Nativity again
On top of the corrections made by an anonymous coward, I have to ask, if Christianity is a cult and not a "bonafide religion", what do you consider to be a bonafide religion? Islam? Buddhism?
917 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2007
Pressure more than law AFAIK.
The ad had an Australian cricketer walk into a crowd of black spectators who were quite clearly supports of the West Indies cricket team. This apparently is made racist because he says something about KFC being able to make anyone a fan (or something to that effect).
Had they used white New Zealanders in the ad, everything would have been fine - I suspect the black W.Indies spectators were chosen simply because there was a game against them around the same time.
It's like one bar that's sort of similar. From a 3 and a half minute song... Hardly grounds for copyright arguments. I really hope the appeal goes well.
If this stands, I'm writing a tune that is every possible combination of notes you can have, recording it, publishing it on the net, and waiting for 5 years. Then I'll sue every music publisher out there.
MS has been at it for years claming their OSes will rock your world. On release, the only reason the world gets rocked is because everyone gets frustrated at some setting or feature being removed.
Where do I want to go today? Pretty much away from Microsoft's marketing department.
The US law is not the world's law. SF is, I guess, legally required to prevent users in said countries from downloading from their US servers.
Since we're talking about Open Source, anyone can take that content, mirror it in another country that doesn't have a silly restriction on software exports, and the "bad guys" can have all they want legally.
I get the distinct impression a large closed source software vendor was behind this in some way - the countries involved are known to be quite keen on open source/cheap software.
But the servers worldwide are NOT owned or operated by SF. They are all 3rd party owned and operated. SF just directs you to them.
The website itself is US based, which raises a problem. But I'm sure some enterprising Chinese person could create a SF website mirror/proxy and direct downloads to appropriate neutral countries.
This US court ruling would explain why 2 days ago I was unable to download the trial of Project 2007 after being sent to a generic redirect.... Who cares that I'm in Australia, not USA... Apparently court rulings in USA apply worldwide.
And as is usual for stupid corporations, the email I sent went unnoticed because a moron paid minimum wage decided not to read it and instead just guess what it was about.
Only a numpty would allos SMB/CIFS to internet, but most numpties allow it for their entire LAN.... Which means just one laptop has to come in from a numpty's home LAN, and the entire business LAN is screwed....
I learned that lesson last year when our LAN at work got hit by Conficker - and no, it wasn't a laptop that caused it but a government department supplied computer that got infected by the government WAN where they had their standard firewall config allowing ALL computers to access SMB/CIFS. I was not ammused!
Within about 10 minutes of finding that problem, I switched all our computers to only allow access to SMB from our local servers (which aren't Windows boxes).
No business owner is going to be happy to have photos of their business splashed with ads for another vendor.
Big businesses probably won't suffer much since people don't generally go look at their local McDonalds or K-Mart in Google Street View. But they're also the more likely to have a legal team ready to pounce on the concept of competitors ads showing on an image of their shop (especially if trademarks start entering into it).
Small businesses in particular will be annoyed. Small businesses in small towns will be even more pissed off - chances are their only competitor's ad will end up stuck in their virtual windows!
All explosives should be treated as if they could blow up. Same basic rule as firearms being treated is if they are loaded.
Did the morons check if the victim had any potentially problematic things in his bag first? Or did they just chuck it in? Even if they had a plan in place to not miss the bag, who's to say something in his bag wouldn't detonate it in the airport killing hundreds of staff and travellers?
NAT != firewall
Firewall != security (especially for badly configured values of firewall)
The above is something I have tried to smack into people who should know better many times over the years. Even my government employer takes this stupid approach of assuming a blocking internet traffic on most ports makes it safe. People seem to forget that once something is breached, the outer perimeter doesn't stop anything.
Fork and call it something else - "YourSQL" anyone? It's not like the name is important.
I'm not worried about what happens. If Oracle mangle it all into a useless blob, then something else will take it's place and popular systems like "MediaWiki", "Joomla", etc will all be adjusted to suite.
You can almost be assured the reason they look like Japanese and/or German trains is that Chinese engineers went and looked at the Japanese and German trains... Then simply copied the design.
