"...censor information that did not reflect 'core socialist values'..."
Core socialist values in modern China??? What else?
2329 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Oct 2007
It could be that he simply typed hsbc in the address field expecting Google to fill the rest of the address based in his former visits to that page. When he noticed the domain change and the http: header, he probably thought that Google had served him a tainted address instead.
This seems to fit well with Mr. Jonson being an IT guy.
This happens to me whenever I clean cookies using Ccleaner or similar products.
Now, one would expect his security preferences to be stored with his Google account, not in his cookies!
I think Google is being 'cunning' here, giving us a total of three options:
1- Leave Google's security settings as they're by default.
2- Never delete our cookies (which in turn probably will facilitate Google's data slurping regardless of the security settings)
3- Spend some serious amount of time setting up the security options every time the cookies are deleted.
There's also a fourth option, but this one is not offered by Google.
Seriously, when a company starts playing this kind of games with its customers, it's time to ditch said company ASAP.
"...most currency as we know it is virtual anyway"...
You're stretching the meaning of 'virtual' a little bit too much, methinks. Or there are many shades of 'virtual'. I agree with the 'fiat' part, though.
"So, apart from a lack of sovereign backing, how is an e-currency any different?"
The point has been made often before that without the laws specifically defining 'virtual currency' as 'real currency', said 'virtual currency' is just 'virtual goods'. Otherwise we may end up with governments taxing things like in-game transactions and such.
"The definition of a money transmitter does not differentiate between real currencies and convertible virtual currencies."
It could be the case that this lack of oversight by the lawmakers is caused by the fact that electronic currencies didn't exist when the law was made. Add to that that "real currencies" != "virtual currencies" (hint: the word "real" in "real currencies"), and you may get the picture.
This way you might understand the reasons why you can't prosecute people for using electronic currency without an adequate legal framework which is, sadly, missing.
Hugs & kisses
I've been seeing this crap even in a few desktop computers. It's painful, stupid and painfully stupid.
The savings obtained by removing the HDD led probably won't pay the cost of a round of drinks for the execs, The alienated customers and techies will remain alienated for a long time, though.
Yeah, and also because it's ten times cheaper than upgrading your fucking infrastructure, you crooks!
The next step will be to broadcast everything at VHS quality so as to be able to accommodate yet more users in their prehistoric network.
Circa 1995 I purchased one of the first 100Mb.* HDDs imported into my country. The price was eye watering! In the vicinity of three thousand Euros, if my memory doesn't fail me.
People would come from other offices and companies to watch "The Beast", and in those days I heard lots of conversations starting with "remember when...?"
Six or seven years after that you could buy a memory stick of a bigger capacity for peanuts.
Interesting times, indeed!
"...what possible use is that data?
I'd guess that they could use it to know the success rate of their different models, as to improve their designs and "please the customers",
They could also test small tweaks for their software, think "Switch the device automatically off after 5 minutes of cardiac inactivity" or "Activate speaker and insert block of ads". ;^)
Oh! and extortion!
Regarding the part about ads, that would be a nasty scenario, but there are worse:
Owner: "iJumpy, STOP!"
iJumpy: "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."
Those were exactly my thoughts after reading the article. The site would be a boon for LEAs and TLAs interested in fighting child sex trafficking. This law would only make their work orders of magnitude more difficult, and just looks like an attempt to sweep things under the rug without addressing the main issue.
I'd like to add that in my opinion, criminalizing adult, voluntary prostitution is not the right thing to do. I'm pretty sure that most prostitutes are in that trade out of necessity, and becoming a prostitute probably beats a hundred times being homeless or watching your children hungry and devoid of opportunities in life. As you said, until the underlying causes are fixed, the law is working for the pimps and against the true victims. It'd make more sense to regulate prostitution as any other job, in such a way that prostitutes get worker's rights, pay taxes and are subject to regular health inspections. That would either take the pimps out of the equation -and good riddance- or force them to act just like other employers, pay their taxes, give a fair share of the earnings to their employees...
Disclaimer: I've never hired a prostitute and never will, but there is a lot of people with different views on the issue, so I don't think a "War on Prostitution" will have a different outcome to, say, the "War on Drugs" or the -thankfully now obsolete- "War on Booze", being humans the way they are.
Like you, I don't think the house's layout is of much interest for burglars (unless it's some big mansion), but on the other hand, they would be really interested in knowing which stuff you own, at what times you are at work and when you're on holidays, and all this info could -I think- be extracted from the Rumba's data transmissions.
