This sounds like a sloperator problem being presented as a everyones problem...
Which is another way for me to say "how about no..."
149 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2026
Well, there is installation convenience for the end-user, and fire-and-forget software release for developers.
The problem is, less-than-favorable compromises has, and will, be made for that to happen. Which inevitably leads back to good ol' "if it's worth doing, it's worth doing it right the first time" rearing its head once more...
"The question is how can we prevent things we don't want becoming input to the LLM? The solution is still being worked on"
Unfortunately, best way would be to get rid of the prompt and instead have a sanitized interface of sort which would only permit input considered to be valid to be, well, inputted.
But that requires work and effort to set up, and also greatly limits the flexibility, even if said flexibility is the epitome of "jack of all trades, master of none"
Implying techbros (who all currently are "AI" shills in one way or another) and Big Tech don't already have too much power...
I mean it's the same with people in politics who know somewhere in-between fuck and all about technology (or generally anything negatively affecting the common populace), or just happens to be easily legally (or "legally enough") bribe-able.
Goddamnit I hate this stupid time line, making me agree with the current head of the Catholic religion.
Starting to suspect the Putin loyal hacking groups might be told to scrape together funds for the 4+ year long "special military operation", and as always, easy marks are first choice.
Because I doubt even Agent Orange's fuckup in Iran will make Russia able to sell enough petroleum products to turn the tide of the state coffers drain rate.
Besides, the US is already in disarray, so mission is already accomplished on that front.
I'll 100% bet the software shitshow is the pinnacle of vibe-coding.
Although obviously not a positive example, but that's redundant regarding anything AI that's propped up with pride like the "we're tired of listening to professionals" anti-intellectuals who are bursting with pride that they're practically drooling knuckledraggers whose outsourced their critical thinking.
Relying on a service by another company to handle it, makes said another company a single-point-of-failure.
Like what just happened...
If they'd stitched something together themselves from rented servers from different providers all around the world, along with redundancy (including the control nodes), it wouldn't have collapsed like a house of cards.
But all that also requires in-house technical experts to set-up and maintain it, something accounting and C-suite would be giddy to outsource wholesale to cheapest option because it makes the budgets look nice'n'neat.
Worst part is, I can understand the reasoning behind Waylands existence (although definitely not the implementation), since the first sentence that comes to mind regarding X11 is "load-bearing technical debt".
While SystemD from the get-go seemed like the brainchild of people who couldn't handle criticism and always thought they were correct.
Those types of people are almost universally wrong until proven otherwise, but in this special case, they have the clout to force their thing onto everyone else.
"
Whether Bun migrates to Rust or not, Sumner is convinced that open source software (OSS) will make increasing use of AI. Commenting on Zig's AI ban, he said on X: "I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed." People will still discuss issues and prioritization, he said, "but the actual act of writing code, of submitting PRs, of replaying and addressing feedback, of implementation will be LLMs."
"
Is he completely ignoring the fact many flock to OSS due to the high amount of focus on ethics?
Ethics like "AI" trained on content without explicit and verbose permission for each and every bit of code-base hoovered up for training is not only prohibited, but hard-stop one of the biggest sins imaginable?
Well Win8 happened on his watch, so yeah.
Though that seemed like it originally came to be because upper echelon at MS felt their desktop & laptop OS was threatened by Android & Apple tablets, which IMO was the dumbest assumption they could've made.
Instead of sticking to what they knew well and spicing it up with what the users actually wanted...
Some ol' fashioned manure spreaders were basically just directing a stream of liquid shit towards what's essentially a centrifugal fan in order to spread it on the field while being towed by a tractor.
Nowadays though, it's more tactical, in that it's directed out to hose ends that are almost drug along the ground right above the plants roots.
Less nutrients loss and also less stank.
I'm not at all surprised that management neglects roles that essentially are about prevention.
As the late Trevor Kletz often said regarding the chemical industry: "if you think safety is expensive, try having an accident", which IMO should be chiseled into the forehead of everyone in a management position.