And like all Chinese knockoffs, it works fine when you try it out the first 2 or 3 times... But then suddenly fails spectacularly when it comes down to using it for something serious.
I'd be pissed if I was one of their users... Bing couldn't find itself if there was a big neon sign saying "I'm here" with an arrow pointing the way.
Seriously, I've been pushed off into a Bing search by MS website 404's, and the result is that it finds nothing. Off to Google, and there I have the answer at the top of the list (using the same query).
Conroy's filter plans are not supported by all Christians and churches. Many who understand the implications are just as against it as the next person.
Most people in our church are against it for one reason or another. Some fear the future censoring that will result. Some just don't like the idea of being frustrated by false positives.
Books can be banned by the Office of Film and Literature Classification.
Unfortunately the internet isn't a book or film. It changes every second, with volumes of information that would take most people a lifetime to consume. By the time a complaint is processed, there's every chance a website has moved or been changed.
You'd still need to pass those through a cracker to see if they are weak. Long does not mean strong. A page of zeros is probably not real strong for example.
Steve does sort of explain where those strings come from, however he fails to explain it in enough detail for anyone to determine if he's cocked it up... Given his history of getting it wrong and then being a dick about it, I think I'll just pass.
Someone's poor choice up front does not mean all open source is bad. I'm gathering from the description that this large e-commerce site is run by people that:
* Don't research hardware compatibility before purchase.
* Chose to reinvent the wheel by writing their own ecommerce solution in Ruby.
* Run benchmarks as root on production machines just to see what happens.
I'm not saying all open source software is perfect or even good. Some stinks, especially mine. But it's the same with closed source. Someone's decision to share is not a gauge of how well they wrote it.
That ~$300 covers vet work required before releasing the dog to a new owner. Remember that they can't legally allow them out without chipping them, and their policy is to desex to avoid future unwanted animals. That alone would be over $200 worth from even a cheap vet.
On top of that, remember they also have operating costs, like food and power.
Buying one elsewhere still ends up needing the above desexing, chipping, etc.
One of them yeah, because they didn't read the article. The other on the other hand feels the same as many others - rootkit once, and be blacklisted forever.
I personally refuse to buy Sony because of a string of warranty issues, followed by that rootkit incident. I don't trust them anymore, and it's incredibly difficult for a large corporation to regain that trust. The catch 22 is you don't buy the products so you don't see them again to find out if they've changed.
Does the warranty card specifically say they will void it if the user tips water in? How about acid? Or cleaning detergents?
Simple matter is there are literally millions of substances users could feed into cooling vents and void the warranty. Apple shouldn't be expected to list everything that could cause damage, or the paper coming with the computers would need it's own shipping container.
I for one welcome Apple's refusal to deal with smoke contaminated computers. They're absolutely disgusting inside.
Testing of the browser is almost unnecessary. It's testing and redesigning the in house intranet systems that cost time and money. Some of that could mean complete rewrites as thousands of lines of MS-mutilated code needs to be brought back to standards compliance.
Of course they're going to have to do it sooner or later, so it seems odd so many are still stuck with IE6 after over 3 years. IE6 is now considered a security problem in itself.
None of those go close to the things we get on a monthly basis in our shop. The spider webs shown here are a tiny display compared to what we have seen.
If you want really disturbing (and I think I've got a photo somewhere) then look no further than a gecko killed by 240V. The eyes explode out of the sockets.
Look how many teens can text faster than they can write with a pen or type on a computer... No problems with typing there.
Some commenters seem to assume criminals are smart... Most, thankfully, are not. Thus kidnap victims often are left with a phone at some stage, but talking would be obvious. Trouble is the beeping of the phone might also be a bit obvious, so I don't know if that helps much.
We needed a Windows based server for one single application. It didn't seem very wise to spend $1000+ on another server that would be idle 99% of the time, especially when the existing Linux server is idle and has tonnes of RAM.
So, qemu went on, and we have a Windows install sitting on our Linux server without anyone noticing. Problem solved. Not a big VM story. Nor is it done "properly", but it's a real use, and it got us out of trouble (well, wasn't really getting out of trouble, as much as adding convenience).