case you hadn't noticed by the end, somewhat tongue-in-cheek.
Personally I find it rather entertaining that we can bicker about something so totally pointless. I think it's more fuelled by people who don't take it so seriously, than "wankers" per se.
Disclaimer: Maths, Cambridge, 1990-93
"The consensus seemed to be that it takes about a month to learn the CUDA nuances and tweak code for the GPGPUs."
"About a month", eh? Are you serious? The amount of time to learn CUDA may be constant, but the amount of time taken to port (not "tweak") code to CUDA depends on how much code there is and how hard the "tweaks" are going to be. Often a complete refactoring is required which can take years for a complex engine. The phrase "about a month" makes CUDA look good but it's in the top percentile of meaningless statistics.
As for Moore's Law, it has not been "blown away" or any other such nonsense. Moore's Law refers to the density of transistors on chips, and with this nVidia are significantly BEHIND the curve.
I liked the breathlessness of the article though. nVidia fanboyism is clearly alive and well at El Reg.
The hardware manufacturers will deliver what they can, not what computer programmers wish for. What programmers wish for is a single 100GHz thread and it just ain't gonna happen. After that, opinions may vary on what the "best" MP architecture is, but these opinions are hardly relevant. Hardware has to go where it can, and that means you won't see 1,024 processors sharing the same DIMM. Multithreading in the "shared memory" sense is already dead. As Ken says right above, the future is (probably) clusters, which design parallels the design of actual massively-parallel algorithms (by which I mean algorithms designed for 100s of processors, not algorithms retro-fitted to handle 3 or 4 threads). The Cell is a cluster on a chip. So is any modern GPU.
Following this, software will follow. And not because the current experts will make it happen - to a man, they have spoken out against where hardware is going, rather than suggesting ways to approach it. (Their actual approach tends to be to shoe-horn existing code into 2 or 3 threads.)
No, the next generation of software will follow from younger people to whom this hardware seems natural and obvious and who have no investment in the status quo.
What we are seeing here, IMHO, is the death of a generation of software developers. Good riddance to Gates but I do hope Knuth stays along for the ride ...
Clearly the MPAA are more DANGEROUS than the Mafia, Yakuza, and all the other criminal groups from GTA. The death toll from the war on copyright is only "low" because we don't count the death of innocence that comes from being propelled into a cold uncaring world where no-one cares about your right to free music and where you're expected to get a JOB if you want to have STUFF.
And yes, when artists sign contracts, that's not an agreement with benefits on both sides, it's STEALING. Whereas, of course, taking stuff that doesn't belong to you is not STEALING as long as there is an "infinite" supply.
FREETARDS FTW!!!
Instead of irresponsibly installing devices that could possibly damage the hearing of babies and small children, I think they should instead legalize tazer use on anyone between the ages of 13 and 21, for whatever reason. This is the age-group the tazer is ideal for - strong hearts, you see. Of course a few of the more crack-addled ones will die, but that's just clearing the gene pool of debris. Most will go on to lead full and active lives, secure in the knowledge that they'll continue to do so as long as they behave themselves in public.
Watch what Sony say carefully.
"No plans for a pricing announcement" means that, whether or not the price will drop very soon, they haven't yet planned the *announcement*. It does not say "No plans for a price drop". These weasel words are typical of Sony PR.
And of course rumours and speculation are "just rumours and speculation", as opposed to an official announcement. That does not imply that they are incorrect in fact.
Nothing of content has actually been said here by Sony. They have neither "denied", "confirmed" nor "verified" anything.
Rather than changing the standard to "fix" the Microsoft problem, why not sell an HTML 5 license for $10K together with a contract that says "if you don't pass this array of conformance tests you don't get to put the code into any public app".
And have a reference implementation.
OK, I'm dreaming, back to work.
"IDC's chief research officer John Gantz said that reducing PC software piracy would benefit small business owners by cutting back the legal risks associated with using unlicensed software."
What risks? The risk that someone in your small business is using unlicensed software without your knowledge? Surely that doesn't go away?
Or do they mean, if there was less piracy, no-one would bother policing it any more, so using unlicensed software would then be "fine" ... thus increasing corporate piracy and bringing us back to square one?
I think we should be told.
... but do you have a citation for this?
"VBA, for example, runs the world financial markets. The credit crunch happened mostly in the minds of Excel spreadsheets doing horribly complex calculations in a language designed to change formatting, or to capture and validate user input."
... or is it just some sort of question-begging "common knowledge"?
Apparently CitiCorp have a daily turnover of (cue Dr Evil) one trillion dollars. It's somewhat hard to believe that this amount is managed in a big Excel spreadsheet.
I can believe that Excel may be used for ad-hoc forecasting, but if that's "running the financial markets" they my diary runs my business.
Since it was El Reg that broke the "news" of VBA being dropped I'm taking this all with a large pinch of NaCl.
And vinegar.
"Why does my office have signs on the fire extiguishers : "Do not use these fire extinguishers to hold the fire doors open" ?"
It's because some idiot decided that, because fire doors should always be closed after use, they should not have any way to latch them open during use.
Then, when normal use turns out to involve leaving them open for a few minutes to load or unload heavy stuff by hand, people use the nearest heavy weight that's to hand. Which turns out to be the fire extinguisher.
In other words, it's a consequence of proscription without proper thought towards need. You see it every day in any sufficiently large organization.
Then to "fix" the problem they put stickers on the fire extinguishers but again fail to provide a solution to the *actual* problem of the doors not having latches or wedges provided.
It's at this stage that it all seems not so much a lack of foresight but a lack of any kind of sight at all.
This is why employees sometimes buy their own door wedges.