The irony obviously being that for quality to quantitatively improve, the irredeemable sloppers and related "use AI" incentives are what actually should be on the chopping block, followed closely by the senior devs training the bright and young ones who's not "AI" addicts.
But this is modern day MS, where the OS no longer is the primary income source, but rather a way to retain market share.
Windows 11's existence can best be described as brute force & ignorance incarnate.
Ignorance in what the users of the operating system wanted and/or needed, versus what the powers there be at Microsoft decreed.
And brute force in how it's being forced through despite user-base pushback and negative feedback.
Such a shame all the big tech & techbro companies went balls-deep on cranking up "AI" datacenters instead of minding the actual need of their customers...
Although in this case, it's probably a rack row or aisle that had a oopsie, so the hard load limit naturally had to be lowered.
Though I'd laugh like a unrestrained maniac if it wasn't the latter, and the whole "AI" craze has caused MS to treat their cloudy biz in the UK like how a deadbeat parent would, criminal neglect and all...
Google has multiple times been proven they're not above dirty tricks, which most of the time were (at least at the time) technically legal on vague technicalities.
Which implies that a part of their supposed success is achieved such way that's basically best described as dirty tricks.
So it's the best way to level the playing field rather than more fines, which if constructed correctly, will actually hurt Google where it stings.
The whole "user tracking privacy" part just implies that even Google shouldn't have been using that kind of data in the first place.
So if Google isn't using the "think of our users privacy" defense to just keep on truckin' as usual, they'd "rm -rf"d that data already.
Would be mighty embarrassing if a 3LA can fix a obscure yet monumental fuckup on Apple's part, and at the same time, point out more security flaws.
Though I'd bet the agencies in question would really prefer to keep those known software loopholes for juicier targets.
The amount of user-side scripts used to deliver content is in some cases mind-boggling.
If it wasn't for a good part of that being "user tracking and fingerprinting" and slinging adverts, I'd say they're wholeheartedly trying to offload the actual need for a non-static-content web-server into your browser.
Bonus points if its content that's static web-page suited, just to really crank up the absurdity.
It being cold outside is actually a advantage for datacenters, less energy is wasted on transporting the generated server heat outside.
The snag though is the humid climate doesn't lend itself well to evaporative chilling, which is a favorite of every "fuck you, got mine" datacentre developers who're depleting the available drinking water nearby.
Not to mention that once a datacentre has been constructed, it needs minimal amount of "human support", which is also why a "AI" bit barn popping up in your vicinity is all around a bad deal.
So ignoring evaporative cooling, and cynically, Maine isn't that bad of a place to plop one down
"Copilot button is reportedly missing from the latest Windows Insider build of Notepad. However, the omission speaks more to how toxic the Copilot brand has become than to the company rethinking its strategy of spraying AI across its product line."
So how long before the" AI" related buttons are gone from laptops and OEM desktop keyboards?
Well d'uh, that's by design...
Hell, the times Google proclaimed they were doing something about user privacy & "fingerprinting", it was in-the-end only to keep competitors out (IE: other web-user tracking companies).
But when anti-monopoly watchdogs came a'sniffin', Google, predictably, gave up instead of protecting the users against themselves (Google).
"hard backups" on paper is still common because you can't 100% trust a computer.
And the part of medical services that are 100% about helping the patients and not at all about profits for board members or shareholders, "trust but verify" reigns supreme.
Which is a surprisingly sane and sensible approach in the modern "move fast and break things" IT age that's also being infected with "AI"
But the more you blabber on, the more you're putting your ineptitude on display for the world to see.
Like the knuckledraggers who think asking ChatGPT why their car makes a occasional clunky sound makes them a master mechanic.
I'd not be surprised if he genuinely believes it's OK when he does it.
After all, you don't get to where you are with a company like Palantir, without immense hypocrisy and moral disconnect from society.
In fact: that's a feature, not a flaw.