Re: NO
The problem is not me (I don't produce / publish that much) but rather everyone that feel the need and that have anything interesting to say falling back to those cages...
198 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Jan 2026
I miss the old days internet... scattered, tiny islands of quirks and information and amusement. and when you stumbled against one of this gems you got the link and shared them with your friends..
nowadays everything is concentrated around a buch od big, walled garden style, platforms force feeding users the crap... sharing something (outside of the platform)? very difficult and obviously with tracking baked into the link (and recently they did away with query parameters that were easy to strip and moved to tracker being part of the share URL that's only later on, after first resolution, gets to actual content)... :/
in general I agree that Venture (vulture?) Capital mixes with companies being public and acting on a whim of the "investors" (shares plummet because they profit didn't meet forecast of 200% and was "only 190%" or similar) is the cancer of our western world
BUT - saying that Chinese models don't have anything guardrails or censorship is a huge stretch...
Besides the companies have heavy subsidy from the state which also skew the picture..
> "The pincer movement comes as US model devs like Anthropic and OpenAI stoke fears over the origins and safety of China-made AI models"
oh the hypocrisy... wasn't it OpenAI model that broke loose and hacked hugging face?
not to mention the cry of legality (again) as if anthropic, OpenAI and the rest wasn't sucking all the data of the internet as there's no end xD
Without regulations forcing (at least public institutions) to use open ODF nothing will change simply by inertia... And if public sector has to use ODF then MS will be forced to support it (well) and then there issue of sharing ODF with anyone will be gone becase excuse "hace to use ms format becase office" will be rendered irrelevant.
Internet changed because if Google fighting Microsoft - google wanted multiplatform internet and not "best viewed in IE" so they pushed hard...
Right now they are same as MS pushing to stick to their ecosystem and for anyone using Google docs the actual format is irrelevant...
the problem is the integration itself. I'm general integrations good but MS abuses it's dominant power to cudgel into using their tools and formats...
Does anyone remember Slack? The tiny app that promoted MS to create Teams and then bundle it into Windows and Office? which then resulted in Slack basically falling of the cliff? Lovely monopolistic practices...
so you can use ESR.
don't get me wrong - I'm mildly annoying with the ridiculous release cycle and we are going from one stupid extreme (release every couoke of years) towards yet another one...
monthly releases are kinda OK and I didn't have much problem with them...
You are assuming worst-case-scenario there. Though for QWACs simply owning domain shouldn't be enough. It simply puts more obligations on (public) institutions when it comes to obtaining and issuing the certificates. And it's mostly intended for them (see TPS).
In a nutshell LE is great in the sense that it made encryption ubiquitous but we did loose in the process the verification because anyone with a domain can issue certificate for "lIoyds.co.uk" (second letter is capital "i")...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_website_authentication_certificate
from what I read: QWACs are geared towards actually verified certificates for organisations that are base in legal framework and requirements how the verification should be carried out. And this Firefox version should correctly handle and display / indicate such verifyied certificate AA mandated by eIDAS.
Now, in the past we had EV (extended verification) certificates and browsers displayed them with distinct signage / icon but then with the proliferation of Let's Encrypt (no verification at all beyond simple domain one, which doesn't prevent phishing at all) and commercial EV being carried out willy nilly ("trust me bro" kind of way) browsers decided to basically drop "verified" AA it didn't bring any improved security. eIDAS / QWAC tries to bring it back with legal safeguards and is mostly intended for government and banking sector (from what I read).
Also - besides Let's encrypt there are still CAs that charge you for the certificate so your comment about "forcing making money" is just plain dumb...
counterpoint: maybe they work on the features separately and when the feature is done and tested they then merge it into mainline and ship? most likely it already works like that with 4 weeks schedule because it's would be already to tight to do it differently... so 2 weeks doesn't mean any news feature is developed within 2 weeks..
But that's exactly what is happening - people are developing and working on Wayland. The "issue" seems to be stemming from the expectations that they MUST ALSO be working on x11 despite them not wanting / liking it because there is rather tiny group of people not wabtjbf Wayland. Great but maybe those people should step up and contribute instead of just complaining? Sadly noone is willing to do what. There are rage-forks that try to maintain the supposedly "abandoned" tech that die out within weeks because that's how much effort those complaining are willing to put into maintaining it...
> . It is also more efficient which may matter on laptops though I doubt that efficiency difference amounts to more of a savings than turning down your brightness a few notches.