That would make sense, not only for EMPs, but also for Carrington events. With our present level of readiness a Carrington even would kill as many people as a total(ish) nuclear war, although with several measures similar to this one we could minimize the casualties a lot.
Alas, I'm afraid our level of preparedness in the future will remain mostly as it's now, this is, NULL. Or it will get even worse, like will all those plans by governments to exclusively use plastic money, so on top of the loss of comms and energy and most transport, we also lose the currency. Sigh...
.-- .... . .-. . / .. - / -. --- - / ..-. --- .-. / - .... . / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / - .-. .- -. ... .-.. .- - --- .-. / .. / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. -. .----. - / ..- -. -.. . .-. ... - .- -. -.. / .- -. -.-- / --- ..-. / - .... .. ... / ... .... .. - .-.-.-
o_0
...heat some minced tobacco leaves only enough to evaporate the water and nicotine in them? I used one for a few months two years ago and it didn't smell at all. The amount of vapour was barely visible and there were no nasty chemicals.And as it used standard rolling tobacco it was really inexpensive also.
The only issue I had with the device was the almost absolute lack of flavour, except for a very faint taste similar to a herbal infusion.
Have any fellow commentards used this kind of vapper? What was your experience like?
"...it will also be laced with whatever concoction of pathogens they currently have in their lungs."
Following that logic, everybody should be prevented from breathing, 'cos otherwise their breath would also "be laced with whatever concoction of pathogens they currently have in their lungs".
That'd be a little bit extreme, wouldn't it?
Hello again, Bob!
Funny. I point out the faulty logic in your (and BJ's) comment and you answer not with a rebuttal, but only with a -granted, very mild- ad hominem.
An advice: you (and BJ) should leave the ad hominem for the end, after having demolished my arguments. The ad hominem alone just make you look silly.*
As I said before, a forum where most of the readers earn their beans using complex logic may not be the best place for you two.**
*: Yes, this is an ad hominem.
**: See *
PD: Thank you for not "shouting" in your last comment! 8^)
...you say "any foreigner" is affected while the article states 15% are merely "concerned."
FYI, John: "concerned" != "affected"
To make it clearer for you: The fact that 15% of possible attendants are "concerned" doesn't imply that a 15% will be affected. The % of foreign visitors "affected" is actually a 100%, in the sense that ANY foreign visitor can will be affected by these stupid measures.
You should seek help with your issues with reading comprehension. Or remove your political blinders, before their weight breaks your neck.
"...we shouldn't really care about people from the handful of "banned nations" when it comes to the internet anyway"
Congrats, Bob. Your straw dog looks more like a straw brontosaurus. Good work!
If you had been paying more attention to the latest developments regarding US customs -or even bothered to read the fucking article- you would know that the issue does not only affect attendants from "banned nations" but any foreigner that enters or leaves the USA. As in Mr. Sternberg's case, where he was rejected entry with no reasons given. Or the vetoing of visitor's social media profiles or the - temporary?- requisition of visitor's electronic devices or the proposed obligation to give electronic devices passwords to the TSA. Or any other stupid occurrence Cheeto may have in the next twelve months.
The "banned nations" part in your comment is just a -poor- attempt at misdirection, and I can't see it gaining any traction in this particular forum. Perhaps you should go somewhere else to peddle your wares, some place more sympathetic with your ideas. How about the Faux News forums?
Have a NICE DAY!!!
'One translation might be "The shepherd's view"'
Nah, in Spanish that sentence is just gibberish. "Romanes eunt domus", etc. etc.
Anyway your comment is a good excuse for posting this video. Enjoy! ;^)
I guess that the point of the "snarkiness" in the article is the way the FCC is hitting hard against a minor, almost inoffensive, nuisance for the public good and, at the same time, letting the telcos and ISPs get away with murder. And IMO it's a very good point.
PAI is just another sociopath, like the guys who chose him for his position.
...there's a point, after a company has made big enough blunders often enough, that any new product they make is automatically considered shit by the public, regardless of its merits.
Add to that the way App developers have been treated in the past by MS, and that their most common answer when someone suggests to them to develop for MS products usually starts with "Hell will freeze over..."
Dear Microsoft: "You'll reap what you've sown."
The International System of Units is based on MKS, that is, Metres, Kilograms & Seconds.
This apparent inconsistency dates back to when the Kg. was first defined as the weight of pure water at 4ºC that fits exactly in a litre, which in turn means a cubic decimetre.