Just the other day phoronix ran some benchmarks and indeed Wayland came on top in overwhelming majority of cases.
sadly in the comments everyone has to have black and white at-extreme stance - either completely anti-AI or ad-absurdum generating slop with ClaudeCode without seeing any middle ground that Linus is talking about (ie. glorifies "auto complete on steroids")...
one (well, two actually) big problem with AI is that either the output is not read / reviewed properly - either because of time constraints or general slack or because it's used by incompetent people that can't sensibly verify the output...
Erm... JS can be fast and is probably the fastest when it comes to dynamic, interpreted languages but as the article states - statically typed, compiled languages are still more performant hence using Go and not JS/TS...
kinda yeah, but this is just a rotten compromise that was created becase member states (including UK) were so butt hurt to give up the power... so glee ended up with the Council (head of member states that drive the agenda), Commission that writes that into law and Parliament (which is actually elected) that votes on it.
There were proposals to give EU Parliament legislative powers but guess who screeched against it?
EU is, in a way, disfuncional because of this power struggle between democratically elected MEPs and member states and I don't see how this could be reformed in a any meaningful way without countries giving up their powers (and veto)... :/
The world moved on...
Maintaining something costs money and if host is not going to support it then why should Java keep doing that?
If someone really needs x64 then they can still maintain the support for their platform as Java is open source (and I'm already gearing the screeching "hurr durr THEY must do it"... funny isn't it? ;) )
Besides - it's not like overnight thing - Apple was quite open about dripping the support for years.... Getting new Intel Mac after they got discontinued was just dumb... (not to me to that even in it's infancy Silicon was better...)
Not particularly found if windows (stopped using it as a platform about 15 years ago) but the feature is indeed interesting.
For some forced to use windows in corporate environment this could BW very handy (and arguably better than docker desktop).
Not to mention that Apple is doing something very similar by providing "lightweight containers" in macOS 27 making docker desktop into an very optional install... (there is also podman but it's a bit weird on macOS from my experience...)
Am I the only one that don't have issues with email? I receive only a handful if messages that are actually important or of interest to me.
But then again - I don't subscribe to any darn newsletter that a stupid website prompts me to do with a nagging popup and actually disable obnoxious notification from other services...
While the idea may seem good in the face it could spectacularly backfire.
The biggest problem with social media is the algorithm and everything being driven by popularity and clicks.
Simply kill that aspect - only show followed accounts in chronological order of posting and voilà - problem solved. No more "suggested for you" that most of the time is simply something inflammatory just to keep engagement up...
also - promote independent websites that can do their own ordering but only if their content.
And make social media responsible for everything posted over there...
Yes, it's quite popular to have a docker compose with related services (app + db + others if needed). Most of the time you would just stick with the required PostgreSQL version when you started and stick with it only bumping APP image version (which then would run schema migrations if needed).
However, at times, it would be nice (of required because of compatibility) to be able to upgraded the database (to next major version) as well and it's not as simple as just changing the image tag like in the APP case, becase PostgreSQL doesn't support that... (it works fine with MySQL though so you could switch from 5.1 to 8.0 and during next docker compose down / start and recreation of the container, new version of MySQL would detect older version of the files and would run then upgrade on it's own.
You are running PostgreSQL 13, you want to switch to 14. You can simply use newer version because it will refuse to start.
In ternera, when NOT running in docker when you upgrade PostgreSQL via system package manger it will download newer version, run pg_upgrade (which requires version _from_ which you are upgrading still being present) and after the upgrade remove older version. With docker it's not possible as you only have current version in the image so PG_upgrade fails.
And while there are workarounds (export / import or using custom, alternative docker images that contain both versions) it's somewhat inconvenient.
So (I'm your docker compose for example) changing image from postgresql:13.0 to postgresql:13.1 will work just fine with in-place upgrade, switching to postgresql:14 will throw an error...
I'm not suggesting upgrading between very far apart versions but upgrades between successive major versions would be nice.
One could only wish becase, as always (and that was the case with banks) "too big to fail" will prevail...
In case of Oracle my obły worry is Java, especially that recently it's picking up steam and finally "goodies" are starting sto land... and while it's now open Oracle will probably hold on to the trademarks like they are doing with JavaScript, which would result in same havoc as it happened with JavaEE - Jakarta migration...
as simple as that.
as for "hurr durr I can built one cheaper". that's most likely true but then again not everyone can do that. What's more - it wouldn't be exactly the same neat, super quiet box that could sit in the living room...
And silence is nice - I opted for M1 MBP years ago instead of regular x86 becase it wasn't trying to burn my hands and was (and still is) absolutely silent....
It's kinda cute that all commenter are on their high horses that "poor China and India are obły using phones and not PCs". Surprise surprise - whole world moved towards mobile first and most people, if not for work or not being tech enthusiasts, would also use virtually only phones (yes, also applies to "rich" UK)